Anti-Islam film causes multiple diplomatic mission attacks

[Dean.]

God have mercy upon his soul ... :trust:

[Omar Aly]

PESHAWAR: A Pakistani federal minister has announced a bounty of $100,000 on the maker of the American film “Innocence of Muslims” disrespecting the Holy Prophet (PBUH), DawnNews reported.

Speaking here at a press conference on Saturday, the Federal Minister for Railways Ghulam Ahmed Bilour said that he was aware that it was a crime to instigate the people for murder, but he was ready to commit the crime. He added that there was no way to instill fear among blasphemers other than taking this step.

The minister also called on members of the Taliban and al Qaeda for their support, saying that if members of the banned militant organisations kill the maker of the blasphemous movie, they will also be rewarded.


Isn't this f**king insane?

/sethit abuse man...   

[Jubin]

Well, if you read what i wrote before this edit, forgive me, i just like to "test" some people out of curiosity. Once again, sorry.

 "No one can touch it except those who are pure." (56:79)  "Indeed the polytheists are impure." (9:28)

Some Muslims believe that just because of this verse, non-believers (including other Abraham religions) are impure and therefore not allowed to touch it.

The first verse is a response to the disbelievers if read right. The disbelievers said that the book was revealed by Demons instead of Angels of God. It has nothing to do about touching by pure or impure physically, means. The verse is a response to the disbelievers because Demons, are who unpure, could not touch the Quran.

The second verse is about the disbelievers. The people in the Arabian penisula were given the message of Islam, they refused. So they were declared as criminals in the eyes of God and then he ordained them. Believers, these polytheists are impure, therefore, they should not come close to Sacred Mosque after this year." (9:28) So basically, they were spiritually impure, therefore they weren't allowed to enter the house of God anymore.

Thanks for reading, once again sorry, the curiosity questions are in my nature and i strive to shun it.

There you go, you answered your own question to me where it says Nathan is not allowed to read quran. Where you decided to give those lines one meaning, I like to take it as it is written in the book itself.

[Alan.Wake]

you answered your own question to me where it says Nathan is not allowed to read quran

He is allowed to read. Some people don't understand the text fully so they get the different meaning about it. You told me it was written in Quran, i figured out which verse you were talking about and explained it.

[Jubin]

He is allowed to read. Some people don't understand the text fully so they get the different meaning about it. You told me it was written in Quran, i figured out which verse you were talking about and explained it.

You explained what you think it means.

[Alan.Wake]

You explained what you think it means.

I explained what many scholars believe.

[Jellyfish]

Just read it on the internet or ask someone well versed in the particular dialect of Arabic (In which the Quran is written) to explain it to you, don't stray from the topic at hand.

[FastSh00T]

If I look at the posts that were removed I clearly saw some who actually seemed to support the violence.

I would love to see those posts.

I bet that you wouldn't mind to share some of those posts with me to backup your statement.

Gandalf, so you decided to ignore my request and reply to the other messages? Well okay then. I'll consider "some" of those Muslims didn't support the violence acts and you just made it up to ruin our reputation.


Whoever has the will to argue, provoke and provide false facts in his "discussion". Simply report him, since provoking is against the rules. If the community staff doesn't take an action against him, then consider the staff is on the same side as those trolls and provocative people.

[Gandalf]

Gandalf, so you decided to ignore my request and reply to the other messages? Well okay then. I'll consider "some" of those Muslims didn't support the violence acts and you just made it up to ruin our reputation.


Whoever has the will to argue, provoke and provide false facts in his "discussion". Simply report him, since provoking is against the rules. If the community staff doesn't take an action against him, then consider the staff is on the same side as those trolls and provocative people.

Conclude whatever you want. I am not giving you access to the deleted posts section.

[FastSh00T]

Conclude whatever you want. I am not giving you access to the deleted posts section.

Screenshots are enough to prove you were right.

[Alan.Wake]

One does not simply get something free from a Russian.

[Dean.]

One does not simply get something free from a Russian.

-_-

[Gandalf]

Screenshots are enough to prove you were right.

I have no need to prove anything to you. If you can not take the word of the owner of the community, you should consider your presence here.

[FastSh00T]

I have no need to prove anything to you. If you can not take the word of the owner of the community, you should consider your presence here.

What I can see from the community owner is gloating over the events happened at U.S embassies and implying Muslims are criminals.

[Gandalf]

What I can see from the community owner is gloating over the events happened at U.S embassies and implying Muslims are criminals.

Do you imply that the people who vandalized and destroyed property, as well as killed people are innocent?

As for gloating, the events were expected by me as it is clearly most violence happened in areas where the USA has used hidden influence to bring a different regime.

Finally, I consider many Muslims as my friend, even if I do not share their enthusiams about their religion.
However I do respect theirs, and will not mock or unnecesary tempt them.