Get a new Wiki sysop

[stormeus]

I totally agree on this.

I agree with agreeing with that.

[SugarD]

I agree with agreeing with that.

I agree with your agreement as well.

Edit: Well it seems someone with rights prefers to taunt users than update pages...

- No one's covering anything. We just don't need a captain obvious here.

Don't need to name names, but that was much less than professional. Thanks for editing my own page to provoke. It's very much appreciated.

Seriously, this is ridiculous. Can't someone just update these pages so we can actually use the wiki? In it's current state, it's next to useless to us...

[Mario_Rinna]

You were denied, SugarD.

Now. I don't have admin rights on wiki. And never had.

I cannot promote users, I cannot delete pages, I cannot fix many things I would like to.

Editing talk pages is a waste of time cause no one with the admin rights reads them.

"Sysops" are Gandalf, Aragorn and Sauron. Still want new "sysops"? Yeah, me too.

[SugarD]

You were denied, SugarD.

Thank you. That's all I wanted to know.

Edit: Just in case it comes off as such, my anger is not directed at any single person here. I'm mad at basically everyone in charge. There's many people set up to handle things and right now only 1-2 at most even log into it. If anyone takes what I say as personal, I do apologize. That is not my intention.

[Mario_Rinna]

Mario_Rinna has been very inactive, and my editor application has been under consideration for months with no response. No one has access to editing. The information is very outdated, and there are no new editors being added.

My suggestion is to either change the editing restrictions, or get a new, active sysop.
EDIT: Sysop = Main Admin or System Operator. Think of it as a wiki webmaster

I told Gandalf about your application the day I got it. What happened after that is not my problem.

Thank you. That's all I wanted to know.

Edit: Just in case it comes off as such, my anger is not directed at any single person here. I'm mad at basically everyone in charge. There's many people set up to handle things and right now only 1-2 at most even log into it. If anyone takes what I say as personal, I do apologize. That is not my intention.

Welcome.

Instead of pointing at outdated things, you could actually update the info and send it to Patton.

[JayL]

There's no need to take anyone out of their place or something IMO...

What I would suggest is to give some rights to the servers leaders so they add the info of their respective communities. But there's just no point to bureucratize a damn wiki. I mean, it's a wiki. Not a game server. Wiki's about writing info, not answering reports banning people bla bla bla. One guy with permissions to defend the wiki from things such as bots and then a few editors would be enough, and not a bureaucratic admin structure.

[SugarD]

There's no need to take anyone out of their place or something IMO...

What I would suggest is to give some rights to the servers leaders so they add the info of their respective communities. But there's just no point to bureucratize a damn wiki. I mean, it's a wiki. Not a game server. Wiki's about writing info, not answering reports banning people bla bla bla. One guy with permissions to defend the wiki from things such as bots and then a few editors would be enough, and not a bureaucratic admin structure.

The problem is the people on there now are generally inactive. Some of the server leaders already have access, but they don't use it. There's also A LOT of missing or outdated information. The point of the wiki was to move all the general information to one place so it could be easy to find and quickly updated, rather than relying on a billion hidden stickied topics on 10 different various forums.

[stormeus]

I don't see why we use the editor group, anyways. Just make the autoconfirmed users (registered 4+ days) as editors. Also, if the owners aren't comfortable with giving sysop privileges, then another user group can be made.

[Mario_Rinna]

The problem is the people on there now are generally inactive.

Don't generalize.

Some of the server leaders already have access, but they don't use it.

Only Boromir.

There's also A LOT of missing or outdated information. The point of the wiki was to move all the general information to one place so it could be easy to find and quickly updated, rather than relying on a billion hidden stickied topics on 10 different various forums.

Instead of moaning about it, you could apply to be an edi-

Oh, wait.

[SugarD]

Instead of moaning about it, you could apply to be an edi-

Oh, wait.

Not funny.

[newton_alex]

Not funny.

It was actually....


Anyway, YEH BOI IM APPLYING SOON

[EliteTerm]

I thought it was clear that provoking users is not permitted on the forums?

The next time this happens, this will be taken up to the forum administration and you will get more than just a measly warn.

[JDC]

It was actually....


Anyway, YEH BOI IM APPLYING SOON

With such attitude, look at yourself before provoking administration members next time. People who are close to you have even requested bans on you because of your attitude, and with the way things are going we just might grant their request soon.

As for the topic, why not allow admins to edit their own information?

[Gandalf]

New sysop has been set. If you wish to know who, check out the wiki.