Argonath RPG - A World of its own

GTA:IV => IV:MP - Liberty City Multiplayer => IV:MP Ideas & Suggestions => Topic started by: Mihail Junkovich on January 18, 2014, 03:42:26 pm

Title: [ GTA IV ] /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Mihail Junkovich on January 18, 2014, 03:42:26 pm
Well, I think that the name says it all. I don't know how we didn't think of it earlier.. but I think it's quite a good choice to be implanted.

As you could notice, a common thing to argue is always "You didn't warn me, I did not see the /m1" lolz..

So, it would be great to limit the /m1 to a certain player the same way as the /fillup or /wash is limited

If I do the /m1 for a player(1) with /m1 1... I would get two possible messages:

1. The player received the message [ Or whatever ]
2. The player is out of range.



Even better thing to do would be this.. to avoid any abuse of this thing. It would be good to see if the player really got warned after becoming a suspect.
So let's say, officer used /m1 ID two times [ The number needed to suspect someone ], we would then later on be able to check with, let's say.. /warnings ID, if the player really had any warnings for the pullover.

We would easily see if anyone is trying to get away with "I did not see the warnings" or.. if the officers are abusing their powah!

Don't know how it could actually work, the thing for the warnings... but I think it would be a good thing.. do some brainstorming xD
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: c903jerk on January 18, 2014, 03:59:12 pm
I support this.

Normally when I get nearby a police who is chasing another guy,I get /m1 ed and it confused me/. XD
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: BojanS on January 18, 2014, 04:03:25 pm
Not sure. It's just the matter of performing pullover the way it should be performed.
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Bruce. on January 18, 2014, 05:04:15 pm
I support this.

Normally when I get nearby a police who is chasing another guy,I get /m1 ed and it confused me/. XD

If you did the driving test correct a  rule says: "You have to pullover when you see or hear emergency sirens" in this case /m1 does the job too.

Also i don't support the /m1 [ID] idea.

Edit:Lol i just noticed the post was for IV:MP, i thought it was for SA:MP but still i don't find right to do /m1 [ID] :P
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: TheRock on January 18, 2014, 05:10:27 pm
Sorry I don't want to spam T - Up arrow or /m1 <time to write id>, couple of times. When I go after somebody, as I guess any other cop would, we either go behind the car we warn, or we are after it? How do you guys get confused if you see cops after other cars on high speed thinking that /m1 is for you?.. Just non sense to me as an idea.. :S
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: BojanS on January 18, 2014, 05:17:12 pm
Sorry I don't want to spam T - Up arrow or /m1 <time to write id>, couple of times. When I go after somebody, as I guess any other cop would, we either go behind the car we warn, or we are after it? How do you guys get confused if you see cops after other cars on high speed thinking that /m1 is for you?.. Just non sense to me as an idea.. :S
Exactly, performing pullover the right way.
As AlexBrooks said, when you see/hear emergency vehicles/lights you move to side of road and almost stop/even stop if needed, so you do not cause accident.

Wouldn't really support /m1 [ID].
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Mihail Junkovich on January 18, 2014, 06:57:16 pm
Let me clear it up for you all (:

As you could notice, a common thing to argue is always "You didn't warn me, I did not see the /m1" lolz..

The idea is not about "Hey, only the "suspicious" driver should see the message" it is about does he see it or not.. so that there is a written evidence that the driver did receive the message ^^
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Phil on January 18, 2014, 07:04:03 pm
The thing is if you are someone like me, I use /m1 to also get people to move out the way when I'm responding to an emergency. So I disagree with the idea on that basis.
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Alexander_Rijav on January 18, 2014, 07:08:09 pm
Disagree,useless,It's a megaphone not a phone!
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Khm on January 18, 2014, 08:29:16 pm
I am not supporting this. That's not realistic.
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Batta on January 18, 2014, 08:45:39 pm
It doesn't matter much this time, but welcome to the IV:MP section guys  :rolleyes: ...
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Khm on January 18, 2014, 08:47:53 pm
It doesn't matter much this time, but welcome to the IV:MP section guys  :rolleyes: ...
I know. And i'm still not supporting this. :P
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: murdoxix on January 19, 2014, 01:06:52 am
I don't support it!

Disagree,useless,It's a megaphone not a phone!

I am not supporting this. That's not realistic.
Title: Re: /m1 ID instead of /m1
Post by: Mihail Junkovich on January 19, 2014, 11:28:06 am
Disagree,useless,It's a megaphone not a phone!

the /m1 ID is not meant to be visible only to the suspect.

The visible part would be the same as it is now. The only added thing to the whole point would be that we would know if the player is out of the range [ Can not see the warning ] or if he did indeed see it [ So that there is no more, I didn't see.. ].

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal