Hunting; for or against

[TruthSvensson]

Those who like to hunt are people who couldn't evolve from their caveman stage and fucking morons who likes the feeling of superiority against a defenseless and clueless animal

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

Those who like to hunt are people who couldn't evolve from their caveman stage and f**king morons who likes the feeling of superiority against a defenseless and clueless animal

If we didn't hunt, animals would die from starvation and mass disease. To me, that's a very slow and painful death, other than taking a bullet or bow to the heart and dying usually within like 5 minutes.

[TruthSvensson]

If we didn't hunt, animals would die from starvation and mass disease. To me, that's a very slow and painful death, other than taking a bullet or bow to the heart and dying usually within like 5 minutes.

Or, if you didn't know, circle of life will work as it did for thousands and thousands of years, and the animals will live their own life time instead of being a trophy in your trophy room full of heads of dead animals or whatever you do with their corpses

[Alsatian]

If we didn't hunt, animals would die from starvation and mass disease. To me, that's a very slow and painful death, other than taking a bullet or bow to the heart and dying usually within like 5 minutes.

Urghhh... just, no man.

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

If w never killed animals, they would continue mating and eventually they would not have enough room to live. Examples(america) we continue building new houses, ruining forests therefore, they would live in our nieghborhoods as they do now where you can't hunt in the city. During the winter months, there is like no food, therefore animals die. So, with a current population os let's say for example 250 deer. Winter comes, 25 deer die. Now, there's 225 deer. Let's say no one hunted, population: 1050. Winter comes, same amount of food as last time, 350 deer die. Now 700 deer. Now, the 700 deer again begin their mating time. Now we have 1000 deer again. Due to natural stuff, we lose 100 deer. Now 900, they are forced out of their homes and are forced to live within a small area with less food. Winter comes, pop. = 900. Now that deer have less food and more population, 500 deer die because there's no food for them to eat. Now there's only 400.

See my point? There would also be more vehicle vs. animal collisions, animal attacks on pets/humans due to animals trying to find food.

[Void]

If you love hunting and enjoy doing it, join the army. You'll like it.

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

If you love hunting and enjoy doing it, join the army. You'll like it.

You can't eat humans and it's not for the thrill of the kill.

[Exclusive.]

You can eat humans, really

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

You can eat humans, really

but it's frowned upon in most of this world.

[Aragorn]

The one who should be hunted - humans...

Of cos its more philosophical then realistical idea...

Hunting is in Nature... People were hunting from the beginning, as it is the same as "getting food"... For people it was also clothes, materials to build ancient houses (bones and skins)...

Nowadays we wll move to the Age of Chemistry... We already have aromatizators and fake-tasters that even a piece of shit can smell and tastes like meat and even strawberries...

Vegetarians are the way to destory humanity, as meat is the one which gives a lot of natural proteins and other things for growing your bodies... Children who were growing on vegetarians diets are more weak and powerless, then their age children who were eating meat...
Also to get effects from vitamines of vegetables you have to eat it a lot (kilograms a day) which is actually non-natural style of living organizm... With this you have to eat meat to make it balanced and effective...

As for hunting - I am not against if people do it only for living issues - food and material for clothes... If just like a sport - I am totally against...

[Cero]

The one who should be hunted - humans...

Of cos its more philosophical then realistical idea...

Hunting is in Nature... People were hunting from the beginning, as it is the same as "getting food"... For people it was also clothes, materials to build ancient houses (bones and skins)...

Nowadays we wll move to the Age of Chemistry... We already have aromatizators and fake-tasters that even a piece of shit can smell and tastes like meat and even strawberries...

Vegetarians are the way to destory humanity, as meat is the one which gives a lot of natural proteins and other things for growing your bodies... Children who were growing on vegetarians diets are more weak and powerless, then their age children who were eating meat...
Also to get effects from vitamines of vegetables you have to eat it a lot (kilograms a day) which is actually non-natural style of living organizm... With this you have to eat meat to make it balanced and effective...

As for hunting - I am not against if people do it only for living issues - food and material for clothes... If just like a sport - I am totally against...

Are you saying we should hunt the vegetarians?

[Eminem.]

Are you saying we should hunt the vegetarians?

Of cos its more philosophical then realistical idea...

[Void]

....it's not for the thrill of the kill.

Are you sure of that?

[TruthSvensson]

Dr_Pepper you can't justify yourself by talking nonsense

[Vince]

I for one support hunting if you're doing it for A) Keeping population down so animals do not begin to live in people's backyards... or B) for sport, so long as you actually make use of the animal (as Aragorn has said use for food, clothes, etc.)

As for hunting - I am not against if people do it only for living issues - food and material for clothes... If just like a sport - I am totally against...

Would you still be against if one hunted for sport but did not waste the animal? (Made food from it). I know my father hunts for sport, but it is not "Ill go take a machine gun and shoot down any animal I see", it is getting up before the sun and going until mid-day and even if he does, it is eaten and supplies food for almost a year if it is a well grown buck.