Yo

[jinjifliaktor]

That's the principle, yes. It doesn't always work out that way and sometimes we are too lenient or too harsh, that is the nature of humans working with humans. But generally speaking, that is the balance we aim to strike.

Excellent. For me it is perfectly clear, and I hope for others is. Thank you all for your time.

[9r2e5i3k]

The rule is "NO FLAMING". Why is it so hard to follow such a simple rule...

[Leon.]

Often this means the admins will need to take a smaller action earlier, to prevent a larger action becoming necessary later.

That's hot. New sig quote.

[jinjifliaktor]

The rule is "NO FLAMING". Why is it so hard to follow such a simple rule...

Nobody said it was difficult to follow the rules, read the topic again and then talk.

[Jubin]

The rule is "NO FLAMING". Why is it so hard to follow such a simple rule...

Because when playing a role of a person somewhat of a bad language is always part of the character and then there might be misunderstandings whether the saying is a part of the character or general insulting of the player behind the screen.

[Chris_Knight]

Cops are judging those flames same like admins,example when I'm driving car with cuffed mexican and he starts go all putos and stuff,I allways do agree with such attidute as I am aware people roleplaying and they are just trying have fun ingame comunity. But when it comes to fcking cop abusers go die and such rythm then obviously I offer my time contact administration and find solution to suspects attidute.

[9r2e5i3k]

Nobody said it was difficult to follow the rules, read the topic again and then talk.

Then what is the point of making topics for "clarification" of such simple rules?
Either you're too stupid to comprehend even such a simple rule, or you're trying to know exactly how far can you go with bending the rule. I do not see any other reasons for such topics.

[duffman]

The rule is "NO FLAMING". Why is it so hard to follow such a simple rule...

Talks the indian guy.
Sometimes i flame, but its like IRL... Its with no point, just because it droped' out of my mough 

[Que]

Then what is the point of making topics for "clarification" of such simple rules?
Either you're too stupid to comprehend even such a simple rule, or you're trying to know exactly how far can you go with bending the rule. I do not see any other reasons for such topics.

Kojak already gave one great reply regarding this. There's no point turning this into something personal between you two.

[Kojak]

Enough arguing. If anyone else has anything constructive to say on the subject they can, otherwise stay out of it.

[jinjifliaktor]

Then what is the point of making topics for "clarification" of such simple rules?
Either you're too stupid to comprehend even such a simple rule, or you're trying to know exactly how far can you go with bending the rule. I do not see any other reasons for such topics.

Okay, who the hell are you to tell me that I'm either  stupid, or want to see how far I can go?  There were some things that were not clear for me, so I made the topic. To see the opinions of others and particularly the views of the community leaders. Now do you understand why I made ​​the topic or should I explain you again?

[Kojak]

I said enough arguing, couldn't do that, so locked.