free

News

collapse

User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

NOTICE OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHANGES by Huntsman
[June 19, 2025, 05:22:50 pm]


Re: Stopping by by Sinister
[June 08, 2025, 01:58:04 pm]


Re: Stopping by by Ehks
[June 04, 2025, 12:25:17 am]


Re: Rest in peace by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 03:38:02 am]


Re: [SA:MP]House of Sforza | The Elite Power | Estd. 2006 | LS - LV by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 03:09:22 am]


Re: The Soprano Family | Royal Loyalty by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 03:00:31 am]


Re: The Gvardia Family || San Fierro's Main Power || Best criminal group of 09/10/11 by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 02:47:01 am]


Re: BALLAS | In memory of INFERNO 9 and NBA by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 02:31:29 am]


Re: Count to 1,000,000. by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 02:15:04 am]


Re: Stopping by by Traser
[June 01, 2025, 10:23:13 pm]


Re: Stopping by by Old Catzu
[May 18, 2025, 07:27:06 pm]


Re: Stopping by by TheRock
[May 18, 2025, 06:44:49 am]

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 447
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Birthday Calender

June 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 [30]

Japanese airlines ground Dreamliners after emergency landing

Reece · 772

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ReeceTopic starter

  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 4016
  • Living.
  • With us since: 07/01/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
All Nippon Airways Co said instruments aboard a domestic flight indicated a battery error, triggering emergency warnings to the pilots. It said the battery in the forward cargo hold was the same lithium-ion type as one involved in a fire on another Dreamliner at a U.S. airport last week.

The carrier grounded all 17 of its 787s, and Japan Airlines Co suspended its 787 flights scheduled for Wednesday. ANA said its planes could be back in the air as soon as Thursday once checks were completed. The two carriers operate around half of the 50 Dreamliners delivered by Boeing to date.

Wednesday's incident, described by a transport ministry official as "highly serious" - language used in international safety circles as indicating there could have been an accident - is the latest in a line of mishaps - fuel leaks, a battery fire, wiring problem, brake computer glitch and cracked cockpit window - to hit the world's first mainly carbon-composite airliner in recent days.

"I think you're nearing the tipping point where they need to regard this as a serious crisis," said Richard Aboulafia, a senior analyst with the Teal Group in Fairfax, Virginia. "This is going to change people's perception of the aircraft if they don't act quickly."

The 787, which has a list price of $207 million (129 million pounds), represents a leap in the way planes are designed and built, but the project has been plagued by cost overruns and years of delays. Some have suggested Boeing's rush to get planes built after those delays resulted in the recent problems, a charge the company strenuously denies.

Both the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said they were monitoring the latest incident as part of a comprehensive review of the Dreamliner announced late last week.

ALARM TRIGGERED

ANA flight 692 left Yamaguchi Airport in western Japan shortly after 8 a.m. local time (11:00 p.m. British time Tuesday) bound for Haneda Airport near Tokyo, a 65-minute flight. About 18 minutes into the flight, at 30,000 feet, the plane began a descent, cutting its altitude to 20,000 feet in about four minutes. It made an emergency landing 16 minutes later, according to flight-tracking website Flightaware.com.

A spokesman for Osaka airport authority said the plane landed at Takamatsu at 8:45 a.m. All 129 passengers and eight crew evacuated via the plane's inflatable chutes. Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said five people were slightly injured.

At a news conference - where ANA's vice-president Osamu Shinobe bowed deeply in apology - the carrier said a battery in the forward cargo hold triggered emergency warnings to the pilots, who decided on the emergency action.

"There was a battery alert in the cockpit and there was an odd smell detected in the cockpit and cabin, and (the pilot) decided to make an emergency landing," Shinobe said.

Passengers leaving the ANA flight told local TV there was an odour like burning plastic on the plane as soon as it took off. "There was a bad smell as soon as we started and before we made the emergency landing there was an announcement and the stewardess' voice was shaking, so I thought this was serious," one passenger told TBS TV.

Shigeru Takano, a senior safety official at the Civil Aviation Bureau, said that an emergency light indicating a malfunction had gone off in the cockpit, followed by another warning light indicating smoke. Checks showed a battery error and smoke was smelled in the cockpit, he added.

One man told a local broadcaster there was a burning smell in the plane. "There was a strong, burning smell, but the smoke appeared after they opened the emergency doors, after we landed," he said.

Marc Birtel, a Boeing spokesman, told Reuters: "We've seen the reports, we're aware of the events and are working with our customer."

UNDER REVIEW

In Asia, only the Japanese and Air India have the Dreamliner in service, but other airlines are among those globally to have ordered around 850 of the new aircraft.

Australia's Qantas Airways said its order for 15 Dreamliners remained on track, with its Jetstar subsidiary due to take delivery of the first of the aircraft in the second half of this year.

India's aviation regulator said it was reviewing the Dreamliner's safety and would talk to parts makers, but had no plans to ground the six planes operated by state-owned Air India. "We are not having any problem with our Dreamliners. The problems we had earlier were fixed," Arun Mishra, Director General of Civil Aviation, told Reuters.

United Airlines, the only U.S. carrier currently flying the 787, said it was not taking any immediate action in response to the latest incident. "We are looking at what is happening with ANA and we will have more information tomorrow," a spokeswoman said.

The Dreamliner's problems echo those of rival Airbus, which a year ago survived a crisis of public confidence after a series of incidents with wing cracks on its A380, the world's largest passenger jet. Those problems tested the manufacturer's relations with airlines, but no plane orders were cancelled.

BATTERY TECHNOLOGY

Shares in GS Yuasa Corp, which makes batteries for the Dreamliner, fell 4.5 percent in Tokyo. The Kyoto-based firm said it was too early to comment on the situation.

The use of new battery technology is among the cost-saving features of the 787, which Boeing says burns 20 percent less fuel than rival jets using older technology.

Lithium-ion batteries can catch fire if they are overcharged, and once alight, they are difficult to put out as the chemicals produce oxygen, Boeing's chief engineer for the 787, Mike Sinnett, told reporters last Wednesday. He said then that lithium-ion was not the only choice of battery, but "it was the right choice".

Shares in other Dreamliner suppliers in Japan came under pressure, with Toray Industries Inc, which supplies carbon fibre used in the plane's composites, also down 4.5 percent, and Fuji Heavy Industries, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and IHI off 2.5-4 percent on a benchmark Nikkei that was 2.6 percent lower. ANA shares slipped 1.6 percent.

PUBLIC CONFIDENCE

Japan's transport minister on Tuesday acknowledged that passenger confidence in the Dreamliner was at stake, as both Japan and the United States have opened broad and open-ended investigations into the plane after the recent incidents.

The 787 is Boeing's first new jet in more than a decade, and the company's financial fortunes are largely tied to its success. The plane offers airlines unprecedented fuel economy, but the huge investment to develop it coupled with years of delay in delivery has caused headaches for customers, hurt Boeing financially and created a delivery bottleneck.

Boeing has said it will at least break even on the cost of building the 1,100 new 787s it expects to deliver over the next decade. Some analysts, however, say Boeing may never make money from the plane, given its enormous development cost.

Any additional cost from fixing problems discovered by the string of recent incidents would affect those forecasts, and could hit Boeing's bottom line more quickly if it has to stop delivering planes, analysts said.



Offline Matthew_Green

  • One of Argo's Worst Drivers
  • Regular
  • **
    • Posts: 710
    With us since: 08/03/2009
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • SA:MP: Matthew_Green
  • Discord: MatthewG141#7322
Reply #1 on: January 17, 2013, 01:07:29 am
Just to addon to this news article....


BREAKING NEWS

U.S. FAA has now offically grounded ALL Boeing 787s. The FAA is putting the blame on the 787's Lithium-ion batteries, the same batteries that's found from your laptop computer to the same batteries used in Hybrids and Electric vehicles. These batteries are well known to overheat and explode under high tempertures.

This of course has a massive negitive impact on Boeing, which is the U.S.'s largest plane manufacture. The future of the 787 is uncertain now, but my guess is that they (Boeing) need to develop a new type of battery that's not a form of the Lithium type.

Driving each day like it's Burnout 3...


Offline Mikal

  • Ex-FLA
  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 7190
    With us since: 10/04/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #2 on: January 17, 2013, 01:42:30 pm
Just to addon to this news article....


BREAKING NEWS

U.S. FAA has now offically grounded ALL Boeing 787s. The FAA is putting the blame on the 787's Lithium-ion batteries, the same batteries that's found from your laptop computer to the same batteries used in Hybrids and Electric vehicles. These batteries are well known to overheat and explode under high tempertures.

This of course has a massive negitive impact on Boeing, which is the U.S.'s largest plane manufacture. The future of the 787 is uncertain now, but my guess is that they (Boeing) need to develop a new type of battery that's not a form of the Lithium type.
Sounds like a simple fix, change the batteries.. :poke:

DENIED


Offline Teddy

  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 9161
  • "I'm on top of the world because of you."
  • With us since: 05/02/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • SA:MP: EvilMiku
Reply #3 on: January 25, 2013, 03:28:46 am
Sounds like a simple fix, change the batteries.. :poke:

Not so easy actually. The plane is designed to work with those specific batteries, changing them requires engineering tweaks all over. These aren't your average batteries either, that type of battery is way more efficient. A fix could take months actually.



Offline [WS]Jacob

  • Regular
  • **
    • Posts: 1890
    With us since: 20/11/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • White Shadows Clan
  • SA:MP: [WS]Jacob
Reply #4 on: January 25, 2013, 05:54:17 pm
A fix could take months actually.
At a considerable cost I'm very sure.



Offline Teddy

  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 9161
  • "I'm on top of the world because of you."
  • With us since: 05/02/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • SA:MP: EvilMiku
Reply #5 on: January 25, 2013, 07:37:53 pm
At a considerable cost I'm very sure.

Very much indeed. Engineers would need to be flown out to each of these airliners and additional parts to do the repairs, which could take a very lengthy amount of resources and time.



Offline ~Legend~

  • Veteran
  • ***
    • Posts: 3863
  • [WS]Legend
  • With us since: 21/02/2009
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • White Shadows
  • VC:MP: [WS]Legend
Reply #6 on: January 29, 2013, 11:05:47 pm
Feel sorry for Boeing...

The Airbus A380 shot ahead of all that had come before in its ability to transport so many people. Boeing, rather than going on the direct offensive and competing immediately to top the passenger number went for luxury.

The Dreamliner looks pretty awesome, hopefully it will get off the ground, literally, soon. :P


Offline Zorex116

  • Veteran
  • ***
    • Posts: 932
    With us since: 01/12/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • SA:MP: [WS]Dave_Digger
Reply #7 on: February 10, 2013, 03:25:47 am
Air bus is growing!

A320NEO
A350XWB

Airbus in 2012: continued success

Post Merge: February 10, 2013, 03:32:30 am
I wanna hook up with the new a320 neo air asia in december :)



 


SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal