Argonath RPG - A World of its own
Argonath RPG Community => Speakerbox => Topic started by: LeonSforza123 on July 04, 2008, 11:46:01 am
-
Answer this
5 + 5 + 5=554
True?
-
uhmm... :conf: no?
-
uhmm... :conf: no?
-
Wrong...
-
Wrong...
Think again :D
-
I may be going out on a limb here but... 15? ..
-
Taaat!! Wrong
-
How?
That's like saying 2+2 = 45.
-
it`s true...but only if you do like this
5+5+5=-5+5*4 (554) :P
-
Omg lol :D byt its wrong
-
FIVE+FIVE+FIVE= FIFTEEN
5 10 15
Or did I went to school for eight years to learn wrong?
-
this is teoretical math.. its same it cam be proven, same as proff that -1=1...
-
yes, its true...
because im saying it is true :razz:
-
2x2=5? With screwed up formulas we can do that -_-
-
It's true.
-
5+5+5 = 554
False
-
It's true.
Explain
-
it`s true...but only if you do like this
5+5+5=-5+5*4 (554) :P
That will do Zero as a result: -5+5= 0*4=0(554)=0
.
Why the f**k 5+5+5=554?
-
Actually John_Spartan, multiplication comes before addition ;)
-
:s:S:S:(
tell us the answer: my brain hearts:(? whats the answer? :( :conf: :devroll:
-
5 + 5 + 5 = 554
False.
-
what 5+5+5=554?
More like 15...
-
The answer:- False!!
you were dumb enough to think about it lmao!!
Low IQ!
-
lol @ people saying its right
-
HAHA Tolja
-
easy answer guys
5+5+5=15 DUH
-
Maths - A
Im in the top 10% for Year 9 :D
It's true.
RLY? :lol:
-
The answer:- False!!
you were dumb enough to think about it lmao!!
Low IQ!
You were dumb enough to make this thread! Low IQ! :D
-
lmfao panda :bow:
-
nice panda and correct :rofl:
-
LMFAO @ Paroxysm :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
And nof or the crooked formula.
if you say a=b, in this case 5+5+5 = a and 554 = b.
if a = b then a * b = a * a, also you should be able to say (a * b) - (b * b) = ( a * a ) - (b * b)
This can be rewritten as b * (a - b) = a * (a - b)
When you divide both sides by (a - b) as is possible in math, you get as result a = b
Which proves that a (5+5+5) = b (554).
Now the high IQ guys should be able to solve this math paradox...
-
pfff.. no , Gandalf.. 5+5+5=15 (lol)
-
pfff.. no , Gandalf.. 5+5+5=15 (lol)
Well then disprove my mathematical calculations :razz:
-
And nof or the crooked formula.
if you say a=b, in this case 5+5+5 = a and 554 = b.
if a = b then a * b = a * a, also you should be able to say (a * b) - (b * b) = ( a * a ) - (b * b)
This can be rewritten as b * (a - b) = a * (a - b)
When you divide both sides by (a - b) as is possible in math, you get as result a = b
Which proves that a (5+5+5) = b (554).
Now the high IQ guys should be able to solve this math paradox... WRONG
5+5+5=15 Right
YEAH! Im a math genius
-
5+5+5=15 Right
YEAH! Im a math genius
Lol...5+5+5=15..
-
If anyone is able to prove that 1 + 1 = 3 , the world will become a chaos and everything builded by humankind will be useless
-
And nof or the crooked formula.
if you say a=b, in this case 5+5+5 = a and 554 = b.
if a = b then a * b = a * a, also you should be able to say (a * b) - (b * b) = ( a * a ) - (b * b)
This can be rewritten as b * (a - b) = a * (a - b)
When you divide both sides by (a - b) as is possible in math, you get as result a = b
Which proves that a (5+5+5) = b (554).
Now the high IQ guys should be able to solve this math paradox...
Well then disprove my mathematical calculations :razz:
Your calculations are wRONg, they fail at the begining already.
Ok so let's put the begining into the numbers.
if a = b then (...)
if 5+5+5 = 554 then (...)
if 15 = 554 then (...)
15 ≠554 - FALSE
See, here is IF 15 = 554, but obviously 15 is not 554, it's FALSE (a ≠b), therefore you can't make the rest of calculations. You could do all the rest calculations (which would prove nothing anyway, as "a = b" is a first condition, and also a result of the prove, so it has no any sense at all) only if variable 'a' would equal variable 'b', but it doesn't.
-
If anyone is able to prove that 1 + 1 = 3 , the world will become a chaos and everything builded by humankind will be useless
if 1 = a and a = 1.5 1+1 = a+a=3 .....
-
Let me solve it 5+5+5=554 is true when
15a=554b
and a= 36.93 so if u multiply 15 by that u will get 554
-
Let me solve it 5+5+5=554 is true when
15a=554b
and a= 36.93 so if u multiply 15 by that u will get 554
dude, srsly, wtf was that. :|
-
Your calculations are wRONg, they fail at the begining already.
Ok so let's put the begining into the numbers.
if a = b then (...)
if 5+5+5 = 554 then (...)
if 15 = 554 then (...)
15 ≠554 - FALSE
See, here is IF 15 = 554, but obviously 15 is not 554, it's FALSE (a ≠b), therefore you can't make the rest of calculations. You could do all the rest calculations (which would prove nothing anyway, as "a = b" is a first condition, and also a result of the prove, so it has no any sense at all) only if variable 'a' would equal variable 'b', but it doesn't.
Yes.
-
pffffffffff Gandlaf the answer is 15 leave me alone!
-
Your calculations are wRONg, they fail at the begining already.
Ok so let's put the begining into the numbers.
if a = b then (...)
if 5+5+5 = 554 then (...)
if 15 = 554 then (...)
15 ≠554 - FALSE
See, here is IF 15 = 554, but obviously 15 is not 554, it's FALSE (a ≠b), therefore you can't make the rest of calculations. You could do all the rest calculations (which would prove nothing anyway, as "a = b" is a first condition, and also a result of the prove, so it has no any sense at all) only if variable 'a' would equal variable 'b', but it doesn't.
Sharphis in order to prove it mathematically I state that 5+5+5 = a and that 554 = b.
Then I prove that a = b by the calculation.
But there is a trick...
-
And nof or the crooked formula.
if you say a=b, in this case 5+5+5 = a and 554 = b.
if a = b then a * b = a * a, also you should be able to say (a * b) - (b * b) = ( a * a ) - (b * b)
This can be rewritten as b * (a - b) = a * (a - b)
When you divide both sides by (a - b) as is possible in math, you get as result a = b
Which proves that a (5+5+5) = b (554).
Now the high IQ guys should be able to solve this math paradox...
You start off with an assumption, you fiddle with the formula to make it look different and then fiddle with it some more the to make look how it was originially, just not by the same method. The calculations are perfectly valid but that does not mean you proved anything. Your concluding equation of a = b was drawn from an initaial equation which was itself an assumption. Only it would be proved that a = b if you added something else to show your assumption as true otherwise it is just as to say, "assuming a equals b, then a equals b".
-
(which would prove nothing anyway, as "a = b" is a first condition, and also a result of the prove, so it has no any sense at all)
But as I said that calculations don't prove anything. They just go like that:
a = b
a * b = a * a
(a * b) - (b * b) = (a * a) - (b * b)
a * (a - b) = b * (a - b)
a = b
How does it prove that a = b?
-
Stoppp it!!!!!!!!!
-
In terms of an actual proof, it is just as useful as to say:
If a = b
a + 5 = b + 5
a + 5 = b + 5
a = b
Therfore a = b
Both this and what you said started on an assumption and shows that the equation is true given the assumption is true. How is the assumption proved? :neutral:
-
if A = ( . Y . ) ...
and I = ( :wow: ) ...
-
If X = me and Y = owns
then XY = You.