Sorry but could you reword that?
I think you misunderstood my point.
I was asking say if a group were to be setup, would it be the public right or not to try suggest, help or even criticize the group? or is it wrong for the public to expect such?
Why isn't it? That's the question I would ask. Surely, through the appropriate channels that is. Anyone
should have the right to suggest, help and/or criticize any group.
This isn't Communist China unfortunately, IMHO it seems some individuals are concerned with trying to run/change their group without public issues concerning them. We all know the notable "omg you dm'd us in that last roleplay, not recommended 0/8 m8" post on many family topics in the past. Of course falsified claims are not morally correct and without any evidence, it can be easy just to brush aside these claims. But when groups go to extreme lengths to protect their image from being criticized and then be made to change their vision or play style, I don't see why the public shouldn't be able to.
Isn't this a fundamental value that we take for granted in modern society?
i dont care. posted this just because you care
Stop posthunting then.