[SA:MP] Developers Answer: Give Examples

[Kaze]

Hi,

A bit confused as to why banned players can not access the panel..

[Stivi]

Hi,

A bit confused as to why banned players can not access the panel..

"because they dont need it".

[Kaze]

"because they dont need it".

What if I was to say they do?

If they lead a group they should be able to access the panel to check on their members perhaps?
If they hold multiple properties, maybe they should monitor how each property is doing?

Although the panel contains ingame information, it technically doesn't mean you are ingame? If that was the case, you would be banned from TS automatically because TS contains ingame information?

[Brian]

What if I was to say they do?

If they lead a group they should be able to access the panel to check on their members perhaps?
If they hold multiple properties, maybe they should monitor how each property is doing?

Although the panel contains ingame information, it technically doesn't mean you are ingame? If that was the case, you would be banned from TS automatically because TS contains ingame information?

TS has multiple servers on it.

[Kaze]

TS has multiple servers on it.

Fair enough but the things you can do on the panel are limited as supposed to actually being ingame.

[Stivi]

What if I was to say they do?

If they lead a group they should be able to access the panel to check on their members perhaps?
If they hold multiple properties, maybe they should monitor how each property is doing?

Although the panel contains ingame information, it technically doesn't mean you are ingame? If that was the case, you would be banned from TS automatically because TS contains ingame information?

In case you didn't notice I was just trying to help you by quoting. I've already said those reasons before but what I got was the quote I said before.

[Kaze]

In case you didn't notice I was just trying to help you by quoting. I've already said those reasons before but what I got was the quote I said before.

Yeah bro, no one is arguing here. It's just a little discussion 

The quote you used seems very simple with no explanation. In a matter of 2/3 posts I already managed to give examples of how a banned user could use the panel..

[TruthSvensson]

I was in a boxing match today. I bet on myself and my opponent broke the rules and didn't get DQ'd. So he beat me up and won.(I died in the situation) So I thought that match was rigged and I got ripped off.

I waited for some time, went back to the boxing gym and killed the gym owner. Is this revenge killing? I think it's not, since if it's a boxing match, it means I got KO'd, not died. Also my killing the gym owner was about me being ripped off, not dying.

I got tempbanned for returning after death for this today. I need an answer. But I'm sure I'm right, if I'm wrong, there's a fallacy in your own logic.

[Teddy]

In most cases that would be considered RK, in this case since the script did not function as intended (preventing death), it's a bit of a gray area. I'd say no since the killing is for being ripped of, but it could of course be argued... how can you be mad about being ripped off if you're dead? Still I'd say no. You'll need managers to confirm more.

But what I can tell you is the gym script is not fully stable right now and it is on my list of things to look into.



I'd also like to remind those whom are incompetent of reading that only developers (scripters, managers+) should be responding to questions within this topic. Not admins. Not players. This is also not a discussion topic. It's you ask a question, you get an answer.

[Sweeper]

Using /helpmeup to avoid death after a bugged interior and the Blueberry bug (spawning in air), is seen as script abusing or using it where it's made for?

[Khm]

Using /helpmeup to avoid death after a bugged interior and the Blueberry bug (spawning in air), is seen as script abusing or using it where it's made for?

^And for carkilling too, is it considered as script abusing?

[Teddy]

Using /helpmeup to avoid death after a bugged interior and the Blueberry bug (spawning in air), is seen as script abusing or using it where it's made for?

No.

^And for carkilling too, is it considered as script abusing?

No.

[clancker]

Is the downtime only a preparation for RS5.2, or any release of RS5.2 will be followed after the server is up ?

[FARQ3X]

Is the downtime only a preparation for RS5.2, or any release of RS5.2 will be followed after the server is up ?

On Friday the 8th we will have a roughly 3 hour downtime in the afternoon (can give a more exact time closer to that). The following Monday (11th) we will also have another brief downtime for about an hour or two.

This last one is tentative, but Friday the 15th, next Friday, we will have an aprox. 1 day downtime.

Do not speculate on any of these please... this is all in preparing the server and services for the upgrade to RS5.2, we want to make sure the transition is smooth. Following Monday's update, there may be some interference in some external services.
- Teddy wrote this

[Stivi]

Is the downtime only a preparation for RS5.2, or any release of RS5.2 will be followed after the server is up ?

Some services are being linked to RS5.2, and it takes time. This does not mean RS5.2 will be released.