Rage Engine on Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas - Argonath Approved?

[Pingster]

What he means is that we're one community, and dividing it in 100 subcommunities is isn't fun.

[Matt Murdock]

hello matt , just wanted to ask you , Dude! Is that Vedio On YT yours I mean the mods are Awesome!

No mate, I don't even have latest version of IV:SA yet, currently I'm working on modding my SA to fullest and a all car pack.  :devroll:

It's a possibility then, but the MP mod hasn't been updated in over a year, and it's being presumed that the creator has lost interest in the project. Hopefully he comes back to it soon.

Also @ Matt specifically: You might want to remove everything in your URL from "PHPSESSID" to "&". That part of the URL is your personal session code, and can cause people to try to hack your account. I removed it in my quote of your post here, if you need an example.

I'm not even registered there, which account are they gonna hack? lol I simply googled, cause I knew such mod existed. lol 

and I know it hasn't been updated, but looking at the youtube video, does it even need any updates? and if that one guy can mod IV:MP to work with IV:SA, I'm pretty sure there are lots of geeks in Argo who can work on it :p MTA:VC hasn't been updated in more than 3 years! and we still have the same fun

okay.

f**king install the server now.

NOW

Keep up the enthusiasm and I'm sure its not far!

 :ps: Sugar is right about donations

Then we'll install a III:VC server. And a State of Liberty: Online server. And an SA:VC server. And a VC:IV server. And a GTAII:VC:IV:V:SA server. See where this is going? And then, once those servers are installed, the player base will end up dividing even further into smaller, modification-based factions.

Moreover, to me, the physics make no difference. If you want to place on a San Andreas map, play in GTA:SA, not on an imported San Andreas mod for GTA IV, and for that, as well as the above points, I say no.

I'm pretty sure none of those even exist atm.  :evil:

What he means is that we're one community, and dividing it in 100 subcommunities is isn't fun.

I see it like this, those with high specs and lust for high end graphics will have more fun on IV:SA server. The ones who prefer classic gaming  can play on SA:MP, Most can play on both. Personally talking, I have been active on all Argonath servers at one time or another, each one of them, doesn't mean I left any of those.

[SugarD]

So you're saying that the less people play the worse it is?


VC:MP or MTA:VC, hnng

1. VC:MP and MTA:VC have plenty of players.
2. He's saying the community doesn't need to be divided up more.
3. Whoever said that all GTA's should be supported, I agree. These are not GTA's. They are mods for GTA.

I'm pretty sure none of those even exist atm.  :evil:

Ironically, most of the ones he listed actually do. He just started making them up towards the end, though.

[Matt Murdock]

1. VC:MP and MTA:VC have plenty of players.
2. He's saying the community doesn't need to be divided up more.
3. Whoever said that all GTA's should be supported, I agree. These are not GTA's. They are mods for GTA.
Ironically, most of the ones he listed actually do. He just started making them up towards the end, though.

I said the third, btw, DayZ is also a mod, so the arguement is invalid  :devroll: http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=92931.0

and I meant does a MP mod exists for any of those?

Even if it does, we're discussing IV:SA here, and the work done on the project is excellent! I don't think it should be left out from the honor of having an Argonath server on its list.

[SugarD]

I said the third, btw, DayZ is also a mod, so the argument is invalid  :devroll: http://www.argonathrpg.eu/index.php?topic=92931.0

I see nothing in that topic saying it's approved yet, so how would that argument be invalid?

[Matt Murdock]

I see nothing in that topic saying it's approved yet, so how would that argument be invalid?

I believe its about time we start respecting some exceptional work done by indie modders. Sometimes they make up stuff better than actual game developers. 

[TiMoN]

And a GTAII:VC:IV:V:SA server.

WTF??!!

[Kirgiz]

1. VC:MP and MTA:VC have plenty of players.

In comparison to SA:MP? brigga plz.

[SugarD]

In comparison to SA:MP? brigga plz.

Maybe if you look at the amount of development put into it, you'll know why. MTA:VC and VC:MP are the reason why SA:MP exists, so don't give me that argument.