Citizens against Election-Tourism

[Devin]

Because certain people supporting a certain party are buying houses in some areas so they can vote?

People are still restricted to only have the ability to vote in a single location even if they own multiple houses.

That's exactly what this topic is about. But it got derailed for some reason. We're just standing up against people buying property just to vote and then leaving it. We proposed that only people who have owned the property prior to the 1st of November be able to vote for that area so there's no "election-tourism", as people who recently moved in have no way to know what's best for the city.

For a change like that to happen mid-way through elections would be rather nit-picking at factors previously unforeseen that may be negatively affecting a party or parties.
It would also mean HQ need to spend time looking through logs for when every single person voting purchased a property thus wasting time unnecessarily which really should be a roleplay matter not staff matter.

[Teddy]

>person goes to vote
>brings proof of residence
>proof is a document of him owning property in said city/area
>document shows the date when the house was purchased...

It's not rocket science.

How do you know person is being honest? I can say I purchased my house 6 years ago. Doesn't make it true. You should know not everyone is honest in RP.

[eymas]

 

[Kostas]

There is no RP way to track down money. We can track money as managers sure, but that's not RP.

Can you bring back the topic where Mayors posted their apps please?

[AK47]

Do we even need to have elections then? Just put your fucking party as winners, Im out, this is ridicoulus

[TheGreasyChopper]

Yes Cofi, everyone sees you and your friends had the game rigged from the start and had this all planned. I couldn't give two fucks about this being set up. This topic was made to call for a change and disallow these things to happen. And I was not "nowhere" to let this happen. I'm just a citizen of Fort Carson who wishes for the best of the city. And I doubt San Fierro people would know what that is. So I propose a change in the election rules.

It would also mean HQ need to spend time looking through logs for when every single person voting purchased a property thus wasting time unnecessarily which really should be a roleplay matter not staff matter.

Just check the logs of today, see if they purchased it today or yesterday. If they did disallow them. Also, it's not "mid-way through elections", it's the first day.

[Teddy]

Can you bring back the topic where Mayors posted their apps please?

was just an RP excuse to counter people cheating. No actual verification was done because it's not possible. I see now you are all talking about pure RP verification. I am talking about script-supported in-game RP verification. Sure, go ahead and ask everyone to verify purely in RP when they purchased their house. Let me know how that works out for you.

* Teddy shows a document saying he purchased his house in 1921

[Sawyer]

For your information, Evergreen is a newly registered player who has been hanging around with us for quite some time now. We took him under our wing - helped him get the hang of the server, taught him everything regarding RP/IC/OOC, boosted him financially to get his own properties/vehicles so he can stay excited about the server and he is still getting better and better in both English and RP level.

Now can someone tell me what's wrong with the picture and why is everyone freaking out over nothing?

[Teddy]

So I propose a change in the election rules.

We will more than gladly consider them for the next elections. You can't propose rules for an election in progress.

[Antonio.]

And I doubt San Fierro people would know what that is.

The same "people of San Fierro" have been trying their best to bring action in San Fierro and make San Fierro alive for years now, while you started some project in Fort Carson just 1-2 months ago and think you can criticize someone. 

[Kostas]

was just an RP excuse to counter people cheating. No actual verification was done because it's not possible. I see now you are all talking about pure RP verification. I am talking about script-supported in-game RP verification. Sure, go ahead and ask everyone to verify purely in RP when they purchased their house. Let me know how that works out for you.

* Teddy shows a document saying he purchased his house in 1921

Oh come on... well get another RP excuse here, but this time fullfill it and dont lie about it.

[TheGreasyChopper]

The same "people of San Fierro" have been trying their best to bring action in San Fierro and make San Fierro alive for years now, while you started some project in Fort Carson just 1-2 months ago and think you can criticize someone. 

I'm not criticizing, I'm just saying you're not part of the Fort Carson community and haven't contributed to it in any way, therefore I don't think you should vote for the future of the city.


But anyway, hope you're comfortable in some people's pockets lmao

lock this, ain't going anywhere

[Cofiliano]

Yes Cofi, everyone sees you and your friends had the game rigged from the start and had this all planned. I couldn't give two fucks about this being set up. This topic was made to call for a change and disallow these things to happen. And I was not "nowhere" to let this happen. I'm just a citizen of Fort Carson who wishes for the best of the city. And I doubt San Fierro people would know what that is. So I propose a change in the election rules.

All I see is you moaning right now. No real argument that counters mine did you point out. You were no where to raise this questions once the elections rules were made.

Yes citizens of San Fierro doesn't wish the best for their city. That's why it turned from a ghost town with 3 houses, and 4 businesses, to a place where everyone wants a peace of it, and often it has more people and roleplay happening in it, then in LS.
San Fierro people doesn't wish the best for their city, they've worked hard for their city last 7 years.

But anyway, hope you're comfortable in some people's pockets lmao

Yes because we needed anyone's help to flawless win in San Fierro. With or without rival candidates.

This is the second reply in a row you're just throwing shit around.

[Teddy]

Oh come on... well get another RP excuse here, but this time fullfill it and dont lie about it.

Then tell me what the fuck you want me to do. There is seriously nothing I can do right now to verify people's property legitimately. I don't know how dumb you need to be to NOT understand this. I cannot say it any other way. If you expect people to be honest in RP you are deeply mistaken. This is the same group of players who have 5k of weed on them and when they get RP searched they say "oh I has wallet, cash, picture of my third cousin Alice, and a pack of faggots" and nothing about drugs. There is NO way to LEGITIMATELY in RP verify a property's date of purchase.

[TheGreasyChopper]

All I see is you moaning right now. No real argument that counters mine did you point out. You were no where to raise this questions once the elections rules were made.

Yes citizens of San Fierro doesn't wish the best for their city. That's why it turned from a ghost town with 3 houses, and 4 businesses, to a place where everyone wants a peace of it, and often it has more people and roleplay happening in it, then in LS.
San Fierro people doesn't wish the best for their city, they've worked hard for their city last 7 years.

Put your glasses on, I was talking about wishing the best for Fort Carson/Las Venturas.