Non-suspect(s) entering a ongoing shootout

[Mashgash]

If you want to see punishment do it when owners are on server and spectating...

So you're actually saying that family members aren't allowed to defend their owns as non suspects?

[Gandalf]

So you're actually saying that family members aren't allowed to defend their owns as non suspects?

Read the post of Aragorn.

In my words : if you are not part of the roleplay in which the suspection started, you are walking on thin ice. If a mafia member is suspected and a car full of non-suspected family members pull up to help in the shootout, expect them getting punushed.

[Jubin]

It all depends on the situation like Gandalf and Aragorn have said. The main aspect is that everybody has to understand who are and who aren't part of the role play.

For example, lets say there has been a shootout in LS and now some people are chasing one Gvardia member.  When that Gvardia member reaches SF  Gvardia HQ, and there are quite a few other Gvardia members there, use your common sense and don't assume you are going to be greeted with some milk and cookies.

[Murt]

Engaging cops as a none suspect it's two things we can punish for, cophunting and deathmatching. IF they now are not apart of the roleplay they shouldn't come and backstab officers since they will be unaware
why they got attacked and will report the player for deathmatching.

If you now so badly want to kill cops, aid your friends, group members or what it is. Offer them a ride to get suspected and easily get your roleplay reason there to kill cops...

[Mashgash]

Alright thanks everyone for their answers! I hope this clearfied things for others and not just me, making sense now.

[9r2e5i3k]

defend

I'd hardly call it defending, since such maneuver will get the whole gang wanted (and most likely killed), instead of only the originally wanted people. Not mentioning admin punishment.

So I don't even see how such "defending" is even profitable in any way, since you have to spend on guns, ammo, armour and health a lot more money than for just turning yourself in and spending only $200 on jail.

[Cero]

I'd hardly call it defending, since such maneuver will get the whole gang wanted (and most likely killed), instead of only the originally wanted people. Not mentioning admin punishment.

So I don't even see how such "defending" is even profitable in any way, since you have to spend on guns, ammo, armour and health a lot more money than for just turning yourself in and spending only $200 on jail.

There is something called comradeship. I'm sure you've heard of it.

[9r2e5i3k]

There is something called comradeship. I'm sure you've heard of it.

It's more like recklessness in this case.

[Mashgash]

I'd hardly call it defending, since such maneuver will get the whole gang wanted (and most likely killed), instead of only the originally wanted people. Not mentioning admin punishment.

So I don't even see how such "defending" is even profitable in any way, since you have to spend on guns, ammo, armour and health a lot more money than for just turning yourself in and spending only $200 on jail.

So you actually want to discuss which word I choosed for my sentence....? I bet you know what I mean, no need to take out one word of my sentence and begin to discuss it, you know what I mean, enough that way...

[9r2e5i3k]

Then what did you mean by "defend"?

[Mashgash]

Then what did you mean by "defend"?

I wrote defend just because I thought it fit in that sentence.

Member 1 is suspected.
Member 2, 3 and 4 approching from the other side of the country just to help him.

Either you call it aiding, defending your partner or you just calling it cophunting / deathmatching as it seems to be that from all the answers that has been given here.

[9r2e5i3k]

@Mash
The word does not matter actually since it still means the same.

[Mashgash]

@Mash
The word does not matter actually since it still means the same.

Then why did you pointed it out  :conf: 

[Romeo]

So by this logic; if cops that arrive to assist other cops who are in a gunfight were not present at the scene or involved in the roleplay, they cannot assist fellow officers in a fight? because its the same thing. If cops can call random cops to come and help them out in a gunfight from across the map then it seems very unfair that we can't do the same. I mean, If I'm being shot at and I run into a group of my associates they're not just going to stand there and let me get killed. They'd shoot the cop to save my life which is what cops do all the time.

[Pandalink]

by this logic

Dangerously sensible words, Romeo.


Anyway, like I mentioned earlier, in order to avoid confusion with police make it clear that you are backing up a suspect, ideally by being in the same group (with the same tag) and arriving to the scene already suspected. That way, there can be no confusion and no cop moaning.