Validation warning (http://i33.tinypic.com/353bdqr.png) Your Validations are removed, you cannot add any, Only when Developers decide otherwise None Reason: Under attention, (http://i34.tinypic.com/2zdrts0.jpg) Your group is being watched None. Reason: Official warning, (warning 1) (http://i37.tinypic.com/2vdflp2.png) Means: Your group has got a warning, If you get another one your group is banned None. Reason: Banned groups (Warning 2) (http://i37.tinypic.com/3148nwk.png) Your group is banned. None Reason: These warnings are being checked by the Main developers, If warned you can lose your warning, Show good behavior, Reorganize your group and more this can only be done if you have a note from the developers for another change Reporting another group This will be true Gandalf his Inbox, Pm him with the folowing Name Would be anonymous : yes/no rulebreaking group : (name) Involved players : (all) Rulebreaking (what/which rules) Evidence : |
[b]Name[/b]
[b]Would be anonymous[/b] : yes/no
[b]rulebreaking group[b] : (name)
[b]Involved players[/b] : (all)
[b]Rulebreaking[/b] (what/which rules)
[b]Evidence[/b] :
The system needs to be standardised in some way, its a bit random at the moment.
Nonetheless, I don't think groups should ever be warned, or at least very rarely - thats my philosophy. If the members rulebreak then its the leaders' responsibility to deal with it. If a single leader refuses or it was they who broke the rules, they should take the responsibility personally.
In short:
If an entire council of leaders refuse to act against the wrongdoings of a member or the wrongdoings of a single leader, only then should a warning of any kind be threatened at all, and if the leaders again refuse to act, only then should warnings be issued.
Well as Frank said Gvardia got warning 1/2 for DMing, go see Cofillianos unban request.That warning really set me off, because:
Some mafias got warned, and they were announced with big texts... Why they're not on the list