Santos Liberal Party :: Agere Sequitur Credere

[Huntsman]

Guys, if you can't take criticism, then you shouldn't run a political party, stop trying to "keep this topic clean" or such. There is a clear disatisfaction with your policies here.
I, myself, saw one of your guys driving around in a towtruck and shouting that whoever who votes for SLP will get a free repair. That is obviously an act of bribery. So yeah, the claims against you are pretty justified.

After reading some of the response I can only come to a conclusion that all the votes were simply bought. I don't see how a sane person would possibly vote for a party that refuses to answer the questions of the voters and outright shits and slanders them in their own topic.

[Sawyer]

Emmett you can't get enough, can you? Give me a break, man.

Guys, if you can't take criticism, then you shouldn't run a political party, stop trying to "keep this topic clean" or such. There is a clear disatisfaction with your policies here.
I, myself, saw one of your guys driving around in a towtruck and shouting that whoever who votes for SLP will get a free repair. That is obviously an act of bribery. So yeah, the claims against you are pretty justified.

After reading some of the response I can only come to a conclusion that all the votes were simply bought. I don't see how a sane person would possibly vote for a party that refuses to answer the questions of the voters and outright shits and slanders them in their own topic.

I do not recall seeing you active the last week at all, yet, you still have an opinion about everything. Sickens me really.

On a side note, ALL questions will be answered once the process ends. Priorities.

[Whiteman]

After reading some of the response I can only come to a conclusion that all the votes were simply bought.

If you have ABSOLUTELY no idea about how we are running this party and how the votes were collected, please, do not spread bullshit. We've been roleplaying and collecting votes for several months now, organising events and meeting with organisations. Simply bought = 8 months of work?

I do not recall seeing you active the last week at all, yet, you still have an opinion about everything. Sickens me really.

On a side note, ALL questions will be answered once the process ends.

[AK47]

Emmett you can't get enough, can you? Give me a break, man.

He stated some things and I answered it since the Party itself doesn't seem to answer concerned citizens and waves it away instead.

[Sawyer]

He stated some things and I answered it since the Party itself doesn't seem to answer concerned citizens and waves it away instead.

Yes bro, have a nice day.

[AK47]

Yes bro, have a nice day.

Yet again this proves my point. Cheers, same m8.

[Mikal]

ALL questions will be answered once the process ends. Priorities.

So winning comes before your voters? I guess there actually must be something dodgy going on then.

Seriously if your party cannot answer a simple question how can they be trusted to run 1 city? Nevermind 3...

[Sawyer]

Action follows belief!

Mayoral Candidate Lawrence Dentico's Public Conference
Thank you for attending and sharing your voice and concerns at the end.

A special thanks to A.R.A, the F.B.I and L.S.P.D.

THANKS FOR ATTENDING!!

Santos Liberal Party - DILLIMORE FUNFAIR!

That was our plans/beliefs/actions/activity/influence. What was yours?

[Huntsman]

I was very well aware of the events you organised either way. That is not the point. The point is the way you respond to questions and doubts arisen in the topic. I can't understand how anyone sane could have voten for you when this is the way you treat your voters. Besides, you still did not completely answer to my statement:

I, myself, saw one of your guys driving around in a towtruck and shouting that whoever who votes for SLP will get a free repair. That is obviously an act of bribery. So yeah, the claims against you are pretty justified.

[Sawyer]

I was very well aware of the events you organised either way. That is not the point. The point is the way you respond to questions and doubts arisen in the topic. I can't understand how anyone sane could have voten for you when this is the way you treat your voters. Besides, you still did not completely answer to my statement:

Of course that's not the point, why could it be? For your information, most of the questions came up from people who switched sides or was from opposite party during THE LAST DAY of elections. We never said there will be no answers at all. We sacrificed plenty of hours which was bad enough already. Even if we had made a longass text, still, someone would have found something wrong in it and turning/translating it to something else only  to damage our reputation and completely waste our valuable time.

About the trucker guy, I have no clue what you are talking about. Talk to him personally, I guess. A trifle won't judge an entire party.

[Mikal]

It's obvious that the voting system is flawed. But it's understandable, since it's the first time it's being used. I think we need to have a serious discussion sometime about the next elections. One of the most obvious pointers is that residents have to live in a city for a long time before being allowed to vote for it, as was the main content of that other topic.

Perhaps a rule that says people need to have owned their house in said area for a certain amount of time before they can vote, say 3 months?

[Devin]

Seems people are trying to make arguments more personal than they need to be. Civilized debates or posts will be removed.

[Bruce.]

Perhaps a rule that says people need to have owned their house in said area for a certain amount of time before they can vote, say 3 months?

That might or will be one of the requirements on the future elections, and many many other things that in these elections were not.

ANYWAY This discussion seemed to be derailed so much I missed the whole point of the topic. You either stay in the topic and stop posting provocative and nonsense posts. Some posts will be cleaned up for the reason I just said above. Please do think twice before you post because it might get you in trouble.

[Salmonella]

That was our plans/beliefs/actions/activity/influence. What was yours?

Sure, nice events and all, but those are hardly the plans people were asking for. This hasn't been something that only started on the last day. Ever since we started our party we encouraged you to come up with real plans and proposals. Ours are all over the AIP topic, so I will refrain from quoting them.

That is really the the point people are trying to make, despite all the cool RP I'm sure you did, there is simply nothing on paper for a neutral voter to review. Voters were left in the blank apart from a few speeches.

This does not take away that there has been a lot of SLP activity ingame, we're just saying that there was nothing on paper/forum in terms of plans. despite advertising ''Joseph Hawk, a man with a plan''.

[Sawyer]

Sure, nice events and all, but those are hardly the plans people were asking for. This hasn't been something that only started on the last day. Ever since we started our party we encouraged you to come up with real plans and proposals. Ours are all over the AIP topic, so I will refrain from quoting them.

That is really the the point people are trying to make, despite all the cool RP I'm sure you did, there is simply nothing on paper for a neutral voter to review. Voters were left in the blank apart from a few speeches.

This does not take away that there has been a lot of SLP activity ingame, we're just saying that there was nothing on paper/forum in terms of plans. despite advertising ''Joseph Hawk, a man with a plan''.

I fully respect your point, "and all", but I fail to see where is the connection between a voter and AiP. On paper? That's why we differ.