Oscar News

[Que]

So this is a personal thing now? I don't even understand why you're posting here, all you do is arguing.
All we wanted to see was the evidence, and it has erupted into something completely different towards that.
I asked GiacJr almost a month ago to send a personal message to me with the stuff that makes our group disqualified. Same did Gvardia. Once we both receive this, no one will ever even argue again. If there are no evidence, I can clearly not see myself or none of our groups disqualified because of some personal grudge from his side. (look at the first reply he posted.) I can't really see what's hard about that really. Now you all are talking utter bullshit like "uhuh don't double post". Give it a break already. This topic is not meant to be a locked because of someone that is not even involved in the first place. Thank you.

Sincerely,

[Jcstodds]

2. He made up the Oscars. He doesn't have to allow anyone if he doesn't want to. It's his personal thing.

  Giac did not make the Oscars and had no part in making any of this years awards, he was just chosen to count them, probably as he counted them last year (which took 3-4 months).

  So guys be patient.

  Gvardia, make court case?

[Shockk]

1. Don't double post. Use the edit button.
2. He made up the Oscars. He doesn't have to allow anyone if he doesn't want to. It's his personal thing.

If a group is disqualified I would like to see the evidence that the group as a whole broke the rules.

:?:

[SugarD]

:?:

Maybe Gandalf has seen this information. He never said it had to be publicized or given to the people being disqualified.

@Que: It's not personal to me at all. I said don't double post because someone actually double-posted. If you're worried about someone locking the topic, I'm honestly surprised someone hasn't yet. It's been moderated several times already.

[Shockk]

Maybe Gandalf has seen this information. He never said it had to be publicized or given to the people being disqualified.

@Que: It's not personal to me at all. I said don't double post because someone actually double-posted. If you're worried about someone locking the topic, I'm honestly surprised someone hasn't yet. It's been moderated several times already.

that irelevant bcos ur point 2 = in validasian 

[Eminem.]

It takes days to make fake evidence guys, be patient please...

[SugarD]

that irelevant bcos ur point 2 = in validasian 

Your entire post was irrelevant because you failed to make an argument, or spell half your words correctly.

[Maxy]

It takes days to make fake evidence guys, be patient please...

 

[Antonio.]

Gvardia, make court case?

Is it really something that can be sued for?

[Jcstodds]

Is it really something that can be sued for?

  If you feel that you have been judged unfairly I suppose you could. Dunno if Giac would be active enough to actually respond to it though

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

It takes days to make fake evidence guys, be patient please...

hahhaa, you speak the truth.

[Antonio.]

It takes days to make fake evidence guys, be patient please...

Good one.

[Shockk]

Your entire post was irrelevant because you failed to make an argument, or spell half your words correctly.

my post is irelelevant bcos i question flaw in ur post  were u state giacjr and can dq without evidance ... ?
take  a brake man   

[SugarD]

my post is irelelevant bcos i question flaw in ur post  were u state giacjr and can dq without evidance ... ?
take  a brake man   

Actually he can. He's doing the count. In fact, he did. Get over yourself. You're only making the issue bigger than it is instead of maturely PM'ing him to DISCUSS the issue POLITELY.

[Pandalink]

You're only making the issue bigger than it is instead of maturely PM'ing him to DISCUSS the issue POLITELY.

I believe they tried that, and recieved no reply.