SA:MP - Server Rules

[Teddy]

Suspect & Citizens:
You aren't allowed to aid your friend if he is suspected, by just shooting officers as a civilian(This is Deathmatching) ????????

You are just confusing others by making these rules as they are not correct.

Actually the first one is entirely correct. See, you just learned something. I guess it was helpful. You are not allowed to aid your friend if you are not suspected by engaging police.

[Def Perry]

Actually the first one is entirely correct. See, you just learned something. I guess it was helpful. You are not allowed to aid your friend if you are not suspected by engaging police.

It is not if you are involved in the role play.

[AK47]

This;

In my opinion if this were to be stickied it would have to explain the rules in more detail/almost all of them

Should have been written by a CL or something, not someone that wants his post stickied.

[Kojak]

Tom, thank you for going to the effort of making this. It would be a good idea to have one thread that firstly detailed the server rules and then went on to add summaries from Developer's Answers.

The information you have provided here is okay for the most part, but there are some areas that are not quite right and as Leon said it needs more detail. If you would like to do a bit more work on this I would be happy for you to do so and if done properly we would use it as the official document.

So, if you're up for it what I would like you to do is write this out again in a text document; after each rule try to give a short example of that rule if appropriate. When it's done send me a forum PM letting me know and I'll receive the file from you, I will go through it and make some amendments and additions until it is fully comprehensive and correct and then send it back to you so you can post it in a new thread. I'll then add the Developer's Answers summaries as a reply and sticky it.

Take your time with it.

[Nathan]

Tom, thank you for going to the effort of making this. It would be a good idea to have one thread that firstly detailed the server rules and then went on to add summaries from Developer's Answers.

The information you have provided here is okay for the most part, but there are some areas that are not quite right and as Leon said it needs more detail. If you would like to do a bit more work on this I would be happy for you to do so and if done properly we would use it as the official document.

So, if you're up for it what I would like you to do is write this out again in a text document; after each rule try to give a short example of that rule if appropriate. When it's done send me a forum PM letting me know and I'll receive the file from you, I will go through it and make some amendments and additions until it is fully comprehensive and correct and then send it back to you so you can post it in a new thread. I'll then add the Developer's Answers summaries as a reply and sticky it.

Take your time with it.

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

[Aca]

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

I know who're you thinking off. 

Tom, you have a nice chance to get your topic stickied, well done, don't miss it! 

[Def Perry]

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

In fact, if the rules are written in a ''higher'' level of English, it would be hard for some players to understand the actual meaning of the rules. Kojak mentioned he'll go through it and make some amendments and additions, which would probably involve removing the grammatical errors.

[Drix]

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

Anyone who's willing to make a project helping the community take up  the "challenge" as i wouldn't call it this way.

[Vector]

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

What? Tome's English is well enough to understand i don't think that English skills should be Great to do this kind of work ? Who we are to criticize Tom?

[Marcel]

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

Why not let Tom write the rules plus explanations, then let someone else correct any grammar/spelling mistakes? Community effort

[Nathan]

In fact, if the rules are written in a ''higher'' level of English, it would be hard for some players to understand. Kojak mentioned he'll  go through it and make some amendments and additions, which would probably involve remove the grammatical errors.

I'm more stressing on the experience part.

And guys, who are we kidding, I'm not gonna do this. I want someone else to try. Not just one guy making all these topics to get more stickies.

[Omar Aly]

Can someone else, with more experience and better English skills, take up on this challenge?

Why the f*ck do you keep hating on anyone trying to do something good for the server or it's players, you think you're smart but actually your getting people who used to respect you to start to hate you, because you're hating on others 24/7 dunno if your hobby is hating on other people who spent much time and effort doing something a doubt you could even do, sorry but your attitude had been crap for the last few weeks, and I' saying that because I used to respect you in the past.



Good luck with that Tom, you can do it buddy!

[Gmail]

Omar.. it's because he doesn't even check why a word has red underlining.. or you know a free site like spell check..

[[Rstar]Paul]

I'm more stressing on the experience part.

And guys, who are we kidding, I'm not gonna do this. I want someone else to try. Not just one guy making all these topics to get more stickies.

Perhaps other people are interested to know what rules to follow, unlike you who's currently sitting in the unban request section.

Thanks for the superb effort, Tom.

[Caesar.]

This should be sticky, good job Tom!