Move MTA:VC back from the NEAR-BOTTOM of the forums

[JDC]

I won't make this post long, but I'll give reasons why.

1. Argonath MTA:VC is the original Argonath Server.
2. It's not helping that the server could use a little more players as not everyone scrolls past a certain part of the forum. Moving it back to where it used to be would help bring more players as opposed to what it is now.

/discuss?

[Aksel]

I was thinking about that the other day actually 

Supported.

[EliteTerm]

Agreed..

Couldn't we have the original style back? MTA:VC, SA:MP, VC:MP, MTA:SA, IV:MP in an order, like a timeline describing Argonath's history

[Bio]

Yes from me too.

[Klaus]

I think the new style goes by activity

[Patton]

Couldn't we have the original style back? MTA:VC, SA:MP, VC:MP, MTA:SA, IV:MP in an order, like a timeline describing Argonath's history

This. Of course, keep the order of the introductiory/groups/etc sections as it is.

[JDC]

I think the new style goes by activity

It will cause the active sub-communities to become even more active while the inactive ones will suffer all the more, hence my request to have MTA:VC moved back.

[Aragorn]

1. Whats the point to have on top of the forums the sections of server which is dead almost all the time?
2. As SAMP is more active - many people, especially new, are confused, as they have no idea about MTA VC server and mix the sections, with that their posts are not checked by exact samp administration...

[Hidduh]

Okay.. I'm just being honest right now and I am stating my opinion, so don't take anything as a offense please.

So, the thing you want.. to move the board to a couple of positions higher? And that's supposed to fix the servers activity?

2. It's not helping that the server could use a little more players as not everyone scrolls past a certain part of the forum. Moving it back to where it used to be would help bring more players as opposed to what it is now.

If people became more active within the MTA:VC server and start hosting events, inviting friends (etc), it would become active again, a simple position on the forums isn't going to fix that.
Maybe it's just me, but I just honestly don't think it's gonna fix the activity problem on the server itself.

[JDC]

1. Whats the point to have on top of the forums the sections of server which is dead almost all the time?

More people are now on MTA:VC because of the MTA:VC0.5 repack that came with a working server browser. This is Argonath MTA:VC's chance to at least maintain decent activity levels, and keeping it at the bottom of the forums isn't going to help it.

2. As SAMP is more active - many people, especially new, are confused, as they have no idea about MTA VC server and mix the sections, with that their posts are not checked by exact samp administration...

Has that not always been a problem since time immemorial?

So, the thing you want.. to move the board to a couple of positions higher? And that's supposed to fix the servers activity?

If people became more active within the MTA:VC server and start hosting events, inviting friends (etc), it would become active again, a simple position on the forums isn't going to fix that.
Maybe it's just me, but I just honestly don't think it's gonna fix the activity problem on the server itself.

It will not fix the activity on its own, but it will help as opposed to keeping it at the bottom of the forums. I know for sure that there are some users who do not browse past certain boards.

[Boromir]

If people became more active within the MTA:VC server and start hosting events, inviting friends (etc), it would become active again, a simple position on the forums isn't going to fix that.
Maybe it's just me, but I just honestly don't think it's gonna fix the activity problem on the server itself.

You think TeaM members havent tried those?
We have tried to recover the server activity by hosting events, making movies, making signatures, and so on for years. All of them did not help because of the server browser problem and players' preferences for SA:MP.

However, recently, it is quite active, compared to the past.
I do not think moving the MTA:VC section up will increase the activity either, but I want it to be on the top as it is our HOME.

[Dave]

Boards should be put back on cronological order...with MTA:VC first, followed by SA:MP, then VC:MP, then MTA:SA and then IV:MP...

[Klaus]

server which is dead almost all the time

a simple position on the forums isn't going to fix that.

the new style goes by activity

That's this idea pretty much rapped up

[Boromir]

That's this idea pretty much rapped up

If it is in order of activity, then it is wrong.
MTA:VC server is currently more active than IVMP and MTA:SA servers.

[Aragorn]

It is a normal internet web organized etiquette if you want...
You will not find organizations, which hold on top the oldest games, yeah?

On top is always new + active...

And yes, it will not increase amount of players... Also I do not see the fair that home server (private actually) should lead the top of servers for multiplayer games... Usually private servers are even separate from others and not that visible actually as public...