Fair Warning

[AK47]

Yeah, I've read lots of topics like this over the years that I've been here and there's really no point as both Richard and Jov mentioned. Start enforcing it instead of empty "threats" on the forum.

[Salmonella]

The issue you call simple has been going on for years, including admins & managers being part of these type of situations. It has never been an issue before until tables were turned and started backfiring on these individuals.
Again, I don't see this going no where. Specially when you personally have told me that you warned us & other groups who were doing the specific mentioned "issues" and if they're repeated, we shall get banned. Guess what? People been doing this over and over, nobody gives a shit what you or the other HQ members say by the looks of it as you guys have been away from the scene for so long and once you decided to step in, you told another admin to make the topic instead of delivering the message as the server management yourself.

Real issue here isn't Corleone, Gvardia, Soprano or Luciano.
"Wars" is what you call issue, even though they keep the server alive.
Do you even recall the last time Argonath got a new player? They don't even get past the registering stage before getting banned for silly reason full of disrespect like "bye" "fuck off", even though they are innocent.
It will be a better start and step if you guys could actually put some effort & time into gathering proofs and having collective decisions over groups and scripts, instead of these boring topics that never get any results.

This pretty much sums it up in two paragraphs.

Too bad it's being ignored by those handing out ''fair warnings''.

[jovanca]

This pretty much sums it up in two paragraphs.

Too bad it's being ignored by those handing out ''fair warnings''.

This thread was meant to be a warning that the staff will be stricter when enforcing rules, not to discuss the 'issues' server does or does not have.

[Salmonella]

This thread was meant to be a warning that the staff will be stricter when enforcing rules, not to discuss the 'issues' server does or does not have.

Yes, and letters are there to be read, not to be purposely overlooked or ignored for the sake of ''topic = warning u cannot post things about the underlying reasons for it''

[jovanca]

Yes, and letters are there to be read, not to be purposely overlooked or ignored for the sake of ''topic = warning u cannot post things about the underlying reasons for it''

Discussing what went wrong will only lead to shit storm just like it did every time in past. No need to let that happen here again and it is off topic anyway

[Jeremy.]

Discussing what went wrong will only lead to shit storm just like it did every time in past. No need to let that happen here again and it is off topic anyway

Watch for it dude, you might get shot in legs.

[Charlie!]

Watch for it dude, you might get shot in legs.

"/me shoots Jeremy's legs"
 

[Bruce.]

Watch for it dude, you might get shot in legs.

[Pete]

I don't think this is the place where you should post your provocations, or any other place, no one needs to watch your shit.

[MarceloS.]

"/me shoots Jeremy's legs"
 

Do you know what does /me stand for ? if it was Jovanca or Jeremy, I wouldnt say anything, both of them know how to RP, but you, didnt expect that

[Hidduh]

[Salmonella]

Discussing what went wrong will only lead to shit storm just like it did every time in past. No need to let that happen here again and it is off topic anyway

Well, no. That's up to the people posting. Just because it has in the past doesn't mean it has to happen again, but

Watch for it dude, you might get shot in legs.

"/me shoots Jeremy's legs"
 

when people start posting things like this to try and vent their hatred for Dennis in this topic, then yes, it does get derailed.

It's ironic that one of you points out that it will be a shitstorm with off-topic hatred and shit and then the other actually starts it.

Almost like you both wanted it to get derailed into a shitstorm.

[Hevar.]

lol they expect us to dicuss the problem in this topic when we cant have speech of freedom, and posts keep getting removed haha

[jovanca]

Well, no. That's up to the people posting. Just because it has in the past doesn't mean it has to happen again, but

when people start posting things like this to try and vent their hatred for Dennis in this topic, then yes, it does get derailed.

It's ironic that one of you points out that it will be a shitstorm with off-topic hatred and shit and then the other actually starts it.

Almost like you both wanted it to get derailed into a shitstorm.

I can not control what others will or will not post. If you want to discuss the issues samp has just start the topic and trust me i willl be the first one to reply, but this is not the place.

[Jeremy.]

Well, no. That's up to the people posting. Just because it has in the past doesn't mean it has to happen again, but

when people start posting things like this to try and vent their hatred for Dennis in this topic, then yes, it does get derailed.

It's ironic that one of you points out that it will be a shitstorm with off-topic hatred and shit and then the other actually starts it.

Almost like you both wanted it to get derailed into a shitstorm.

Well I'm sorry for you and your friend but one guy doesn't get banned twice using the same /me. Firstly when he recorded himself aimbotting *me shots cofis in the lef* and now once more, after numerous warnings from staff members to stop supporting DM scenarios. I show 0 respect for hackers and rulebreakers, so hence again. Sorry.

Regarding this topic, derailing it with nosense is pointless. Follow the server rules and play for fun, not 2win. It's glad to see this rule being applied and this is actually the way to the right path.