Project 1.94 - 2.0's easier alternative

[Morphine]

Someone asked why we are pointing to such desperate measures.

Have a quick guess.

[~Legend~]

I wouldn't (and I hope no one else either) say that 1.93's a "waste" or "useless".

I doubt we would even think about anything like this if 2.0's development had not been released publicly.
Let's keep 1.9x what it is, and 2.0 a massive step up?

[SugarD]

if there will be no new features, i dont see point of restarting. imagine restart, you work hard to finally get prop/car/something, then it restarts again due to 2.0

Umm, 1.9x has been out for years...

[Marcell]

Umm, 1.9x has been out for years...

and what that statement has to do with my quote?

[SugarD]

and what that statement has to do with my quote?

If people worked hard to earn things, they've had plenty of time to enjoy them. You said they "finally" got all this stuff. They've had it all for awhile. If anything, 2.0's fresh restart is badly needed. The balance between players in the server has gotten ridiculous.

[Morphine]

Why don't you play the game for 3 months and then tell yourself something about the balance? It's quite alright to me. (10 months a regular here)

[Marcell]

If people worked hard to earn things, they've had plenty of time to enjoy them. You said they "finally" got all this stuff. They've had it all for awhile. If anything, 2.0's fresh restart is badly needed. The balance between players in the server has gotten ridiculous.

You got me wrong. I never said that 2.0 restart is un-needed. I said that it wouldnt be logical to have restart on 1.93, then on 2.0 again

[Kessu]

I've been playing god knows how long and my bank account must be like -500k  :razz:

So no, it's not about the balance between players, but who actually does something to earn his cash.

Also restart in 1.93 is pointless, since it would restart again in 2.0. I agree with Marcell on that one.

[SugarD]

You got me wrong. I never said that 2.0 restart is un-needed. I said that it wouldnt be logical to have restart on 1.93, then on 2.0 again

Apologies. I agree with that statement then.

[Ave]

Okay, if you want to keep the low-activity level for another 2-3 months - have fun. Pretty much challenging :skull:

[~Legend~]

I don't see why the server should be any different to the summer (general example), content wise, as it is the same.

[stormeus]

A fancy new script should not change activity as much as you perceive it would. The health of the community must come first.

[Morphine]

The health of the community reaches higher levels with higher innovation, hence

a fancy new script

would contribute to it a lot.

[SugarD]

The health of the community reaches higher levels with higher innovation, hence  would contribute to it a lot.

Not if the community is unhealthy due to how they treat scripts, not how advanced they are.

[Ave]

If you're not up for serious changes, at least we have to take care of goods that are owned by inactive guys (more than 3 months).
Newcomers are unable to find anything cool on the market, a little reset would fix it.