Ammunation Vice Point (North Point Mall) vs [EAF]Nylez

[Nylez]

Court of Argonath Vice City,

I am [EAF]Nylez, trucker, EAF member and co-owner of Ocean Beach Ammunation.

Today a well affiliated man of North Point Mall, named Reaper, destroyed stock worth of $100,000 while I was being stopped for a routine check by FBI Chief Marco_White and FBI Agent Rapture. There has also been made a fine of $10,000 for delivery costs.
Along with the stock was also a Yankee from the Vice City Port Authority destroyed, which obviously had to be replaced. This costed $65,000 as that's the price Sunshine Autos sells it for, including delivery costs of course. As the stock, ordered by [EAF]Sean didn't reach his Ammunation, a lot of profit was also lost. This profit was budgeted to $100,000.

My request is that the NPM Ammunation owner will compensate OB Ammunation and VCPA for the costs made as a result for the done deed.

As a summary:
NPM Ammunation owes $210,000 to [EAF]Sean and his Ammunation
NPM Ammunation owes $65,000 to Vice City Port Authority, to Truck Driver [EAF]Nylez in particular. He was the one being held responsible for the destroying of the truck.

Evidence:
[EAF]Sean ordering the stock


[EAF]Nylez taking the delivery from [EAF]Sean


Evidence of the stock being destroyed and Reaper being the one doing it.




Thank you in advance.

Signed,

[EAF]Nylez

[stormeus]

I'll be presiding over this case. Has the defendant been informed of the case against him? Also, I'm assuming that the claimed damages of $210,000 ARD to Sean's business is a typo as the evidence submitted indicates damages of $110,000 ARD instead ($100,000 for the shipment + $10,000 in fees).

As far as legal standing goes, I need a statement from Sean authorizing you to act as his legal representative for this case, as he is the one directly damaged by this incident. Your personal damages would be limited to any compensation you would've directly lost from being unable to deliver the stock — in this case the $10,000 in fees.

Lastly, if the Vice City Port Authority themselves would like to sue for the cost of the replacement vehicle, that's their choice, though I fail to see how you're directly affected by it. Moreover, since the VCPA is an autonomous government agency, it's highly unlikely that they'd be able to sue in the first place.

To summarize, these are the damages I'm considering for this case:

• $100,000 to Sean for the value of the stock that was destroyed (pending Sean's authorization)
• $10,000 to Nylez for lost compensation from fees

I'll be awaiting a response from the defendant. I'm also summoning Marco White and Rapture to testify as witnesses to this case.

Stormeus
Chief Justice for the State of Florida

[stormeus]

The summons for Marco and Rapture to testify has been delivered and is hereby being entered into the public record.



Stormeus
Chief Justice for the State of Florida

[Marcell]

Hello, this is North Point Mall Ammu-Nation management.
We are very sorry for your loss, but our employee's actions have nothing to do with it. In fact, according to our information, he was shot down by FBI agents shortly after his assault. Formalities wise, the man has been fired (even though he's dead) and is in no way associated with our business. He was replaced by a more competent employee.
In fact, we even grabbed a shot from Printworks CCTV cameras:

Sincerely,
North Point Ammunation Management

[Nylez]

As the employee in question was acting on behalf of your Ammunation I have every right to blame you for the deeds he has done.
In the business world it's common sense that once an employee is hired, management of the business in particular is responsible for any action of this employee.

Signed,

[EAF]Nylez

[Dance]

Hello, [EAF]Sean here. Nylez being co-owner of Ocean Beach Ammunation, and my family member, will speak on my behalf as a lawyer.

Signed,

[EAF]Sean

[Marcell]

will speak on my behalf as a lawyer.

Mr. Nylez is not a registered lawyer.

[Marco]

   To the Honorable Court Hall of Vice City,


   I, Marco White, hereby present my statement as an answer to the summons received.
   
   Me, as acting FBI Director, and Agent Rapture were conducting a traffic stop on a cargo truck near the bridge between Vice Port and Washington/Ocean Beach. During that stop, a civilian wearing a police uniform (which later was found out to be a disguise) appeared bearing a M60 machine-gun and shot the truck until it exploded. He was suspected on sight and a chase ensued, ending at the Print Works factory in Little Haiti, where he opened fire against us and ended up killed.

   Should there be any doubts to be cleared regarding this statement, I'd be glad to do so. Thank you for your time.

[Rapture]

Honorable judge,

I'm here on behalf of the witness summon that was delivered to me, and I'm here to testify as an eyewitness.
I, Rapture, was with Marco White at the precise time this event took place. While pulling over a truck driver for a routine check, he gave us an invoice about this delivery that took place to Ocean Beach Ammunation. The Vice Port Authority employee in question; Mr. Nylez; also did have crates of weaponry in the back.

The event that the court is interested in; destruction of stock contained within the truck was indeed destroyed by a civilian arriving in a motorbike and blowing up the aforementioned truck with an M60 machine gun. Afterwards, the civilian ran away with said motorbike and the FBI was involved in a chase until it came to a stop at Haiti Print Works. The civilian opened fire on us and we were engaged in a firefight, where it came to an end where Marco White neutralized the man.

By his belongings, he had a counterfeit VCPD uniform & credentials.

[stormeus]

Nylez is not registered as a lawyer for the state, which only means that he isn't required to represent people who can't afford private lawyers. Private lawyers and self-representation is still allowed in this courtroom. I will ask the plaintiff to provide some form of evidence to directly show Reaper's involvement in the operation of the NPM Ammunation.

The court also recognizes the testimony of the witnesses summoned.

Stormeus
Chief Justice

[Nylez]

Respected Judge,

could you ellaborate on the required evidence you need?
Defendant Reaper has already stated to be the owner of the business I am suing and has admitted that the attacker of the VCPA Yankee was an employee of his company.

Some more details on the required evidence are necessary.
My apologies for the inconvenience.

Signed,

[EAF]Nylez

[Marcell]

Defendant Reaper has already stated to be the owner of the business

Sir, that man has nothing to do with our store - you're free to go and check yourself who's the current employee/owner, it's legal information available for everyone (/place).

Signed,
NPM Ammu-Nation Management

[Nylez]

 So you lied in court about owning the Ammunation?

Let me quote the statement you made:

Hello, this is North Point Mall Ammu-Nation management.

Selling your business and make one of your associates the owner will not change anything, you were still the owner at the moment the incident took place.
Just to clarify you have owned it:

[Marcell]

That reference doesn't show any date when it took place. You are suing the store and so I am answering as 'business' itself and not a person, the person you're blaming is well, dead, which doesn't really make it valid.

[Nylez]

You were answering as Management of the Ammunation, proving you are an individual, representing the North Point Mall Ammunation. The fact that you first claim to be part of Management and then claim that "Reaper" has no business with the Ammunation in particular?



The picture above shows the employee in particular shout : "no stock for you!!"
This clearly shows that the employee has planned the attack all along, as he knew exactly which truck with which driver he had to attack to make sure Ocean Beach Ammunation would not get their delivery.

I'll let the respected Judge handle this further.

Signed,

[EAF]Nylez