Fooling administration.

[Cutt3r]

As the topic says, some people - whether regular or new players - are attempting to fool administration for various matters - typically it may be for setting of a house after one property admin says 'No'. Or if a property admin says that a place can't have a Mad Dogg int, the player concerned goes to another admin to try his luck.
Another instance is when players ask for refund - a player claims that a bug ate his 10k used for car modification. He asks an admin for a refund and the admin gives him the cash, trusting him. He repeats the same act with other members of administration.

Anyone doing either what is listed above or any such other acts wherein they try to have their way with members of administration by fooling them - will be punished. Punishment can be in any form - monetary or otherwise. It depends on each case.

If you are told by a property admin that a particular place will not be set or that an interior will not fit a building - accept it. Do not go to another property admin and try your luck. Respect the word of the former admin.

Yes, each admin may see a particular building in a particular way. Because the setting of houses/interiors is based on judgment about size and other matters. But when an attempt is made to bypass one admin for another to try and get a 'yes' from him - that is just fooling the former admin.

I have got a few names of players who are trying to have their way with various property admins - be warned. Do not continue such practices.

[MorlanV]

Sorry but I dont know why I laughed when you said "try to have their way with administration"

I guess it's because I'm an idiot.

Oh wait, it sounds sexual nevermind

[Wake]

Why not just take a "No" from an admin and respect their answer. Ignoring what they say and going to ask another might blow your only chance
to be trusted by the admins 

[Murt]

This seems rather logical, people have tried to fool me but did not succed.

Good heads up to everyone Cutt3r.

now i dm u 

[Caltson]

With all due respect, Cutter, but I think it's simply the nature of some people characteristics.

This issue can be seen in several similar cases:

- Kids who won't get their candy from dad will ask it from mom.
- Customers in a Shop that don't get a refund of a particular product will try to ask another shop employee.

It's seen in a various kind of scenarios, I think this warning can wake up some people, however will not get rid of your problem. Let's hope there will be many members reading it knowing that such form of 'backstabbing?' is not tolerated and really disrespectfull towards others.

[Shejken]

Yesterday i asked Jcs to set me a house:

It was at Temple, opposite of my ex-house what was by then owned. They were same sized and i asked same int to house what i wanted. When it was ready, it costed half more than my ex-house [500k] (same size, same parking lot, same int)
I didn't even have cash for the house so it was useless and is still unowned. So is it fair that house what i requested costed half more than the ex-house.

But i hope you don't mean me with those "names"

[Exterminator]

Yesterday i asked Jcs to set me a house:

It was at Temple, opposite of my ex-house what was by then owned. They were same sized and i asked same int to house what i wanted. When it was ready, it costed half more than my ex-house [500k] (same size, same parking lot, same int)
I didn't even have cash for the house so it was useless and is still unowned. So is it fair that house what i requested costed half more than the ex-house.

But i hope you don't mean me with those "names"

Maybe the other's house's value was invalid and jcs thought the value for that house should be 750k?

[Caltson]

Yesterday i asked Jcs to set me a house:

It was at Temple, opposite of my ex-house what was by then owned. They were same sized and i asked same int to house what i wanted. When it was ready, it costed half more than my ex-house [500k] (same size, same parking lot, same int)
I didn't even have cash for the house so it was useless and is still unowned. So is it fair that house what i requested costed half more than the ex-house.

But i hope you don't mean me with those "names"

The house on the other side of my street costs the double of my house aswell, that's economy, check before you buy.

[Blinky17]

well JCS set a ammunation for skyhawk in fort carson and its only 260k,

i thought ammnuations were no longer allowed.

maybe jsc pricing is lower or higher in areas.

[Julio.]

well JCS set a ammunation for skyhawk in fort carson and its only 260k,

i thought ammnuations were no longer allowed.

maybe jsc pricing is lower or higher in areas.

Well Obviously as they are Admins they get Preferential Treatment :P

[Murt]

well JCS set a ammunation for skyhawk in fort carson and its only 260k,

i thought ammnuations were no longer allowed.

maybe jsc pricing is lower or higher in areas.

There is already an ammunation existing in Fort Carson who have been there for a while. And SkyHawk own the Willowfield Cluckin Bell and that have he had for a while.

[Blinky17]

Its owned by skyhawk but held by some coreleone member

[Cutt3r]

Some guys just love to point fingers...

Jcs was not aware about the rule regarding not setting ammunations. He should be aware about it now. There is no case of preferential treatment.

[Blinky17]

Exactly the point i was trying to make, jsc is new to setting of propertys and might not of known ... he a good admin

[Jcstodds]

  I did not know more ammunations were not set. Only reason I found out is from this thread. 

  Property guidelines for pricing can be found here: http://www.argonathrpg.eu/forum/index.php?topic=52556  so feel free to evaluate your property beforehand, to avoid disappointment in price.

 I do not alter prices based on nearby houses, only check them as guidelines. In Shejkens case above, although house was same, yours had a large closed off garden area, and the other is under priced and was set years ago.

Well Obviously as they are Admins they get Preferential Treatment :P