/checkfordrugs (/cfd)

[Martin.]

Already suggested (As /frisk), and got denied. It could be abused easily by any free-cop just to suspect a drugs-holder.

Restrict to officers+ - Solved.

Don't want to get suspected? Dont carry drugs. Problem solved.

Exactly. Why would a person run along the city with 5k drugs on him ? Doesnt make any sense. But atm there is nowhere to store drugs so Lazlows idea should be implemented first.

We will need new in-game rules about this, cause it would be little stupid to go from player to player and write /cfd
But generally I like the idea.

Yeah, some rules about when can you use this command. And if to restrict this command to officers+ then they as regular players of the server should understand and respect those rules.

[Mihail Junkovich]

We could rp the warrent, but it can also be a cmd xD

Example: /warrant ID text

After that, on players screen would appear a message like the one when you show your identification ( Likes /sb ID ). Then the player can use cmd for search..

That one.. /checkdrugs, /cfd, /search.. or whatever xD

Also, this cmd should maybe be allowed only to FBI Agents and LCPD UC ( If something like that would be organized in future ). I think there is no need that "regular" officers do some searching for drugs, that's job for feds :P

[Batta]

It just forces RP imo.

[Martin.]

Can you bring an example of how this forces player to RP, without the command actually being abused at the same time.

[Mihail Junkovich]

It just forces RP imo.

That's why only FBI would have that cmd. You wouldn't ( At least I hope you wouldn't ) just go around and show people a warrant then search 'em.. and do that like 5 times a day, until you hit the jackpot. It should be a little bit more rp style and targets should be carefully choose due to theirs activity on server. But, of course, you, the FBI, would deal with details for that.. how, when and who you will search. ^^

Also, the searching shouldn't be in short periods, like.. every day once, or every 3 days. It should be like maybe 3 time in one month max( per person of course ). :]


So.. "forcing" rp 3 times per month.. it ain't much.

[Batta]

Can you bring an example of how this forces player to RP, without the command actually being abused at the same time.

If someone wants to RP that he has/doesn't have drugs he's forced to choose by the result of this /cfd.

Like when you are stopped by a criminal group you're not forced to /give the money but you can simply /me gives money . .

[Martin.]

If someone wants to RP that he has/doesn't have drugs he's forced to choose by the result of this /cfd.

Well thats the thing, he has them ... If i dont want to go to jail then can I RP that I didnt do it ? Even though I m wanted. I think its the same thing. I agree with Miha, if u dont want to get caught then dont wear drugs with you. ANd why should someone randomly search you ? There can be rules attached to to the command to prevent randomly searching ppl. But if you are involved with organized crime then thats the risk you gonna have to take.

[Batta]

What's their solution atm? Can they deposit the drugs somewhere? No.

[Martin.]

They can eventually.

[Batta]

They can eventually.

Eventually . . .

Without that function it would be a bit unfair.

[Martin.]

I m not suggesting adding this command without ability to store drugs somewhere. I stated that in my previous posts already.

[Ted]

Restrict to officers+ - Solved.

That's pretty much what was thought for the SA-MP server did it solve anything? No.

[miha1111]

If someone wants to RP that he has/doesn't have drugs he's forced to choose by the result of this /cfd.

Like when you are stopped by a criminal group you're not forced to /give the money but you can simply /me gives money . .

NO!

You are not forcing anybody to RP with /checkfordrugs command in this case.....IF They dont want to RP having drugs - They should not have it.....problem solved...

[Martin.]

That's pretty much what was thought for the SA-MP server did it solve anything? No.

What about adding special rules for the use of this command ? Breaking them will lead to punishments or demoting that officer for abusing this command. IV is small enough to keep an eye on everything, I dont think it will cause problems. In the other hand, I dont know the background of SAMP incidents.

[Ted]

Currently IV:MP is small enough but at some point in the future it may grow larger. You can go about setting rules, regulations and guidelines to everything possible but it just get that much more complicated.