No botting, unattended automation, or complex keybinds

[Salmonella]

People like at least getting the feeling their report's being looked into. Without hearing something, it feels like it's ignored, especially if 0 consequences appear to be connected to the report from the reporter's perspective. This thing where the follow-up isn't shown to the reporter, is where the ''reporting to the email never works'' stereotype stems from.

I get the logistics problem, though. Especially since an unsatisfactory result will probably lead to more discussion between reporter and HQ, and a lot of the reports probably aren't that important from HQ's perspective.

[TrotlDebilni]

We are in a topic discussing how human interaction is important, the automated email you receive from "gandalf" when contacting the HQ via email just explaining the damn rules again is just plain silly.
I understand 300 reports is a fuckton and responding to each individual one would take time, that's why I said a "ok" would suffice, all we care about is our voice being heard, yelling into a cave without a response gets tiring after a while.

Although responding to it with you actual name might give players incentive to bother you about it. I get it, I just hope you see it from our perspective too.

[Pizza4_Games]

Your report was also resolved within a week, just because you heard nothing about it does not mean nothing happened with it.
[/quote]And the result is?

[Devin]

And the result is?

The result remains within the staff team. The report was handled as we deem necessary.