Yesterday Live: "Russia attacks Sweden" parody! (English subtitles) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkwgVCdRMUs#ws)Vg98E[/url]LOL
Swedish army is quality over quantity
No, it's bad. Really bad. Our Commander-in-Chief even said we will only make one week in a war. Even Norway got a bigger army then us...
LOL
Russia is mad becasue we mocked them in Melodifestivalen
LOL
Post Merge: March 03, 2013, 04:04:25 pm
Flashar lite
Sweden should turn to Lithuania for help. Maybe they can cut their single tank and give one half to Sweden as NATO military aid.
For a country that once ravaged Poland and Russia and resisted Peter the Great for 20 years in the North war, and had a couple of grand victory's against the Russian Empire in the beginning of the 1700's this sure does not come easily ..but they are definitely right about the NATO part, if that criminal organisation never existed I don't think anyone could hold down the Russians except maybe Americans,Chines and Brits(only because of its geographic predispositions as a island but I'm sure they would fall as well as they could in WW2 but they didn't thanks to bad tactics from the Germans, and their stupid and persistent use of Luftwaffe- airforce instead of Navy , but that's another story. )
If there would be no eastern front in ww2 britain would have fallen to the germansThe UK has invaded 90% of the worlds countries and hasn't been invaded itself since 1066 (by the French) in which case they also failed to invade successfully, so I highly doubt Nazi Germany would have ever successfully invaded, though Britain was made extremely weak in the WW's, the nazi's would have been forced to forget about the UK and move onto less-defended countries.
The UK has invaded 90% of the worlds countries and hasn't been invaded itself since 1066 (by the French) in which case they also failed to invade successfully, so I highly doubt Nazi Germany would have ever successfully invaded, though Britain was made extremely weak in the WW's, the nazi's would have been forced to forget about the UK and move onto less-defended countries.Given the allies of both sides at the time of invasion, Nazi Germany would have likely had successfully invaded the UK, but would have also faced a much larger war by doing so.
Given the allies of both sides at the time of invasion, Nazi Germany would have likely had successfully invaded the UK, but would have also faced a much larger war by doing so.No, they simply no longer had the man power to do such a thing. :poke:
The UK has invaded 90% of the worlds countries and hasn't been invaded itself since 1066 (by the French) in which case they also failed to invade successfully, so I highly doubt Nazi Germany would have ever successfully invaded, though Britain was made extremely weak in the WW's, the nazi's would have been forced to forget about the UK and move onto less-defended countries.
But remember Germany was not at war with just one country. Just look at the German techology, pretty much all modern technology that America and Russia uses comes from German technology after ww2. I do not like the Nazi ideology, but look away from that Germany was a mighty country during ww2Yeh Germany was a superpower during the WW's, thats how they managed to screw over so many countries all at once, with war comes technology advancements, it's a fact that most of the technology we see today wouldn't exist if it weren't for war, planes are a prime example of it, well planes would exist but we'd be behind on it's modern design.
Just look at the German techology, pretty much all modern technology that America and Russia uses comes from German technology after ww2.Still a lot of technology we use comes from Germany, guns, cars, phones etc. At least we are friends now :D
And to add, the USA isn't as close of an ally with the UK as everyone thinks, even Obama made that clear, if it were my choice, the USA would be going all it's wars alone.Obama was not President during World War I and II. ;)
Mikal, Hitler would have invaded Britain of course he would, if he didn't face the problem of all our allies that would have 'teamed' up against Germany to help us.I still doubt it. :)
Obama was not President during World War I and II. ;)I forgot to mention it was Bush's father who funded the nazi's into power. :roll:
I still doubt it. :)You doubt that a man who wanted to claim the whole world as Germany's would not have invaded if he had the chance.
You doubt that a man who wanted to claim the whole world as Germany's would not have invaded if he had the chance.Mass bombing from the skies would have been the best way in helping him invade, the UK had invented radar by the time of WW2 and were constantly scanning the skies, if they were going to invade successfully the UK not knowing about an incoming aerial attack would have been his best chance, and the UK mostly always knew when they were coming, though without Russia moving in on them, we'd be in the shit.
And ofcourse there are the famous moon landing, German scientists was behind that.They never mention other countries in the credits, like all the scientists from all over the world which also helped, but no, it was just the USA's landing.. :lol:
I forgot to mention it was Bush's father who funded the nazi's into power. :roll:A man who was also not President during the World Wars.
A man who was also not President during the World Wars.No, but was a politician, the father of the future president and a millionaire who was behind the nazi's gaining power as fast as they did. :roll:
No, but was a politician, the father of the future president and a millionaire who was behind the nazi's gaining power as fast as they did. :roll:Please link to your evidence of this information.
Please link to your evidence of this information.http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar)That says his grandfather, not his father.
That says his grandfather, not his father.Wow, I muddled them up, that makes a big difference...
The fact that Sweden is not a member of NATO makes it very voulnerable if, they by all means, would be attacked. Anyhow, if an attack would occur, they would be aided by the western world, without any doubt, including Norway. A Nordic cooperation would be a good idea I think, with Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark and Iceland.Cause of the oil reserves in the North Sea, Russia definitely doesn't give a fuck about Norway.
http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/artikkel.php?artid=10101036 (http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/artikkel.php?artid=10101036)
Seems like Russia has engaged a mass investment in millitary equipment in the north, on the border to Norway. Wonder why...