Question about Counter Strike: Source

[Omri]

Play 1.6. Counter-Strike source sux big time! De_dust2 best map ever!

hax0r1337

[Radagast]

It's the exact opposite of Omri's last comment. I forgot how SH*T the graphics on 1.6 are...compared to source. It's like comparing GTA I and GTA:SA...


-(Fr)Johannes

[Watahell]

Dust2 Rools

FTW1

Nah, I'd rather play pn my own shitty maps.

It is the top of a builiding, with one room, with a computer on a table. and 2 open areas. But its real shit 

(at least you can play soccer with the PC's Graphics card, motherboard, mouse, keyboard and it's keys. But my favorite is the processor. )

Just learned how to use VHE, so my map sucks a lot 

[Fatboy_Rob]

Vice City has better Gfx than Shit SA does...

[Watahell]

Vice City has better Gfx than Shit SA does...

VC is just more colourfull... At least it's my opinion.

[Fatboy_Rob]

Vice City has better Gfx than Shit SA does...

Actually it does, RON + Gandalf agree.
think about it

Skins:
VC is more detailed, clothing was detailed
SA is just plain & simple polygons, SLIGHTY Detailed things on gangsters + main characters, others, none...

Cars:
VC more detailed Car interiors + exteriors (compare the greenwoods & the sabres & the cheetah's)
SA used a Quanity than quality with all their cars.


SA is bigger, and R*North was Runing short on their time before deadline of release, and they didnt have skin or car details ready, only some cars, like hydra, boats, etc.
and they shipped it out too early.

[Gimli]

Maybe Vice City does have better GFX, but San Andreas is way more realistic.

• Vice City: You can't move the camera around like in SA.
• Vice City: It's way too fast, unlike SA.

[UberPwner]

Maybe Vice City does have better GFX, but San Andreas is way more realistic.

• Vice City: You can't move the camera around like in SA.
• Vice City: It's way too fast, unlike SA.

= SA Wins.

[Watahell]

And the SA gfx is more realistic, not the colourfull VC. SA's seems worse because the streets, houses and cars are dirty, ugly, like the world out there

[Jubin]

Maybe Vice City does have better GFX, but San Andreas is way more realistic.

• Vice City: You can't move the camera around like in SA.

...
[/list]

And yeah in real life you can watch your back not even looking at that direction(leave out mirrors)
Don't talk about realism when it comes to GTA as when you get shot IRL you usually won't start again at the same age in a nearest hospital.

[Fatboy_Rob]

And the SA gfx is more realistic, not the colourfull VC. SA's seems worse because the streets, houses and cars are dirty, ugly, like the world out there

dude....

VC is based in Miami...
go to Miami at night, all neon lights & stuff everywhere.



See? it was the same way in the 80's...
How do i know: i live 3 hours away from Miami(where VC is Realisticly based on)
Posted on: October 25, 2007, 08:09:48 PMoh and thats Southbeach(ocean Drive)

And Vc has a dirty side too...
go to Littlehaiti & lil havana

Just like IRL

[Watahell]

So, SA is realistic, cuz it's not colourful on some streets. Now take LV. It's colourful cuz Las Vegas is also colorful IRL.

[Fatboy_Rob]

So, SA is realistic, cuz it's not colourful on some streets. Now take LV. It's colourful cuz Las Vegas is also colorful IRL.

and all of Vice City is colorful?
nope, goto the mainland, you dont see any lights...

Vice City is realistic as much as SA is...

[Watahell]

I guess you're right

[PMP]

pff... VC has better GFX, at least in cars. Check out the difference.
In VC they bothered to draw shadows in the car's skins to highlight the details. In SA the car appears to be made of a plastic body.