So was I. Your video held no relevance to that at all.
I was implying that if whoever was suspected to be in the cabin was someone other than Dorner (read: one of the two maids) inside the house getting burned, then events such as those that took place in Los Angeles beginning on April 29th, 1992 might occur.
I also implied that Dorner might have had an accomplice with him. He may also have had a hostage with him, whom he perhaps left inside the cabin that was set ablaze. The hostage would have likely been someone related to the LAPD, "I never had the opportunity to have a family of my own, I’m terminating yours." (pg. 10 manifesto).
The lapse in time between the Officers losing Dorner off the main highway and the "standoff" at the second cabin would allow him sufficient time to initiate his plot of having the LAPD murder* someone related to them, thinking it is Dorne and for his accomplice to escape. *Nearly 100% of the time when tear gas canisters are shot into houses, the house burns to the ground; the police don't allow the fire department to extinguish the blaze.
And who is to say the supposed events of the shooting, chase, and standoff are completely true? The LAPD cannot event confirm that it was, in fact, Dorner who was inside the cabin?
>hollywood is mad because they couldn't think of this script.
Guests: 292
Hidden: 0
Users: 0