Argonath RPG - A World of its own
Argonath RPG Community => Forum and site ideas and information => Topic started by: Norrage on January 24, 2011, 01:39:35 pm
-
For example:
SAMP forums:
SAMP General
SAMP City hall
SAMP Unban Requests
SAMP Groups and Families
VCMP forums:
VCMP General
VCMP City Hall
VCMP Unban Requests
VCMP Groups and Families
etc etc
We place all the SAMP groups inside the "SAMP groups and families".
We do the same for VCMP, IVMP, MTAVC, and MTASA.
Main clans keep in the current forum, like [WS], =AV=, [TCL] Etc, clans who are active on all servers.
-
Well I didnt understand much of your ideia, but I would prefer each server has his own board to his groups. It's a big mess atm :neutral:
-
Agree. SAMP groups take too much space and gives other server groups less attention.
-
Supported.
Reason is the same as Aksel.
Agree. SAMP groups take too much space and gives other server groups less attention.
-
Oh I got it, SUpported.
-
I support this too as with current system it's just big mess there. With different sections it will be more messy places but not so much mess anyways :P
-
I was just about to write something about this when I saw your topic.
I believe it would better if they would be separated under each section, which would highly reduce the confusion once a group from another place than SAMP is made.
Supported.
-
Another bump. This idea has alot of support and will definatly be benificial for groups on the other servers other than SAMP.
-
Great idea, Supported!
-
Bump..
-
This was the old system. While I actually like this idea due to the flood of SAMP Groups, the boards were merged as to avoid groups having to register every time they expanded to a new server.
Perhaps the Groups board could have the sub-boards for each server, and an extra board for those groups which are not confined to one server.
-
This was the old system. While I actually like this idea due to the flood of SAMP Groups, the boards were merged as to avoid groups having to register every time they expanded to a new server.
Perhaps the Groups board could have the sub-boards for each server, and an extra board for those groups which are not confined to one server.
Or this yes, since its one big mess out there now.
-
Perhaps the Groups board could have the sub-boards for each server, and an extra board for those groups which are not confined to one server.
YES, YES, YES, AND YES.
-
Another bump.
-
supported, the old system was way better
-
Indeed, the old system was pretty good.
I support this idea.
-
May be more efficient as those servers with lower numbers of players/lesser groups and clans would be able to find their own topics quite easily.
May be particularly beneficial for visitors and newer members of the forums.
Also, to add to that I think official groups/clans all deserve a sticky of their own, as they have been granted "official" status for a reason, right? :)
-
Do not forget about a board for groups who span more than one server, in this way we can keep both advantages from the New and Old systems. Multi-Server groups will not have more than one topic / registration, and groups from lesser-filled servers will not be spammed by topics from populated servers such as SA:MP.
-
Bump again.
-
Supported.
-
Highly supported, it would make less mess, you dont need to look if group is for your server, would make easier to moderate groups etc..
Only clans should stay the way they're now since alot of clans are spread on all argo servers.
-
Bump.