What is HC-RPG?

[Teddy]

I don't agree with changing the server to some kinda hardcore serious rp... i love argonath the way it is.

It's not changing, it's a whole new server.

[Salmonella]

You might as well create another server with RS4 on it.

Yeah why not? Roll back to RS4 and put RS5 on the HC-RPG server then to have some significant difference.

Seriously though I don't see why this is needed at all. Splitting 23 players isn't good.

[Pizza4_Games]

It's not changing, it's a whole new server.

Oh... sorry then let me change my vote to yes

[Manoni]

Yes.

Good. Now lets stop going away from the subject.

It is true, there isn't enough people in the dev/scripters team, but it isn't because they don't want to hire nobody else, is because they haven't seen anyone with the suitable qualities for the task.
Going back to the hc server idea, I would still support it and I hope it doesn't gets cancelled like most of other ideas, only due to complainings.

[Teddy]

I should remind you, quantity does not mean quality. I would personally rather have a small server with high quality than a large server with little quality.

[Salmonella]

I should remind you, quantity does not mean quality. I would personally rather have a small server with high quality than a large server with little quality.

There isn't any quality to be seen if the server is half empty.

[Teddy]

There isn't any quality to be seen if the server is half empty.

Really? I've had few quality RPs over the last few weeks. Don't let your own inability to seek or create RP hinder anyone else

[Salmonella]

Really? I've had few quality RPs over the last few weeks. Don't let your own inability to seek or create RP hinder anyone else

I don't think you get the point. I've had nice roleplay too. We're talking about what's gonna happen if this second server becomes reality.

There's a threshold for when an environment allows quality to exist. I mean, sure, you can gather your group and RP alone with 10 people in a server, but Argonath is about multiplaying as far as I'm concerned.

[Teddy]

I don't think you get the point. I've had nice roleplay too. We're talking about what's gonna happen if this second server becomes reality.

There's a threshold for when an environment allows quality to exist. I mean, sure, you can gather your group and RP alone with 10 people in a server, but Argonath is about multiplaying as far as I'm concerned.

I'm certain I get the point. You don't. You are still assuming more people won't come back or join fresh to this new server. You cannot base assumptions that there will be zero new players, zero returning players (who left by the absence of such).

[Salmonella]

I'm certain I get the point. You don't. You are still assuming more people won't come back or join fresh to this new server. You cannot base assumptions that there will be zero new players, zero returning players (who left by the absence of such).

Wait, so you think that magically more new players will join just because there's two servers in this scenario?

I'm assuming the amount of new players joining will not be affected at all by this, and will stay close to zero. I don't think this is a measure that'll attract new players, and it wasn't presented as such either. It was presented to satisfy some of the current players, from what I read.

And because of that, and by looking at the poll, you're essentially splitting the current player count (around 20) into 2. And when the counts go that low, not a lot of people will be inclined to join, not new players, but also not veterans when they see what's happened.

You gotta think of it practically too.

[Teddy]

I should note this was moved to SA:MP general since it's not something I am inclined to do anymore. It was at first but eh.

And for the record Sal, it is thinking practical. I'm sure you can consider the number of vets who left because of the lack of quality RP and not just driving around screwing off on pizza bikes and calling it RP.

[Manoni]

I should note this was moved to SA:MP general since it's not something I am inclined to do anymore. It was at first but eh.

I hope it doesn't gets cancelled like most of other ideas, only due to complainings.

Oh well.

[Salmonella]

I should note this was moved to SA:MP general since it's not something I am inclined to do anymore. It was at first but eh.

And for the record Sal, it is thinking practical. I'm sure you can consider the number of vets who left because of the lack of quality RP and not just driving around screwing off on pizza bikes and calling it RP.

It's not really practical at all. All the vets I've spoken to have very different reasons for leaving than ''lack of quality RP''. For the record, while I tried to bring ''quality RP'' to the gates of Area 69 you came to me a few days later out of nowhere and accused me of harrasing and copbaiting, all without apparently even knowing what really happened there.

So when I try to bring quality RP to OTHER players and not just being a lonely group that only roleplays with itself, it's called harrasing, but when I do stuff with my friends it's called ''screwing off'' and ''nonRP''?

What's up with speaking so degradingly about stalking roleplay anyway? I'm not going around calling towtrucking something for wankers that just like to tow cars and annoy others...

[MrTony]

screwing off on pizza bikes and calling it RP.

as a pizza delivery man i find this offensive

[Teddy]

as a pizza delivery man i find this offensive

Then you don't understand the context. Rping on a pizza bike != screwing off.

It's not really practical at all. All the vets I've spoken to have very different reasons for leaving than ''lack of quality RP''. For the record, while I tried to bring ''quality RP'' to the gates of Area 69 you came to me a few days later out of nowhere and accused me of harrasing and copbaiting, all without apparently even knowing what really happened there.

So when I try to bring quality RP to OTHER players and not just being a lonely group that only roleplays with itself, it's called harrasing, but when I do stuff with my friends it's called ''screwing off'' and ''nonRP''?

What's up with speaking so degradingly about stalking roleplay anyway? I'm not going around calling towtrucking something for wankers that just like to tow cars and annoy others...

I figured you didn't understand what I meant by that. Can't say I'm surprised.