Flaws with the elections

[AK47]

Then I suggest you re-read all my post in this topic, starting from the first one. Because everything you wrote is really opposite.

breeeeeee

[Dizzy.]

Soprano did. But, what about others?

Soprano worked hard, others they have to do some effort to success.

[Bruce.]

Soprano did. But, what about others?

A party has way more people then soprano, cmon man... It's easy to make 1m in 3 months if you have minimum 30 people supporting your party...

[MrTony]

Also, speaking of the 1 million requirement, I'd rather see 20 parties in Argonath trying to run for elections (which will create heavy roleplaying opportunities for very many and obvious reasons) than have 2. It will also be an automatic way to regulate votes and not have an outpour of them going in one thing.

[Mikal]

Also, speaking of the 1 million requirement, I'd rather see 20 parties in Argonath trying to run for elections (which will create heavy roleplaying opportunities for very many and obvious reasons) than have 2. It will also be an automatic way to regulate votes and not have an outpour of them going in one thing.

Yes! Players should be elected because of their policies and RP, the 1 million dollar rule kind of ruins that.

[Sawyer]

Yes 3 months are not bad, too.

You're right. But one correcton: Minimum once per six months is more then enough.

You don't have your own opinion, do you mate? 

[Teddy]

In the discussion of length, we will throw it to vote between 3, 4 and 6 months. It's a choice that both sides of the table have provided arguments and I honestly cannot decide myself.

Is there any suggestions for elections themselves? Candidacy rules, voter rules, etc. Don't get pissed off at me and call me corrupt if you miss this chance... again.. to make suggestions.