The Gvardia Family || San Fierro's Main Power || Best criminal group of 09/10/11

[PrtiBeeGee]

Only our side got punished.
Interesting.

[Acika]

You are lucky to not have been perm banned. Just take a look at your punishment history. 8 punishments in one day.. never seen that in my life. Lucky that we are at Christmas time. You shot and failed to give a proper explanation, constantly saying "but cofiliano said this" "oh but the guy next to me shot so I shot". Stop acting innocent.

I gave you good explanation. You're the first one who mentioned Cofi, so it's incorrect so i gave you explanation. I didnt say they shot near me i said they shot on me. It's obvious that im whichhunted by you since u have banned me fore 60mins yesterday when i presses once TAB in nowhere, alone. Also you gave me advice to leave the server.

[Hugo.]

"but cofiliano said this"

The only things that Cofiliano said was "Calm down, guys", "Don't shoot" and "STOP SHOOTING!!"...

[Acika]

The only things that Cofiliano said was "Calm down, guys", "Don't shoot" and "STOP SHOOTING!!"...

+1

[Mashgash]

I strongly advice those who accuse administration of being bias provide evidence or refrain from writing without knowing the facts.
You did not saw the admin chat and you are not aware of what we did to prevent the situation to occur. We used different methods and few players was lucky to get away just with their weapons removed.

Merry Christmas.

[Cyril]

If you get abused by admins, quit and go to another server.

Tab abusing, even in middle of nowhere = rulebreaking. Blame yourself, not the admins for doing their job. You are rulebreaking ? Even in middle of nowhere ? You are punished. Simple as that.

http://wiki.argonathrpg.com/index.php/SA-MP_Server_Rules

[Kavensky]

Harris started attacking me

/report is the command if you see a rulebreaker.

[Lincoln.]

I strongly advice those who accuse administration of being bias provide evidence or refrain from writing without knowing the facts.
You did not saw the admin chat and you are not aware of what we did to prevent the situation to occur. We used different methods and few players was lucky to get away just with their weapons removed.

Merry Christmas.

Then why don't you provide the evidence of us, breaking the rules? It's normal that you take action based on what you see, but you don't understand us when we see somebody rulebreaking (talking about DMing, carkilling, abusing /su rights), you simply ask for evidence which we don't have, as we're not able to take screenshots while we're trying to avoid being killed and reporting the rulebreaker.
You have witnessed that a guy DMed me from the back in the middle of the scene you are all talking about now (RP yesterday), and you have warned him for deathmatching. Not even five minutes passed, Ness got permanently banned for Deathmatching. Come on, you keep saying that we are all equal here. The same action was done by the two different players in a range of 5 minutes, one of them got warned while the other got banned. Could you explain your way of thinking when warning the player who Dmed me, and the way that the other admin was thinking when banning Ness?

/report is the command if you see a rulebreaker.

And what is the command to explain the admins that it's urgent, and if they do not spectate the rulebreaker immediately, they won't have any reasons to punish him?

[Cyril]

Then why don't you provide the evidence of us, breaking the rules? It's normal that you take action based on what you see, but you don't understand us when we see somebody rulebreaking (talking about DMing, carkilling, abusing /su rights), you simply ask for evidence which we don't have, as we're not able to take screenshots while we're trying to avoid being killed and reporting the rulebreaker.
You have witnessed that a guy DMed me from the back in the middle of the scene you are all talking about now (RP yesterday), and you have warned him for deathmatching. Not even five minutes passed, Ness got permanently banned for Deathmatching. Come on, you keep saying that we are all equal here. The same action was done by the two different players in a range of 5 minutes, one of them got warned while the other got banned. Could you explain your way of thinking when warning the player who Dmed me, and the way that the other admin was thinking when banning Ness?
And what is the command to explain the admins that it's urgent, and if they do not spectate the rulebreaker immediately, they won't have any reasons to punish him?

Admins don't have to give you evidences for anything.. Admins can only punish when they witness something. Of course, if you report someone for something and while we spectate we don't see anything, nothing will happen probably.
And each case of rulebreaking is different. If a new player deathmatchs or if Lincoln deathmatchs, it won't be the same punishment. It's pretty easy to understand.

[Antonio.]

Mother of shitstorm. Everyone, chill.

[#Insanity]

Mother of shitstorm. Everyone, chill.

 

 :ps: any progress on my application ?

[Hugo.]

/report is the command if you see a rulebreaker.

read everything again
anyways im out of this idiotic and pointless discussion

[Lincoln.]

anyways im out of this idiotic and pointless discussion

[KhornateMonkey]

Mother of shitstorm. Everyone, chill.

 

[Jeremy.]

Anyway, I don't see a point of this shitti discussion. Is a bit strange because as Cyril said, admins can't watch 100 people at same time. So, by sayint that, you're telling us that admins were watching just Gvardia, and thats the reason of the punshiments just on one side. Never mind, this discussion will not get anywhere. Better we should drop this and come back on topic.