[Petition]

[Pandalink]

Groups need to be able to attack for the most part at random, this means that organising it is not viable, and a set location is also not viable.

and 2 hours then yes, but thats just the time you set
if you say dead=dead its much easier and the same

How is it the same? A single gangwar would wipe a gang clean. That isn't how a game is supposed to work.

[Malcolm]

I'd like it even more if you, like Gandalf, said tried to have meetings. During the meeting in wich ya'll might not agree on a point, and then blast eachother! That way the location doesn't have to be that random Of course you don't have to have a gangwar after a meeting all the time, as it would get vveerryyy boring, but you know..

[Hovis_Araatus]

I LOVE ALL OF YOU

[Gandalf]

valid reasons can be like:
a gang member got robbed by another gang,
someone got shot by the others
the other gang keeps entering the HQ

Getting robbed or even shot is not a strong enough reason to shoot the hell out of each other and spoil lives.
In such case you go to the leader and ask compensation (for the victim or their 'widow'), that is unless you were getting robbed while on the terrain of the other gang. In that case you should have known better and get nothing.

If a gang keeps entering the HQ, fire your security and get a better one.

[Pandalink]

Getting robbed or even shot is not a strong enough reason to shoot the hell out of each other and spoil lives.
In such case you go to the leader and ask compensation (for the victim or their 'widow'), that is unless you were getting robbed while on the terrain of the other gang. In that case you should have known better and get nothing.

If a gang keeps entering the HQ, fire your security and get a better one.

True that.

[punkemo]

WHO WANTS TO PARTY ON DOWN  :banana:

[Pandalink]

Ehm.. moving swiftly on. :roll:

I think we need to think up some good reasons for gangs to begin fighting.

[Pancher]

People have been in "Gang war" so it shouldn't be that hard for you to come with some suggestions ? 

[Pandalink]

Problem is that I need this from people who think "being enemies" isn't a good reason, because in my eyes its perfectly fine just to attack for no reason other than "Don't like those guys".

[hell1989]

I think only way for this to work is for mafia/gangs to all begin again at neutral instead of enemies, then we will find valid RP reasons to attack each other later.

Allies can of course still be allies.

[Pancher]

Anyway many good Points Panda that can be slightly modified, good if group leaders can handle the big parts without administration involved to much.

[NitrOx]

I agree with all points Panda made.

[Wash]

I agree with all of Panda's points too. D :

[Julian]

I agree with all of Panda's points too. D :

[Cofiliano]

I woud realy like to know what is strong enough reason that can cause gangwar.... from Main Admins view.