Modern warfare 3

[Trey_Johnson]

Ah well if you have a fully functional active clan who plays CoD fair enough, Elite would be somewhat helpful for you.
Most DLC IW provide isn't exactly special, I bought both MW2 DLC's and both were a letdown, half the maps were from COD4 and not even the good one's.

I'd love to have a MW3 map-pack including a few MW2 maps such as - Terminal, Favela, Skidrow and Highrise.

They're gonna add those?! I loved all 4 of those maps.

[Rusty]

They're gonna add those?! I loved all 4 of those maps.

No.
I just wish if they do release a MW2 based map-pack they include any of those.

[Exterminator]

One thing i always wondered, is why the hell is one of the MW2 MP maps named after a Piracy group?The one that actually specialises in cracking COD games too?-.-
(SKIDROW)

[Ragdoll]

One thing i always wondered, is why the hell is one of the MW2 MP maps named after a Piracy group?The one that actually specialises in cracking COD games too?-.-
(SKIDROW)

A skid row or skid road is a run-down or dilapidated urban area with a large, impoverished population.

[Freedom]

It's not greed if they want to get paid for what they work HARD on. It's not easy developing a game such as MW3, so developers do it expecting a pay.

For some reason, I don't think they worked that hard on mw3.

[Freeborn]

For some reason, I don't think they worked that hard on mw3.

You sure you seen its MP trailer?

[Caltson]

For some reason, I don't think they worked that hard on mw3.

I'm quite sure that Infinity Ward did not just ignore all of these complaints and 'far looked' advertisments slogan such as 'CoD doesn't innovate'.
I even think that on release it will be Call of Duty stealing the show, not Battlefield, thanks to it's attempt to break down another franchise, which you NEVER should do.

If we both bake cookies freedom and I'm saying yours are bad, won't you make extra work of it to prove me and the rest of the world wrong and outrun me and my statements?

I saw the multiplayer trailers, those who say there are no changes definatly never played call of duty. It is normal that interface remains somewhat the same, it's the same franchise. In fact, I don't see much 'new' features in Battlefield 3 either, everything in the game has been done before.

[Wolfe]

Competition will be everywhere, noone is trying to break down the other franchise, basicly because it is impossible, It's like Saying Burger King should not compete with McDonald's.

No Ryan, BF3 is using a brand fucking new engine, it's physics are completely new, It looks way Different of BC2, yet with some remarks, jet's are a new addition, and so are the improvement of gun attachments, it's a completely new game, while MW3 uses the same engine, same looks, same physics, same map layout.. It just adds different game modes and maps, It's a glorified Map pack imo.

[Caltson]

Competition will be everywhere, noone is trying to break down the other franchise, basicly because it is impossible, It's like Saying Burger King should not compete with McDonald's.

No Ryan, BF3 is using a brand f**king new engine, it's physics are completely new, It looks way Different of BC2, yet with some remarks, jet's are a new addition, and so are the improvement of gun attachments, it's a completely new game, while MW3 uses the same engine, same looks, same physics, same map layout.. It just adds different game modes and maps, It's a glorified Map pack imo.

Call of Duty:
Same engine, new interface, new killstreak system, new clan system, new maps, new gamemodes, new storyline, similar interface to Mw2

Battlefield 3:
New engine, New interface, same killstreak system, same clan system, partially same maps, new storyline, new gamemode featuring jets, similar to Battlefield Bad Company 2.

I'm not saying Battlefield 3 is a bad game, but for me the most smooth and interesting game is Call of Duty. Battlefield just plays real 'clunky' like you're walking with a broomstick.
I know that my preference is Call of Duty to the bone, so I may be subjective here, but that's my opinion on Battlefield and espescially EA who always try to make a living out of other concepts. (FIFA vs PES) (SHIFT vs GT5 and Project Gotham) (MoH vs CoD) (Battlefield vs CoD)
The only good franchises they made without looking from the rest is the 'original' need for speed, the sims and SSX.

[Wolfe]

MW3 has no new interface, it is identical to the fucking MW2 one, BF3 does not have a killstreak system, Clan system is new, specially with the addition of Battlelog, Same Maps ? Go play BC2 and tell me if their similar. That just turns the tide doesn't it ?

Activision/IW can't say their pretty much innovative, It's like getting a cheeseburger, adding I don't know, Bacon, and calling it a brand new invention.

[Rusty]

Call Of Duty is the more popular choice because it's the easier of the two games to play.
BF is a tactical shooter, where as Call Of Duty is straight up noob friendly and much easier to master. 

[Trey_Johnson]

Call Of Duty is the more popular choice because it's the easier of the two games to play.
BF is a tactical shooter, where as Call Of Duty is straight up noob friendly and much easier to master. 

That's one of the reasons that Cod is also disliked.

[Freedom]

The singleplayer campaigns of CoD are awesome, though.

[Trey_Johnson]

The singleplayer campaigns of CoD are awesome, though.

That's the best in cod.

[Caltson]

Call Of Duty is the more popular choice because it's the easier of the two games to play.
BF is a tactical shooter, where as Call Of Duty is straight up noob friendly and much easier to master. 

I don't think you ever tried playing tactical on Call of Duty?
It takes a certain strategy to play with decency on it. As Clanleader of the White Shadows Clan's PS3 division I think you should just see our tactical strategy plannings and load outs. All of them are set in such a way it's nearly impossible for us to lose a match. In battlefield you could just run straight from point A to B and killing all guys on your way aswell, I'm the living evidence, I suppose. Call of Duty is not noob friendly.

By the way, never tried using the Riot Shield with your clanmembers? That's how strategy goes in Call of Duty. It may be less conventional as Battlefield where you'll just crouch, but that's what makes CoD more interesting and attractive to me; inventing new unconventional strategies that can't be matched.

That's one of the reasons that Cod is also disliked.

I know more people that dislike Battlefield due to it's poor beta compared to the 'high expectations' given to us by EA.

MW3 has no new interface, it is identical to the f**king MW2 one, BF3 does not have a killstreak system, Clan system is new, specially with the addition of Battlelog, Same Maps ? Go play BC2 and tell me if their similar. That just turns the tide doesn't it ?

Activision/IW can't say their pretty much innovative, It's like getting a cheeseburger, adding I don't know, Bacon, and calling it a brand new invention.

Mw3 has new interface and new gamemodes Battlefield can't be compared too. Clan system on Battlefield appears to be a total fail and completely bugged (can be fixed though) and I think Modern Warfare 3 Clan features will be much more extended than just 'form a squad' Clantags can be edited for the entire clan, you can take part into clan matches straight from the game itself and with Elite your own clan will be profiting from extra Clan XP Boost.

EA has their ways to suck the money out of people. In many cases they succeed, like with the Battlefield series. Can't say their really bad, but their work lacks much detail and doesn't go in the demand what people really ask.

Activision and IW have more than new features you think you have. I think you should check up with their recent video's and look at the many new features it'll bring along. Battlefield 3 has no new features either, they're just slightly improved aswell, so don't say Call of Duty is 'the same boring shit'.