San Andreas Mobster Map | [Version 2.0]

[Pandalink]

I only added the three Araatus HQs, not every single shop and house our members own.

[Melvin]

Wash, Can you edit foster valley now please?

[Romeo]

Wash, Can you edit foster valley now please?

Well, you do only own one property there. But its the only one, but I dont think that means you can own the whole place, or can you?

Someone should state the rules of claiming turfs.

[Wash]

Someone should state the rules of claiming turfs.

The rules for claiming turfs are clear. You must own the property that you outline as your 'turf'. Aswell as this, you will be able to mark your building and the directly surrounding land.

Well, you do only own one property there. But its the only one, but I dont think that means you can own the whole place, or can you?

He has paid $5,100,000 for a single property, which is a ridiculous amount. Therefore he does not own a small apartment there, or a little 24/7. He owns the whole of Foster Valley.

[Romeo]

Quite true, untill someone else sets a property there.

If a Mafia runs in a town with no other mafia's, and owns a majority percentage of the assets in this town, (say, Palamino Creek for example), Can the group claim the town as turf?

Seeing as No other mafia should oppose this.

[Wash]

If a Mafia runs in a town with no other mafia's, and owns a majority percentage of the assets in this town, (say, Palamino Creek for example), Can the group claim the town as turf?

No. I will only highlight the direct property they own with the direct surroundings, however the group is free to call the town their own.

[Melvin]

But why do you only mark 1 building of me and Corleone got a whole mountain highlighted  :conf:

[Wash]

But why do you only mark 1 building of me and Corleone got a whole mountain highlighted  :conf:

Just haven't had the chance to add San Fierro update.

Post Merge: August 16, 2009, 05:43:04 amAll 3 (Los Santos, San Fierro, Las Venturas) maps have now been updated.

[Romeo]

If it is only the building, then why do you highlight Verdenant bluffs hill?

[(tr)Ollie]

There aren't any other properties that can be set on that hill so it doesn't matter.

[Romeo]

Still, doesnt make it part of the property.

[(tr)Ollie]

Depending on the value I suppose it could be classed as their property as that is no different than Foster Valley then. There's been no trouble with this before so why bring it up now anyway?

[Wash]

If it is only the building, then why do you highlight Verdenant bluffs hill?

Yes it does.. As ollie_p rightly said, do you see anything else going to be set there? A tree house maybe..?

Please read what has been posted previously. You are able to mark the building and the direct surroundings.

[Romeo]

I think I understand this.

[Eugene]

hmm, last time i check people could not purchase land....
so idk how you guys bought that Foster Valley and that Verdalf Bluffs hill  :trust: