John Meeses against Emily Sanderson

[Kowalski.]

From:
John Meeses,
Dukes, Liberty City

To:
State of Argonath, People's Court

Dear court, on the date of 4/6/2017
I had applied for the LCPD. Although I have already acknowledged the fact that denial can be given with or without reason, I do not see this reason to be fair. Here are some points as to why:

Number 1: If you have received a report on a false suspection, show proof and I will explain whatever happened

Number 2: RT are the only family that I have, can't the LCPD have some compassion for a lonely man who wants to join the law enforcers but only has a small family, a family which they don't want to leave? If they don't, this shows a lack of compassion, a lack of respect, a lack of emotions, a lack of mercy towards a person in a family, a lack of professionalism and disappointment altogether, giving people reasons as to consider another agency or to remain as freecops. I acknowledge the fact that a crime family doesn't fit into LCPD but can you guarantee that I am a criminal? Although it is a risk, it doesn't mean that the applicant should be denied, especially after a months work of dedication and effort, as well as daily patrol reports. This is absolutely infuriating, that people show so much dedication, effort and compassion in their work, and all the Chief can do is sit back, eating junk food and denying whoever she wishes. If Emily Sanderson cannot be a good Chief, she doesn't deserve to be the Chief.

Number 3: LCPD could have asked me to leave Gruppe Sechs, Tw@ and the Civilization Committee and I would have, if it meant a chance in LCPD, instead, I was given a straight denial. This shows that they used this as an excuse to prevent me from entering LCPD and they thought it would work, however, I have seen right through it and will fight to the end to show up this bullshit that the Chief has shown. If the Chief doesn't want an ex-criminal who can use his knowledge to the LCPD's advantage in a hostage or robbery situation, does Emily Sanderson deserve to be the Chief of LCPD? If so, what can I say?


My demands:
A strong chance of joining LCPD in future
A compensation fee of $185,000 to me
A fine of $200,000 deducted from the LCPD's overall balance
A drastic improvement from the Chief.


Yours faithfully,
John Meeses


Post screens:
                       

Recordings:
N/A

Witnesses:
N/A

[Norrage]

Dear court,

I will be responding and defending myself in this court case by John Meeses against myself.


Let me begin with some questions for you.

In your response to the court you have stated on your first line of your pleed that you have acknowledged the fact that denial can be given with or without reason but do not see a reason for this to be fair. I am wondering: is this ment towards your LCPD application only or the LCPD applications in general?

Another question that rises in my mind after reading your pleed is why this court case is directed towards me directly and not towards the LCPD. Isn't the application you have been denied in directed towards the LCPD?

Also, why did you spread false information into the world by using a photo edit program? Is it to blackmail me?
(source: http://i65.tinypic.com/96hima.jpg)

Furthermore I will start with responding to your pleed.

• You have been constantly harassing several NOOSE and LCPD members to do little things whilst they were busy or even in an undercover operation. This can cause several harm to these members or even blow their cover. This all could have resulted in a massive shootout with loosing several members of these agencies. Evidence can be seen in the spoiler below.
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  
  
  And some time later..
  
  
  As seen, John Meeses has been buggering several NOOSE members to organise a training under his lead. This was one small reason of the denial of his application.

• Another reason for his denial is the language and actions against NOOSE and LCPD members. John Meeses has been harassing and even insulting NOOSE members, and has even shot one (NOOSE TRU member Dway A. R.).
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  
  
  John Meeses saying sorry for shooting the member
  
  

  Dway, the operative I assaulted talked in a way that made me feel harrassed. He talked rudely about my grandfather, the LCPD Chief in the 1960s. I publicly apologised but I felt provoked and then he pulled an m4 on me! He could have done it in a much better way than a crash tank resort with an m4 carbine. I understand my wrongdoing and hope it will not influence my application. This is the first and only time I have ever assaulted another operative. I am sorry for what I did. Dway is a good person and I feel ashamed of what I did. I hope to not be denied over this.
  
  We clearly do not want an officer in our department that assaults other members, even because of some rude interaction. These things should be reported to the command members and not be dealt with alone.

• John Meeses also has been harassing (ex)-LCPD applicants.
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  

To summon reason one up: we have had several reports of childish behaviour, constantly harassing NOOSE and LCPD members and even assaulting them. We do not want such officer in our department. For the sake of privacy we will not give any evidence of the falsly suspectations.

• The second reason is about the RT crime family. John Meeses is the president of the RT Crime Family (source: http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=118567.0) and has even comitted some crimes (see spoiler).
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  
  
  

• Furthermore, John Meeses has failed to show responsibility with his group named Gruppe6. He has requested a warrant (source: http://arpd.argonathrpg.com/forum/index.php?topic=38977.0) to use lethal force. The conditions were clear but John Meeses failed to follow the conditions, making John Meeses an unstable officer in the department.

• As response to your pleed:
  
  

  ..can't the LCPD have some compassion for a lonely man who wants to join the law enforcers but only has a small family, a family which they don't want to leave?

  The LCPD is not some sort of 'social' house so no.
  
  

  If they don't, this shows a lack of compassion, a lack of respect, a lack of emotions, a lack of mercy towards a person in a family, a lack of professionalism and disappointment altogether, giving people reasons as to consider another agency or to remain as freecops.

  As said above, we are not a social house so we are not required to have compassion, respect, emotions or mercy with applicants who might not have the same thing with the LCPD. Criminals will not show compassion or respect to officers in danger so no,we do not.
  
  

  I acknowledge the fact that a crime family doesn't fit into LCPD but can you guarantee that I am a criminal? Although it is a risk, it doesn't mean that the applicant should be denied, especially after a months work of dedication and effort, as well as daily patrol reports.

  Noted above: yes you are a criminal. And saying that it does not mean that the applicant should be denied: we are the ones deciding if we should deny them or not. Not you.
  
  

  This is absolutely infuriating, that people show so much dedication, effort and compassion in their work, and all the Chief can do is sit back, eating junk food and denying whoever she wishes. If Emily Sanderson cannot be a good Chief, she doesn't deserve to be the Chief.

  If you have problems with me as a Chief of Police, respond a message to the government. And watch your words: everyting written down here will not be forgotten in any way: not even in the future. This means that everything you have said so far will always be thought of if you decide to apply again for the LCPD or NOOSE with me as Chief or Commander.

• The third reason for your denial is the ownership of several businesses. Explain us: how do you think to keep all these businesses up and running whilst being in the LCPD with a day time job? Why do you think almost no other LCPD members have any other business besides their LCPD tasks?
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=119864.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=120365.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=120378.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=119984.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=120002.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=119476.0

• As response to your pleed:
  
  

  LCPD could have asked me to leave Gruppe Sechs, Tw@ and the Civilization Committee and I would have, if it meant a chance in LCPD, instead, I was given a straight denial..

  But we did not.
  
  

  ..This shows that they used this as an excuse to prevent me from entering LCPD and they thought it would work..

  Refer above for more reasons to your denial.
  
  

  ..however, I have seen right through it and will fight to the end to show up this bullshit that the Chief has shown. If the Chief doesn't want an ex-criminal who can use his knowledge to the LCPD's advantage in a hostage or robbery situation, does Emily Sanderson deserve to be the Chief of LCPD? If so, what can I say?

  What does the knowledge of criminal business have to do with deserving to be a Chief of Police? Total bullshit you just wrote here.

As for your demands:

A strong chance of joining LCPD in future

Not going to happen with me as Chief. We have quality over quantity.

A compensation fee of $185,000 to me

Why? Psychological trauma? It seems the LCPD must transform to a social house after all.

A fine of $200,000 deducted from the LCPD's overall balance

Fun fact: the LCPD does not have a overall balance and does not even have $200.000 in their secret vault.

A drastic improvement from the Chief.

I will always be at your service, John.


Greetings,
Emily Sanderson
LCPD Chief of Police

[Kowalski.]

Dear court,

I will be responding and defending myself in this court case by John Meeses against myself.


Let me begin with some questions for you.

In your response to the court you have stated on your first line of your pleed that you have acknowledged the fact that denial can be given with or without reason but do not see a reason for this to be fair. I am wondering: is this ment towards your LCPD application only or the LCPD applications in general?

Another question that rises in my mind after reading your pleed is why this court case is directed towards me directly and not towards the LCPD. Isn't the application you have been denied in directed towards the LCPD?

Also, why did you spread false information into the world by using a photo edit program? Is it to blackmail me?
(source: http://i65.tinypic.com/96hima.jpg)

Furthermore I will start with responding to your pleed.

• You have been constantly harassing several NOOSE and LCPD members to do little things whilst they were busy or even in an undercover operation. This can cause several harm to these members or even blow their cover. This all could have resulted in a massive shootout with loosing several members of these agencies. Evidence can be seen in the spoiler below.
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  
  
  And some time later..
  
  
  As seen, John Meeses has been buggering several NOOSE members to organise a training under his lead. This was one small reason of the denial of his application.

• Another reason for his denial is the language and actions against NOOSE and LCPD members. John Meeses has been harassing and even insulting NOOSE members, and has even shot one (NOOSE TRU member Dway A. R.).
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  
  
  John Meeses saying sorry for shooting the member
  
  We clearly do not want an officer in our department that assaults other members, even because of some rude interaction. These things should be reported to the command members and not be dealt with alone.

• John Meeses also has been harassing (ex)-LCPD applicants.
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  

To summon reason one up: we have had several reports of childish behaviour, constantly harassing NOOSE and LCPD members and even assaulting them. We do not want such officer in our department. For the sake of privacy we will not give any evidence of the falsly suspectations.

• The second reason is about the RT crime family. John Meeses is the president of the RT Crime Family (source: http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=118567.0) and has even comitted some crimes (see spoiler).
  
  Spoiler for Hiden:

  
  
  

• Furthermore, John Meeses has failed to show responsibility with his group named Gruppe6. He has requested a warrant (source: http://arpd.argonathrpg.com/forum/index.php?topic=38977.0) to use lethal force. The conditions were clear but John Meeses failed to follow the conditions, making John Meeses an unstable officer in the department.

• As response to your pleed:
  The LCPD is not some sort of 'social' house so no.
  As said above, we are not a social house so we are not required to have compassion, respect, emotions or mercy with applicants who might not have the same thing with the LCPD. Criminals will not show compassion or respect to officers in danger so no,we do not.
  Noted above: yes you are a criminal. And saying that it does not mean that the applicant should be denied: we are the ones deciding if we should deny them or not. Not you.
  If you have problems with me as a Chief of Police, respond a message to the government. And watch your words: everyting written down here will not be forgotten in any way: not even in the future. This means that everything you have said so far will always be thought of if you decide to apply again for the LCPD or NOOSE with me as Chief or Commander.

• The third reason for your denial is the ownership of several businesses. Explain us: how do you think to keep all these businesses up and running whilst being in the LCPD with a day time job? Why do you think almost no other LCPD members have any other business besides their LCPD tasks?
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=119864.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=120365.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=120378.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=119984.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=120002.0
  - http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=119476.0

• As response to your pleed:
  But we did not.
  Refer above for more reasons to your denial.
  What does the knowledge of criminal business have to do with deserving to be a Chief of Police? Total bullshit you just wrote here.

As for your demands:
Not going to happen with me as Chief. We have quality over quantity.
Why? Psychological trauma? It seems the LCPD must transform to a social house after all.
Fun fact: the LCPD does not have a overall balance and does not even have $200.000 in their secret vault.
I will always be at your service, John.


Greetings,
Emily Sanderson
LCPD Chief of Police

For one, this whole "blackmail" bullshit is irrelevant, also you have already seen the complete joke, so don't try giving me that total bullshit. This whole convoy thing, I don't see any "buggering" when Hernandez, the Operative refused, I simply asked WHY he could not work without another member, also, some time later, sure, I asked again but how could you make the assumption their "cover" would be blown? They patrol in heavily marked and armored vehicles, carry carbine rifles and you think their cover will be blown? Bullshit. If this was CIU I would understand. Also, you made an assumption that they would die. They wear bulletproof armor, carry m4 carbines and have other Officers to save, assist and back them up. Absolute bullshit. Also, you said I bugged SEVERAL members, what bullshit is this? I asked one person, so don't lie.

As for shooting a NOOSE Operative, that is also bullshit. I admit, I slapped him, but I never SHOT him, he was the one who took his rifle out. I slapped him because of his attitude, I not only apologised for it, but I also solved this in the application period. Also, this bullshit about harassing an ex-applicant, you haven't shown the stalking or the attitude coming from him, to protect yourself. Bullshit, total Bullshit.

Also, this whole "for the sake of privacy" bullshit for not giving proof of a false suspection, is only letting you down. As the Chief, I wouldn't be making allegations and then failing to show sufficient proof.

Also, this whole insulting thing, it has already been resolved with Gregory Parker, the LCPD Deputy Chief and the CIU Inspector.

This "criminal applicant" crap is also unbelievable, if I applied for LCPD, doesn't it show I would give up crime for LCPD? Also, if you want people to give up their families for your agency, you are acting like an absolute moron, why the hell should anyone give up their family for an agency? That's a very emotional and difficult decision, don't put that burden on others.

Also, as I had said before, you could have requested I leave these businesses. However, you did not, showing you have tried to make a reason to deny me.

Thank you.

[Norrage]

Let me begin with the request to tone your voice down. I am treating you with respect and I would like to see the same thing back.

For one, this whole "blackmail" bullshit is irrelevant, also you have already seen the complete joke, so don't try giving me that total bullshit.

Response of John Meeses to the 'joke' on the 17th of May, already after I have replied to the topic.

Says enough. Does not seem irrelevant to me.

This whole convoy thing, I don't see any "buggering" when Hernandez, the Operative refused, I simply asked WHY he could not work without another member, also, some time later, sure, I asked again but how could you make the assumption their "cover" would be blown?

You do not see any "buggering" because you are the one buggering. Officers who get buggered and their supervisors see a clear version of 'stalking' towards the members. I am quite sure not only we do, but also the court does. But nevertheless that is up to the court.

They patrol in heavily marked and armored vehicles, carry carbine rifles and you think their cover will be blown? Bullshit. If this was CIU I would understand.

And who say they weren't on the way to a situation and had to hide in cover? The Tactical Response Unit have several techniques to avoid being seen, wich I will not state here because they are classified. The judge may request this information in private.

Also, you made an assumption that they would die. They wear bulletproof armor, carry m4 carbines and have other Officers to save, assist and back them up. Absolute bullshit.

So they cannot die in your eyes?

Also, you said I bugged SEVERAL members, what bullshit is this? I asked one person, so don't lie.

We only have the word of other members saying that you buggered him. That is up to the Judge to find out.

Spoiler for Hiden:

As for shooting a NOOSE Operative, that is also bullshit. I admit, I slapped him, but I never SHOT him, he was the one who took his rifle out.

Does not matter. Assault is assault and we do not want officers who punch each other in our team. Not even officers who spit at each other.

I slapped him because of his attitude, I not only apologised for it, but I also solved this in the application period.

But this will always stay in our minds, and also was taken into consideration after denying you.

Also, this bullshit about harassing an ex-applicant, you haven't shown the stalking or the attitude coming from him, to protect yourself. Bullshit, total Bullshit.

Thanks for the assumption. Does not matter: stalking and having a bad attitude is nothing we want in our team. Is the other applicant in our team? No.

Also, this whole "for the sake of privacy" bullshit for not giving proof of a false suspection, is only letting you down. As the Chief, I wouldn't be making allegations and then failing to show sufficient proof.

As a security group Chief, I would not keep assaulting and commenting like a child on every single thing that does not suit you.

Also, this whole insulting thing, it has already been resolved with Gregory Parker, the LCPD Deputy Chief and the CIU Inspector.

I am Emily Sanderson, greetings.

This "criminal applicant" crap is also unbelievable, if I applied for LCPD, doesn't it show I would give up crime for LCPD?

No. Ever heard of spies?

Also, if you want people to give up their families for your agency, you are acting like an absolute moron, why the hell should anyone give up their family for an agency? That's a very emotional and difficult decision, don't put that burden on others.

I did. My decision, not yours.

Also, as I had said before, you could have requested I leave these businesses. However, you did not, showing you have tried to make a reason to deny me.

Another assumption. Not going to comment on this.


Greetings,
Emily Sanderson
LCPD Chief of Police

[Kowalski.]

Withdrawn

[Norrage]

I am requesting the Judge and the jury to take note of the comment by the other party.

[Senate]

Plaintiff has withdrawn his case.

closed