Why Argonath RPG is no in the OFFICIAL list?

[Bianconeri]

I can't tell the difference between us on official and off official.

We still have more or less the same amount of players.. D:

difference is obvious,
its really hard to find the server if not official
if it hadnt been official i probably never found this

in the morning we had 40-50, now maybe 20,
but less hackers/rulebreakers so thats good

[Inkognito]

difference is obvious,
its really hard to find the server if not official
if it hadnt been official i probably never found this

in the morning we had 40-50, now maybe 20,
but less hackers/rulebreakers so thats good

Personally, I support our server being on Official list. Haxours is nothing to an opportunity

[Fabio]

For you, Legend

I thought we were removed because of the Rich Life Roleplay on IV:MP?

[Nexxt]

I thought we were removed because of the Rich Life Roleplay on IV:MP?

Same as I heard, and if so - it would be lame.

[Fabio]

Apparantly, the makers of IV:MP and SA:MP are enemies from what I was told, so that could of played a part in the decision to take Argonath RPG off the Official Servers list.

[xphatknightx]

i have been noticeing the lack of hackers

[Vince]

I thought we were removed because of the Rich Life Roleplay on IV:MP?

wtf? Really? O.O

[Matthew_Green]

i have been noticeing the lack of hackers

Well yeah. Sure it's not on the official list.. But I've been noticing a shard decrease in hackers lately.

[David_Omid]

Thanks Vince.
I can see those SAMP folks are sooooo jelous that MTASA has done an amazing work and has done it better and faster than them... well, who cares!

MTA:SA isn't better than SA:MP, it also has faults...example: lag

[9r2e5i3k]

MTA:SA isn't better than SA:MP, it also has faults...example: lag

Lags less than SAMP for me (when both clients compared in "deserted" areas as I haven't had a chance to compare crowded areas yet).

And since MTA:SA 1.0 supports joysticks (way better than GTA:SA does in default), I'm actually ready to move there from SAMP.

[The_Wolf]

MTA:SA isn't better than SA:MP, it also has faults...example: lag

For you it may not be better, but for a lot of other people it is. And lag was in MTASA developers preview, in MTA:SA 1.0 there is no sign of lag, even if 50+ players.
Also MTA:SA does not have crashes every 5 minutes and has a 100 percent better syncronization.
That's not a place to discuss which client is better and why, thought, let's drop it now.

[Ibrahim]

And we still got Gvardia to keep us (ARPD) busy

we are always there APRD and will be always there to keep you busy  :hurray:  :banana:

[CM Daniel]

From what I have seen, I'd have to say that MTA: SA is much better than SA:MP right now. It basicly crushes SA:MP in nearly all aspects. All who do not believe me should give MTA: SA 1.0 a try, and find out for yourselves.