[SA:MP] Developers Answer: Give Examples

[Bilbo]

That did not answer the question

The administrator team has the tools to check if the player hacked or not. And yes, they are required to check them before banning.

[Julio.]

The administrator team has the tools to check if the player hacked or not. And yes, they are required to check them before banning.

Well StrikeFreedom never checked me before banning. And I never hacked when the script said I did.

So you are saying he should have checked first? Quoted, Thanks Icy

[Altair_Carter]

All hackers are warned to leave the server immediately to remove their hacks or they are banned.

So, you say, if I come in the server with hacks, I'll get warned first?

Sounds bull.

[Bilbo]

The administrator team is required to check for all hacks before banning, that is, checking.
If you are a regular, you are supposed to know the rules. So do not get surprised if you're not asked to remove them before banning.

[Julio.]

The administrator team is required to check for all hacks before banning, that is, checking.
If you are a regular, you are supposed to know the rules. So do not get surprised if you're not asked to remove them before banning.

On the contrary, I would have thought that if you are a regular, the administrators have the same duty to ask the player, a regular has less motivation

[Gandalf]

If a player has supposedly hacked a minigun, should the admin check with that player first before swinging the banhammer?

Because I believe not asking the player is a seriously bad shortcut

If the script warns regarding hacked weapons, admins are allowed to ban without any questioning or research.

[Gandalf]

On the contrary, I would have thought that if you are a regular, the administrators have the same duty to ask the player, a regular has less motivation

As regular you are required to be familiar with all the rules. A new player who has never been on the server or read the forum might get a friendly warning. Regulars know that hacking gets you banned, and there for have no excuse.

[Julio.]

As regular you are required to be familiar with all the rules. A new player who has never been on the server or read the forum might get a friendly warning. Regulars know that hacking gets you banned, and there for have no excuse.

That is where you and I differ, my question was related to the checking to confirm the scripts, not all about checking the player.

Assumption that scripts are right is not good.

'Computers have ghosts'

[Ben.]

As regular you are required to be familiar with all the rules. A new player who has never been on the server or read the forum might get a friendly warning. Regulars know that hacking gets you banned, and there for have no excuse.

As a regular, you have spent time getting somewhere in the server, and so are less likely to want to hack, you have more to lose.
We know that hacking gets you banned, which is why regulars are less likely to do it.  :trust:

[Violet]

All hackers are warned to leave the server immediately to remove their hacks or they are banned.

No they aren't. Admins are not obliged to use the command at all on any hacker, it is their choice to use it or to instantly ban.

[Cero]

SA:MP Admin applications opening anytime soon?

[Lorenzo.]

Can you see how many bans, kicks and warns already been given?

[Kenny.]

Can you see how many bans, kicks and warns already been given?

Yes the Adminstration team can

[Lorenzo.]

Okay cool,

How much bans/kicks/warns are already been made?

[Pancher]

Made on who?