Even young girls should be entirely covered

[Batta]

It is true that the full dress is based on tradition. However that tradition has nothing to do with religion. People who use this are originating from desert tribes. When traveling through the desert, the wind will blow sand that penetrates about everything and can make someone uncomfortable.
By wearing a full thick dress that covers everything the sand would not get through. And dark colours are very effective against the heat as well as the cold.
Men, being in general less caring about skin and comfort, would still cover their face as the current desert tribes still do.

This tradition has set in to those religions still living under desert thoughts.

This is right. In any case this does not explain why even girls should be covered.. The topic does not directly refer to tribes.

[Alan.Wake]

And? They're so troglodyte that they can't hold their instinct?

They can or they can't. No man can be fully perfect...

It must be like that if women are covered.. it's a fact!

Saudi Arabia has the lowest crime rates related to adultery, rape and also fornication, it's a FACT. Should i compare the statistic with America or some European country such as Sweden?

This mentality really worries me. I know that many societies/religions are still crossing the Stone Age, but please, we're in 2013, wake up!

Stone age? I see people are still making wars, being snobbish and backstabbing in work, cheating/adultery/fornication, and what other negative things i should add. Accept people religion and tradition rather than making assumptions about how men are "forcing" women to dress and how primitive they are because they can't control themselves or some other religious part you disagree/hate upon.

I will clarify once again, men are also required to wear a garment that doesn't reveal their body lines, this is to prevent temptation from the other gender. Example, woman meets man, woman submits to desires, talks, man also get tempted, and so on. Same thing with the hijab.

I don't think that the new law would be passed, even if it does so, then other religious leaders would react on it. The Muslims follow the holy book and the teachings of the Prophets, not these men.

[Sweeper]

Accept people religion and tradition rather than making assumptions about how men are "forcing" women to dress and how primitive they are because they can't control themselves or some other religious part you disagree/hate upon.

Entirely covered (wo)men should be disallowed, tradition or not. It's just unsafe and dangerous.

Check: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2272706/Naomi-Oni-Anguish-Victorias-Secret-girl-scarred-acid-attacker-niqab.html#axzz2KCsyRRZz

You know what was under that niqab? I don't, this woman doesn't, nobody does.
What now? Security cameras are useless since you can't see a shit of what's under that dress/niqab.




Look at this, it's scaring me and a lot of people off. It's walking through the streets and you want me to accept this?


And if it is a tradition, why are they forcing Western women to wear similar "clothes" such as an ayaba.

[Alan.Wake]

Ok

[Sweeper]

Ok

Amen.

[Jellyfish]

And if it is a tradition, why are they forcing Western women to wear similar "clothes" such as an ayaba.

Because they're offended by people showing too much skin. It goes against their 'nature', so to speak.

[Sweeper]

Because they're offended by people showing too much skin. It goes against their 'nature', so to speak.

Accept people religion and tradition

Accept the Western culture then.

And "too much skin", like they're walking half-naked through the streets in Europe?

[Batta]

Saudi Arabia has the lowest crime rates related to adultery, rape and also fornication, it's a FACT.

Maybe because in some cases women are stoned?

Accept people religion and tradition rather than making assumptions about how men are "forcing" women to dress and how primitive they are because they can't control themselves or some other religious part you disagree/hate upon.

What you don't understand is that a religion shall never force anyone to do anything. I accept religions and especially traditions. Forcing someone to do something is nothing to be proud of instead.

I will clarify once again, men are also required to wear a garment that doesn't reveal their body lines, this is to prevent temptation from the other gender.

Such evolute way rather than controlling themselves.

Example, woman meets man, woman submits to desires, talks, man also get tempted, and so on.

Everyday!

Look at this, it's scaring me and a lot of people off. It's walking through the streets and you want me to accept this?

Indeed. Tradition or not I would never allow someone to cover him/herself like that. You just can't understand who that person is.

[Mikal]

This shit should be banned in modernised countries, you can't tell who the fuck it is.. If police were looking for an illegal dressed like that, could they identify her?
I mean they arnt even allowed to tell her to remove her face shit so they can identify her face, because it would breach her 'religious' rights, honestly, want to dress like that?
Go back to your own country where it's considered tradition and not stupidness.

[chichibung]

This shit should be banned in modernised countries, you can't tell who the f**k it is.. If police were looking for an illegal dressed like that, could they identify her?
I mean they arnt even allowed to tell her to remove her face shit so they can identify her face, because it would breach her 'religious' rights, honestly, want to dress like that?
Go back to your own country where it's considered tradition and not stupidness. 

i already want this topic to be locked/removed. why are you talking about dresses in this topic? somebody open a fashion topic and speak there  :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop: :pop:
 :ps:  :gd: :gd: :gd:  :gd:

[Sweeper]

This shit should be banned in modernised countries, you can't tell who the f**k it is.. If police were looking for an illegal dressed like that, could they identify her?
I mean they arnt even allowed to tell her to remove her face shit so they can identify her face, because it would breach her 'religious' rights, honestly, want to dress like that?
Go back to your own country where it's considered tradition and not stupidness.

Indeed, we must adapt in their country but they don't want to in our.

[Alan.Wake]

i already want this topic to be locked/removed. why are you talking about dresses in this topic? somebody open a fashion topic and speak there

Hakim!

Maybe because in some cases women are stoned?

Such evolute way rather than controlling themselves.

Maybe because in some cases women are stoned?

Yes, because women are rapists, fornicators and what not, and men are pure saints. Anything else you would like to add, or want me to say, my dear sweet Roman brother?

This shit should be banned in modernised countries, you can't tell who the f**k it is.. If police were looking for an illegal dressed like that, could they identify her?
I mean they arnt even allowed to tell her to remove her face shit so they can identify her face, because it would breach her 'religious' rights, honestly, want to dress like that?
Go back to your own country where it's considered tradition and not stupidness.

Would be nice to see people robbing banks wearing that traditional dress or maybe in Scottish kilts!

[Mikal]

Would be nice to see people robbing banks wearing that traditional dress or maybe in Scottish kilts!

Kilt's don't cover peoples faces.. ;X

[Batta]

Yes, because women are rapists, fornicators and what not, and men are pure saints. Anything else you would like to add, or want me to say, my dear sweet Roman brother?

It just means you cannot keep the discussion going.. anyway don't misuse that word.

[Alan.Wake]

It just means you cannot keep the discussion going.. anyway don't misuse that word.

Discussion? My bad, thought it ended days back.

Kilt's don't cover peoples faces.. ;X

Scottish kilts with Arabian veil!