Hydras & Hunters etc.

[JDC]

The SWAT chases those who are suspected for the most non violent crimes. Speeding, reckless.

Now that is what I do not understand... you might as well re-assign all non-SWAT units to desk jobs or donut delivery.

[[NP]Monte Montague]

Now that is what I do not understand... you might as well re-assign all non-SWAT units to desk jobs or donut delivery.

No offence to DPD officers, but I think the SAPD command staff have that in mind for DPD who coincidently refused SWAT, did you notice yet the new desks they got in the weapon equip room?
DPD officers liked the desks, they are the best police department I think. 
IF it was just FBI + DPD, I think like would be much easier.



I have had bad experiences and heard a lot of bad, but still very good comments about SRU, one of my own also.
I was patrolling and pulled over someone for reckless driving, I told him to pay a ticket, he said ok, so he paid, I went for unsus started to PM admins, SAPD command, SRU people too , then SRU comes along the guy gets freaked and drives off, I tell SRU to back off, I asked for an unsus many many times. They did not listen and ended up killing this person.

[Altair_Carter]

ITT: SWAT is now a group of individuals which work as a regular cop, in SWAT uniform and heavily armed.

[Kenny.]

The SWAT chases those who are suspected for the most non violent crimes. Speeding, reckless.

Do you have proofs? Report to leaders

I was patrolling and pulled over someone for reckless driving, I told him to pay a ticket, he said ok, so he paid, I went for unsus started to PM admins, SAPD command, SRU people too , then SRU comes along the guy gets freaked and drives off, I tell SRU to back off, I asked for an unsus many many times. They did not listen and ended up killing this person.

Do you have proofs?

ps; you complain about SRU, now SWAT is there anything you dont moan about?how about you man up get your f**king guns and fight or dont f**king commit high risk crimes and shit...

[Murt]

Do you have proofs? Report to leaders

Do you have proofs?

ps; you complain about SRU, now SWAT is there anything you dont moan about?how about you man up get your f**king guns and fight or dont f**king commit high risk crimes and shit...

I have witnessed it several times, but I don't take screenshots since anything won't happen anyway. As a great wise man said to some time ago "Welcome to Argonath".

[Ray Carter]

This is just another problem in the overlap between Freeroam and Roleplay..

Argonath ain't a real life roleplay server and doesn't need to abide by real life law enforcement.

As long as suspects continue to steal airplanes, or use jetpacks.. Hydra and Hunter should remain.

[Leon.]

Do you have proofs? Report to leaders

Gvardia high-ups, especially myself, cannot stress enough that people need to report "ZOMG GVARDIA DM" to us, regardless if they have proof or not. In my eyes...
Proof = punishment (if necessary) + lecture
No proof = Reminder lecture.
It's best you at least regard the ones without proof. They MIGHT be true, but either way, you should talk to your people about the issue. If I receive a report on Bob_Gvardia for dming without proof, I'll ask him if he's done something along the lines of DMing. Regardless of the answer, I remind him of the strict rules of Argonath and Gvardia regarding deathmatching.

Even the admins try on the reports of incidents they didn't see. They ask, "Did you DM id 3?" blahblahblah, they do a lil talk if they have the time (Pff, as if when there's one admin per one hundred players), kefekjfwh etc etc

The best way to piss someone off is to openly ignore their problems when the solution is ever so easy.

[quincy69]

Gvardia high-ups, especially myself, cannot stress enough that people need to report "ZOMG GVARDIA DM" to us, regardless if they have proof or not. In my eyes...
Proof = punishment (if necessary) + lecture
No proof = Reminder lecture.
It's best you at least regard the ones without proof. They MIGHT be true, but either way, you should talk to your people about the issue. If I receive a report on Bob_Gvardia for dming without proof, I'll ask him if he's done something along the lines of DMing. Regardless of the answer, I remind him of the strict rules of Argonath and Gvardia regarding deathmatching.

Even the admins try on the reports of incidents they didn't see. They ask, "Did you DM id 3?" blahblahblah, they do a lil talk if they have the time (Pff, as if when there's one admin per one hundred players), kefekjfwh etc etc

The best way to piss someone off is to openly ignore their problems when the solution is ever so easy.

SRU for ever!!! They bitch about SRU because mob think they are stronger then anyone!


Well Not anymore d******es!!!!!! GOOD LUCK Kenny!

[Leon.]

The fuck you on about?

The issues about SRU are true, but are exaggerated beyond belief. An example of not exaggerating is Curse's post. That is actually reasonable, as any person including myself could make that same mistake. But when you go "SRU IS KARKILLIN ERRYUN WEN DAY R SUSPEKT LIKE 50000 TIMES", that's just... what the fuck?
Common sense, guys. Why would a group of people who have been on the server long enough to know the rules blatantly run people's asses over in an attempt to kill them? I have no complaints on SRU as long as they follow the same rules I have to follow. And, of course, every group is going to have a wave of rule breakers. Gvardia's had it, Corleone's had it, and SRU's had it. They do nothing but crash the reputation, because us as humans tend to look past the good in things and focus more on the bad. Hence the statement, "Every win eventually becomes a fail."

[Oliver]

How about you stop telling what SWAT can and can't do when you're not even part of the bloody group?
We do armed responses due to the new SAPD rules. If you have a problem with that, take it up with Hank Rafferty or Gandalf, but leave the f**king people who are following orders out of this.

If you see SWAT chasing reckless drivers/regular evaders, F8 and send a screenie to me. I assure you that they will get punished.
No proof nor screenshots? Shut the fuck up and go back to your bhopping combat chaerg rambo gameplay.

[Raykaza]

How about you stop telling what SWAT can and can't do when you're not even part of the bloody group?
We do armed responses due to the new SAPD rules. If you have a problem with that, take it up with Hank Rafferty or Gandalf, but leave the f**king people who are following orders out of this.

If you see SWAT chasing reckless drivers/regular evaders, F8 and send a screenie to me. I assure you that they will get punished.
No proof nor screenshots? Shut the f**k up and go back to your bhopping combat chaerg rambo gameplay.

Doesn't matter, SWAT is not a pursuit team, it's a ground combat team.

Doesnt matter what kind of suspects there is.

Where is the tactic when a group of SWAT driving a rancher and Drivebying at the suspect like any other cop would do.SWAT are made for  Kdinaps/Bank robberies...

[Kenny.]

Doesnt matter what kind of suspects there is.

Where is the tactic when a group of SWAT driving a rancher and Drivebying at the suspect like any other cop would do.SWAT are made for  Kdinaps/Bank robberies...

Leave to SWAT what we can/cant do, you obviously dont fucking know the damn rules and you are trying to shove up your retarded "i think i think" my ass i think, you dont think. Its either facts or your opinion's which dont matter at this point.

Proof = punishment (if necessary) + lecture
No proof = Reminder lecture.
It's best you at least regard the ones without proof. They MIGHT be true, but either way, you should talk to your people about the issue. If I receive a report on Bob_Gvardia for dming without proof, I'll ask him if he's done something along the lines of DMing. Regardless of the answer, I remind him of the strict rules of Argonath and Gvardia regarding deathmatching.

No thats is not the correct way to handle reports without any proofs.

From your logic it looks like you rather belief what others say who dont provide proofs than your members word.

What you should be doing is if you get a report without proofs, you should watch that member closely o see if he/she does things said those reports. not remind them what they already know "Hey dont rulebreak man ?!?!"

[Leon.]

you dont think.

lol.

Leave to SWAT what we can/cant do, you obviously dont f**king know the damn rules and you are trying to shove up
What you should be doing is if you get a report without proofs, you should watch that member closely o see if he/she does things said those reports. not remind them what they already know "Hey dont rulebreak man ?!?!"

More like, "Hey man, I got a report on you DMing. Be completely honest with me. What happened with <name>?"
Then they say what happened, defending their innocence.
"Alright, whatever you may have done seemed like DM to <name>. Please try to avoid it around them so they don't whine and cry all over the place again."
If they say nothing happened
"ok lol have a nice day obtw dont dm"

[Oliver]

SWAT are made for  Kdinaps/Bank robberies...

I'm sorry, chief of Argonath Police. I won't repeat the same mistakes again, sir.

If you actually did any research on real-life SWAT you'd find out that SWAT also carries out high-risk warrants - arresting murderers, drug dealers and the like. If you kill someone, you become a high risk suspect and SWAT gets deployed to either take you into custody or neutralize the threat.

If you want to give your opinion, do so, but don't go around talking about shit you know nothing about.

[Murt]

Guys, we are off-topic  , even I was it.