free

News

collapse

User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Recent Posts

NOTICE OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT CHANGES by Huntsman
[June 19, 2025, 05:22:50 pm]


Re: Stopping by by Sinister
[June 08, 2025, 01:58:04 pm]


Re: Stopping by by Ehks
[June 04, 2025, 12:25:17 am]


Re: Rest in peace by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 03:38:02 am]


Re: [SA:MP]House of Sforza | The Elite Power | Estd. 2006 | LS - LV by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 03:09:22 am]


Re: The Soprano Family | Royal Loyalty by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 03:00:31 am]


Re: The Gvardia Family || San Fierro's Main Power || Best criminal group of 09/10/11 by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 02:47:01 am]


Re: BALLAS | In memory of INFERNO 9 and NBA by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 02:31:29 am]


Re: Count to 1,000,000. by Stefanrsb
[June 02, 2025, 02:15:04 am]


Re: Stopping by by Traser
[June 01, 2025, 10:23:13 pm]


Re: Stopping by by Old Catzu
[May 18, 2025, 07:27:06 pm]


Re: Stopping by by TheRock
[May 18, 2025, 06:44:49 am]

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 465
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Birthday Calender

June 2025
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 [30]

David Cameron says yes to EU "IN/OUT" referendum (finally)

Reece · 5242

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ReeceTopic starter

  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 4016
  • Living.
  • With us since: 07/01/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
David Cameron has rebuffed criticism at home and abroad of his commitment to hold a referendum on the UK's future in Europe if he wins the next election.

Labour and the Lib Dems have said plans to renegotiate the UK's membership and put it to a public vote was a gamble and against the national interest.

France and Germany warned the UK against pursuing an "a la carte" approach. The US said the UK and the EU were stronger together.

But the PM said he had public backing.

And he said Labour's arguments were "fatally undermined" by confusion over their own position.

Mr Cameron's promise to give the British people "their say" on Europe - in the form of an in/out referendum to be held before 2018 - has been welcomed by most Conservative MPs and eurosceptics in other parties.

MPs will get the opportunity to debate the plan in the House of Commons next Wednesday.

At the next election - expected in 2015 - the Conservative leader said his party would offer people a "simple choice" between staying in the EU under new terms, or leaving the 27-member union altogether.

'Destiny'
He said the issue of the UK's future in Europe would not "go away" and now was the right time to confront it when the EU was set to go through a period of profound change amid calls for further integration.

In a long-awaited speech, Mr Cameron said the referendum would be a decision on the UK's "destiny" and, if he secured a new relationship he was happy with, he would campaign "heart and soul" to stay within the EU.

While he believed the UK could survive outside the EU, he said withdrawal would be a "one-way ticket" and he appealed for "cool heads" in the debate to come.

The prime minister rejected suggestions that a new relationship was "impossible to achieve" and dismissed calls for the referendum to be held sooner, saying such a "momentous decision" must wait until the UK's relationship with the EU "had been put right".

"Our approach is what the British people want. It is right for business, right for the economy and we will fight for it in the years ahead."

However, Mr Cameron did not spell out what powers he would like to see the UK take back as part of a new settlement or what would happen if the negotiations did not go his way.

'Wriggle room'
The Conservative leader has been under pressure from many of his MPs to give a binding commitment to a vote on Europe.

But Foreign Secretary William Hague told the BBC that Mr Cameron's message was not "confined or directed" to his backbenchers or those voters attracted by the UK Independence Party's call for EU withdrawal and should resonate across Europe

"It is not the Conservative Party he is speaking to. It is the British public and the European public."

Conservative MPs who want a looser relationship with the EU welcomed Mr Cameron's promise and said it had united the party.

One MP, Mark Reckless, even suggested Mr Cameron had left his own position in a referendum "up for grabs" and had the "wriggle room" to campaign for an exit if he believed this was the only option left for Britain.

Labour said Mr Cameron was "going to put Britain through years of uncertainty, and take a huge gamble with our economy".

But their leader Ed Miliband came under pressure himself after he appeared to go further than he has done before and told MPs that he opposed the idea of an in/out referendum.

The opposition have previously declined to rule out a referendum in the future while arguing that now is not the right time for one, but party sources insisted their position had not changed.

'Ill-defined'
Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg, who is also deputy prime minister, said there was a "right place and right time" for a referendum.

But he added: "My view is that years and years of uncertainty because of a protracted, ill-defined renegotiation of our place in Europe is not in the national interest because it hits growth and jobs."

The UK Independence Party said the "genie was out of the bottle" about a possible exit from the EU but acknowledged that winning a referendum on a platform for withdrawal would not be easy.

Conservatives have said their reform message is likely to win favour with European allies such as Sweden and the Netherlands.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she would listen to British "wishes" but her foreign minister Guido Westerwelle said "cherry picking is not an option" before adding that Europe needed more, not less, integration.

And French foreign minister Laurent Fabius warned: "You can't do Europe a la carte... to take an example which our British friends will understand - imagine Europe is a football club and you join, once you're in it you can't say 'Let's play rugby'".

President Obama's press secretary, Jay Carney said he welcomed Mr Cameron's call for Britain to remain in the European Union, adding: "We believe that the United Kingdom is stronger as a result of its European Union membership and we believe the European Union is stronger as a result of having the United Kingdom in the EU."

No 10 said the British public would have the final say.



Q&A

What has happened?

Prime Minister David Cameron has delivered a speech (full text) setting out his views on the UK's future in the European Union. The speech has been months in the planning.

Why the big deal about the speech?

Mr Cameron had been facing mounting pressure from within the Eurosceptic ranks of his own Conservative Party, and the UK Independence Party, who are unhappy with the current relationship between the UK and the European Union. There have been calls for a referendum to be held, and his own MPs want to see action on the Conservative election pledge to "bring back" powers to Westminster from Brussels. For months now, the promise has been that these questions will all be answered in a big speech.

So what did Cameron say?

Mr Cameron said he plans to renegotiate parts of the UK's relations with Europe and put that changed membership package to the British people in an in-out referendum after the next general election, by the end of 2017. That, obviously, also depends on the Conservatives winning a majority in 2015. To see more of what he said, here are selection of key extracts from the speech.

What sorts of powers does the UK want back?

The prime minister did not spell this out in his speech, but there is a cross-government audit currently under way looking at where the EU has powers over life in the UK. The idea is that each one will then be examined to see whether it is necessary or whether the power could be "brought back" to the UK. Areas it might include are the Working Time Directive, which imposes employment rules such as limiting the working week and giving EU workers a minimum number of holidays each year. The UK is also keen on opt-outs from policing and criminal justice measures. The 2010 Conservative manifesto said: "We will work to bring back key powers over legal rights, criminal justice and social and employment legislation to the UK."

Why does Cameron think he can agree changes with EU leaders?

The recent eurozone crisis has led those countries using the single currency to believe that they need closer integration in future - a move which will further increase the gap between the euro and non-euro EU members. Mr Cameron says there needs to be a new EU treaty to facilitate the eurozone integration, so, as part of negotiations, there is a chance to redefine the membership rules for countries like the UK.

So does this all mean that the UK's going to leave the EU?

David Cameron said that he opposed the idea of the UK leaving the EU (the UK joined when it was the European Economic Community, in 1973). However he did say during a recent BBC radio interview: "Would Britain collapse if we left the European Union? No, of course not. You could choose a different path. The question is, what is in our national interest? I've always been very clear it's in our national interest as a trading nation to be in the single market."

What has been the reaction in the UK?

Eurosceptics seem seem pretty happy with the speech - it has been very warmly welcomed by Conservative MPs. Although the UK Independence Party said it wanted a referendum sooner, party leader Nigel Farage called the PM's promise of an in/out referendum his party's greatest achievement.

Pro-Europeans have been unhappy with the speech - Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg warned that proposing a referendum at a future date causes uncertainty and will have a "chilling effect" on jobs and growth. Ex-European Commissioner and Labour cabinet minister Lord Mandelson called it "game, set and match" to the hardliners in Mr Cameron's party.

The BBC has compiled a selection of responses to the speech.

What about the reaction around Europe?

The BBC's Steve Evans in Berlin said opinion was hardening in Germany and France, with many politicians believing that those opposed to further European integration would be better off "leaving gracefully". Guido Westerwelle, German foreign minister, said "cherry picking is not an option". French foreign minister Laurent Fabius said: "We want the British to be able to bring all their positive characteristics to Europe... but you can't do Europe a la carte. I'll take an example which our British friends will understand. Let's imagine Europe is a football club and you join, but once you're in it you can't say, 'Let's play rugby'." Read more EU reaction.

What about the reaction from business?

A succession of business leaders have spoken up in favour of UK membership of the EU and the US and a range of European politicians have also warned of negative results if the UK left the EU. Some business leaders, such as IG Group founder Stuart Wheeler and Next boss Lord Wolfson, have also called for changes in the UK's relationship with the EU. The director general of the employers' group the CBI, John Cridland, said "closer union of the eurozone is not for us" but Mr Cameron "rightly recognises the benefits of retaining membership of what must be a reformed EU".

MORE: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21170265



Offline Mikal

  • Ex-FLA
  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 7190
    With us since: 10/04/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #1 on: January 24, 2013, 12:01:08 am
No vote until 2017? Holy shit thats a long time.. I say the UK should leave anyway, the UK is a union in a union, and that won't really work out no matter how many threats and talks both sides throw at eachother.

DENIED


Offline Jcstodds

  • Owner
  • *******
    • Posts: 4633
    With us since: 04/03/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • V:MP: [Rstar]Jcstodds
Reply #2 on: January 24, 2013, 12:13:27 am
  With my extremely limited knowledge of the politics, I can think the only real bad reason for leaving EU will be losing out with trade.

And it's not as if we will lose all trade. We just need to trade more with China. Make them our new friends!


  I would support it to reduce immigration, reduce tax money going to bale out EU countries. Lets face it - UK is not exactly a manufacturing powerhouse anymore...



Offline SugarD

  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 11515
    With us since: 21/03/2008
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #3 on: January 24, 2013, 12:14:17 am
What doesn't make sense to me is their first argument:
Quote
Labour and the Lib Dems have said plans to renegotiate the UK's membership and put it to a public vote was a gamble and against the national interest.

If the public is voting on it, how in the hell would it be against the national interest when their votes are the national interest?



Offline Mikal

  • Ex-FLA
  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 7190
    With us since: 10/04/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #4 on: January 24, 2013, 12:15:26 am
  With my extremely limited knowledge of the politics, I can think the only real bad reason for leaving EU will be losing out with trade.

And it's not as if we will lose all trade. We just need to trade more with China. Make them our new friends!


  I would support it to reduce immigration, reduce tax money going to bale out EU countries. Lets face it - UK is not exactly a manufacturing powerhouse anymore...
Hell fucking yes! Migration because of the EU is pathetic, migrants are just flooding into the UK like no tomorrow because of the shitty EU open border policy's, and yeh the UK should be trading more with China other than the EU, who has more money? :lol:

DENIED


Offline Alsatian

  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 5659
    With us since: 28/09/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #5 on: January 24, 2013, 12:24:13 am
If the public is voting on it, how in the hell would it be against the national interest when their votes are the national interest?

In other words, the Tories are concerned that the "Immigrants are stealing our jobs!" crowd come out and vote in favour of the UK leaving the EU.

I'm a bit torn on the situation, however certain factors such as the overwhelming power the EU holds over our legal system is swaying me in favour of leaving the EU. Not to mention some of the ridiculous outcomes of certain cases as a result of the intervention of the ECHR.



Offline ReeceTopic starter

  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 4016
  • Living.
  • With us since: 07/01/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #6 on: January 24, 2013, 12:29:51 am
I find the fact that some chap in Brusseles can over-rule our Supreme Court absurd.

http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/european-court-blocks-extradition-by-uk-of-alleged-bin-laden-aide

This is one of the many reasons why I no longer support the EU.



Offline SugarD

  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 11515
    With us since: 21/03/2008
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #7 on: January 24, 2013, 12:32:52 am
I find the fact that some chap in Brusseles can over-rule our Supreme Court absurd.

http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/european-court-blocks-extradition-by-uk-of-alleged-bin-laden-aide

This is one of the many reasons why I no longer support the EU.
The EU shouldn't even have a say in the situation unless it affects the EU as a whole. I agree with you Reece, that is ridiculous.



Offline Alsatian

  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 5659
    With us since: 28/09/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #8 on: January 24, 2013, 12:42:41 am
The EU shouldn't even have a say in the situation unless it affects the EU as a whole. I agree with you Reece, that is ridiculous.

Well yeah, part of being a member state of the EU is that we surrender our parliamentary sovereignty. Any law that we attempt to implement has to be in accordance with the EU.

It's all a load of crap really, and has led to some unbelievable occurences in recent years.



Offline EliteTerm

  • Retired
  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 4062
  • Wastelander
  • With us since: 24/08/2007
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • SA:MP: [Rstar]EliteTerm
Reply #9 on: January 24, 2013, 01:18:11 am
With the current financial crisis the European Union is suffering, it seems wise to get out.

Where must we go... we who wander this Wasteland in search of our better selves?


Offline SugarD

  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 11515
    With us since: 21/03/2008
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #10 on: January 24, 2013, 01:28:52 am
With the current financial crisis the European Union is suffering, it seems wise to get out.
Agreed. If the EU collapses and takes everyone down with it, then it's only a matter of time until the backlash hits the US and takes it down too. Once that happens, the world economy will fall apart.



Offline Huntsman

  • [VC:MP] Chief of Police
  • Veteran
  • ***
    • Posts: 3964
    With us since: 21/05/2010
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
  • VC:MP: Huntsman
Reply #11 on: January 26, 2013, 09:21:24 am
Lithuania should do the same

Over 10 years in Argonath


Offline Jubin

  • Hero
  • ****
    • Posts: 3321
    With us since: 18/08/2006
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #12 on: January 26, 2013, 03:21:34 pm
I find the fact that some chap in Brusseles can over-rule our Supreme Court absurd.

http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/european-court-blocks-extradition-by-uk-of-alleged-bin-laden-aide

This is one of the many reasons why I no longer support the EU.

The EU shouldn't even have a say in the situation unless it affects the EU as a whole. I agree with you Reece, that is ridiculous.
First off  The European Court of Human Rights has nothing to do with European Union, but all the European countries including Serbia, Albania and Norway.
Second The European Court of Human Rights deals with the situations where the person thinks that the court of the country he is being persecuted in is not being fair and I think it's only fair if he then seeks the judgment of even higher courts or other countries. For example In Estonia Anna Maria Galojan was sentenced to prison for her crimes, she then fled to UK, where she will have another trial to determine if UK will give her out to Estonia and it's her right. Analogue  situation applies to Julian Assange and his case.

And we do not try to be real life, as why would you ever play real life if you have one ? We play the GTA universe, and our players should try to live in the GTA world, not the real one.



Offline ReeceTopic starter

  • Orc
  • *****
    • Posts: 4016
  • Living.
  • With us since: 07/01/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Reply #13 on: January 26, 2013, 03:54:22 pm
First off  The European Court of Human Rights has nothing to do with European Union, but all the European countries including Serbia, Albania and Norway.
Second The European Court of Human Rights deals with the situations where the person thinks that the court of the country he is being persecuted in is not being fair and I think it's only fair if he then seeks the judgment of even higher courts or other countries. For example In Estonia Anna Maria Galojan was sentenced to prison for her crimes, she then fled to UK, where she will have another trial to determine if UK will give her out to Estonia and it's her right. Analogue  situation applies to Julian Assange and his case.

Sorry, that was the wrong article. I can't find the name of the person who I was looking for, but he appealed to the European Court of Justice and they over rules us, which is absurd. We should have sole control over our laws, not some guy in Brussels.



Offline [WS]Jacob

  • Regular
  • **
    • Posts: 1890
    With us since: 20/11/2011
    YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • White Shadows Clan
  • SA:MP: [WS]Jacob
Reply #14 on: January 26, 2013, 03:59:38 pm
I don't see why the US is so bothered. If we do become EU independant then we will probably end up with a better US/UK trade deal as well as with other countries which being in the EU was restricting us from doing. Yes the EU has good points to our trade but migration is a huge issue for us. Unemployment is high and British people need to take those jobs. Finally we should be able to regain at least some control over our borders and we need to take example from Australian border control authorities who don't take s**t.



 


free
free
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal