fuke yeah!
i still dont get one thing, in the end counter strike was made by a modder, a human being with no connection to valve whatsoever.Has it ever struck your mind that he migth have started working for valve? :P
They how is valve reproducing CS?isnt that the modder guy's thing?
Has it ever struck your mind that he migth have started working for valve? :P
seeing counter strike 1.3 had a "f**k VALVE" i doubt itBoth of the creators are employed by Valve.
EA designed CS Anthology.wat
CSS already sucks(http://myfacewhen.com/images/58.jpg)
as most of the computers(for ex mine) don't support CSS with high graphicswat
wat
(http://myfacewhen.com/images/58.jpg)
Damn 1.6 players, why can't they accept that Source is just a better engine and that CSS is a superior product?
Anyway, this sounds like a TF2-ification of CSS, since it is on consoles too.
I will play it at Eurogamer in September and report back with results.
EA didn't "design" anything to do with CS.
Also here is this anthology thing on steam: http://store.steampowered.com/sub/41/ (http://store.steampowered.com/sub/41/)
I have a relative that's an FBI field agent, he said that the people in the FBI buildings he's been to always has CS: Source as a form of training software......You almost had me there
Why would it be on their official web page then?"Design" implies they had anything to do with development, which they did not.
I don't understand why they keep making new CS games, the CS gamers, will continue sticking to 1.6, and when that "wave" from the 90s-07 is over, CS is dead..There's a lot of players still on CS:S on a daily basis, some are even 12 years old!
watand I'm serious.
and I'm serious.Maybe your computer can't, but almost any other PC could run CSS pretty high at this point.
but only for those who never knew to play 1.6 because of lack of skill
My point exactly. 1.6 players have too much of a f**king attitude with the being z0mg pr0 120% skillz0rz.Because you have to have skill to play 1.6, unlike CS:S.
Because you have to have skill to play 1.6, unlike CS:S.You have to have skill to play Quake 2, unlike CS 1.6.
My point exactly. 1.6 players have too much of a f**king attitude with the being z0mg pr0 120% skillz0rz.
You have to have skill to play Quake 2, unlike CS 1.6.Doesn't change the fact that 1.6 is still a better game than CSS.
Doesn't change the fact that 1.6 is still a better game than CSS.Except for the players (attitude wise) and graphics quality (which isn't the most important in a game), I can agree.
Well not really,but it indeed need more skill.Source grew up in totally different time unlike 1.6 so it recieved influences of modern fps games..CS:S is nothing like modern FPS games. It's still Counter-Strike, just on the Source engine (HL2 graphics/physics). They're not that different at all.
Maybe your computer can't, but almost any other PC could run CSS pretty high at this point.My PC can run, But at an average fps of 25-30 FPS, Which really sucks.
I mean, it is 7 years old.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive - Video Preview (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tN93xXfews4#ws)Is like COD - sucks. CS 1.6 rocks.
I'm having doubts now..
Erm, They are releasing it in 2012, Is there anyway to contact them and suggest them to use a better engine and update the graphics? :conf:
By the way, CS (1.6/CZ and Source too I think) are 75% off on Steam again.yep.