Argonath RPG - A World of its own

GTA:VC => Vice City - City Hall => VC:MP - Vice City Multiplayer => VC:MP Courts => Topic started by: krystianoo on August 06, 2019, 02:45:35 am

Title: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 06, 2019, 02:45:35 am
From: Ghayed Hamzah
To: Vice City Courthouse



I. Opening Statement

Dear Judges and State of Argonath,
I am hereby suing Riad Mahrez (http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?action=profile;u=46222) on behalf of my client, Jo Renjiro.




II. Summary

We would like to put forth a claim of BREACH OF CONTRACT, ASSAULT against Mr Riad Mahrez.

My client signed a contract (Exhibit A) with Mr Mahrez regarding the sale of my client's Maverick helicopter with the license plate VC-C876. The contract was signed by both parties but carried out by only one: my client.

Mr Renjiro had sold his helicopter to Mr Mahrez (Exhibit B) but did not receive the agreed upon payment in the form of a bank wire, in fact; no payment was received at all.

Upon requesting the agreed-upon payment in the Bank of Vice City (El Banco Corrupto Grande), my client was told by the defendant to, quote, "fk off from his life" and pulled a weapon on him, attemping to murder him in an effort to scam an innocent man.
This should easily be proved by means of surveillance cameras installed in the Bank institution. (Should the bank choose to provide it, it is titled Exhibit C)

Mr Renjiro, reacting immediately, escaped the bank and called the first person on his phone for help. That person, in turn, helped him get in touch with a private security guard who helped Mr Renjiro in surviving: he witnessed my client being attacked and as such he will be asked by Mr Renjiro to give his testimony.

After meeting up with the security guard in Vice Point, Mr Renjiro, in his car, witnessed him engage in a gunfight with Mr Mahrez which eventually ended in a stalemate.

My client and the security guard who identified himself as coming from the Callahan Security agency escaped the scene leaving Mr Mahrez alone and the chase being over.




III. Charges


1) BREACH OF SIGNED CONTRACT /
* refer to [CONTRACT] Sale of a Maverick helicopter (http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=127284) and Exhibit B

2) ASSAULT / ATTEMPTED MURDER /
* Under the Act I, Section III. of the Constitution of the State of Vice
Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary, assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health.
* refer to Exhibit C




IV. Demands - sorted from highest priority to lowest priority

Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 06, 2019, 02:53:21 am
Your Honour,

we would like to inform the Court that we have informed the Defendant of the case against him here.

(https://i.imgur.com/qsUreND.png)




Your Honour,

We would also like to call Andrew Aky, the often mentioned private security guard in II. Summary as a witness to the case so he can give his testimony, should the Court allow it.

Thank you,
On behalf of Jo Renjiro,
Ghayed Hamzah
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 06, 2019, 05:23:15 pm
Your Honour,

after lengthy consultation with Mr Renjiro, he decided to display his kind heart by instructing us to change section IV. Demands to the following:

IV. Demands - sorted from highest priority to lowest priority


My client, an avid helicopter pilot, used to take rich people in his helicopter to see the panorama of Vice City and it's famous landmarks, such as the Hyman Memorial Stadium, Leaf Links, or the Jewel of Vice City: The Starfish Manor. This proved to be a lucrative job, but now that my client is left without both his helicopter and the money to find a replacement, he is forced to work in jobs that he is not qualified for, such as pizza delivery, garbage collection.

Your Honour,

With this in mind we would like to submit the following exhibit: Exhibit DE1 (https://imgur.com/a/HBJDyVH) and announce that the Original court entry has been edited to suit our current demands accordingly. We will refer to this submission as Plantiff Submission #3


Thank you,
On behalf of Jo Renjiro,
Ghayed Hamzah
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 08, 2019, 12:31:08 pm
Your Honour,

we would like to inform the Court that the Defendant has sold off his assets seen in Exhibit D2 (https://i.imgur.com/8cPAL9U.jpg): Mr Renjiro's helicopter and his own Infernus to a character by the name of Ghiless, possibly as an attempt to evade justice. We would like the Court to consider this action as an act of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, given that the asset sold off occured after Mr Mahrez was informed of the court proceedings against him to which he still has not appeared.


  • Exhibit FU (https://i.imgur.com/dl8Bneq.png)
    Assets of the Defendant now in possession of 'Ghiless'.

    Thank you,
    On behalf of Jo Renjiro,
    Ghayed Hamzah
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 08, 2019, 01:19:04 pm
Your Honour, with the above submission in mind, we would like for Mr. Ghiless to be summoned to court so he can explain his connection with two of Mr Mahrez's assets that he is the owner of now.

We have notified Mr. Ghiless of the court case and summons.

(https://i.imgur.com/BXlvZrr.png)

Thank you,
On behalf of Jo Renjiro,
Ghayed Hamzah




Additional Submission 8th August 13:21 CET

Additional summons to Mr. Ghiless:

Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: Klaus on August 08, 2019, 11:49:20 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/1PyQkiD.png)
Vice City Law Courts
Argonath Federal Court



From: The Argonath Administrative Tribunal Committee
Address: 143 Downtown State Street, Downtown Vice City, Florida
Topic: "Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez"
Proceeding Number: VC-CIVIL0002/2019




COURT MINUTE

Upon service of the civil complaint, the defendant(s) will have one week to prepare submissions on their liability as well as any relevant court motions.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

[1].        Upon service of the civil complaint, any defendants shall have one week to present their submissions on their liability and to submit any relevant motions to defer the civil case.

[2].        Liberty to apply.

ORDERED, on this 8th day of August, 2019.

Signed,

Klaus
Sir Klaus
Judge
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: riad on August 09, 2019, 01:28:14 pm
first thing hi, and.....
 I want evidence of my involvement in this case .
thank you.

Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: riad on August 14, 2019, 11:56:33 am
 These charges are all false. Please close this case :neutral2: :app:
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 16, 2019, 08:36:04 pm
Your Honour,

we would like to note that the one week the Court has granted the Defense to present their submissions and to submit any relevant motions to deter the civil case has passed.

Thank you
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: Klaus on August 16, 2019, 11:40:20 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/1PyQkiD.png)
Vice City Law Courts
Argonath Federal Court



From: The Argonath Administrative Tribunal Committee
Address: 143 Downtown State Street, Downtown Vice City, Florida
Topic: "Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez"
Proceeding Number: VC-CIVIL0002/2019




COURT MINUTE

The Court notes the defendant's plea of not guilty and reserves summary judgement to be published within three days. 

ORDERED, on this 16th day of August, 2019.

Signed,

Klaus
Sir Klaus
Judge
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: riad on August 17, 2019, 12:47:38 am
You took a picture of me without asking me, this is not fair and I will open a case for you ;) :app:
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on August 27, 2019, 11:42:59 pm
Your Honour,

excuse our impudence, however we would like to note that the deadline for the issuing of the summary judgement by the Court has passed a week ago.
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: riad on September 14, 2019, 10:55:44 pm
Its was my fault I'm riad mahrez I scammed u jo im so sorry
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on September 19, 2019, 03:38:36 pm
Your Honour,

excuse our impudence, however we would like to note that the deadline for the issuing of the summary judgement by the Court has passed a month ago.
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: krystianoo on October 19, 2019, 02:02:18 pm
Your Honour,

excuse our impudence, however we would like to note that the deadline for the issuing of the summary judgement by the Court has passed two months ago, which is 8 weeks ago, which is 60 days ago, which is 1440 hours ago, which is 86400 minutes ago, which is 5184000 seconds ago.
Title: Re: Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez
Post by: Klaus on August 30, 2020, 06:58:53 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/1PyQkiD.png)
Vice City Law Courts
Argonath Federal Court



From: The Argonath Administrative Tribunal Committee
Address: 143 Downtown State Street, Downtown Vice City, Florida
Topic: "Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez"
Proceeding Number: VC-CIVIL0002/2019



Medium Neutral Citation:Jo Renjiro v. Riad Mahrez [2019] AFC 33
Date of Decision:30 August 2020
Jurisdiction:Common Law
Before:Sir Klaus
Catchwords:CIVIL LITIGATION - Conclusion judgement - Contract law.

CONTRACT LITIGATION - Defendant charged with Breach of Contact.

CRIMINAL LAW - Defendant charged with Assault / Attempted Murder
Legislation Cited:         Crimes (Further Offences) Ordinance 2017 (http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=122929.0)
Interim Constitution (http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=75902.0)
Cases Cited:None.
Texts Cited:None.
Parties:Mr Jo Renjiro (Prosecution)
Mr Riad Mahrez (Defendant)
Representation:Legal Representatives/Counsel:
Mr Ghayed Hamzah (Prosecutor)
Mr R Mahrez (Defence)



JUDGEMENT

[1].        On the 6th of August 2019, Mr Riad Mahrez (the ‘Defendant’) and Mr Jo Renjiro (the 'Plaintiff') submitted a written agreement to the Court of Vice City. The Contract was a signed legal agreement on the sale of a Maverick model helicopter for $180,000, and involved three sets of instructions for both parties. These instructions are as follows: Both parties will sign this contract in court, Riad will wire $180,000 to Jo Renjiro, Jo Renjiro will hand over his keys to Maverick VC-C876 to Riad. This Contract was submitted as Exhibit A by the Prosecution.

[2].        Shortly after the plaintiff filed a civil complaint and summons in this Court alleging that the defendant, Mr Mahrez was in breach of said contract, as well as claiming  that the defendant had attempted to murder Mr Renjiro. There are various issues to address in this case, firstly that is whether the evidence submitted is valid, secondly whether the defendant should be liable for Breach of Contract, and thirdly whether the claims have any basis in law.

[3].        The defendant entered into a plea of not guilty, implicating that the charges are in fact false and that the case should be dropped immediately. Mr Riad Mahrez questioned the evidence put fourth by the Prosecution and demanded further evidence of Mr Riad Mahez's involvement in the case to be submitted.

Defence Submissions

[4].        The defence submits in primary three grounds, one of his involvement in the case is questionable, two that the evidence submitted is false, and three that the Plaintiff took photographs of Mr Mahrez without his knowing or consent.

Ground One: Mr Riad Mahrez's involvement:

[5].        The defence submitted: ‘I want evidence of my involvement in this case’.

[6].        We believe Exhibit A is enough evidence to prove that Mr Riad Mahrez entered into a legal agreement with Mr Jo Renjiro. Mr Riad Mahrez signed the contract: I hereby agree with and sign the above contract, riad mahrez.

Ground Two: False evidence:

[7].        The defence stated the following: "These charges are all false. Please close this case".

[8].        We believe Exhibit B to be valid evidence of the sale of Maverick VC C-876.

Ground Three: Taking of photographs without consent:

[9].        There is no law that states the taking of a photograph in a public place requires the consent of those in the photo. Therefore we find this evidence admissible.


Sentencing

[10].      In addressing sentencing, the defendant is found to be in breach of contract Sale of a Maverick helicopter (http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=127284). As the defendant has since changed his plea to guilty, he is entitled to a 20% discount in monetary penalty. I find no alternative to conviction and subsequently convict the defendant based on the evidence provided.

[11].         I accordingly penalise the defendant $50,000 ARD, taking into account the demands of the prosecution and court fees.

[12].         The prosecution wished to adduce the evidence in Exhibit C to prove that the defendant had attempted murder. I find that the evidence submitted not concrete evidence that connects the defendant to such crime.

I certify that the preceding twelve (12) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Judge Sir Klaus.

Registrar

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

[1].        That the defendant is to be convicted of the crimes for which he plead guilty to.

[2].        That the defendant must transfer the Maverick VC C-876 back to it's rightful owner Mr Jo Renjiro, or pay it's face value of $200,000.

[3].        That the defendant be issued a monetary penalty of $40,000 ARD, to be stripped from the defendant's bank accounts and/or if the defendant cannot pay the sum, for the liquidation of any property, businesses, vehicles or other assets to cover such fine.

[4].        That the defendant be found not guilty of attempted murder under by the Crimes (Further Offences) Ordinance 2017.

ORDERED, on this 30th day of August, 2020.

Signed,

Klaus
Sir Klaus
AAT Committee member



JUDGEMENT SUMMARY
Today, the Argonath Federal Court found that Riad Mahrez was in breach of contract, and has been forced to carry out said contract. Riad Mahrez will also be given a monetary fine based on the prosecutions demands and court fees. Riad Mahrez was also found not guilty for attempted murder.
 



~Distributed by authority of the Courts of Argonath~
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal