Teen charged with Christopher Lane's murder admits 'we were bored'

[Dolfagr]

His tweets, apparently it is a hate crime on white people.

[saberman]

Yes, because the gun is at fault. No, it's these retarded punks. Should just find the nearest oak tree and make 'em swing.

Yes, so you should make it easy for them to get guns...

[EliteTerm]

Yes, so you should make it easy for them to get guns...

What about flashlights? Killed by 2 black teens with flashlights..

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57599877-504083/delbert-belton-murder-update-arrest-made-in-beating-death-of-wash-wwii-veteran-report-says/


As for the Chris Lane's murder, the pistol was most likely ILLEGALLY obtained. They even found a shotgun disassembled with the serial numbers filed off (also illegal) in the suspects' vehicle.

[Hess]

It's easier to defend yourself from flashlights... or at least run away...

[Dillon]

Ultimately blaming guns is wrong for this availability of guns should be counted for before the gun itself. Our fault is not so simple, the reason school was to reov youths from committing crimes on the streets as they were always getting into trouble. I could kill people with so many weapons and you would argue oh right guns make it easy to do, we'll yes I suppose but that is not ultimately the correct way to put it. The guns availability caused this, I could easily enough goth s hardware store and build a device to shoot projectiles at high speeds but you never see that happening, any bout object is a weapon I could kill you with my lamp a bow and arrow weapons are everywhere. Chemicals are so deadly yet nearly everyone has them, people do use them incorrectly and in cases they are used to kill but we won't ban them, Americas second ammenmant was used in 1946(?) To prevent police from taking ballot boxes, during that it was not muskets it was pistols vs. rifles and who knows maybe even a tommy gun? Those guns existed then, its so ignorant to simply blame guns we have this law to protect us this is our way to make the government afraid of its people, "we should not be afraid of our governments, our governments should be afraid of us. It's an abused right but to the statistics it is simple, in comparison to he guns in circulation the amount used to kill people is not 1% these teens f**ked up and did something stupid but I'm sure it could be blamed on more than the gun. And Hess if I hit you in the back of the head with a flashlight I want to see you get up and runaway, you would rather shoot the people beating you then runaway anyway.

(Written on iPad expect so any complaints send them to Apple not me)

[Petarda]

Ultimately blaming guns is wrong for this availability of guns should be counted for before the gun itself. Our fault is not so simple, the reason school was to reov youths from committing crimes on the streets as they were always getting into trouble. I could kill people with so many weapons and you would argue oh right guns make it easy to do, we'll yes I suppose but that is not ultimately the correct way to put it. The guns availability caused this, I could easily enough goth s hardware store and build a device to shoot projectiles at high speeds but you never see that happening, any bout object is a weapon I could kill you with my lamp a bow and arrow weapons are everywhere. Chemicals are so deadly yet nearly everyone has them, people do use them incorrectly and in cases they are used to kill but we won't ban them, Americas second ammenmant was used in 1946(?) To prevent police from taking ballot boxes, during that it was not muskets it was pistols vs. rifles and who knows maybe even a tommy gun? Those guns existed then, its so ignorant to simply blame guns we have this law to protect us this is our way to make the government afraid of its people, "we should not be afraid of our governments, our governments should be afraid of us. It's an abused right but to the statistics it is simple, in comparison to he guns in circulation the amount used to kill people is not 1% these teens f**ked up and did something stupid but I'm sure it could be blamed on more than the gun. And Hess if I hit you in the back of the head with a flashlight I want to see you get up and runaway, you would rather shoot the people beating you then runaway anyway.

(Written on iPad expect so any complaints send them to Apple not me)

Typical American

When you give man a fishing pole, he will go fishing, he also can fish with hands and sharp things but it's hard, I guess that you get my point.

[Dillon]

Typical American

When you give man a fishing pole, he will go fishing, he also can fish with hands and sharp things but it's hard, I guess that you get my point.

Lets just switch that up.

When you give a man a rifle, he will go hunting, he can also hunt with bows and spears but its hard, I guess you get my point.

[[WS]Jacob]

Ultimately blaming guns is wrong for this availability of guns should be counted for before the gun itself.

This happened in Australia not America, it's much harder to get your hands on weapons due to the restrictions.

[Dillon]

This happened in Australia not America, it's much harder to get your hands on weapons due to the restrictions.

I'm sorry I don't understand? There is a problem in America with how available guns are obviously...

Saying that this happened in Austrailia and not America? Obviously it is a problem here.....

[Mikal]

Yes, because the gun is at fault. No, it's these retarded punks. Should just find the nearest oak tree and make 'em swing.

Retard + Gun = Certain death of victim
No gun + Retard = Chance of survival of victim
Retard + Knife = Chance of survival of victim

USA + Gun control = Never gonna happen, too stupid to see reality.

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

What about smart person + gun? What does that equal???

[Exterminator]

Honestly dude, killing is in the human genome. Everybody that thinks that they wont be killers or that it was attitude or w/e, look up the Just World Fallacy and the Fundamental Attribution Error (Both of which are real psychology gobblesmackel, btw)

Your ancestors grew up bashing skulls, and everytime you meet a guy, your brain subconsiously calculates the chances of the guy trying to kill you and whether you should pre-emptive attack him. Yes, even your parents.

The main thing is fear, come to India and you will see a clear example of it. The common people are scared to shit to attack, cause there is a good chance they may get caught.

On the other hand, powerful politicians and rich people practically give em to their kids, mainly cause they know they'd get bailed out.
 
The kids there were motivated by a long chain of psychological conditioning, paired with just right environmental factors, mob mentality and what not and you have a human being that will do things that go against your basic moral values (This is the reason the nazis were able to inspire thousands of youth to do things that were unimaginable crimes to them just a few years ago).

Heck, it can happen to anybody. You might just be a future serial killer.
Some scientists at stanford converted students with no history of violence into angry dangerous prisoners and abusive prison guards, just by putting em in a fake prison.

[Bundy]

What about smart person + gun? What does that equal???

That equals lots of kills without anybody finding out

[Mikal]

What about smart person + gun? What does that equal???

Smart person + gun = Someone who think's he is big telling people who don't care what caliber his rifle is.

That equals lots of kills without anybody finding out

Hahahaha!

[[SE]Dr_Pepper27]

Smart person + gun = Someone who think's he is big telling people who don't care what caliber his rifle is.

So what category does this guy fall into? Personally, I'd put him in the ''Never-a-Victim" category.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/08/25/robber-brings-knife-to-pizza-delivery-heist-but-dominos-guy-has-a-gun/

Also, here's another good read.

http://www.smallgovtimes.com/article/harvard-study-reveals-gun-control-counterproductive/

It sucks when facts get in the way of emotions, doesn't it? You can look up literally any study on guns(providing it's a reputable source, such as Harvard College) and they will always tell you less guns = more crimes. You literally can't argue with facts, it's indisputable.