An end to constant use of military jets and helicopters

[Simon_sullivan]

I don't really see the point to the topic I think it is just a way to get airial removed so it would work to the suspects advantage, it gives them a better chance of escaping and I think that is why these players want them removed.

And to me this just seems like a pointless and useless topics, it is just another report which is against the simple fact that suspect escapes should be made easier

[LoHi]

Apparently Hunters and Hydras are allowed to attack civilians for a new reason called "commissioner's orders".

Saw this. Absolutely disgusting. Sadly I lost the video of it, but there were multiple people there.

[[NP]Monte Montague]

I don't really see the point to the topic I think it is just a way to get airial removed so it would work to the suspects advantage, it gives them a better chance of escaping and I think that is why these players want them removed.

And to me this just seems like a pointless and useless topics, it is just another report which is against the simple fact that suspect escapes should be made easier

>inb4 the officer who made this thread would much rather see Miniguns on /duty to kill all suspects rather than make it easier for them to get away

[Cofiliano]

Another item being complained about?
If people with access to the hunter/hydra abuse it, their access will be revoked if reported. I don't see what else is needed.

This>

It isnt regulated the way it should be regulated, by rules. Guidelines simply isn't enough. In example I cant report a guy in game for misusage of it so admins can check, cause its not a rule yet guidelines. And we're talking about most dangerous weapon that exist on the server.

So we wont have this:

Apparently Hunters and Hydras are allowed to attack civilians for a new reason called "commissioner's orders".

Saw this. Absolutely disgusting. Sadly I lost the video of it, but there were multiple people there.

I have too.

Also may I add that even that guideline is not announced in public, so people dont even know what should AirDivision do or not, so you can't really know exactly is something they are doing, allowed by guideline or not. Its convenient cause then when ever you report for something that's clearly abuse of it, it can be claimed it was done 'by the guideline' while no one knows what it says in the guidline 


Its pure nepotism what we're talking about here, nepotism with the most deadliest weapon in the game, just for fun.

[Rick.]

All offical groups can spawn RPG

Yes.

[Spike.]

So you want to remove Over Power guns from heavily vehicles and your idea is to place another "Mass DM weapon" ?

[PulseEffect]

When I was still in the criminal business in RS4, I had no issues with escaping from heavy air without opening fire at them, you should use your brain and not your guns.

Might not of been in the criminal business but what Brian states is pretty true..

[[NP]Monte Montague]

I'd like some nepotism once in a while...

True about the guidelines, it seems really fishy to me.

[PulseEffect]

I'd like some nepotism once in a while...

True about the guidelines, it seems really fishy to me.

As a previous member of Air Division.. I can say that I remember all my runs were either against aircraft or against vehicles posing serious threat to public or seriously close to evasion, noting this was in RS4.

Only once did I breach regulations and I got punished for it. Rest of my runs, all gave grounds for me to open fire.

And these "guidelines" they are literally common sense.

[[NP]Monte Montague]

As a previous member of Air Division.. I can say that I remember all my runs were either against aircraft or against vehicles posing serious threat to public or seriously close to evasion, noting this was in RS4.

Only once did I breach regulations and I got punished for it. Rest of my runs, all gave grounds for me to open fire.

And these "guidelines" they are literally common sense.

Mmm yea, but common sense isn't so common these days.
http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=106849.new#new

It should be clear cut.

I could state "Well it's common sense to expect to be immediately jailed if you can not pay the $250 right then and there"  or something else, I dunno I'm sleepy, you should catch my drift.

[Str8Shoot3r]

What about not shooting the Hydra/Hunter but shooting their standard issue helicopter prior to?
Does this still merit opening fire with the Hydra/Hunter when the suspects are on foot after their car has exploded for whatever reason?

[Cofiliano]

So you want to remove Over Power guns from heavily vehicles and your idea is to place another "Mass DM weapon" ?

No, either remove both, or placed both with strict rules of usage, so everyone else would have fun with it, or a way to defend themselves from others having fun.

[[NP]Monte Montague]

http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=106850.0;viewresults

[eymas]

Nothing much would change if one would add "strict rules of usage" since the guidelines are already being heavily enforced. Some examples have been given already; you could easily deduce the most common points based from the information provided in this topic alone.

[[NP]Monte Montague]

Nothing much would change if one would add "strict rules of usage" since the guidelines are already being heavily enforced. Some examples have been given already; you could easily deduce the most common points based from the information provided in this topic alone.

It'd be bad to assume things.