Gang Wars FAQ

[Chris_Knight]

* Pepper in normal civilan clothes fights Mash in purple aka Balla clothes at Idlewood.
* Frank Hawk comes from Grove Street after a succesful fight with CJ. Frank have green clothes (no offense Frank! :razz: ) on and can not be connected to the Ballas. He draw his deagle and shooting Pepper since Pepper fought Mash, which is Frank's friend.

Will you complain or accept that Frank opened fire?

Shouldn't question him,as in his logic get shot in the ass by random attacker out of nowhere is perfectly fine. 
Post Merge: July 31, 2012, 07:45:37 pm

As long as you and Frank are friends, then there is no reason to complain. Deathmatching is random killing, if I remember correctly, in instances like this, they have a reason to kill. Just because they don't say anything doesn't mean they don't have a valid reason. 

You remember wrong,deathmatching is classified  as attacking without roleplay reason and/or roleplay notify.

Your suppose to make your victim aware of your engagement and reason of it.

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

So what you're saying is, if I witness balla Mash rape my mother, kill my father, then punch my fish (-seanc) in the face I have to say, "Sir balla! Pardon me for one moment! I believe you have offended me, therefore I shall shoot you!" to make it a valid roleplay reason and not deathmatch? hohohoohohohohoho 

[Chris_Knight]

So what you're saying is, if I witness balla Mash rape my mother, kill my father, then punch my fish (-seanc) in the face I have to say, "Sir balla! Pardon me for one moment! I believe you have offended me, therefore I shall shoot you!" to make it a valid roleplay reason and not deathmatch? hohohoohohohohoho 

Properly without your xD xD and trololol ho ho ho content : You have assaulted my family and have killed my father,I'm here to make justice and  take what belongs to me... Your life.   

That would go all fine.

[Nexxt]

Pepper with all due respect, you are a regular (or I should say veteran) and I know you know the rules. I wonder why you are questioning these rules now, they never changed and they are like they used to be. Or am I being stupid?

Go punch sum fish <3

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

this is seemingly a new rule, probably made up by admins themselves.


see chris, now you're agreeing with me. you see them killing your close friends or family, and then you take what belongs to you... their life.

[Gandalf]

this is seemingly a new rule, probably made up by admins themselves.


see chris, now you're agreeing with me. you see them killing your close friends or family, and then you take what belongs to you... their life.

This rule has been questined by players since 2007......

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

This rule has been questined by players since 2007......

so you'd think maybe this rule would be revised for some common sense.

[Ness]

Man I think the rule applies if you weren't part of the situation itself from the start, but if you were right beside me when the attacker approached, the reason for you attacking him would be obvious and would not need to be announced. Just my interpretation, probably wrong though.

[Gandalf]

so you'd think maybe this rule would be revised for some common sense.

The rule was made for those lacking common sense, so it does not have to be revised.

[Chris_Knight]

Man I think the rule applies if you weren't part of the situation itself from the start, but if you were right beside me when the attacker approached, the reason for you attacking him would be obvious and would not need to be announced. Just my interpretation, probably wrong though.

Example : You are standing with your friend and talking ,then an murderer appears as he had an issue with your friend. He has argument with your friend interrupting you and your friends discussion. He decides assault your friend and you engage protecting your friend. Was it DM? No as the murderer could see you both talking and the fact you've been there whole time.

Now same scenario but instead of you talking,there is two of your friends talking and your far away from them . Murderer appears,argument begins and they start shootout.then you engage. Is it DM? Yes. The murderer couldn't be aware your with them as you didn't interacted with them and neither with murderer him self so you appeared out of nowhere without providing information why murderer is being assaulted.

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

The rule was made for those lacking common sense, so it does not have to be revised.

You see your best friend being killed. You have a deagle, what do you do?

[Chrome]

You see your best friend being killed. You have a deagle, what do you do?

Kill the one who killed your friend.

If you can role-play a gang war properly, I cannot see any issues with it. Yet if you use it as a hidden way of deathmatching other individuals, I find it moronic. A gang war is so much more than just shooting at each other, if you can use your imagination a little bit, it's not so hard to find out what I mean.

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

Deathmatching: Killing without a roleplay reason.

If my friends being killed, that's a pretty damn good roleplay reason.

[Karmps.]

And this shows exatly why people should teach new players, even if they are cops.
You got taught, pass on the torch.

This.

[Gandalf]

You see your best friend being killed. You have a deagle, what do you do?

See your best friend arrested by 5 cops, do you kill them?