Argonath RPG - A World of its own
Argonath RPG Community => Speakerbox => World and local news => Topic started by: KhornateMonkey on December 29, 2013, 06:27:04 pm
-
An attack on a train station in Russia's southern city of Volgograd has killed 15 people, officials say.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-25541019
-
Sorry for those peoples lives...
-
RIP to all those who died as violence to counter whatever the Russian government is doing (no matter how immoral) is never the right road to follow. I'm now just concerned that Putin will use this incident to justify abuses against his own citizens to further degrade their human rights.
-
RIP to all those who died as violence to counter whatever the Russian government is doing (no matter how immoral) is never the right road to follow. I'm now just concerned that Putin will use this incident to justify abuses against his own citizens to further degrade their human rights.
Wow, what a cool story. :lol:
-
Wow, what a cool story. :lol:
Fact*
-
Fact*
Please explain then how that bombing is against Russian government and how Putin can abuse it. :)
-
what do putin think about gays?
-
May all rest in peace
-
Please explain then how that bombing is against Russian government and how Putin can abuse it. :)
He's already abusing several things but I guess Russians are blind to it or just used to Putin. Someone has bombed our city, we must further restrict the rights of our citizens, bringing more violence onto the streets.
what do putin think about gays?
Don't even go there. It's very reminiscent of what Hitler did to the Jews...
-
He's already abusing several things but I guess Russians are blind to it or just used to Putin. Someone has bombed our city, we must further restrict the rights of our citizens, bringing more violence onto the streets.
And this is where you're wrong: the majority of Russians support Putin in whatever he does and not only they're aware of his "abuse," they want him to do it, want him to continue.
Don't even go there. It's very reminiscent of what Hitler did to the Jews...
I am not sure whether Hitler had support of the majority when it comes to Holocaust; here, it's pretty clear that most hate gays and don't even consider them to be humans.
I doubt, however, that there will be concentration camps for gays in Russia. While Putin may be able to find some way to pull that off, the hatred for gays is used as a cover to pass laws which will help bring back censorship.
There are lots of peopleâ€â€most of them born in the USSRâ€â€dreaming about the return of the crumbling Soviet gerontocracy, and lots of people who just don't care about what's happening in their own country. In reality, the USSR never fell apart; it's just it's much weaker today than Russians want it to be.
Putin is pretty much the embodiment of the beliefs of an average Russian. People started worshipping him even before all the propaganda was properly launched. He is a dictator, yeah; unfortunately, people are fascinated with that.
That said, Putin doesn't actually need to use such incidents any more; he got what he wanted long ago. It's much more likely that someone sent him a message this way.
-
The only reason Sweden even have a defense budget is because of Russia. Now, when Russia have for the past months been more aggressive on the Baltic countries, the government of Sweden have deiced to put more money and effort in the military. We're also on the way to join NATO. They say that Sweden are member of NATO before 2020.
Close down the federation and free those countries. Step down Russia.
-
And this is where you're wrong: the majority of Russians support Putin in whatever he does and not only they're aware of his "abuse," they want him to do it, want him to continue.
More fool them. Russia is descending into corruption and chaos with Putin at the helm.
-
(http://dungheap.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/putin_flash.jpg)
In all seriousness, if Russia is descending into chaos and corruption under Putin, then where are all the mass anti-establishment demonstrations? (someone please enlighten me as I am not too updated on Russian news)
-
The only reason Sweden even have a defense budget is because of Russia. Now, when Russia have for the past months been more aggressive on the Baltic countries, the government of Sweden have deiced to put more money and effort in the military. We're also on the way to join NATO. They say that Sweden are member of NATO before 2020.
Close down the federation and free those countries. Step down Russia.
Russia wouldn't touch Sweden even if it didn't have a military, Europe and it's allies wouldn't let it happen.
-
@JDC Putin is ex-KGB. Need I say more?
-
Putin is ex-KGB. Need I say more?
Yes.
-
@JDC Putin is ex-KGB. Need I say more?
Do you mean "ex-KGB" as in Putin being well-versed in the ways of suppressing dissent and hiding discontent among his constituents from the rest of the world, "ex-KGB" in that he represents the ideals of USSR-era Russia as one of the top two superpowers in the world and as such is supported in what he is doing by Russians, or both?
-
On the topic point, here is some footage but remember, you're seeing people just before they die, so click if you're ready to see some scary shit, but it isn't gross, just.. disturbing, I repeat DO NOT CLICK (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=94a_1389869200)
-
On the topic point, here is some footage but remember, you're seeing people just before they die, so click if you're ready to see some scary shit, but it isn't gross, just.. disturbing, I repeat DO NOT CLICK (http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=94a_1389869200)
That is one unintelligent heartless c***...
-
That is one unintelligent heartless c***...
It just happened so quick.. millions of years of evolution gone in a few seconds because someone decided it was time for him.. god damn it.
-
As I do not see the need to post a new topic about this, you guys should check this out. What's your opinion on it?
A rumor, or conspiracy, circulated for many years as to why Osama Bin Laden was never able to pull off another terrorist attack inside of the U.S. after 9/11. According to the rumor, or conspiracy, which ever title you prefer, former U.S. President George W. Bush had somehow gotten in contact with Bin Laden, personally, and warned him that if there was one more attack on U.S. soil, that he would nuke Mecca. Be it true or not, if it did happen, the method was affective.
Similar rumors circulated that the same threat had been put out by Russian President Vladamir Putin after terrorists bombed a Russian high-speed train back in 2009, killing 27 people. However, it is believed by many that Bin Laden was killed earlier in 2009, and his replacement to whom Putin had sent the warning, Ayman al-Zawahiri, merely scoffed and did not take him seriously.
Now, in light of the two terrorist bombings in Russia just last month that killed a total of 34 people and injured more than 100 others, rumor is creeping out of the Kremlin that Putin has had enough with warnings and tough talk and is planning a tactical nuclear strike on Mecca, the heart of Islamic ideology; the Muslim holy land. (http://boltonbnp.blogspot.com/2014/01/putin-vows-to-nuke-mecca.html)
-
As I do not see the need to post a new topic about this, you guys should check this out. What's your opinion on it?
A rumor, or conspiracy, circulated for many years as to why Osama Bin Laden was never able to pull off another terrorist attack inside of the U.S. after 9/11. According to the rumor, or conspiracy, which ever title you prefer, former U.S. President George W. Bush had somehow gotten in contact with Bin Laden, personally, and warned him that if there was one more attack on U.S. soil, that he would nuke Mecca. Be it true or not, if it did happen, the method was affective.
Similar rumors circulated that the same threat had been put out by Russian President Vladamir Putin after terrorists bombed a Russian high-speed train back in 2009, killing 27 people. However, it is believed by many that Bin Laden was killed earlier in 2009, and his replacement to whom Putin had sent the warning, Ayman al-Zawahiri, merely scoffed and did not take him seriously.
Now, in light of the two terrorist bombings in Russia just last month that killed a total of 34 people and injured more than 100 others, rumor is creeping out of the Kremlin that Putin has had enough with warnings and tough talk and is planning a tactical nuclear strike on Mecca, the heart of Islamic ideology; the Muslim holy land. (http://boltonbnp.blogspot.com/2014/01/putin-vows-to-nuke-mecca.html)
Only those who lack all their brain cells will "think" of -touching- Mecca. Trust me, this is nothing but bullshit. Everyone knows if Mecca were attacked all hell would break loose. Look what happened when they made that movie that insulted the prophet. If Mecca were to be touched, Trust me that would be Armageddon.
-
It just happened so quick.. millions of years of evolution gone in a few seconds because someone decided it was time for him.. god damn it.
It disgusts me that a human being can do such a thing, and what does he expect after he's blown himself up? Afterlife? Some people need to get a brain, when you die, you die and thats it, the end, you rot in the ground or get burned and sit in a pot for the rest of time, fucking morons they are.
Trust me that would be Armageddon.
Yup, but only for those at Mecca..
Also why would Putin nuke Mecca? I mean it is Islam that is causing the problems in Russia but he's always stood by middle east countries when it comes to the west threatening them, Putin needs to pick a side if he did say he'd nuke Mecca, what a messy politician.
-
It disgusts me that a human being can do such a thing, and what does he expect after he's blown himself up? Afterlife? Some people need to get a brain, when you die, you die and thats it, the end, you rot in the ground or get burned and sit in a pot for the rest of time, f**king morons they are.
When there's people who believe that this life is a passage into the next and that by taking other people with them is a good thing, that's a dangerous thing. Thank goodness it's only a small narrow-minded brainwashed minority though.
-
It disgusts me that a human being can do such a thing, and what does he expect after he's blown himself up? Afterlife? Some people need to get a brain, when you die, you die and thats it, the end, you rot in the ground or get burned and sit in a pot for the rest of time, f**king morons they are.
The worst thing is when people do it for religious reasons, I'm pretty sure human race is evolved enough to not believe in supernatural and believe in itself.. but here we are, back to the f**king beginning, back to where people killed each other with rocks just because they didn't know anything else. If you think it's your time.. hang yourself, jump off a bridge, or just barry yourself so other people won't have to clean you up, you don't need to ruin other people's lives, what people do just to prove something is scary some times.
Lethal force should be the last thing people think about, but yet shootings and explosions everywhere, why can't we live in peace, why do innocent people have to die, day to day you hear on the news how someone shot a person just because he stepped on his lawn. People shouldn't have access to lethal weaponary.
If you can't control your temper not to kill someone you should be a threat to others and put in jail.. or there is a simpler solution; Don't let people have guns. I recently found out a secret browser that is being hunted by the FBI on which you can buy guns, slaves, explosions, HITMEN! FOR FREE! Some dude was going to kill for you.. for nothing..
Human kind disgusts me, why can't we act like we are INTELLIGENT LIFE , maybe that is the reason we can't communicate intergalacticaly, we are insane, we kill people for the lols! When did this become a thing, why are people born to do bad things, why can't someone realize that he would be a terrible parent and not have a child. I know it sounds harsh but if your dad was crazy and you're crazy your kid will be crazy.
200,000 years of evolution worth since the first intelligent human, 10 million years since we were apes, did humanity do a 180° turn? We don't need to fight, we aren't the enemy, nobody is the enemy, nature is the enemy, when we find aliens you can say they're the enemy, it seems like presidents and dictators start wars just because they have too many guns or people.
In some cases killing yourself was honorable, japanese soldiers were crashing their planes or doing the "kamikazi" maneuver by themselves, nobody told them to, they wanted to win WW2 because they respected their king, at that point their king was pronounced a God in Japan, a f**king GOD, what is this shit, that's why I'm an atheist, they killed themselves because they were promised after life, they were promised happiness, NOTHING OF THAT HAPPENED! It was just terrible people fighting even more terrible people. Why is human kind doing this, we were supposed to be the intelligent ones, not the ones who ruin the planet, our culture and ourselves.
-
When there's people who believe that this life is a passage into the next and that by taking other people with them is a good thing, that's a dangerous thing. Thank goodness it's only a small narrow-minded brainwashed minority though.
I thought most religions have after life and 70+ virgins? :lol:
The worst thing is when people do it for religious reasons, I'm pretty sure human race is evolved enough to not believe in supernatural and believe in itself.. but here we are, back to the f**king beginning, back to where people killed each other with rocks just because they didn't know anything else. If you think it's your time.. hang yourself, jump off a bridge, or just barry yourself so other people won't have to clean you up, you don't need to ruin other people's lives, what people do just to prove something is scary some times.
Lethal force should be the last thing people think about, but yet shootings and explosions everywhere, why can't we live in peace, why do innocent people have to die, day to day you hear on the news how someone shot a person just because he stepped on his lawn. People shouldn't have access to lethal weaponary.
If you can't control your temper not to kill someone you should be a threat to others and put in jail.. or there is a simpler solution; Don't let people have guns. I recently found out a secret browser that is being hunted by the FBI on which you can buy guns, slaves, explosions, HITMEN! FOR FREE! Some dude was going to kill for you.. for nothing..
Human kind disgusts me, why can't we act like we are INTELLIGENT LIFE , maybe that is the reason we can't communicate intergalacticaly, we are insane, we kill people for the lols! When did this become a thing, why are people born to do bad things, why can't someone realize that he would be a terrible parent and not have a child. I know it sounds harsh but if your dad was crazy and you're crazy your kid will be crazy.
200,000 years of evolution worth since the first intelligent human, 10 million years since we were apes, did humanity do a 180° turn? We don't need to fight, we aren't the enemy, nobody is the enemy, nature is the enemy, when we find aliens you can say they're the enemy, it seems like presidents and dictators start wars just because they have too many guns or people.
In some cases killing yourself was honorable, japanese soldiers were crashing their planes or doing the "kamikazi" maneuver by themselves, nobody told them to, they wanted to win WW2 because they respected their king, at that point their king was pronounced a God in Japan, a f**king GOD, what is this shit, that's why I'm an atheist, they killed themselves because they were promised after life, they were promised happiness, NOTHING OF THAT HAPPENED! It was just terrible people fighting even more terrible people. Why is human kind doing this, we were supposed to be the intelligent ones, not the ones who ruin the planet, our culture and ourselves.
Big but true story bro, I fail to see how an 'intelligent' human can be fooled into thinking they will get after life and even virgins(lol) if they kill themselves and others for a god, you'd have to be a pretty dumb human being.
-
It wouldn't be an Armageddon for those in Mecca it would be one for the whole world. Imagine 1.7 billion muslims angry at the destruction of their holiest city. The movie insulting the prophet caused all hell to break loose. Even in World War I the British and French didn't dare attack the Arabian Peninsula because they knew they would basically be declaring war on 1.7 billion people. Every last man, woman, and child would be wreaking havoc.
-
Even in World War I the British and French didn't dare attack the Arabian Peninsula because they knew they would basically be declaring war on 1.7 billion people.
No, it was because the Nazi's were the problem, not Muslims, and there weren't even 1.7 billion Muslims in the world during the time of WW1 and there still isn't now, theres around 1.6, not that it really matters.. You have to realise that there's 7 billion people in the world right now making Muslims not a small amount but still smaller amount compared to the 2 billion Christians, 1.1 billion (and growing rapidly) Atheist along with the countless other religions that fill up the rest of the 7 billion population, which means theres not really enough Muslims to cause an actual armageddon or any extreme problem, though I guess of course terrorism would rise, though I also guess most Muslims would just convert to another religion if their holy center was to be destroyed.
To be honest the fact that you state that if Islam's holy place were to be nuked there would be armageddon kind of shows how much of a problem religion really is, glad to be one of those 1.1 billion atheists.
-
Nazi's
WW1
are you sure
-
No, it was because the Nazi's were the problem, not Muslims, and there weren't even 1.7 billion Muslims in the world during the time of WW1 and there still isn't now, theres around 1.6, not that it really matters.. You have to realise that there's 7 billion people in the world right now making Muslims not a small amount but still smaller amount compared to the 2 billion Christians, 1.1 billion (and growing rapidly) Atheist along with the countless other religions that fill up the rest of the 7 billion population, which means theres not really enough Muslims to cause an actual armageddon or any extreme problem, though I guess of course terrorism would rise, though I also guess most Muslims would just convert to another religion if their holy center was to be destroyed.
To be honest the fact that you state that if Islam's holy place were to be nuked there would be armageddon kind of shows how much of a problem religion really is, glad to be one of those 1.1 billion atheists.
Tell me more about your calculations and numbers..
-
No, it was because the Nazi's were the problem, not Muslims, and there weren't even 1.7 billion Muslims in the world during the time of WW1 and there still isn't now, theres around 1.6, not that it really matters.. You have to realise that there's 7 billion people in the world right now making Muslims not a small amount but still smaller amount compared to the 2 billion Christians, 1.1 billion (and growing rapidly) Atheist along with the countless other religions that fill up the rest of the 7 billion population, which means theres not really enough Muslims to cause an actual armageddon or any extreme problem, though I guess of course terrorism would rise, though I also guess most Muslims would just convert to another religion if their holy center was to be destroyed.
To be honest the fact that you state that if Islam's holy place were to be nuked there would be armageddon kind of shows how much of a problem religion really is, glad to be one of those 1.1 billion atheists.
Are you okay? You want us to sit back and watch it and do nothing about it?
Also you know what's funny? You basically just said NUKING Mecca is totally fine, but us defending ourselves is chaos. Seriously Mikal. LOL... Let's nuke London and see your reaction.
-
are you sure
Yes, they just weren't called Nazi's yet.
Tell me more about your calculations and numbers..
1+1=2
Are you okay? You want us to sit back and watch it and do nothing about it?
Also you know what's funny? You basically just said NUKING Mecca is totally fine, but us defending ourselves is chaos. Seriously Mikal. LOL... Let's nuke London and see your reaction.
No I didn't say it was fine, I was just saying it wouldn't cause a problem for non-Islamic countries apart from the rise in terrorism which can be dealt with through stricter immigration controls and policing.
One cannot really nuke London due to the UK's advanced air defence technology along with the fact that your country doesn't have nukes.
-
Yes, they just weren't called Nazi's yet.
For the love of British education, I'm wondering what you were doing during your history class. You might want to read on "German Empire", "Nazi Party", and the difference between them too.
No I didn't say it was fine, I was just saying it wouldn't cause a problem for non-Islamic countries apart from the rise in terrorism which can be dealt with through stricter immigration controls and policing.
Let's add your Physics and Economics classes too. Do you seriously think the majority of the world will suffer problems that can be limited by mere immigration control if the holiest city of the second largest religion is nuked?
Air delivery is not the only way to nuke a city like London either. If I were a nuke-wielding terrorist, the last approach I would like to use when attacking a city is to send a nuke rocketing through the sky where everyone can see it coming for a long time.
But granting somebody was actually that stupid to pull it off, even if a warhead were intercepted in mid-air a few kilometers from London, it could still cause catastrophic damage.
-
For the love of British education, I'm wondering what you were doing during your history class. You might want to read on "German Empire", "Nazi Party", and the difference between them too.
I still call them Nazi..
Let's add your Physics and Economics classes too. Do you seriously think the majority of the world will suffer problems that can be limited by mere immigration control if the holiest city of the second largest religion is nuked?
Not the larger majority of the world, but any modernised countries with the slighest bit of brain can prevent terrorism.
Air delivery is not the only way to nuke a city like London either. If I were a nuke-wielding terrorist, the last approach I would like to use when attacking a city is to send a nuke rocketing through the sky where everyone can see it coming for a long time.
But granting somebody was actually that stupid to pull it off, even if a warhead were intercepted in mid-air a few kilometers from London, it could still cause catastrophic damage.
Right, so when you find a nuke that is small and light enough to fit into a terrorists back pack and be smuggled over many countries to get to it's final destination, let me know.
But granting somebody was actually that stupid to pull it off, even if a warhead were intercepted in mid-air a few kilometers from London, it could still cause catastrophic damage.
Look at Europe please, only 2 of it's countries in it have nuclear weapons and that is the UK and France, however most countries in Europe have anti-missile technology so even if Pakistan (the only Islamic country with nuclear weapons) were to launch a missile at Russia, the UK or any other country for that matter it would likely be shot down before it reaches anywhere near the edge of Europe or Russia, if not even while it's still inside Pakistan.
-
I was just saying it wouldn't cause a problem for non-Islamic countries
Last I checked there are Muslims all over the world. Do you reaaaaaaally want to piss those guys off?
Face it... whether you nuke Mecca, or I dunno.. the Vatican, or Jerusalem, there's going to be chaos.
-
Last I checked there are Muslims all over the world. Do you reaaaaaaally want to piss those guys off?
Face it... whether you nuke Mecca, or I dunno.. the Vatican, or Jerusalem, there's going to be chaos.
If a single nuke went off in a populated area, no matter which country or religion, there will be chaos. Fingers will be pointing at each other and tensions would be worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis.
-
Yes, they just weren't called Nazi's yet.
I still call them Nazi..
(http://i42.tinypic.com/10ye1pc.png)
Are you being real right now?
-
(http://i42.tinypic.com/10ye1pc.png)
Are you being real right now?
Yes, they were the start of what would become the Nazi's, and so I call them Nazi's regardless, if you have a better name please share.
-
Are you being real right now?
You can never tell with that guy...
If a single nuke went off in a populated area, no matter which country or religion, there will be chaos. Fingers will be pointing at each other and tensions would be worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Bingo.
-
I still call them Nazi..
Panda and I do not usually agree on some things, but right now I think both of us are wholly agreeing on something...
That aside, the Nazi party was one of many factions during the time of the Weimar republic. Just because they controlled Germany during WW2, that does not mean they were the same constituency or majority thereof in WW1.
Not the larger majority of the world, but any modernised countries with the slighest bit of brain can prevent terrorism.
Kindly explain what "slightest bit of brain" is and how exactly it can prevent the mixture of political / ideological discontent and violence into the root of terrorism.
Right, so when you find a nuke that is small and light enough to fit into a terrorists back pack and be smuggled over many countries to get to it's final destination, let me know.
Who said it has to be small as a backpack? With the prevalence of corruption in many customs' departments, things even as large as cars can be smuggled without so much of a proper thorough inspection if you had the right connections.
Look at Europe please, only 2 of it's countries in it have nuclear weapons and that is the UK and France, however most countries in Europe have anti-missile technology so even if Pakistan (the only Islamic country with nuclear weapons) were to launch a missile at Russia, the UK or any other country for that matter it would likely be shot down before it reaches anywhere near the edge of Europe or Russia, if not even while it's still inside Pakistan.
A terrorist organization with the right connections and tactics will obviously not use a nuke from a country that has none, but will procure/steal one from a country that has. Not to mention common sense will tell them not to launch it from thousands of kilometers away where it can be shot down by anyone, but to sneak it to a nearby and ideal launch point.
If you still do not get the message, then try and realize how professing in logic regarding things (physics, economics, politics) you actually know little about makes you look ridiculous.
-
Panda and I do not usually agree on some things, but right now I think both of us are wholly agreeing on something...
I think you'll find Panda isn't the only one.
That aside, the Nazi party was one of many factions during the time of the Weimar republic. Just because they controlled Germany during WW2, that does not mean they were the same constituency or majority thereof in WW1.
And yet I'll still call them Nazi's.. :rolleyes:
Kindly explain what "slightest bit of brain" is and how exactly it can prevent the mixture of political / ideological discontent and violence into the root of terrorism.
What I meant by that is, any organised, modernised country which actually has control of it's borders and government agencies can prevent terrorism from breaking out, as countries like the UK does today, just before the 2012 olympics there was a 4 man terror plot foiled in which they planned to attack the olympic events, this is what I mean by 'slightest bit of brain.'
Who said it has to be small as a backpack? With the prevalence of corruption in many customs' departments, things even as large as cars can be smuggled without so much of a proper thorough inspection if you had the right connections.
Well, do you know how big a nuke is? Cars yes, cars are not in the slightest bit suspicious unless you actually know what ones are linked to criminal activity or terror, I think if you tried to smuggle a nuke into any country 'with the slightest bit of brain' you'd have a bit of a problem, even with the right connections, customs staff don't work alone and so cannot assist you to smuggle a nuke in on their own, unless it's a country like some of those on the African continent or middle east..
A terrorist organization with the right connections and tactics will obviously not use a nuke from a country that has none, but will procure/steal one from a country that has. Not to mention common sense will tell them not to launch it from thousands of kilometers away where it can be shot down by anyone, but to sneak it to a nearby and ideal launch point.
Connections connections, no matter how many you have you'd have to be the fucking president to actually steal a nuke, real life isn't an episode of the A-Team, fuck me.
If you still do not get the message, then try and realize how professing in logic regarding things (physics, economics, politics) you actually know little about makes you look ridiculous.
Look who's talking. :app:
-
And yet I'll still call them Nazi's.. :rolleyes:
Would you like the regular aluminum tinfoil hat or the deluxe edition?
What I meant by that is, any organised, modernised country which actually has control of it's borders and government agencies can prevent terrorism from breaking out, as countries like the UK does today, just before the 2012 olympics there was a 4 man terror plot foiled in which they planned to attack the olympic events, this is what I mean by 'slightest bit of brain.'
You'll find that the real world is far more complex and socio-political conditions far more diverse than what you have seen in the UK.
Well, do you know how big a nuke is? Cars yes, cars are not in the slightest bit suspicious unless you actually know what ones are linked to criminal activity or terror, I think if you tried to smuggle a nuke into any country 'with the slightest bit of brain' you'd have a bit of a problem, even with the right connections, customs staff don't work alone and so cannot assist you to smuggle a nuke in on their own, unless it's a country like some of those on the African continent or middle east..
You have not travelled much outside of the UK, have you?
Look who's talking. :app:
Certainly not the guy who thinks Imperial Germany was run by the Nazis and that nuking Mecca will not cause problems for non-Islamic countries.
-
Would you like the regular aluminum tinfoil hat or the deluxe edition?
Aluminium!
You'll find that the real world is far more complex and socio-political conditions far more diverse than what you have seen in the UK.
Yes but we were talking about the UK originally.
You have not travelled much outside of the UK, have you?
Only to Ireland.
Certainly not the guy who thinks Imperial Germany was run by the Nazis and that nuking Mecca will not cause problems for non-Islamic countries.
I said I call them Nazi's regardless, wether they were or weren't that's just what I call them, how long will it take you to realise that?
-
I said I call them Nazi's regardless, wether they were or weren't that's just what I call them, how long will it take you to realise that?
When you realize that doing that is incredibly stupid, and that you're being prejudiced against an entire group of people with no affiliation to the NSDAP. You're basically stereotyping my entire nation and that is against the forum rules, because it could be considered a form of racism.
You idiot.
-
Panda and I do not usually agree on some things, but right now I think both of us are wholly agreeing on something...
It isn't even about agreeing, we're just stating historical facts.
Come on Mikal, I don't even need my 20th century history GCSE to know this shit.
I said I call them Nazi's regardless, wether they were or weren't that's just what I call them, how long will it take you to realise that?
But that's wrong.
-
I guess we can all agree that the first usage of the time machine shall be sending Mikal back to Nazi Germany.
-
It isn't even about agreeing, we're just stating historical facts.
Come on Mikal, I don't even need my 20th century history GCSE to know this shit.
But that's wrong.
I'm not saying what you're saying is what, I'm just saying I'll still call them Nazi's regardless, what they did had influence on the future of Nazi Germany.
I guess we can all agree that the first usage of the time machine shall be sending Mikal back to Nazi Germany.
Or before that so I can call their empire Nazi's. :)
-
I'm not saying what you're saying is what, I'm just saying I'll still call them Nazi's regardless, what they did had influence on the future of Nazi Germany.
So I guess you're a christian then.
I know you're not but I'll call you one anyway.
praise jesus
-
So I guess you're a christian then.
I know you're not but I'll call you one anyway.
praise jesus
Ok. :janek: