CharlieKasper · 5394
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Isn't it ironic that Anonymous put money into the pockets of a certain major media corporation every time they don one of these masks? Ref: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/technology/masked-anonymous-protesters-aid-time-warners-profits.html
Were they not the reason behind PSN and other Sony services being down for like a week or so?
Nope, that was LulzSec
And LulzSec were Anonymous members.. Derp.
Nope.avi...LulzSec were friends with anonymous but LulzSec was never declared to be a anonymous-affiliated group.Matter of fact a good deal of their members were part of a earlier hacking group that was rivals with anonymous.
I specifically recall BBC News saying the LulzSec members were associated with Anonymous.
But that's the thing, they are to be taken lighty. Keyboard warriors, attic trolls, skiddies, social outcasts and 13 year olds. Be happy somebody is willing to wear 'your' mask.This is a perfect example to show how useless these people and their 'goals' really are.
[Pictures]
OP #ButtHurtSalmo
Will they target Bieber? Maybe. They might just hack his social accounts, but what the hell would that prove? That they know how to hack?