Every section: Groups?

[Norrage]

For example:
SAMP forums:

SAMP General
SAMP City hall
SAMP Unban Requests
SAMP Groups and Families

VCMP forums:

VCMP General
VCMP City Hall
VCMP Unban Requests
VCMP Groups and Families

etc etc

We place all the SAMP groups inside the "SAMP groups and families".

We do the same for VCMP, IVMP, MTAVC, and MTASA.
Main clans keep in the current forum, like [WS], =AV=, [TCL] Etc, clans who are active on all servers.

[Dorg]

Well I didnt understand much of your ideia, but I would prefer each server has his own board to his groups. It's a big mess atm 

[Aksel]

Agree. SAMP groups take too much space and gives other server groups less attention.

[Fruity]

Supported.

Reason is the same as Aksel.

Agree. SAMP groups take too much space and gives other server groups less attention.

[Dorg]

Oh I got it, SUpported.

[Dexter]

I support this too as with current system it's just big mess there. With different sections it will be more messy places but not so much mess anyways :P

[Que]

I was just about to write something about this when I saw your topic.
I believe it would better if they would be separated under each section, which would highly reduce the confusion once a group from another place than SAMP is made.

Supported.

[Fruity]

Another bump. This idea has alot of support and will definatly be benificial for groups on the other servers other than SAMP.

[Drix]

Great idea, Supported!

[Norrage]

Bump..

[JDC]

This was the old system. While I actually like this idea due to the flood of SAMP Groups, the boards were merged as to avoid groups having to register every time they expanded to a new server.
 
Perhaps the Groups board could have the sub-boards for each server, and an extra board for those groups which are not confined to one server.

[Norrage]

This was the old system. While I actually like this idea due to the flood of SAMP Groups, the boards were merged as to avoid groups having to register every time they expanded to a new server.
 
Perhaps the Groups board could have the sub-boards for each server, and an extra board for those groups which are not confined to one server.

Or this yes, since its one big mess out there now.

[Leon.]

Perhaps the Groups board could have the sub-boards for each server, and an extra board for those groups which are not confined to one server.

YES, YES, YES, AND YES.

[Norrage]

Another bump.

[Drastic]

supported, the old system was way better