United States of Argonath vs. Andrew Aky

[Kowalski.]

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Vice City - Miami Division

CASE NO 2412201320

UNITED STATES OF ARGONATH VS. ANDREW AKY

I. Introduction

Greetings to the United States Supreme Court,

On April 10th of 2020, an initial investigation against VCPD Chief Andrew Aky, based on suspected criminal operation, was initiated. Undercover and marked agents have kept this individual under surveillance for quite some time now and have looked further into the defendant's activities to determine the legitimacy of our suspicions.

Unfortunately, in the process of our investigation, we found our suspicions to be valid. With that, the United States of Argonath is now prosecuting this individual for several crimes against the Constitution of the State of Vice and its bylaws.

II. Case Breakdown

First of all, the Bureau has collected several instances of intelligence demonstrating crime committed by the Chief of Police. The initial crimes Mr. Aky was investigated for by the FBI were murder charges, however, due to a lack of evidence, no charges were laid.

However, knowing that Chief Aky was committing criminal acts, a task force was formed and investigated Mr. Aky for different crimes as well as corruption. The FBI continued to track the defendant, and successfully collected evidence proving the alleged breaches of the law.

On the 11th of November, Chief Aky committed an act of obstruction of justice, preventing a federal agent from going on duty by barricading his vehicle using police barriers, blatantly disregarding any protocol in regards to their use. Through his recklessness and blatant misuse of standard police equipment, an FBI Special Agent was prevented from being able to exit the local police precinct and perform his duties [1].

Chief of Police Andrew Aky was once again sighted by the very same FBI Special Agent misusing police barriers by placing them around another Officer and then shooting at them, completely disregarding any risk of harm to the Officer. Mr. Aky was now misusing three different issues of police equipment - roadblock barriers, his duty pistol, and his duty shotgun. This was a serious occurrence and the officer was lucky not to have been accidentally shot by the Chief in his act of public endangerment, as well as having broken the law by brandishing and firing his weapon without lawful purpose and abusing his power as a senior law enforcement official.

Chief Aky then proceeded to start driving recklessly around various districts, showing a complete disregard for anybody's safety, including his own. His actions resulted in a head-on collision with another civilian, destroying their vehicle, yet Chief Aky seemed to show no remorse for the destruction of private property that he was responsible for, nor did he even try and see if the other driver was alright. Despite this, the Chief then decided to start driving in the oncoming traffic lane, deliberately near-missing the federal agent several times, for which he described the purpose as "training". Based on the Chief's willingness to break the law and endanger everyone more than necessary during a so-called police training, as well as the methods used in a totally uncontrolled public environment prove beyond any possible doubt that Mr. Aky does not care about the fact that he is breaking the law, shows no remorse whatsoever, nor any recognition or understanding of the impact his actions are having on citizens and law enforcers within the state [2].

Chief Aky was also caught using prohibited drugs while off-duty by FBI Director Klaus. The drugs were identified as cocaine, which is prohibited by law as it is categorized as a controlled substance. Mr. Aky's use of prohibited drugs while off-duty show that he has no remorse for his acts against the law, and the fact he was willing to do it in front of an on-duty federal agent also further proves his incompetence and lack of any common sense whatsoever as a Chief of Police of the Vice City Police Department, based on his recklessness and tolerability for breaking the law, which further proves corruption in public office. [3]

Officer Andrew Davidson once again caught Chief Aky, this time committing manslaughter due to his reckless actions. Despite the woman standing on the scooter, Mr. Aky insisted on driving it regardless of the risk, which ultimately led to the woman's death, caused by a hard fall from the scooter. Had he not knowingly made such a stupid decision regardless of the risks which he was well aware of, the woman may still have been alive today, which was her right to not be deprived of life as per the constitution. This right was taken away from her by the defendant whose actions caused her death through his idiocy and his clear inability to think before acting. The recklessness and disregard for his own and others' safety only serve to further prove our allegations of corruption and public endangerment against the defendant. After the manslaughter was committed, the off-duty police chief was apprehended by Officer Davidson swiftly and placed into detainment awaiting trial [4].

VCPD Chief Andrew Aky also publicly admitted over the police radio that he was guilty of Grand Theft Auto, stealing a blue Banshee, later identified to be the property of FBI Agent Goura Mohamed. Chief Aky makes it clear on duty that nobody saw him steal the vehicle and therefore nobody has any evidence against him, as well as blindly identifying the owner of the vehicle he stole, which proves that he stole the vehicle, despite not showing the occurrence itself. This again shows a lack of remorse and acknowledgement of the crime he committed as well as the impact it could have had on the FBI Agent who owns the vehicle, being unable to commute throughout the city, which is an integral part of his job. However, regardless of all that, Chief Aky simply took the vehicle and broke the law once again, showing another demonstration of the Chief's corruption as an officer of the law as well as his total disregard of the law [5].

Officer Luca Cottonfield also gathered evidence against the Chief as part of the task force. The evidence shows counts of sexual discrimination, destruction of private property, conspiracy to commit aggravated assault and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Mr. Aky proceeded to stop a woman piloting a helicopter and began to sexually harass her. He made remarks that she couldn't fly properly because she was a woman, where he says "you are a woman, I mean you put the world in a great danger by piloting this", as well as other continuous sexually discriminatory references. Again through his complete disregard for anyone's safety, he lit up a cigar and tossed it by the helicopter, which then exploded as a result due to leaking petrol. The chief clearly states that he doesn't believe anything can go wrong and does it anyway despite Officer Luca Cottonfield's warnings. He continues to make sexual references, such as how he seemingly masturbates all day, which we quote "I crack my cock all day, fapping it hard", to which the woman replies that nobody needs to hear that. Chief Aky then proceeded to state that he wishes to murder anyone who says that, plotting and desiring to kill anybody who says such a thing. Chief Aky blatantly commits conspiracy to commit first-degree murder by threatening that he wishes to kill anyone who says what the woman said to him. The cigar that Aky dropped then ignited droplets of leaking petrol which then caused the helicopter explosion. Aky then orders over the radio to launch a napalm strike, which falls under conspiracy to commit aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as he attempted and encouraged to do so through his orders to his subordinates. However, luckily the VCPD have no access to napalm, and the officers on-scene disregarded anything Aky said, knowing he was breaking the law. This proves further beyond any possible belief that VCPD Chief Andrew Aky is an incompetent criminal holding a leadership position he is totally unworthy of [6].

Based on the evidence provided for the corresponding charges, Special Agent Kowalski requested a warrant for Chief Aky's arrest from the FBI High Command which was granted by Director Klaus [7]. Special Agent Kowalski then proceeded to make the arrest with Director Klaus and Senior Officer Andrew Davidson. Once at FBI HQ in Ocean Beach, Special Agent Kowalski proceeded to interrogate Chief Aky. During the interrogation, Mr. Aky claimed to not remember anything and tended to avoid answering any questions or answering to any of the charges. Ultimately, the interrogation was concluded with the Chief released pending trial [8].

III. Intelligence Dissemination and Case Evidence

Obstruction of Justice [1]:

Spoiler for Special Agent Kowalski 2020:

https://imgur.com/a/jLBN3TI

Public Endangerment [2]:

Spoiler for Special Agent Kowalski 2020:

https://imgur.com/a/UbWiqWD

Use of prohibited drugs (cocaine) [3]:

Spoiler for Director Klaus Meine 2020:

Manslaughter [4]:

Spoiler for Senior Officer Andrew Davidson 2020:

https://imgur.com/a/wH4OKgA

Grand Theft Auto [5]:

Spoiler for Officer Luca Cottonfield 2020:

https://imgur.com/a/URRkrph

Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault, Conspiracy to commit First Degree Murder, Sexual Harassment and Destruction of Private Property [6]:

Spoiler for Officer Luca Cottonfield + Senior Officer Andrew Davidson 2020:

https://imgur.com/a/jZ3kQax

Spoiler for Conspiracy to commit First Degree Murder:

Spoiler for Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault:

Spoiler for Sexual Harassment:

Spoiler for Destruction of Private Property:

Arrest Warrant - Special Agent Kowalski [7]:

Spoiler for Arrest Warrant - FBI Director Klaus 2020:

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division

U.S. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FEDERAL ARREST WARRANT

Date of File: 20th December 2020. Agent filing the warrant: Special Agent Kowalski

Subject of the warrant: VCPD Chief of Police Andrew Aky Warrant type: Interrogation and Arrest. Charges: Conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Manslaughter. Conspiracy to commit aggravated assault. Grand Theft Auto. Use of prohibited drugs (cocaine). Sexual harassment. Destruction of private property - 2 counts. Public Endangerment - 4 counts. Obstruction of Justice.

Evidence: Spoiler for Conspiracy to commit First Degree Murder: Spoiler for Manslaughter: https://imgur.com/a/wH4OKgA Spoiler for Grand Theft Auto: https://imgur.com/a/URRkrph Spoiler for Use of Cocaine: Spoiler for Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault + Sexual Harassment + Destruction of Private Property Count 1: https://imgur.com/a/jZ3kQax Spoiler for Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault: Spoiler for Sexual Harassment: Spoiler for Destruction of Private Property Count 1: Spoiler for Public Endangerment + Destruction of Private Property Count 2: https://imgur.com/a/UbWiqWD Spoiler for Destruction of Private Property Count 2: Spoiler for Obstruction of Justice: https://imgur.com/a/jLBN3TI Witnesses: Director Klaus Meine - FBI Senior Officer Andrew Davidson - VCPD Officer Luca Cottonfield - VCPD Ghiless - Civilian.

Signed,
Special Agent Kowalski - Miami Division
U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Approved.

Interrogation [8]:

Spoiler for Special Agent Kowalski + Director Klaus + Senior Officer Andrew Davidson 2020:

https://imgur.com/a/3cBWISA

IV. Charges and Demands

The United States of Argonath, represented by the Federal Bureau of Investigation disseminates the following charges and monetary penalties demanded:

1.) One (1) count of Obstruction of Justice // $45,000 ARD

2.) Four (4) counts of Public Endangerment // $26,800 ARD

3.) One (1) count of Use of Prohibited Drugs // $15,000 ARD

4.) One (1) count of Manslaughter // $75,000 ARD

5.) One (1) count of Grand Theft Auto // $25,000 ARD

6.) One (1) count of Conspiracy to commit First Degree Murder // $25,000 ARD

7.) One (1) count of Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault // $25,000 ARD

8.) Two (2) counts of Destruction of Private Property // $45,000 ARD

9.) One (1) count of Sexual Harassment // $35,000 ARD

Based on the gravity of the above crimes as well as Chief of Police Andrew Aky's position in public office, we demand a total monetary penalty of $316,800 ARD for the crimes committed against the state. We demand that should the defendant be unable to pay the amount, that his assets be liquidized and sold to pay the penalty. The state also demands that the defendant be issued the following prison sentencing:

1.) One count of Obstruction of Justice - as per the case by the United States of Argonath against [VU_T]EazY, we demand 5 years (5 minutes) of imprisonment.
2.) Four counts of Public Endangerment - we demand 10 years (10 minutes) of imprisonment.
3.) One count of Use of Prohibited Drugs - we demand 6 months (30 seconds) of imprisonment.
4.) One count of Manslaughter - we demand 10 years (10 minutes) of imprisonment.
5.) One count of Grand Theft Auto - we demand 1 year (1 minute) of imprisonment.
6.) One count of Conspiracy to commit First Degree Murder - as per the case by the United States of Argonath against the Escotta Family, we demand 20 years (20 minutes) of imprisonment.
7.) One count of Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault - as per the case by the United States of Argonath against the Escotta Family, we demand 20 years (20 minutes) of imprisonment.
8.) Two counts of Destruction of Private Property - we demand 5 years (5 minutes) of imprisonment.
9.) One count of Sexual Harassment - we demand 4 years (4 minutes) of imprisonment.

We hereby demand an accumulated total of 75 years and 6 months (75 minutes and 30 seconds) of imprisonment for the breaches of the State's Constitution.

V. Charges Index and Further Justification

1.) Obstruction of Justice:

    Act VIII
    Anyone who causes, by their presence or by disrupting the tasks of law enforcement personnel, is
    to be charged with obstruction of justice. Anyone refusing to cooperate with law enforcement
    personnel with reasonable cause to act can be charged with obstruction of justice as well.

Basis for demands: United States of Argonath vs. [VU_T]EazY

2.) Public Endangerment:

    Act I
    Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,
    assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health.

Basis for demands: United States of Argonath vs. Kool Kat
United States of Argonath vs. The Escotta Family

Justification of Requested Penalty: Per the Kool Kat case, Andrew Aky has committed three counts. Per the penalty requested by former Chief of Police Daniel Lold, this demand has been multiplied by three for the three counts of public endangerment with a vehicle. As per the first count where Chief Aky has fired his weapon at an officer, we reference the Escotta case in which the United States demanded a monetary penalty of $50,000 ARD from Luis Escotta for the attempted murder of a law enforcement official. In this instance, the first count of public endangerment placed the officer at the same risk. Due to a lack of murderous intent, we divided the penalty issued to Luis Escotta by two, resulting in a total of $25,000 ARD for the first count, added to the other three vehicular counts of public endangerment which standalone are a total of $1,800 ARD. However, due to the negligence, intent and stupidity behind the crimes, we demand the same ten-year imprisonment given to Luis Escotta.

3.) Use of Prohibited Drugs:

    Act II
    Production, use, sale, distribution, and/or possession of any controlled substance is unlawful and prohibited.

Basis for demands: United States of Argonath vs. Kool Kat

Justification of Requested Penalty: Per the Kool Kat case, the defendant was issued a penalty of $30,000 ARD for two counts of possession of narcotics. As we are unable to prove the cocaine that Chief Aky used was actually his, and that he was in possession of it personally as the property was not his, we divide this penalty by two and request $15,000 ARD for one count of narcotics use per the same ordinance for possession and use of narcotics under the constitution stated above. We believe that six months is also a warranted amount of time of imprisonment for this count standalone.

4.) Manslaughter:

    Act I
    Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,
    assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health.

Basis for demands: United States of Argonath vs. The Leone Family

Justification of Requested Penalty: Per the Leone case, Salvatore Leone was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment for murder. Chief Aky's actions had the same result on the victim, resulting in her death, despite the differentiating circumstances. However, as there is a lack of premeditated murderous intent and because none of the other charges pressed against Salvatore Leone apply to Andrew Aky in any way, we have removed five years from the demand and therefore request ten years of imprisonment. With the same reasoning, we have also removed $25,000 ARD from the Salvatore Leone penalty of $100,000 and therefore request a monetary penalty of $75,000 ARD from Andrew Aky.

5.) Grand Theft Auto:

    Act I
    Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,
    assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health.

Justification of Requested Penalty: Chief Aky has admitted to stealing a federal agent's vehicle while on duty as the VCPD Chief of Police in front of his subordinates. Our demands were decided upon review of his severe police misconduct and vehemently defying the expectations of him as a Chief of Police to serve and protect, as well as the two officers who witnessed and recorded the incident. His theft could have prevented a federal agent from being able to do his job, and yet Chief Aky was willing to blatantly admit to it and even identify the federal agent who owns the vehicle - Agent Goura Mohamed. His outright admission to the crime itself as well as the blatancy of his claims over the police radio shows a total lack of remorse or even any acknowledgement of the incident.

6.) Conspiracy to commit First Degree Murder:

    Act VI
    Anyone taking part in an offense is guilty of that offense. Anyone encouraging, helping to prepare or
    to commit that offense is guilty of that offense.

    Act IV
    Threats or plotting a criminal act, or encouraging a criminal act is a crime.

Basis for demands: United States of Argonath vs. The Escotta Family

Justification of Requested Penalty: In the Escotta Family case, the United States demanded a monetary penalty of $50,000 ARD from Luis Escotta for the attempted murder of a law enforcement official. In this instance, the crime itself was not committed, however, the Chief of Police, on duty, has plotted and desired to commit first-degree murder in front of a civilian and his subordinates. Due to any actual murder thankfully not having been committed, we divided the penalty issued to Luis Escotta by two, resulting in a total of $25,000 ARD for conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Regarding the jail term, we once again refer to the Escotta Family case, however, to the third defendant, Pyro. While having not being found guilty, the charge previously requested by the United States did not directly show any real encouragement or conspiracy within the evidence. In this instance, Chief Aky has specifically committed conspiracy to commit first-degree murder while on duty as a Chief of Police in front of a civilian and his subordinates. That said, we divided the penalty by two and request a twenty-year jail sentence for Andrew Aky based on this sole count.

7.) Conspiracy to commit Aggravated Assault:

    Act VI
    Anyone taking part in an offense is guilty of that offense. Anyone encouraging, helping to prepare or
    to commit that offense is guilty of that offense.

    Act IV
    Threats or plotting a criminal act, or encouraging a criminal act is a crime.

Basis for demands: United States of Argonath vs. The Escotta Family

Justification of Requested Penalty: In the Escotta Family case, the United States demanded a monetary penalty of $50,000 ARD from Luis Escotta for the attempted murder of a law enforcement official. In this instance, the crime itself was not committed, however, the Chief of Police, on duty, has plotted and desired to commit aggravated assault right after plotting and desiring to commit first-degree murder, both counts in front of a civilian and his subordinates. Due to any actual assault thankfully not having been committed, we divided the penalty issued to Luis Escotta by two, resulting in a total of $25,000 ARD for conspiracy to commit aggravated assault. Regarding the jail term, we once again refer to the Escotta Family case, however, to the third defendant, Pyro. While having not being found guilty, the charge previously requested by the United States did not directly show any real encouragement or conspiracy within the evidence. In this instance, Chief Aky has specifically committed conspiracy to commit aggravated assault while on duty as a Chief of Police in front of a civilian and his subordinates. That said, we divided the penalty by two for the murder conspiracy and request a twenty-year jail sentence for Andrew Aky based on this sole count, leading to a total of the original 50 years requested in the Escotta case against Pyro Escotta and a total of the original $50,000 ARD against Luis Escotta, however, for much more justifiable evidence showing a much more severe count of a similar crime.

8.) Destruction of Private Property:

    Act I
    Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,
    assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health.

Justification of Requested Penalty: Chief Aky has destroyed a civilian's helicopter through pure negligence and disregard for any sort of public safety by tossing a cigar towards leaking petrol coming from the helicopter while on duty as the VCPD Chief of Police in front of his subordinates. Our demands were decided upon review of his severe police misconduct, negligence and vehemently defying the expectations of him as a Chief of Police to serve and protect, as well as the two officers who witnessed and recorded the incident.

9.) Sexual Harassment:

    Ordinance V
    All citizens have the right to pursue happiness in this nation. Therefore, this right shall be upheld unless
    such pursuit involves infringing laws set by the government. Thus, any citizen has the legal right to own
    a home and/or business. Likewise, citizens have the legal right to own and operate a vehicle.

    Ordinance VII
    The rights of citizens cannot be denied or abridged by the nation or by any state due to race, colour,
    religious or political beliefs, criminal history, or previous lifestyles.

Justification of Requested Penalty: Chief Aky has discriminated a civilian because of her gender while on duty as the VCPD Chief of Police in front of his subordinates. Our demands were decided upon review of his severe police misconduct and vehemently defying the expectations of him as a Chief of Police to serve and protect, as well as the two officers who witnessed and recorded the incident.

Signed,

Klaus Meine FBI Director

Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor

[Kowalski.]

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 196 HAVANA HIGHWAY, VICE CITY, MIAMI. FROM: THE DESK OF SPECIAL AGENT KOWALSKI, FBI HEADQUARTERS, OCEAN BEACH, VICE CITY, MIAMI. Your honour, We, the United States of Argonath, have summoned the defendant to the courts. Attached below is a copy of the summons sent. Spoiler for Chief of Police Andrew Aky - Summons:       U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: CHIEF OF POLICE ANDREW AKY - VICE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT. FROM: SPECIAL AGENT KOWALSKI - FBI LEAD PROSECUTOR. Chief Aky, This is a notice of summons to the United States Supreme Court where you are currently being prosecuted within the case "United States of Argonath vs. Andrew Aky". Thank you, Special Agent Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor. Regards, Special Agent Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor.

[Kowalski.]

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 196 HAVANA HIGHWAY, VICE CITY, MIAMI. FROM: THE DESK OF SPECIAL AGENT KOWALSKI, FBI HEADQUARTERS, OCEAN BEACH, VICE CITY, MIAMI. Your honour, We, the United States of Argonath, have summoned VCPD Officer Luca Cottonfield and VCPD Senior Officer Andrew Davidson to testify against the defendant in regards to various offences witnessed being committed by Chief Andrew Aky. Attached below are copies of the summons sent. Spoiler for Officer Luca Cottonfield - Summons:       U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: OFFICER LUCA COTTONFIELD - VICE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT. FROM: SPECIAL AGENT KOWALSKI - FBI LEAD PROSECUTOR. Officer Luca Cottonfield, This is a notice of summons to the United States Supreme Court to testify in the case "United States of Argonath vs. Andrew Aky" as a material witness to multiple offences committed by the defendant, Mr. Andrew Aky, Chief of the Vice City Police Department. You will be required to present your written testimony to the Supreme Court of the United States against, confirming the events you witnessed for the prosecution. Thank you, Special Agent Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor. Spoiler for Senior Officer Andrew Davidson - Summons:       U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: SENIOR OFFICER ANDREW DAVIDSON - VICE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT. FROM: SPECIAL AGENT KOWALSKI - FBI LEAD PROSECUTOR. Senior Officer Andrew Davidson, This is a notice of summons to the United States Supreme Court to testify in the case "United States of Argonath vs. Andrew Aky" as a material witness to multiple offences committed by the defendant, Mr. Andrew Aky, Chief of the Vice City Police Department. You will be required to present your written testimony to the Supreme Court of the United States against, confirming the events you witnessed for the prosecution. Thank you, Special Agent Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor. Regards, Special Agent Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor.

[Andrew_Davidson]

Greetings to the United States Supreme Court of Law,

I am Sergeant Andrew Davidson with the Vice City Police Department. I was a Senior Officer at the time of the majority of these events and witnessed our own Chief of Police commit manslaughter for which I detained him in exhibit 4, as well as witnessing the conspiracy charges as well as sexual harassment and destruction of private property being committed in exhibit 6.

I can confirm that during all of these events, Chief Aky proceeded to commit all of the offences listed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. I testify that I was one of the officers on the clandestine task force set up to bring down Mr. Aky and I also attest that I can personally identify our Chief of Police Andrew Aky himself as the one to have committed the offences.

To reinforce my claims, I wish to reference to VCPD Dispatch in the evidence, notably when Chief Aky started screaming at us to launch a napalm attack (the conspiracy to commit aggravated assault charge), where Dispatch will clearly recognize that it was Andrew Aky.

While I was on the scene at the Vice Port, one civilian came and he parked his vehicle aside. Eventually, Chief Aky came to the Vice Port, stepped out of his cruiser and made his way to the civilian's vehicle. He entered the vehicle and drove off, while civilian didn't even see that. After a while, Chief Aky came back without the car and he stepped inside his cruiser. Few moments after Chief Aky arrived, officer Luca Cottonfield arrived as well.

However, to prove what I am saying, I also believe that Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield, who was an Officer at the time, can back up the claims I am making against Chief Aky.

Regards,
Sergeant Andrew Davidson
Vice City Police Department.

[Lonewolf]

Good evening your honour. I would like to enter my client's plea of not guilty to the accusations that have been thrown against him.
((I will proceed to act as my own attorney and address myself in the third person))

On the 11th of November, Chief Aky committed an act of obstruction of justice, preventing a federal agent from going on duty by barricading his vehicle using police barriers, blatantly disregarding any protocol in regards to their use. Through his recklessness and blatant misuse of standard police equipment, an FBI Special Agent was prevented from being able to exit the local police precinct and perform his duties [1].

First accusation, the barriers were not misused since my client was using them for training and research before the agent came and decided to take the vehicle that my client was using for such training and research. Andrew Aky was supposed to develop new tactics for the new equipment since no one did it before so, he had to use them and take notice of how it behaves and how it is suppose to be used by other officers. The agent came while sir Andrew was taking notes of the way the equipment behaves and thought the defendant targeted him with such misconduct. The chief tried to explain to him afterwards that he should have used another vehicle because he was already using that one for testing. The agent did not state being in a hurry to performi his duties, as the problem seems to be put forward here, hence why Aky decided to have a talk with said agent. This incident did not take over 5 minutes. The agent did not have to respond to any of the defendants remarks and orders either, since the chief was not his superior and was not even in the same department, as the agent knows very well, so he could have went about his business, but since he was not in a hurry and clearly did not have any active duties or tasks, he entertained the chief's will to converse and responded. You can also see that the chief, being forced by the other officer, removed the barriers as soon as he could and moved to the side, and only because the officer didn't hurry and was up for a chat, Aky decided to move closer and continue the discussion.

This was a misunderstanding and it gives off the impression that the entire accusation was a gamble made by the agent, that the judge might count this as a misconduct and charge my client for it aswell.

Chief of Police Andrew Aky was once again sighted by the very same FBI Special Agent misusing police barriers by placing them around another Officer and then shooting at them, completely disregarding any risk of harm to the Officer. Mr. Aky was now misusing three different issues of police equipment - roadblock barriers, his duty pistol, and his duty shotgun. This was a serious occurrence and the officer was lucky not to have been accidentally shot by the Chief in his act of public endangerment, as well as having broken the law by brandishing and firing his weapon without lawful purpose and abusing his power as a senior law enforcement official.

The second sight of Chief of Police Andrew Aky misusing his equipment is again just another instance of the barrier research, testing and training that he was doing at the time. He did not respond to the agent since he found it unnecessary. The officer from this "incident" was well aware of what was going on as the chief was showing him how easily the barriers can be vandalised, aswell as showing the officer how not to use these barriers. I also request the said officer, which is Officer Ghiless, to be brought here to testify regarding the fact that it was all part of the research, training and testing procedure. FBI Director Klaus, who is aware of Aky's attempts to develop a new training protocol for barrier usage, can also testify his knowledge of such research. The environment in which the actions took place did not endanger anyone's life or damage any private property.

To conclude this point, the usage of the equipment was well within normal norms and happened in a controlled environment.




For the second accusation:

Chief Aky then proceeded to start driving recklessly around various districts, showing a complete disregard for anybody's safety, including his own. His actions resulted in a head-on collision with another civilian, destroying their vehicle, yet Chief Aky seemed to show no remorse for the destruction of private property that he was responsible for, nor did he even try and see if the other driver was alright. Despite this, the Chief then decided to start driving in the oncoming traffic lane, deliberately near-missing the federal agent several times, for which he described the purpose as "training". Based on the Chief's willingness to break the law and endanger everyone more than necessary during a so-called police training, as well as the methods used in a totally uncontrolled public environment prove beyond any possible doubt that Mr. Aky does not care about the fact that he is breaking the law, shows no remorse whatsoever, nor any recognition or understanding of the impact his actions are having on citizens and law enforcers within the state [2].

First of all, the accusation of reckless driving resulting in a head-on collision and the desctruction of property, is completly false as I could not spot any evidence that shows any such action. The only evidence that would support such a thing, is the one from Little Haiti in which the Infernus' driver drove into the sewers, without even touching the chief's vehicle, which will be explained later.

Also the evidence showed doesn't really display the so called "reckless driving" that the chief of police is accused of. We are going to break down the evidence chronologically:

First piece of evidence is the one in which the chief can be seen taking off in his rental Hermes from the parking spot behind the pole, close to his friend's and ex-collegue Callum's house, which he wanted to visit, but left since no one was home. We can spot Aky looking for incoming traffic as he is entering the road.

Spoiler for Hiden:

In the second piece of evidence:

Spoiler for Hiden:

We can spot Aky being stationary on the side of the road as he contemplates the reason why there is a the car tailing him, clearly stalking the chief since he had no intention of passing him, but only to follow and probably gather information.

After taking off again, being stalked by a federal agent, he continued minding his own business, visiting his associate's home, which he was helping with managing Meison Wenifell. Since he was near-by he decided to pay him a visit but unfortunately, just as his friend Callum, the associate was not home.

Spoiler for Hiden:

The skidmarks start from from where Andrew took off and point towards the location where the house of the associate is. Since it was raining, making the road extremely wet, coupled with a late and sudden release of the clutch, led to the car sliding. Aky is clearly seen losing control for a few seconds, not being able to get back on his lane and passing the yellow light without checking for incoming traffic from the right side. However, he manages to get the car back on the right lane, as the skid marks suggest, and putting grip onto the tires with the use of the service brake and clutch for cutting the gear's power. It was indeed a mistake on Aky's part for releasing the clutch late and suddenly, with the acceleration already being high, probably in the thousands of RPM, doing a full throttle with the muscle car, Hermes, is an unwise decision to say the least. However, I wouldn't put the full blame on the chief as the weather conditions could have made even the most experienced drivers lose control of their vehicles. This action didn't put anyone's life in danger since he already knew no car was coming from the left side, because of the high visibility that he had on that side, and should a car have appeared on the right side, the speed wouldn't have been enough to produce a serious accident, since that section begins with a 90 degree turn together with another intersection, which needs to be approached with the second gear.

The next piece of evidence shows Aky entering the back side of the warehouse that he is in charge of, together with some random skidmarks on the side of the agent's car and later Aky deciding to park somewhere close to the entrance. I fail to see how this supports the prosecution's point. As I mentioned before, it feels like a piece of evidence that was simply placed randomly, in the hopes that it would deter from the actual accusation and pad the case.

Spoiler for Hiden:

https://i.imgur.com/0bVB3v8.png

((most probably the pole probably was broken due to the sync issue that VCMP has, but I am leaving this to the judge))

Moving forward to the next image, in which again, Aky is stationary on the side of the road and reving up the engine, resulting in the exhaust gases together with the unburnt fuel being released through the side exhaust, which led to the creation of small flames at their tips.

Spoiler for Hiden:

In this piece of evidence it is unclear whether it is the defendant driving the vehicle, or another person altogether.

Spoiler for Hiden:

In this image

Spoiler for Hiden:

we can spot Aky following a reckless driver as he was spotted entering the sewer system of Little Haiti. The driver entered the sewers, saw Aky following him and decided to do an U-turn, hitting the side of his car into the side wall of the sewers with such force that the vehicle physically bounced (for a lack of a better term) in the air. The chief proceeded to use the same tactic as the reckless driver but he did not hit the suspect's vehicle in any way. Why did Aky start following the reckless driver you may ask? Because that is his duty, he can't just stand idly and look as an unauthorized individual was entering the sewer system, which goes far beyond "driving off the road". VCPD personel are allowed to drive other vehicles than VCPD owned ones while on duty only when to dealing with incidents that aren't VCPD related, however, since Aky spotted the crime taking place and had no station near-by, he couldn't just let the outlaw run away and never be found again. As such, his sense of duty made him disregard the usual protocol. However since the suspect was driving a far more powerful vehicle than the chief, he quickly gained distance from him. Since the chief was losing the suspect around the port area, between Cam's Can Openers and Little Havana PD, the defendant decided to turn around and switch to a High Speed Pursuit Unit from the near-by PD. Whether or not it was an unlawful turn around and to drive that way back to the station is debatable since the problem was put forward at the court house years ago and no official gave a clear answer and conclusion to it, so now it is the time for a judge to give his answer on the situation: About the road to Downtown. This particular "driving on the wrong lane" charge would not be denied if the judge explains in this court case how the road is suppose to work. We would also want to point out that, as in the previous examples, no individual or property was directly damaged by the defendant's actions in this situation.

Later on, the agent was questioning the chief regarding his "reckless driving", while chief was already annoyed by the fact that he was losing the suspect. One can only imagine the stress he was under since an agent, whose work he clearly respected, was questioning his way of approaching the situation, resulting in him responding ironically and sarcastically to the agent on the radio in order to relief the stress he was facing at that point, as he usually does. Being a VCPD memeber is probably one of, if not, the most stressing job as they face danger around every corner and relieving tension on the radio was always something officers did, and most allowed it as long as they keept a decent behavior and attitude. Anything from an ironic remark, a sarcastic answer etc. was nothing out of the ordinary.

In the last image, we can see Aky later on in his personal vehicle, being parked on the side of the road, near his business. Nothing out of the ordinary once again.

Spoiler for Hiden:

The same pattern as before emerges from these pieces of evidence, that the prosecution is throwing baseless claims and misleading evidence in an attempt to fool the court into passing a false verdict. The defendant was clearly minding his own business when his sense of duty called him into action, with the prosecution team desperatly trying to find any semblence of incriminating evidence in the middle of it.

Chief Aky was also caught using prohibited drugs while off-duty by FBI Director Klaus. The drugs were identified as cocaine, which is prohibited by law as it is categorized as a controlled substance. Mr. Aky's use of prohibited drugs while off-duty show that he has no remorse for his acts against the law, and the fact he was willing to do it in front of an on-duty federal agent also further proves his incompetence and lack of any common sense whatsoever as a Chief of Police of the Vice City Police Department, based on his recklessness and tolerability for breaking the law, which further proves corruption in public office. [3]

The defendant requests further context to the situation. We would like to ask the prosecution a few questions before giving our side of the story to the accusation.

Our first question is why was FBI Director Klaus with Andrew Aky at that exact moment inside an unidentified interior?
What was the context in which they were there together at that time?
Where were these action taking place exactly? What property were they in?
Who was the owner of the drugs that were supposedly being used in the evidence?
And finally, why did the FBI director not react to the situation at the time and just allowed the defendant to consume said subtance?

These questions need to be answered since the accusation is lacking context. Did Aky and Klaus happen to be inside a random house with the chief randomly snorting cocaine, in front of the FBI Director no less, for no reason, with mister Klaus just standing there and letting it happen? This is the head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation that we are talking about here, a man who deals with illegal drugs far more than the average person. The situation presented sounds not only ludicrous but absolutely impossible given the context. That is why we would request that the prosecution answers these questions or conducts further investigation in order to fully describe the context in which the actions described took place.

Officer Andrew Davidson once again caught Chief Aky, this time committing manslaughter due to his reckless actions. Despite the woman standing on the scooter, Mr. Aky insisted on driving it regardless of the risk, which ultimately led to the woman's death, caused by a hard fall from the scooter. Had he not knowingly made such a stupid decision regardless of the risks which he was well aware of, the woman may still have been alive today, which was her right to not be deprived of life as per the constitution. This right was taken away from her by the defendant whose actions caused her death through his idiocy and his clear inability to think before acting. The recklessness and disregard for his own and others' safety only serve to further prove our allegations of corruption and public endangerment against the defendant. After the manslaughter was committed, the off-duty police chief was apprehended by Officer Davidson swiftly and placed into detainment awaiting trial [4].

This indeed was indeed an unfortunate accident. However the evidence collected from the accident scene by the officer in question is not enough to be able to conclude that the crime was indeed Andrew Aky's fault. The quality of the photos submitted as evidence prevents one from distiguinshing who were the people involved. The motorcycle in question can barely be seen at the moment of the accident. Our client says he was needed to perform an emergency brake as pedestrians were passing the street right through the front of his bike in an area where pedestrian's crossing is prohibited, and because of the momentum the victim was launched on the pavement. Until the officer arrived at the scene, on foot, all the way from Little Havana PD to Little Havana Hospital, the other suspects had time to run away from the scene. Thinking he will be interrogated at the station by the officer, he didn't say anything and cooperated with the officer by walking all the way to Little Havana PD, by getting cuffed and transported to the Washington Beach PD. There, without being asked if he wants to be interrogated about the case, he was invited to the cells and jailed, voiding his right to a fair interrogation and resulting in this case of manslaughter being pinned on him. We would like to know the judge's opinion if this case should be further investigated  or not as the defense believes that the evidence is insufficient.

VCPD Chief Andrew Aky also publicly admitted over the police radio that he was guilty of Grand Theft Auto, stealing a blue Banshee, later identified to be the property of FBI Agent Goura Mohamed. Chief Aky makes it clear on duty that nobody saw him steal the vehicle and therefore nobody has any evidence against him, as well as blindly identifying the owner of the vehicle he stole, which proves that he stole the vehicle, despite not showing the occurrence itself. This again shows a lack of remorse and acknowledgement of the crime he committed as well as the impact it could have had on the FBI Agent who owns the vehicle, being unable to commute throughout the city, which is an integral part of his job. However, regardless of all that, Chief Aky simply took the vehicle and broke the law once again, showing another demonstration of the Chief's corruption as an officer of the law as well as his total disregard of the law [5].

First of all, it is not publicly admitting if it was made on a police radio which is not public. Second, the information is false since officer Goura owns a dark red Banshee, and the records never show him having owned a blue Banshee. We would like to hear his take on this and ask if he ever had his Banshee painted blue. We think him testifying would be pretty much enough to nullify this accusation. The radio is a crowded place most of the times, and in this case this crowding resulted in a misunderstanding. At the same time as Aky was responding to another officer on the question "Who cares anyway" another one asked "Who's car was it?" at the same time, resulting in a jumbled up conversation, but since it was not questioned further, the chief did not give it much thought, as per the "no proof" and "no one saw me do it". This was once again an ironic and sarcastic comment about the situation, a joke, something that was already established as being part of the defendants
mannerism. The officers later looked around town to find the vehicle in question, and found it and as such the owner took it. The vehicle found, was indeed blue as the guy describes it and parked at the North Point Mall's Parking Lot, how would Aky be able to drive that vehicle right there, in that exact spot so fast and come back in such a short time? It again is highly unlikely that this is what happended. There is no proof that the actions described by the prosecution team actually took place. All the evidence in this is the fact that the chief was joking on the radio about stealing the guy's car, with the chief being at the crane together with other officers, and later on finding the vehicle, the owner taking it, since that was the vehicle he was looking for, a vehicle which was not owned by any "Goura".
The defense would like to request Goura to testify regarding ever having a blue banshee, around the date in which the action took place, and, if possible, asks the victim be brought forth so that he may tell his side of the story.

Officer Luca Cottonfield also gathered evidence against the Chief as part of the task force. The evidence shows counts of sexual discrimination, destruction of private property, conspiracy to commit aggravated assault and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Mr. Aky proceeded to stop a woman piloting a helicopter and began to sexually harass her. He made remarks that she couldn't fly properly because she was a woman, where he says "you are a woman, I mean you put the world in a great danger by piloting this", as well as other continuous sexually discriminatory references. Again through his complete disregard for anyone's safety, he lit up a cigar and tossed it by the helicopter, which then exploded as a result due to leaking petrol. The chief clearly states that he doesn't believe anything can go wrong and does it anyway despite Officer Luca Cottonfield's warnings. He continues to make sexual references, such as how he seemingly masturbates all day, which we quote "I crack my cock all day, fapping it hard", to which the woman replies that nobody needs to hear that. Chief Aky then proceeded to state that he wishes to murder anyone who says that, plotting and desiring to kill anybody who says such a thing. Chief Aky blatantly commits conspiracy to commit first-degree murder by threatening that he wishes to kill anyone who says what the woman said to him. The cigar that Aky dropped then ignited droplets of leaking petrol which then caused the helicopter explosion. Aky then orders over the radio to launch a napalm strike, which falls under conspiracy to commit aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as he attempted and encouraged to do so through his orders to his subordinates. However, luckily the VCPD have no access to napalm, and the officers on-scene disregarded anything Aky said, knowing he was breaking the law. This proves further beyond any possible belief that VCPD Chief Andrew Aky is an incompetent criminal holding a leadership position he is totally unworthy of [6].

The defendant denies that it was him in the evidence shown by the prosecution and would like to have the main victim brought to testify. The person from the evidence presents himself as someone from the Air Force, his life story does not match my client's and on top of it all, the gentleman is of a completely different race from the defendant:
The Air Force sir, who is certainly caucasian.


Andrew Aky's desk photo, the defendant being an african-american.


The victim's testimony would also help a lot in clearing this accusation if the judge considers it necessary.


In the end we would like to be granted the permission, as mentioned in the Constitution for the State of Vice City, Section IV, Ordinance VI, to bring our witnesses, victims and others who can present their testimony and to get answers to our questions that were addressed to the prosecution.

[Goura]

Hello:
It's me FBI Agent Goura Mohamed , im here to say the truth , My car has not been stolen and is in good condition since I bought it from the dealership, and it is blackish red (benshee)
This picture shows that:

-Maybe a misunderstanding occurred

[Kowalski.]

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 196 HAVANA HIGHWAY, VICE CITY, MIAMI. FROM: THE DESK OF SPECIAL AGENT KOWALSKI, FBI HEADQUARTERS, OCEAN BEACH, VICE CITY, MIAMI. Your honour, The United States of Argonath wishes to address the defendant's claims. Good evening your honour. I would like to enter my plea of not guilty to the accusations that have been thrown against me. ((I will proceed to act as my own attorney and address myself in the third person)) On the 11th of November, Chief Aky committed an act of obstruction of justice, preventing a federal agent from going on duty by barricading his vehicle using police barriers, blatantly disregarding any protocol in regards to their use. Through his recklessness and blatant misuse of standard police equipment, an FBI Special Agent was prevented from being able to exit the local police precinct and perform his duties [1]. First accusation, the barriers were not misused since my client was using them for training and research before the agent came and decided to take the vehicle that my client was using for such training and research. Andrew Aky was supposed to develop new tactics for the new equipment since no one did it before so, he had to use them and take notice of how it behaves and how it is suppose to be used by other officers. The agent came while sir Andrew was taking notes of the way the equipment behaves and thought the defendant targeted him with such misconduct. The chief tried to explain to him afterwards that he should have used another vehicle because he was already using that one for testing. The agent did not state being in a hurry to performi his duties, as the problem seems to be put forward here, hence why Aky decided to have a talk with said agent. This incident did not take over 5 minutes. The agent did not have to respond to any of the defendants remarks and orders either, since the chief was not his superior and was not even in the same department, as the agent knows very well, so he could have went about his business, but since he was not in a hurry and clearly did not have any active duties or tasks, he entertained the chief's will to converse and responded. You can also see that the chief, being forced by the other officer, removed the barriers as soon as he could and moved to the side, and only because the officer didn't hurry and was up for a chat, Aky decided to move closer and continue the discussion. This was a misunderstanding and it gives off the impression that the entire accusation was a gamble made by the agent, that the judge might count this as a misconduct and charge my client for it aswell. The agent, regardless of being aware of the Chief deciding to randomly place barriers and calling it training, couldn't possibly move without causing an accident that may have injured the Chief, and so did not move his cheetah. Also, any sort of law enforcement training does not take place on the spot especially in public in a totally uncontrolled environment just because someone wants an excuse to blatantly misuse police equipment and weaponry. I request Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield to testify in regards to this, especially from his own direct and current experience in the VCPD. Chief of Police Andrew Aky was once again sighted by the very same FBI Special Agent misusing police barriers by placing them around another Officer and then shooting at them, completely disregarding any risk of harm to the Officer. Mr. Aky was now misusing three different issues of police equipment - roadblock barriers, his duty pistol, and his duty shotgun. This was a serious occurrence and the officer was lucky not to have been accidentally shot by the Chief in his act of public endangerment, as well as having broken the law by brandishing and firing his weapon without lawful purpose and abusing his power as a senior law enforcement official. The second sight of Chief of Police Andrew Aky misusing his equipment is again just another instance of the barrier research, testing and training that he was doing at the time. He did not respond to the agent since he found it unnecessary. The officer from this "incident" was well aware of what was going on as the chief was showing him how easily the barriers can be vandalised, aswell as showing the officer how not to use these barriers. I also request the said officer, which is Officer Ghiless, to be brought here to testify regarding the fact that it was all part of the research, training and testing procedure. FBI Director Klaus, who is aware of Aky's attempts to develop a new training protocol for barrier usage, can also testify his knowledge of such research. The environment in which the actions took place did not endanger anyone's life or damage any private property. To conclude this point, the usage of the equipment was well within normal norms and happened in a controlled environment. We wish to reiterate that any weaponized training is always to be done in the Fort Baxter Training Base where the VCPD can conduct their training without endangering other people. However, Chief Aky is very clearly attempting to simply lie his way out of the charge by stating it was a "training" when in reality it was nothing but him abusing his weaponry and brandishing it without any legally justifiable reason in public. Therefore I request FBI Director Klaus to attest that he authorized, condoned or in any way encouraged this sort of blatant misuse of standard police barriers and/or weaponry. This "environment" the defendant speaks of was a public police station, and this reaffirms the Special Agent's claims. We also request Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield to testify for the prosecution. For the second accusation: Chief Aky then proceeded to start driving recklessly around various districts, showing a complete disregard for anybody's safety, including his own. His actions resulted in a head-on collision with another civilian, destroying their vehicle, yet Chief Aky seemed to show no remorse for the destruction of private property that he was responsible for, nor did he even try and see if the other driver was alright. Despite this, the Chief then decided to start driving in the oncoming traffic lane, deliberately near-missing the federal agent several times, for which he described the purpose as "training". Based on the Chief's willingness to break the law and endanger everyone more than necessary during a so-called police training, as well as the methods used in a totally uncontrolled public environment prove beyond any possible doubt that Mr. Aky does not care about the fact that he is breaking the law, shows no remorse whatsoever, nor any recognition or understanding of the impact his actions are having on citizens and law enforcers within the state [2]. First of all, the accusation of reckless driving resulting in a head-on collision and the desctruction of property, is completly false as I could not spot any evidence that shows any such action. The only evidence that would support such a thing, is the one from Little Haiti in which the Infernus' driver drove into the sewers, without even touching the chief's vehicle, which will be explained later. Also the evidence showed doesn't really display the so called "reckless driving" that the chief of police is accused of. We are going to break down the evidence chronologically: First piece of evidence is the one in which the chief can be seen taking off in his rental Hermes from the parking spot behind the pole, close to his friend's and ex-collegue Callum's house, which he wanted to visit, but left since no one was home. We can spot Aky looking for incoming traffic as he is entering the road. Spoiler for Hiden: In the second piece of evidence: Spoiler for Hiden: We can spot Aky being stationary on the side of the road as he contemplates the reason why there is a the car tailing him, clearly stalking the chief since he had no intention of passing him, but only to follow and probably gather information. After taking off again, being stalked by a federal agent, he continued minding his own business, visiting his associate's home, which he was helping with managing Meison Wenifell. Since he was near-by he decided to pay him a visit but unfortunately, just as his friend Callum, the associate was not home. Spoiler for Hiden: The skidmarks start from from where Andrew took off and point towards the location where the house of the associate is. Since it was raining, making the road extremely wet, coupled with a late and sudden release of the clutch, led to the car sliding. Aky is clearly seen losing control for a few seconds, not being able to get back on his lane and passing the yellow light without checking for incoming traffic from the right side. However, he manages to get the car back on the right lane, as the skid marks suggest, and putting grip onto the tires with the use of the service brake and clutch for cutting the gear's power. It was indeed a mistake on Aky's part for releasing the clutch late and suddenly, with the acceleration already being high, probably in the thousands of RPM, doing a full throttle with the muscle car, Hermes, is an unwise decision to say the least. However, I wouldn't put the full blame on the chief as the weather conditions could have made even the most experienced drivers lose control of their vehicles. This action didn't put anyone's life in danger since he already knew no car was coming from the left side, because of the high visibility that he had on that side, and should a car have appeared on the right side, the speed wouldn't have been enough to produce a serious accident, since that section begins with a 90 degree turn together with another intersection, which needs to be approached with the second gear. The next piece of evidence shows Aky entering the back side of the warehouse that he is in charge of, together with some random skidmarks on the side of the agent's car and later Aky deciding to park somewhere close to the entrance. I fail to see how this supports the prosecution's point. As I mentioned before, it feels like a piece of evidence that was simply placed randomly, in the hopes that it would deter from the actual accusation and pad the case. Spoiler for Hiden: https://i.imgur.com/0bVB3v8.png ((most probably the pole probably was broken due to the sync issue that VCMP has, but I am leaving this to the judge)) To address the defendant's claims, we will again follow in chronological order. In the first display of evidence, Andrew Aky was seen obstructing the sidewalk with his vehicle which is still illegal under the following ordinance:     Act III     Reckless driving is to be considered any form of driving that could endanger other citizens, and under such     circumstances, a law enforcement officer can take any necessary actions. Parking can only be done in a     manner that does not obstruct access to a building, a house or business, or an essential space for public     services. Regarding the second and third counts, the Special Agent who was behind, did not see the defendant stop at all, which leads us to believe the defendant may be lying. However, we will give Mr. Aky the benefit of the doubt on this charge as they are mostly reckless driving. In the fourth, it is however seen that Mr. Aky decided to obstruct traffic flow and risk an accident by parking right in the middle of the road. We believe this still qualifies as reckless behaviour under the following ordinance:     Act III     Reckless driving is to be considered any form of driving that could endanger other citizens, and under such     circumstances, a law enforcement officer can take any necessary actions. Parking can only be done in a     manner that does not obstruct access to a building, a house or business, or an essential space for public     services. The United States still believes that his obstruction of essential space, in this instance the road, still qualifies as a breach of the law. Moving forward to the next image, in which again, Aky is stationary on the side of the road and reving up the engine, resulting in the exhaust gases together with the unburnt fuel being released through the side exhaust, which led to the creation of small flames at their tips. Spoiler for Hiden: In this piece of evidence it is unclear whether it is the defendant driving the vehicle, or another person altogether. Spoiler for Hiden: In this image Spoiler for Hiden: we can spot Aky following a reckless driver as he was spotted entering the sewer system of Little Haiti. The driver entered the sewers, saw Aky following him and decided to do an U-turn, hitting the side of his car into the side wall of the sewers with such force that the vehicle physically bounced (for a lack of a better term) in the air. The chief proceeded to use the same tactic as the reckless driver but he did not hit the suspect's vehicle in any way. Why did Aky start following the reckless driver you may ask? Because that is his duty, he can't just stand idly and look as an unauthorized individual was entering the sewer system, which goes far beyond "driving off the road". VCPD personel are allowed to drive other vehicles than VCPD owned ones while on duty only when to dealing with incidents that aren't VCPD related, however, since Aky spotted the crime taking place and had no station near-by, he couldn't just let the outlaw run away and never be found again. As such, his sense of duty made him disregard the usual protocol. However since the suspect was driving a far more powerful vehicle than the chief, he quickly gained distance from him. Since the chief was losing the suspect around the port area, between Cam's Can Openers and Little Havana PD, the defendant decided to turn around and switch to a High Speed Pursuit Unit from the near-by PD. Whether or not it was an unlawful turn around and to drive that way back to the station is debatable since the problem was put forward at the court house years ago and no official gave a clear answer and conclusion to it, so now it is the time for a judge to give his answer on the situation: About the road to Downtown. This particular "driving on the wrong lane" charge would not be denied if the judge explains in this court case how the road is suppose to work. We would also want to point out that, as in the previous examples, no individual or property was directly damaged by the defendant's actions in this situation. Later on, the agent was questioning the chief regarding his "reckless driving", while chief was already annoyed by the fact that he was losing the suspect. One can only imagine the stress he was under since an agent, whose work he clearly respected, was questioning his way of approaching the situation, resulting in him responding ironically and sarcastically to the agent on the radio in order to relief the stress he was facing at that point, as he usually does. Being a VCPD memeber is probably one of, if not, the most stressing job as they face danger around every corner and relieving tension on the radio was always something officers did, and most allowed it as long as they keept a decent behavior and attitude. Anything from an ironic remark, a sarcastic answer etc. was nothing out of the ordinary. In the last image, we can see Aky later on in his personal vehicle, being parked on the side of the road, near his business. Nothing out of the ordinary once again. Spoiler for Hiden: The same pattern as before emerges from these pieces of evidence, that the prosecution is throwing baseless claims and misleading evidence in an attempt to fool the court into passing a false verdict. The defendant was clearly minding his own business when his sense of duty called him into action, with the prosecution team desperatly trying to find any semblence of incriminating evidence in the middle of it. The evidence does show, as admitted by the defendant over the police radio, that he is "training" by trying to near-miss the federal agent in the oncoming traffic lane. This constitutes as public endangerment as the defendant is driving recklessly and using "training" as some sort of an excuse to drive in a public area in an oncoming traffic lane, deliberately attempting to near-miss a federal agent, putting his safety and health in jeopardy, which is once again a breach of the following ordinance:     Act I     Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,     assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health. I as a witness and an on-duty law enforcer at the time wish to testify that the driver of the other vehicle was not a suspect as described and alleged by the defendant, and we request evidence from Chief Aky that this other driver was indeed suspected for his alleged reckless behaviour. As per the court topic mentioned by the defendant's attorney regarding the road from Downtown, it is very clearly stated by the government that the first example in the first post is correct, which is the way that the FBI Special Agent was driving, while the Chief was driving contradictory to the legal way of driving. This post is referenced here. However, we will now begin to address the more serious charges for which we primarily intend to prosecute Chief Aky. Chief Aky was also caught using prohibited drugs while off-duty by FBI Director Klaus. The drugs were identified as cocaine, which is prohibited by law as it is categorized as a controlled substance. Mr. Aky's use of prohibited drugs while off-duty show that he has no remorse for his acts against the law, and the fact he was willing to do it in front of an on-duty federal agent also further proves his incompetence and lack of any common sense whatsoever as a Chief of Police of the Vice City Police Department, based on his recklessness and tolerability for breaking the law, which further proves corruption in public office. [3] The defendant requests further context to the situation. We would like to ask the prosecution a few questions before giving our side of the story to the accusation. Our first question is why was FBI Director Klaus with Andrew Aky at that exact moment inside an unidentified interior? What was the context in which they were there together at that time? Where were these action taking place exactly? What property were they in? Who was the owner of the drugs that were supposedly being used in the evidence? And finally, why did the FBI director not react to the situation at the time and just allowed the defendant to consume said subtance? These questions need to be answered since the accusation is lacking context. Did Aky and Klaus happen to be inside a random house with the chief randomly snorting cocaine, in front of the FBI Director no less, for no reason, with mister Klaus just standing there and letting it happen? This is the head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation that we are talking about here, a man who deals with illegal drugs far more than the average person. The situation presented sounds not only ludicrous but absolutely impossible given the context. That is why we would request that the prosecution answers these questions or conducts further investigation in order to fully describe the context in which the actions described took place. Director Klaus was with Chief Aky in the Hyman Condo, Downtown, to check out the building. The owner was there and had nothing against their presence, not asking them to leave, and even allowing Director Klaus inside. There was some cocaine on the table, and while the owner of said cocaine cannot be proven, the Chief did use cocaine. Now, regarding the questions as to how the Director dealt with the situation, as a federal agent and a supervisor of the task force set up to bring the defendant down, he took evidence for use in court instead of detaining the suspect on the spot. Chief of Police Andrew Aky is however asking irrelevant questions regarding the evidence gathered about him according to which he used cocaine, as federal agents are allowed to gather evidence by any means necessary, and there are no actual prerequisites such as 'right time' or 'right place' for such tasks to be carried out. Officer Andrew Davidson once again caught Chief Aky, this time committing manslaughter due to his reckless actions. Despite the woman standing on the scooter, Mr. Aky insisted on driving it regardless of the risk, which ultimately led to the woman's death, caused by a hard fall from the scooter. Had he not knowingly made such a stupid decision regardless of the risks which he was well aware of, the woman may still have been alive today, which was her right to not be deprived of life as per the constitution. This right was taken away from her by the defendant whose actions caused her death through his idiocy and his clear inability to think before acting. The recklessness and disregard for his own and others' safety only serve to further prove our allegations of corruption and public endangerment against the defendant. After the manslaughter was committed, the off-duty police chief was apprehended by Officer Davidson swiftly and placed into detainment awaiting trial [4]. This indeed was indeed an unfortunate accident. However the evidence collected from the accident scene by the officer in question is not enough to be able to conclude that the crime was indeed Andrew Aky's fault. The quality of the photos submitted as evidence prevents one from distiguinshing who were the people involved. The motorcycle in question can barely be seen at the moment of the accident. Our client says he was needed to perform an emergency brake as pedestrians were passing the street right through the front of his bike in an area where pedestrian's crossing is prohibited, and because of the momentum the victim was launched on the pavement. Until the officer arrived at the scene, on foot, all the way from Little Havana PD to Little Havana Hospital, the other suspects had time to run away from the scene. Thinking he will be interrogated at the station by the officer, he didn't say anything and cooperated with the officer by walking all the way to Little Havana PD, by getting cuffed and transported to the Washington Beach PD. There, without being asked if he wants to be interrogated about the case, he was invited to the cells and jailed, voiding his right to a fair interrogation and resulting in this case of manslaughter being pinned on him. We would like to know the judge's opinion if this case should be further investigated  or not as the defense believes that the evidence is insufficient. For a start, the evidence is very much able to conclude the crime was Andrew Aky's fault. It was very evident that the woman was for whatever reason standing on the scooter, and yet the defendant rode it, knowing the risks. The quality of the photos is very evident when Officer Andrew Davidson approaches the driver, clearly identifiable as Andrew Aky, which we believe the Officer has already attested to in his testimony, however, can do so again. Regarding the allegation that the defendant was voided of his right to an interrogation, there was no request for one. We request conclusive evidence proving that Andrew Aky specifically requested an interrogation for his crime. However, we believe that based on the event that took place in front of Officer Davidson, an interrogation would still have found the defendant guilty especially with Senior Officer Davidson as a material witness as well as presented evidence. This "unfortunate accident" was still caused by the reckless and negligent actions of the defendant and therefore constitutes manslaughter which is a crime per the ordinance:     Act I     Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,     assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health. We now wish to address the next charge. VCPD Chief Andrew Aky also publicly admitted over the police radio that he was guilty of Grand Theft Auto, stealing a blue Banshee, later identified to be the property of FBI Agent Goura Mohamed. Chief Aky makes it clear on duty that nobody saw him steal the vehicle and therefore nobody has any evidence against him, as well as blindly identifying the owner of the vehicle he stole, which proves that he stole the vehicle, despite not showing the occurrence itself. This again shows a lack of remorse and acknowledgement of the crime he committed as well as the impact it could have had on the FBI Agent who owns the vehicle, being unable to commute throughout the city, which is an integral part of his job. However, regardless of all that, Chief Aky simply took the vehicle and broke the law once again, showing another demonstration of the Chief's corruption as an officer of the law as well as his total disregard of the law [5]. First of all, it is not publicly admitting if it was made on a police radio which is not public. Second, the information is false since officer Goura owns a dark red Banshee, and the records never show him having owned a blue Banshee. We would like to hear his take on this and ask if he ever had his Banshee painted blue. We think him testifying would be pretty much enough to nullify this accusation. The radio is a crowded place most of the times, and in this case this crowding resulted in a misunderstanding. At the same time as Aky was responding to another officer on the question "Who cares anyway" another one asked "Who's car was it?" at the same time, resulting in a jumbled up conversation, but since it was not questioned further, the chief did not give it much thought, as per the "no proof" and "no one saw me do it". This was once again an ironic and sarcastic comment about the situation, a joke, something that was already established as being part of the defendants mannerism. The officers later looked around town to find the vehicle in question, and found it and as such the owner took it. The vehicle found, was indeed blue as the guy describes it and parked at the North Point Mall's Parking Lot, how would Aky be able to drive that vehicle right there, in that exact spot so fast and come back in such a short time? It again is highly unlikely that this is what happended. There is no proof that the actions described by the prosecution team actually took place. All the evidence in this is the fact that the chief was joking on the radio about stealing the guy's car, with the chief being at the crane together with other officers, and later on finding the vehicle, the owner taking it, since that was the vehicle he was looking for, a vehicle which was not owned by any "Goura". The defense would like to request Goura to testify regarding ever having a blue banshee, around the date in which the action took place, and, if possible, asks the victim be brought forth so that he may tell his side of the story. The owner of the vehicle was indeed misidentified and there was some sort of miscommunication along the way. However, we believe the defendant is still guilty of this offence. Sergeant Andrew Davidson witnessed the theft of the state vehicle from the civilian who was renting it, MasterOz at Viceport. We request Mr. MasterOz to testify that his vehicle was stolen, the blue state Banshee that he was driving and using up until the theft of the vehicle from Viceport. We also once again request Sergeant Andrew Davidson to testify that he witnessed the theft of the vehicle. Finally, we request both Sergeant Andrew Davidson and Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield to testify regarding the lack of preemptive humour or any sort of fun over the radio and the seemingly serious context of the admission. Officer Luca Cottonfield also gathered evidence against the Chief as part of the task force. The evidence shows counts of sexual discrimination, destruction of private property, conspiracy to commit aggravated assault and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Mr. Aky proceeded to stop a woman piloting a helicopter and began to sexually harass her. He made remarks that she couldn't fly properly because she was a woman, where he says "you are a woman, I mean you put the world in a great danger by piloting this", as well as other continuous sexually discriminatory references. Again through his complete disregard for anyone's safety, he lit up a cigar and tossed it by the helicopter, which then exploded as a result due to leaking petrol. The chief clearly states that he doesn't believe anything can go wrong and does it anyway despite Officer Luca Cottonfield's warnings. He continues to make sexual references, such as how he seemingly masturbates all day, which we quote "I crack my cock all day, fapping it hard", to which the woman replies that nobody needs to hear that. Chief Aky then proceeded to state that he wishes to murder anyone who says that, plotting and desiring to kill anybody who says such a thing. Chief Aky blatantly commits conspiracy to commit first-degree murder by threatening that he wishes to kill anyone who says what the woman said to him. The cigar that Aky dropped then ignited droplets of leaking petrol which then caused the helicopter explosion. Aky then orders over the radio to launch a napalm strike, which falls under conspiracy to commit aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as he attempted and encouraged to do so through his orders to his subordinates. However, luckily the VCPD have no access to napalm, and the officers on-scene disregarded anything Aky said, knowing he was breaking the law. This proves further beyond any possible belief that VCPD Chief Andrew Aky is an incompetent criminal holding a leadership position he is totally unworthy of [6]. The defendant denies that it was him in the evidence shown by the prosecution and would like to have the main victim brought to testify. The person from the evidence presents himself as someone from the Air Force, his life story does not match my client's and on top of it all, the gentleman is of a completely different race from the defendant: The Air Force sir, who is certainly caucasian. Andrew Aky's desk photo, the defendant being an african-american. The victim's testimony would also help a lot in clearing this accusation if the judge considers it necessary. VCPD Dispatch can confirm per the evidence that the officer was indeed Chief of Police Andrew Aky. Wearing different clothes does not constitute a different person, and we remain adamant that Andrew Aky face the charges presented regarding this incident. We also believe that Sergeant Andrew Davidson and Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield can attest to the identity of the defendant being present on-scene, which has already been done by the Sergeant, however, can be done again. ((OOC: A skin does not constitute another character, and I am fairly sure that VC:MP Management can confirm this. Just to add, that VCS skin of you isn't actually a skin in-game.)) We also wish to state for the record another law, however, this time from the Law Enforcement Ordinance breached by Chief Aky throughout all charges: Part 6 - Misconduct and Relating Provisions Section 25: Classification of Law Enforcement Misconduct For the purposes of this ordinance, law enforcement misconduct is classified as any of the following:    (a) using police powers without valid reason, or    (b) using police powers for criminal purposes, or    (c) malicious deprivation of individual’s rights, or    (d) committing criminal offences whilst being a police officer, or    (e) excessive use of force, or    (f) any other common law claims of law enforcement abuse or police misconduct, or    (g) failing to exercise their powers when the circumstances necessitate such usage, or    (h) failing to uphold their duty. The charges we have pressed therefore constitute law enforcement misconduct from a Chief of Police. Regards, Special Agent Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor.

[Luca Man]

Good day, your Honour who is to preside over this case. I am VCPD Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield. I was an Officer during the period most of the acts of law breaking, that are presented here, were carried out by Chief of Police Andrew Aky. My role here is to give a witness testimony regarding the events which I witnessed myself, as well as to prevent Chief of Police Andrew Aky from using an attorney in order to blatantly lie as part of his 'defense'.

Good evening your honour. I would like to enter my plea of not guilty to the accusations that have been thrown against me.
((I will proceed to act as my own attorney and address myself in the third person))

On the 11th of November, Chief Aky committed an act of obstruction of justice, preventing a federal agent from going on duty by barricading his vehicle using police barriers, blatantly disregarding any protocol in regards to their use. Through his recklessness and blatant misuse of standard police equipment, an FBI Special Agent was prevented from being able to exit the local police precinct and perform his duties [1].

First accusation, the barriers were not misused since my client was using them for training and research before the agent came and decided to take the vehicle that my client was using for such training and research. Andrew Aky was supposed to develop new tactics for the new equipment since no one did it before so, he had to use them and take notice of how it behaves and how it is suppose to be used by other officers. The agent came while sir Andrew was taking notes of the way the equipment behaves and thought the defendant targeted him with such misconduct. The chief tried to explain to him afterwards that he should have used another vehicle because he was already using that one for testing. The agent did not state being in a hurry to performi his duties, as the problem seems to be put forward here, hence why Aky decided to have a talk with said agent. This incident did not take over 5 minutes. The agent did not have to respond to any of the defendants remarks and orders either, since the chief was not his superior and was not even in the same department, as the agent knows very well, so he could have went about his business, but since he was not in a hurry and clearly did not have any active duties or tasks, he entertained the chief's will to converse and responded. You can also see that the chief, being forced by the other officer, removed the barriers as soon as he could and moved to the side, and only because the officer didn't hurry and was up for a chat, Aky decided to move closer and continue the discussion.

This was a misunderstanding and it gives off the impression that the entire accusation was a gamble made by the agent, that the judge might count this as a misconduct and charge my client for it aswell.

Chief of Police Andrew Aky claims that the barriers that were randomly used were actually part of 'training and research'. However, police training is supposed to be organized. Such events are to take place within a certain secured perimeter, at a specific time and to involve a certain piece of equipment. The randomly placed barriers were shot by using standard duty weaponry. Weapon training is to take place strictly within the perimeter of Fort Baxter, to avoid disturbing civilians and potentially causing harm to property, whether it is private or state property. The shooting of the barriers could have gone terribly wrong, as the bullets could have hit the police vehicle and potentially injured the federal agent inside it. Police training does not take place on the spot, just because a certain law enforcement officer 'feels like doing it'. As a result of Andrew Aky's random playful behaviour, FBI Special Agent Kowalski lost some precious minutes, during which he could have worked on a federal case. Andrew Aky's demand for the agent to take another car is outright preposterous. Basically, the agent had to run around town in order to retrieve a personal vehicle so that he could carry out his work. While federal agents can indeed use personal vehicles to perform their duties, it is counterproductive to go looking around for a personal vehicle when there is an official police vehicle within close proximity. Federal agents are on the go ; they must move quickly in order to accomplish their tasks, and that's exactly what Kowalski was prevented from doing, thanks to the intense 'research, training and testing' carried out by the Chief of Police.  Andrew Aky's 'training' proved to have no actual purpose. Randomly tossing police barriers onto a stationary police vehicle and then running around it repeatedly does not account for a practical situation that is to be encountered within the field work. What happened within this exhibit is that the Chief of Police randomly used police equipment without there being an actual reason to do so. In order to defend himself, he actually claimed that it was 'training' and then proceeded to frame the federal agent at the scene for not actually cooperating with the training and taking another duty vehicle. We would like to see the reaction of Andrew Aky when he is in a foot pursuit, and he randomly gets thrown a police barrier in front of him, resulting in him tripping over and falling to the ground, and then getting blamed for not 'cooperating with the training'.

VCPD Chief Andrew Aky also publicly admitted over the police radio that he was guilty of Grand Theft Auto, stealing a blue Banshee, later identified to be the property of FBI Agent Goura Mohamed. Chief Aky makes it clear on duty that nobody saw him steal the vehicle and therefore nobody has any evidence against him, as well as blindly identifying the owner of the vehicle he stole, which proves that he stole the vehicle, despite not showing the occurrence itself. This again shows a lack of remorse and acknowledgement of the crime he committed as well as the impact it could have had on the FBI Agent who owns the vehicle, being unable to commute throughout the city, which is an integral part of his job. However, regardless of all that, Chief Aky simply took the vehicle and broke the law once again, showing another demonstration of the Chief's corruption as an officer of the law as well as his total disregard of the law [5].

First of all, it is not publicly admitting if it was made on a police radio which is not public. Second, the information is false since officer Goura owns a dark red Banshee, and the records never show him having owned a blue Banshee. We would like to hear his take on this and ask if he ever had his Banshee painted blue. We think him testifying would be pretty much enough to nullify this accusation. The radio is a crowded place most of the times, and in this case this crowding resulted in a misunderstanding. At the same time as Aky was responding to another officer on the question "Who cares anyway" another one asked "Who's car was it?" at the same time, resulting in a jumbled up conversation, but since it was not questioned further, the chief did not give it much thought, as per the "no proof" and "no one saw me do it". This was once again an ironic and sarcastic comment about the situation, a joke, something that was already established as being part of the defendants
mannerism. The officers later looked around town to find the vehicle in question, and found it and as such the owner took it. The vehicle found, was indeed blue as the guy describes it and parked at the North Point Mall's Parking Lot, how would Aky be able to drive that vehicle right there, in that exact spot so fast and come back in such a short time? It again is highly unlikely that this is what happended. There is no proof that the actions described by the prosecution team actually took place. All the evidence in this is the fact that the chief was joking on the radio about stealing the guy's car, with the chief being at the crane together with other officers, and later on finding the vehicle, the owner taking it, since that was the vehicle he was looking for, a vehicle which was not owned by any "Goura".
The defense would like to request Goura to testify regarding ever having a blue banshee, around the date in which the action took place, and, if possible, asks the victim be brought forth so that he may tell his side of the story.

A police radio is a public radio for all law enforcement operatives, whether they are officially employed by the Vice City Police Department/Federal Bureau of Investigation or they are just volunteers willing to make the streets of Vice City better and safer for the regular citizen. It is embarrassing enough that the Chief of Police would resort to admitting to have carried out an act of Grand Theft Auto, whether it is part of a joke or not, in front of his direct underlings, let alone actual volunteers. This just puts the reputation of the whole police department at stake, and people who do not directly know the Chief of Police, which is especially the case of police volunteers, may assume that the Chief of Police is an actual criminal (yes, he actually is, he has proven it himself through other charges as well) and have a bad opinion of VCPD just because of such a statement. However, there was no preemptive humour, nor any sort of fun over the radio and Aky seemed very serious. The whole context of the conversation and admission seemed quite serious and now the Chief (or his attorney) allege that at the time of this event, Chief Aky had suddenly decided that it was prank time despite the seriousness of police duty especially at that point in time. I don't believe this qualifies as "mannerism" or some sort of a practical joke, but as a serious admission, and I believe that Sergeant Andrew Davidson will confirm that he sees it the same way as I do, as well as the United States' view of the admission in the evidence. This sort of behaviour directly takes a toll on VCPD, as police volunteers may refuse to consider an official career within the department.

Officer Luca Cottonfield also gathered evidence against the Chief as part of the task force. The evidence shows counts of sexual discrimination, destruction of private property, conspiracy to commit aggravated assault and conspiracy to commit first-degree murder. Mr. Aky proceeded to stop a woman piloting a helicopter and began to sexually harass her. He made remarks that she couldn't fly properly because she was a woman, where he says "you are a woman, I mean you put the world in a great danger by piloting this", as well as other continuous sexually discriminatory references. Again through his complete disregard for anyone's safety, he lit up a cigar and tossed it by the helicopter, which then exploded as a result due to leaking petrol. The chief clearly states that he doesn't believe anything can go wrong and does it anyway despite Officer Luca Cottonfield's warnings. He continues to make sexual references, such as how he seemingly masturbates all day, which we quote "I crack my cock all day, fapping it hard", to which the woman replies that nobody needs to hear that. Chief Aky then proceeded to state that he wishes to murder anyone who says that, plotting and desiring to kill anybody who says such a thing. Chief Aky blatantly commits conspiracy to commit first-degree murder by threatening that he wishes to kill anyone who says what the woman said to him. The cigar that Aky dropped then ignited droplets of leaking petrol which then caused the helicopter explosion. Aky then orders over the radio to launch a napalm strike, which falls under conspiracy to commit aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as he attempted and encouraged to do so through his orders to his subordinates. However, luckily the VCPD have no access to napalm, and the officers on-scene disregarded anything Aky said, knowing he was breaking the law. This proves further beyond any possible belief that VCPD Chief Andrew Aky is an incompetent criminal holding a leadership position he is totally unworthy of [6].

The defendant denies that it was him in the evidence shown by the prosecution and would like to have the main victim brought to testify. The person from the evidence presents himself as someone from the Air Force, his life story does not match my client's and on top of it all, the gentleman is of a completely different race from the defendant:
The Air Force sir, who is certainly caucasian.


Andrew Aky's desk photo, the defendant being an african-american.


The victim's testimony would also help a lot in clearing this accusation if the judge considers it necessary.

The Chief of Police is trying to escape out of this situation by framing someone else for his very own deeds. I have discovered (albeit through prolonged scientific 'research') that changing your clothes does not make you a different person. Both Sergeant Andrew Davidson (who was on scene, and was a Senior Officer at the time of the incident) and I witnessed this 'different individual', and we can confirm that what we heard was indeed Andrew Aky's voice. Moreover, Andrew Davidson was wearing exactly the same uniform as Andrew Aky, but, interestingly enough, he did not become another person and still was Andrew Davidson. Therefore, the Chief of Police is guilty for all the charges that have been brought to him through this incident, despite wearing different clothing. Andrew Aky has proved that he is quite misogynistic, underestimating the stopped pilot's capacity to fly helicopters purely because of her gender, forgetting that once he flattened a surrendered suspect by landing a helicopter on him. The Chief of Police also proved himself to be rather careless about his surroundings, throwing a cigarette bud towards the smoking engine of a helicopter, resulting in an explosion and the destruction of the female pilot's helicopter. Andrew Aky didn't even have the guts to offer the pilot a refund for her helicopter. Last but not least, Andrew Aky dropped to the ground and randomly shouted about plots of revenge against "vietcongs", whom he allegedly found guilty for his cigarette bud tossing, ordering, as he puts it, 'a napalm strike' to be delivered against the so-called ''vietcongs''. Whether the Chief of Police was heavily inebriated at the time, or he just suffered from post traumatic stress disorder due to having watched a film about the Vietnam war the night before the incident is not known. However, what is known is that he publicly humiliated the department when making such threats, as the female pilot whose helicopter was blown up due to his carelessness was still nearby and could hear the Chief's incoherent speech.


Now it's time to put everything together and perhaps take a look at the constitution to see what was done wrong.

Part 6 - Misconduct and Relating Provisions

Section 25: Classification of Law Enforcement Misconduct
For the purposes of this ordinance, law enforcement misconduct is classified as any of the following:
   (a) using police powers without valid reason, or
   (b) using police powers for criminal purposes, or
   (c) malicious deprivation of individual’s rights, or
   (d) committing criminal offences whilst being a police officer, or
   (e) excessive use of force, or
   (f) any other common law claims of law enforcement abuse or police misconduct, or
   (g) failing to exercise their powers when the circumstances necessitate such usage, or
   (h) failing to uphold their duty.

(a) - This of course is well exemplified within the exhibit regarding the obstruction of justice charge, where the Chief of Police was 'training and researching'.
(b) - This is exemplified more as a threat when the delusional Chief asks his underlings to launch a 'napalm strike'. Nothing actually happened, but the intention was there.
(c) - The 'napalm strike' that was ordered, if it were to be carried out, would have led to severe injuries or deaths within the population of Vice City. Therefore, some individuals could have been deprived of their rights to good health or even to life.
(d) - Obstruction of justice? Sexual harassment? Destruction of private property? Conspiracy to commit aggravated assault? Whether done wittingly or unwittingly, these did in fact take place.
(e) - No such account has been witnessed.
(f) - Discrimination of a citizen by taking into account the gender can back this article up, as well as ordering a 'napalm strike', which could have led to terrible consequences, had it been carried out.
(g) - No such account has been witnessed.
(h) - Within all exhibits, Andrew Aky has failed to uphold his duty, leading to situations of either corruption or outright incompetence.

Section 10C: Removal of Chief of Police
The President, Prime Minister or a Commissioner may remove the Chief of Police on grounds of proven misbehaviour, corruption, criminal conviction, incompetence or incapacity.

Andrew Aky has proven himself to be within all situations in this article.


In the end, I'd like to demand from the Vice City Court that they take action within this case as quickly as possible. This so-called Chief of Police has proved that he is completely incapable of having such a great responsibility on his shoulders. It seems he has forgotten that he is the leader of a law enforcement organisation and instead he constantly resorted to criminal acts, embarrassing the whole department in the process, damaging our public image and nullifying the credibility that the department is supposed to have in front of the citizens. The Vice City Police Department is to be represented by a law-abiding individual, not by a criminal with a badge on his chest.


Signed,
Luca Cottonfield,
VCPD Senior Officer

[MasterOz.]

Greetings to the courts,

I am Mr. MasterOz and am here to testify for the prosecution per the request of the FBI Lead Prosecutor. I wish to confirm that I was indeed driving a rental blue banshee belonging to the state. I cannot confirm the actual thief, however I can attest that I was driving the vehicle and found it gone not long after.

It is also seen in the evidence exhibit that I inquired where my vehicle went. I am not sure what exactly happened and I cannot confirm who the thief is, however for the prosecution, I wish to confirm that I was indeed the driver of the stolen Banshee until the theft occurred.

Sincerely,
MasterOz.

[Kessu]

Vice City Law Courts Argonath Federal Court

From: The Argonath Administrative Tribunal Committee Address: 143 Downtown State Street, Downtown Vice City, Florida Topic: "State vs Andrew Aky" Proceeding Number: VC-CR0002/2021

COURT MINUTE

The court notices that the defendant has been summoned and that he has posted his defense, as well as some witnesses having put forth their testimonies. We also acknowledge the defendants pleas on the charges and the court would like to comment on a couple.

[1]. The defendant's claim against the evidence labeled as [6] that it is not him due to a difference in skin color is refused.

[2]. The prosecution should not be charging the defendant with multiple counts of the same charge for one situation that occured. The court will combine the charges as one when and where necessary.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

[1]. The court would like to hear Officer Ghiless' testimony on the charges and evidence labeled as [2]. The Downtown PD scene in specific and the endangering public charge. Witness has 2 weeks to give his testimony and if it is not provided, we will proceed with the case without it.

[2]. The prosecution submits the interrogation evidence in full as the court noticed some discrepancies in the recordings. Prosecution has 2 weeks to provide the interrogation in full without discrepancies or we will proceed with the case without considering the interrogation as part of the evidence pool.

ORDERED, on this 12th day of February, 2021.

Signed,

H. Fakd
H. Fakd
Administrative Tribunal Judge

[Ghiless]

Your Honor, I, Ghiless Aal, was taking part in a training program with the Chief of Police, Andrew Aky, during the day in which the supposed incident took place.  We were indeed in the process of testing the equipment and, during the time when the evidence was collected by the prosecution, the chief was showing me the weaknesses and strengths of the mentioned equipment and showcasing exactly how much force was required to break a standard issue barrier. I was fully aware of what was going on and I agreed to take part in the training of my own volition. I did not feel in danger at any point during the training because I fully trusted the Chief and I knew that none of the procedures would put me in real danger.
Looking at it from the perspective of a passer-by I can now see that the way the equipment testing took place may look extremely dangerous and I should have asked the Chief to take further precautions. I am deeply sorry that my negligence led to the Chief being sent for trial.

[Kowalski.]

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 196 HAVANA HIGHWAY, VICE CITY, MIAMI. FROM: THE DESK OF ACTING DIRECTOR KOWALSKI, FBI HEADQUARTERS, OCEAN BEACH, VICE CITY, MIAMI. Your honour, The United States of Argonath has re-uploaded the evidence pictures so as to try and remove any discrepancies. They can be found enclosed here. We would also like to respond to the recent testimony of Ghiless Aal. Your Honor, I, Ghiless Aal, was taking part in a training program with the Chief of Police, Andrew Aky, during the day in which the supposed incident took place.  We were indeed in the process of testing the equipment and, during the time when the evidence was collected by the prosecution, the chief was showing me the weaknesses and strengths of the mentioned equipment and showcasing exactly how much force was required to break a standard issue barrier. I was fully aware of what was going on and I agreed to take part in the training of my own volition. I did not feel in danger at any point during the training because I fully trusted the Chief and I knew that none of the procedures would put me in real danger. Looking at it from the perspective of a passer-by I can now see that the way the equipment testing took place may look extremely dangerous and I should have asked the Chief to take further precautions. I am deeply sorry that my negligence led to the Chief being sent for trial. Regardless of your awareness, the "training" carried out by the Chief of Police was negligent, dangerous and hazardous. The training methods are also very questionable in regards to safety. By knowingly taking part in this training, you are part of the committed offence. However, as this trial is against Andrew Aky, we will focus solely on the defendant in this case. As a police officer, you should have been aware that your actions were classed as any that may cause damage to one's health under the following act:     Act I     Under punishment by law enforcement, no individual may commit murder, acts of thievery or burglary,     assault, vandalism, rape, abduction, fraud, or any act of harming one's wealth, property, or health. It is also alleged that none of the procedures would put the "witness" in real danger. We believe it was a danger to yourself, possibly the defendant, and anyone else who could have ended up within proximity of the actions shown. Regardless of whether it was training or not, or whether the Officer did it willingly - it still does not change the danger they put themselves and potentially others in, their actions were negligent and reckless. The United States remains adamant that the defendant faces this charge. We'd also like to cite the VCPD Procedures in response to the claims that this was a training: 10.1. VCPD Officer is not allowed to discharge his weapon in public without a proper reason. 10.2. VCPD Officer is not allowed to display weapons in plain sight unless in a high-risk situation or being threatened. As far as the United States is concerned, training is no excuse to violate protocol, especially by a Chief of Police who sets the precedent that such negligence and recklessness is allowed in the department. We wish to cite the Law Enforcement Ordinance: Section 25: Classification of Law Enforcement Misconduct For the purposes of this ordinance, law enforcement misconduct is classified as any of the following:    (a) using police powers without valid reason, or    (d) committing criminal offences whilst being a police officer, or    (f) any other common law claims of law enforcement abuse or police misconduct, or We believe the defendant is in contravention of this legal section's specific points as displayed within the evidence of the Downtown PD training count. Therefore, the United States remains adamant that the defendant faces the charges presented, and believe that the witness' testimony does not justify his, or the defendant's actions and negligence. Regards, Kowalski Acting FBI Director

[Kessu]

Vice City Law Courts Argonath Federal Court

From: The Argonath Administrative Tribunal Committee Address: 143 Downtown State Street, Downtown Vice City, Florida Topic: "State vs Andrew Aky" Proceeding Number: VC-CR0002/2021

COURT MINUTE

[1]. The court notes that the prosecution responded to the court's order after the deadline and the court will hereby ignore the interrogation in full.

[2].The court notes Officer Ghiless' witness statement.

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

[1]. That the prosecution and defendant put forth their closing statements if they wish to do so within 2 weeks. The court will proceed towards giving verdict after the deadline is over even if nothing is submitted.

ORDERED, on this 8th day of March, 2021.

Signed,

H. Fakd
H. Fakd
Administrative Tribunal Judge

[Kowalski.]

U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 196 HAVANA HIGHWAY, VICE CITY, MIAMI. FROM: THE DESK OF ACTING DIRECTOR KOWALSKI, FBI HEADQUARTERS, OCEAN BEACH, VICE CITY, MIAMI. Your honour, We have summoned Deputy Chief of Police Klaus Meine and Sergeant Andrew Davidson of the Vice City Police Department to provide more information and testimonies against the defendant regarding some of the charges, and some of the claims made by the defendant. A copy of the summons to both witnesses is attached below. Spoiler for Summons - Deputy Chief of Police Klaus Meine:       U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: DEPUTY CHIEF OF POLICE KLAUS MEINE - VICE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT. FROM: ACTING DIRECTOR KOWALSKI - FBI LEAD PROSECUTOR. Deputy Chief Klaus Meine, This is a notice of summons to the United States Supreme Court to testify in the case "United States of Argonath vs. Andrew Aky" as a material witness to an offence and a statement by the defendant, Mr. Andrew Aky, Chief of the Vice City Police Department, using your name to substantiate a claim made in regards to a charge against them. You will be required to present your written testimony to the Supreme Court of the United States against the defendant, confirming the events you witnessed for the prosecution. Regards, Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor Spoiler for Summons - Sergeant Andrew Davidson:       U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation Vice City - Miami Division TO: SERGEANT ANDREW DAVIDSON - VICE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT. FROM: ACTING DIRECTOR KOWALSKI - FBI LEAD PROSECUTOR. Sergeant Andrew Davidson, This is a notice of summons to the United States Supreme Court to testify in the case "United States of Argonath vs. Andrew Aky" as a material witness to offences committed by the defendant, Mr. Andrew Aky, Chief of the Vice City Police Department. You will be required to present your written testimony to the Supreme Court of the United States against the defendant, confirming the events you witnessed for the prosecution. Regards, Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor We hereby request Deputy Chief Klaus Meine to attest that he witnessed the defendant use cocaine in front of him on the 17th of November, 2020, and to corroborate whether he condoned, authorized or approved of the defendant's "training methods" regarding barrier usage in any way. We also request Sergeant Andrew Davidson to reaffirm that he witnessed the theft of the blue Banshee being used by Mr. MasterOz, and that there was no premeditated humour prior to the defendant admitting the theft of the vehicle, backing up Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield's witness statement of the situation. Regards, Kowalski FBI Lead Prosecutor

[Andrew_Davidson]

Your honor,

While patrolling the Viceport area, we noticed that Mr. Master0z arrived in our vicinity. Upon his arrival, I noticed that he parked his vehicle not far away from where I was. Few moments later, Chief Aky came here as well, he left his vehicle and got into Mr. Master0z's vehicle. He drove away with the vehicle and came back later.

During the time in which the aforementioned GTA happened, as a Senior Officer, I was fulfilling my responsibilities as a law enforcer and a senior police officer. The department was on alert for crime in the Viceport area, thus resulting in the serious atmosphere over the radio which should be usual precedent when communicating with department personnel, which, since his appointment, has no longer been the case with Andrew Aky's unprofessional actions and dereliction of duty.

However, despite the seriousness of the situation, when I mentioned the GTA, Andrew Aky still proceeded to admit to the crime and even laugh about it. Based upon this, it's the common judgment between myself and now Senior Officer Luca Cottonfield that the admission was indeed real and combined with my witnessing of the situation, and Mr. MasterOz having also witnessed that his vehicle was indeed stolen, that there are solid grounds to charge the defendant with Grand Theft Auto.

Regards,
Sergeant Andrew Davidson
Vice City Police Department.