Argonath RPG - A World of its own

GTA:SA => SA:MP - San Andreas Multiplayer => SA:MP General => Topic started by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 12:36:14 am

Title: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 12:36:14 am
Out of Roleplay Agreement 

Peace Treaty
United States of Argonath and Flint Liberation Army

Date: 30/05/2016

Agreement terms

• Citizens of the United States of Argonath and law enforcement have access to Flint County and Whetstone but law enforcement are not permitted to enter Angel Pine. Law enforcement officials who enter Angel Pine will be reported to senior law enforcement (FBI & SAPD Sgt+) who will then ensure those officers are removed from the restricted area. Law enforcement and civilians will still be allowed to use the highways bordering Angel Pine and access Mt. Chiliad.
• Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area. 
• Any suspect above Soldier rank will have to result in law enforcement negotiating the release of the suspect by FLA or any other possible outcome.
• Stop the moaning in public chat in-game and forums from both sides. No provoking comments or behavior in-game or forum.
• FLA will remove people who join for shootouts and do not participate with FLA RP.
• FLA will stop blocking main roads connecting cities such as Flint Intersection, LS-SF Tunnel etc.
• If entry is needed into Angel Pine for whatever reason, the highest ranking law enforcement official of any law enforcement agency should consult with the highest ranking FLA member.

This treaty is effective immediately as of 30th May, 2016. Violation of any of the agreements from any party result will result in involvement and strict action by HQ.

Signed,

Development Team
Evil Teddy
        Headquarters
Leon Arallian
        Federal Bureau of Investigation
Arslan Carter
        San Andreas Police Department
Trane Kiedis
        Flint Liberation Army
Mikal O'Defaid
       
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Leonardo on May 31, 2016, 12:39:17 am
Decent enough.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on May 31, 2016, 12:47:56 am
 Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area. 

Lol, what a joke.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on May 31, 2016, 12:49:01 am
It's a good start.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on May 31, 2016, 12:50:31 am
Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area. 

Lol, what a joke.

How is it a joke?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on May 31, 2016, 12:55:20 am
How is it a joke?

Because it should include people that are affiliated with FLA not just FLA on it's own. (FLA's proper allies)
I can see this chaos happening again even though it's a tad regulated..

Besides this particular agreement, it's a good start as Mikal said.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 12:57:23 am
Because it should include people that are affiliated with FLA not just FLA on it's own. (FLA's proper allies)
I can see this chaos happening again even though it's a tad regulated..

Besides this particular agreement, it's a good start as Mikal said.

Nearly 100 percent of civilians population is FLA ally when it comes to shootouts so no, this is the only reasonable solution which means only people actually part of FLA's RP have right to participate in such things.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: psyron on May 31, 2016, 12:57:40 am
citizens of flint may intervene for no apparent reasons or maybe just rebellious minds due to recent events. the sapd should understand that there maybe a rise in rebel activities which may or may not be within FLA's knowledge.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 01:00:05 am
citizens of flint may intervene for no apparent reasons or maybe just rebellious minds due to recent events. the sapd should understand that there maybe a rise in rebel activities which may or may not be within FLA's knowledge.

Yeah no.. any rise in "rebel activities" who use this bullshit excuse while not actually being part of FLA RP and just to use their grenades and RPGs will be dealt with by HQ.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: psyron on May 31, 2016, 01:03:21 am
Yeah no.. any rise in "rebel activities" who use this bullshit excuse while not actually being part of FLA RP and just to use their grenades and RPGs will be dealt with by HQ.

i wish i could use em but i have 0 notoriety so i will just do it with /me  :jackson:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on May 31, 2016, 01:03:34 am
Nearly 100 percent of civilians population is FLA ally when it comes to shootouts so no, this is the only reasonable solution which means only people actually part of FLA's RP have right to participate in such things.

I agree with you there, a lot of the time random people come and start spraying bullets. What I mean is anyone affiliated with the FLA (Officially allies on the FLA main topic) should also be included. So for example FLA are official allies with Corleone so a Corleone member has no extradition.

I don't agree with a random 'civillian' coming from nowhere that represents none of FLA's allies and start spraying the cops.

Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Bruce. on May 31, 2016, 01:10:16 am
About time  :app:
Let's hope the atmosphere will change now, cause so far... it has been stressful as fuck to watch all the crying, bitching and provocative fights on main chat  :eek:
It's a good step, let's see how it will work out. We all hope for the best :D
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 01:10:24 am
I agree with you there, a lot of the time random people come and start spraying bullets. What I mean is anyone affiliated with the FLA (Officially allies on the FLA main topic) should also be included. So for example FLA are official allies with Corleone so a Corleone member has no extradition.

I don't agree with a random 'civillian' coming from nowhere that represents none of FLA's allies and start spraying the cops.

Corleone should focus on Mafia roleplay and promoting the type of RP their group stands for and FLA should promote theirs. An organised crime family has nothing to do with terrorists.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on May 31, 2016, 01:16:12 am
An organised crime family has nothing to do with terrorists.
How come you posted this on Corleones topic then? :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 01:16:55 am
How come you posted this on Corleones topic then? :rolleyes:
To remind them of their purpose and so they don't jump into FLA shootouts anymore.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on May 31, 2016, 01:17:29 am
Is it a possibility to change the FLA Soldier+ into FLA Recruit+? Recruits are still those who roleplay with us, but just don't earn their full rank as Soldiers yet.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Luke on May 31, 2016, 01:17:40 am
Sounds good!  :app:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Monty yate on May 31, 2016, 01:17:55 am
Fair enough for both sides...
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 01:19:37 am
Is it a possibility to change the FLA Soldier+ into FLA Recruit+? Recruits are still those who roleplay with us, but just don't earn their full rank as Soldiers yet.

Again this was discussed but makes the quota under FLA flag too large so to keep it reasonable for both sides, soldier rank was picked.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on May 31, 2016, 01:21:07 am
Corleone should focus on Mafia roleplay and promoting the type of RP their group stands for and FLA should promote theirs. An organised crime family has nothing to do with terrorists.

for example

Clearly I'm right and you just feel the need to make me look like an idiot because you have nothing to back up my statement.

Is it a possibility to change the FLA Soldier+ into FLA Recruit+? Recruits are still those who roleplay with us, but just don't earn their full rank as Soldiers yet.

If FLA + Associates/Affiliates/Allies doesn't work out then at the very least HQ should grant this effective immediately.



Again this was discussed but makes the quota under FLA flag too large so to keep it reasonable for both sides, soldier rank was picked.

I see.. minimize the amount of people involved which is a significant advantage to you.  :app:

For now, I don't represent FLA so I'm in a neutral side. My views are my own and does not reflect on what the FLA has to say in regards to this treaty.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 01:24:55 am
I see.. minimize the amount of people involved which is a significant advantage to you.  :app:

For now, I don't represent FLA so I'm in a neutral side. My views are my own and does not reflect on what the FLA has to say in regards to this treaty.
Yeah, since you don't represent them and since you weren't involved in the discussion to reach this conclusion I suggest you stop attempting to create a mess of this topic by claiming who did what for their own advantage. This is an agreement made by leaders of both relevant sides. You don't like it? Tuff, deal with it.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on May 31, 2016, 01:30:16 am
To remind them of their purpose and so they don't jump into FLA shootouts anymore.
Members of Corleone who are members of FLA have full right to support us.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on May 31, 2016, 01:33:04 am
Members of Corleone who are members of FLA have full right to support us.

Of course. They just won't be getting any protection from crimes in Angel Pine unless they're soldier+.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on May 31, 2016, 01:33:34 am
Members of Corleone who are members of FLA have full right to support us.
Yeah, that's fine, if you mean people like John, Rapture, who actually get involved in FLA RP. I am mostly directly towards the rest of the Corleone Mafia.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on May 31, 2016, 01:43:53 am
Since no one else will say it, I will. @Kaze fuck off. Thanks.

People actually make progress in the community for the better, something you are incapable of doing.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Marcell on May 31, 2016, 02:34:26 am
An organised crime family has nothing to do with terrorists.
Avoiding getting into the argument here, but have you read the book? :P (Godfather) mobsters were sent to help the rebels in Sicily for both political reasons and in order to grasp some training. It makes perfect sense especially when there's not much mafia RP to be had when half of people flat out refuse to roleplay.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on May 31, 2016, 07:31:52 am
I can at least hope no one buries this under another half a dozen shitflinging pages like usual, for this is something that finally gets us out of the vicious cycle of death to us and the server. For those who can do naught but provoke arguments we'd have no problem removing them. Not meant to further bully out Kaze, but you hopefully understand what I aim for.

As for the whole soldier+ stuff, it's already explained that we can't take associates as just about everyone could be considered one, and like many groups we do not consider them full members either to prevent potential misuse of systems and the like. (Not even partially in most cases)
Especially in this treaty it's a crucial bit, because in this case people can't bullshit their way saying they're associates when they're not  :lol:

In any way, I hope this holds water for -at least- June and beyond.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Stivi on May 31, 2016, 07:37:55 am
Since no one else will say it, I will. @Kaze fuck off. Thanks.

People actually make progress in the community for the better, something you are incapable of doing.
Well I for one think he raised a valid point. I did NOT read through the rest of the replies, though.

Why would I, as the guy running the Gvardia Ammunation Co. who owns the Angel Pine Ammu-Nation be arrested for entering Angel Pine? Or the current holder of the ammu-nation, or even our employees?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on May 31, 2016, 07:51:22 am
Citizens remain free to access Angel Pine for as far as I am aware lest it is mentioned differently somewhere, nor would you be arrested for it by the ARPD.
I can't guarantee you would be safe from what happens inside, though.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Norrage on May 31, 2016, 08:44:32 am
Pleased to see the bullshitting via main chat is finally getting to an end. Good job to both parties.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: CharlieKasper on May 31, 2016, 08:50:14 am
Yeah, that's fine, if you mean people like John, Rapture, who actually get involved in FLA RP. I am mostly directly towards the rest of the Corleone Mafia.
Just FYI, Corleone is not at all involved with FLA directly. Only a few members are part of FLA. Those few members barely make 10% of the Corleone member base, and only half of active member base. I don't know about others but my FLA character is not the same as my Corleone character. I joined FLA with a different name and only changed back to my current name to get active in Corleone.
I don't have money to change my name or skin back and forth everytime, so I end up using the same skin and name.

No other Corleone who is not listed in FLA take parts FLA roleplay anymore.

Nonetheless, fair treaty.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TrotlDebilni on May 31, 2016, 09:45:18 am
This is good to hear
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: beLTa on May 31, 2016, 09:51:24 am
It's over, finally.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on May 31, 2016, 09:54:43 am
It's over, finally.
It isn't over, this is a peace treaty, we still want independence, but this will stop all the chaotic shooting and TDM's every day, for now.

Perhaps we can RP our way into independence.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on May 31, 2016, 09:58:12 am
Can we still patrol FC and pull over people to traffic violations and such? <-- LEOs not counted
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Bruce. on May 31, 2016, 10:37:43 am
It isn't over
I would better say that its the start of a new chapter with hopefully some god damn peace by both sides. :D
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Huntsman on May 31, 2016, 11:34:46 am
The point about those who are not involved with the FLA is a very wise one. I'll admit that yesterday while being a suspect for unrelated reasons, I saw the gunfight in Angel Pine and joined in to see if anyone would notice. Besides me there were shitloads of people who have nothing to do with FLA but joined just for the lolz like me. Sorry guys :D
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Huntsman on May 31, 2016, 01:08:44 pm
(http://i.imgur.com/eUSpS.png)



As the primary law enforcement in the counties of the State of San Andreas, United States of Argonath, San Andreas Sheriff's Department aknowledges this peace treaty and will not tresspass Angel Pine.

Regards,

Sheriff Huntsman
SASD
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on May 31, 2016, 01:52:30 pm
Since no one else will say it, I will. @Kaze fuck off. Thanks.

People actually make progress in the community for the better, something you are incapable of doing.

You're telling me to fuck off after I've done nothing but support the HQ for how many months now? Nice to see to be stabbed in the back. Follow an example from eymas on how to respond to my 'opinion' before throwing tantrums.

Thanks for the constructive response to my opinion @eymas


Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TheGreasyChopper on May 31, 2016, 02:20:46 pm
• Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area. 

So the AOD Angel Pine Chapter that has been running for a few weeks now has no access to Angel Pine? That's bullshit. If you're gonna take decisions for other groups atleast invite them to the discussions about it too. You can't just take actions against a certain group(without even talking with them) just because it's in the same area in which you have trouble dealing with FLA.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Stivi on May 31, 2016, 02:31:28 pm
So the AOD Angel Pine Chapter that has been running for a few weeks now has no access to Angel Pine? That's bullshit. If you're gonna take decisions for other groups atleast invite them to the discussions about it too. You can't just take actions against a certain group(without even talk with them) just because it's in the same area in which you have trouble dealing with FLA.
Yeah this. They did say "criminals" but then again how would one know the citizen entering Angel Pine is a criminal?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Spike. on May 31, 2016, 02:33:28 pm
So the AOD Angel Pine Chapter that has been running for a few weeks now has no access to Angel Pine? That's bullshit. If you're gonna take decisions for other groups atleast invite them to the discussions about it too. You can't just take actions against a certain group(without even talk with them) just because it's in the same area in which you have trouble dealing with FLA.


@TheGreasyChopper

What that means is, if you are a suspect and enter Angel Pine LEOs can engage you without consulting the FLA.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Stivi on May 31, 2016, 02:37:38 pm

@TheGreasyChopper

What that means is, if you are a suspect and enter Angel Pine LEOs can engage you without consulting the FLA.
If that's the case, the wording should be changed because suspects aren't criminals. Or have ya'll not had your training in the SAPD yet? :D
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on May 31, 2016, 02:54:28 pm
The point about those who are not involved with the FLA is a very wise one. I'll admit that yesterday while being a suspect for unrelated reasons, I saw the gunfight in Angel Pine and joined in to see if anyone would notice. Besides me there were shitloads of people who have nothing to do with FLA but joined just for the lolz like me. Sorry guys :D

Just you and Stalker afaik. The rest were all FLA/associated.

So the AOD Angel Pine Chapter that has been running for a few weeks now has no access to Angel Pine? That's bullshit. If you're gonna take decisions for other groups atleast invite them to the discussions about it too. You can't just take actions against a certain group(without even talking with them) just because it's in the same area in which you have trouble dealing with FLA.

No, it just says you have to be FLA Soldier+ make use of the immunity from law enforcement you'd enjoy in Angel Pine. Basically nothing changed for those who don't have that position, so I don't see what the fuzz is about.

Wouldn't really have made sense to extend an invitation to AoD because AoD isn't part of the conflict. It's just AoD members that also happen to fight in the FLA, so practically, most AoD Angel Pine members already enjoy the law enforcement immunity for their enlistment and work in the FLA. 
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on May 31, 2016, 03:26:40 pm
The point about those who are not involved with the FLA is a very wise one. I'll admit that yesterday while being a suspect for unrelated reasons, I saw the gunfight in Angel Pine and joined in to see if anyone would notice. Besides me there were shitloads of people who have nothing to do with FLA but joined just for the lolz like me. Sorry guys :D
What a load bullcrap, for one, most of the people at Angel Pine were told to come on the CB which FLA uses, you were not in any RP contact with us and just decided to come and join in the shootout, if I'm correct that's bannable, I had wondered what you were doing there since you're usually on police duty, and now you admit to doing that in an attempt to make us look bad, didn't work.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on May 31, 2016, 03:29:42 pm
You're telling me to fuck off after I've done nothing but support the HQ for how many months now? Nice to see to be stabbed in the back. Follow an example from eymas on how to respond to my 'opinion' before throwing tantrums.

Thanks for the constructive response to my opinion @eymas

I think you mistaken support for posting bullshit. Leon and I handle things very differently, my perspective changed thanks to people like you in this community. I just don't get why you're focused on something that is aimed to fix this community when it has absolutely nothing to do with you. You are in no way affiliated with either party. The only benefit this has to you is less moaning and bitching in /p from these parties on a daily basis, for that you should be thankful.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on May 31, 2016, 03:45:47 pm
my perspective changed thanks to people like you in this community.

Funny thing is the last couple of months I've been the guy at the back with popcorn just laughing at the pathetic shit that happened/happens in this community whilst I was inactive. Just because I don't agree with someone I am now a cancer to the community?  :lol: I don't know where you got this 'people like you' vibe from me especially but whatever floats your boat bro.

If you want to carry on this bizzare accusations of yours then my PM is open for you. I'll take the leader role now and stop derailing this topic on behalf of the community.

I would like to personally apologize for the behavior shown by both parties. Please forgive me and Teddy.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on May 31, 2016, 04:14:25 pm
I just keep personal feelings aside, even though it is required most of the time since those words make impact in thick skulls ;)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: OmaR_RuLeZx on May 31, 2016, 06:33:38 pm
Fair enough.  :)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TruthSvensson on May 31, 2016, 09:42:43 pm
This is a great event in the history of Argonath which effects every character in the server. I'm very happy to see both sides have actually shown progress in this continous RP and didn't let "winning complex" cloud their judgment.

Viva la Flint  :cowboy:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 01, 2016, 10:17:57 am
This is a great event in the history of Argonath which effects every character in the server. I'm very happy to see both sides have actually shown progress in this continous RP and didn't let "winning complex" cloud their judgment.

Viva la Flint  :cowboy:

Indeed, started off a bit rough but hopefully this has been a learning curve for both sides  :cowboy:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Huntsman on June 01, 2016, 11:03:49 am
What a load bullcrap, for one, most of the people at Angel Pine were told to come on the CB which FLA uses, you were not in any RP contact with us and just decided to come and join in the shootout, if I'm correct that's bannable, I had wondered what you were doing there since you're usually on police duty, and now you admit to doing that in an attempt to make us look bad, didn't work.

What the fuck, literally. Get off that high horse and stop being so paranoid. How the hell am I trying to make you look bad? Do you even read before you post, or do you just take a slightest glimpse of opportunity you see to shit and bitch on someone?  I did not try to discredit FLA in any way. What I was saying is that the point about FLA having to remove people who are not associated with FLA is a good one, since there are people who tend to randomly join in when they see a shootout to satisfy their hunger for DM. And no, in my case it is not bannable because we entered Angel Pine and out of the blue I saw FBI shooting at us, hence why I had a right to defend myself. Sure, I could have just left, but as I said, I wanted to see if anybody noticed. Nobody did. Now how on earth am I even trying to make FLA look bad? How is that FLA's fault? Do you see me claiming that this is FLA's fault at any point? Get off that high horse and lower your ego a little. Not everything revolves around you.

<text>

There is this guy, and yet I am the one of whose picture of dead body Teddy has hanged by his villa entrance :(
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 01, 2016, 11:10:39 am
Arguing about it isn't going to do anything, go ingame, RP together and make it right  :cowboy:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on June 01, 2016, 12:37:37 pm
Indeed, the best for all of us is to stop seeking conflict and simply play the game. Sadly, for some this wasn't the case before (and possibly still) but hopefully this might lead us further ahead to a spot where we can stop worrying about limiting us to words alone, and start expressing more than two emotions.

I've tried convincing people already to just play, but that didn't work.  :lol:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 01, 2016, 07:25:44 pm
I wanted to see if anybody noticed. Nobody did.
Noticed what? You coming and randomly joining in a shootout not involving you? Except for your excuse about FBI shooting you giving you reason to defend yourself of course.

You try to make out that FLA invites anyone and everyone just for shootouts, but that isn't the case, we invite players who want to join, because we are an army, and what kind of army only had 4 members? Those players in turn invite their friends and such, thus the army grows, if they don't RP they will be kicked, otherwise they are all welcome to stay and help grow the army further, if we get so big that we can't lose, as we have been, then I guess law enforcement need to recruit more people?

Hopefully though there won't be any more large scale shootouts for the duration of the peace treaty, FLA will go off the radar and take up more activities similar to those of the IRA nearing the end of their time, we'll require some C4. :rolleyes:

I bet these posts are being flagged up on some cyber spy base somewhere in the world, with all this talk of FBI, IRA, shooting and C4. :lol:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 01, 2016, 07:30:15 pm
I bet these posts are being flagged up on some cyber spy base somewhere in the world, with all this talk of FBI, IRA, shooting and C4. :lol:

It's okay, I'm already on a 'list'.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Marcell on June 02, 2016, 01:40:49 am
I have to say I'm really satisfied with the treaty so far, officials were very responsive whenever some freecops / officers unaware of treaty were tresspassing and swiftly took action, while at the same aknowledging that freecops who don't listen to their warnings won't have their support. I hope both of us keep it up.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Huntsman on June 02, 2016, 09:42:01 am
I bet these posts are being flagged up on some cyber spy base somewhere in the world, with all this talk of FBI, IRA, shooting and C4. :lol:

This has to be the first time you genuinly made me laugh rather than piss me off. Good job sir  :rofl:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 02, 2016, 10:04:14 am
It's okay, I'm already on a 'list'.

The no-fly list for getting drunk before getting on planes?  :balance:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 02, 2016, 11:59:45 am
The no-fly list for getting drunk before getting on planes?  :balance:

But sir I went on the plane high multiple times when my eyes were bloodshot red, no one dared to say anything to me?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 02, 2016, 05:13:31 pm
The no-fly list for getting drunk before getting on planes?  :balance:

No, I can still get on an airplane. :D
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 01:41:56 am
It saddens me to say that only 3 days after the peace treaty was created, it has been broken by SAPD's senior staff, thus bringing an end to the ceasefire.
It is to my understanding that SAPD made no attempts to negotiate with FLA before entering Angel Pine, something that was agreed with the creation of this treaty regardless of the crimes committed.

I apologize in advance for the chaos that may ensue, but they broke their promise, it is now once again a fight for independence.

(http://i.imgur.com/qkc1qeZ.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/FPq5K7C.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/AEE12EW.jpg)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 01:48:43 am
You can show a few pictures of us entering Angel Pine to take care of criminals who quite clearly entered LS to commit criminal acts and engaged officers in doing so but it's not really representative of the whole story now is it?

Just today, about 2-4 hours earlier, you all decided to come into LS and do this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX7NlVBU-eA

Who broke the treaty again?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:50:58 am
Not to mention the only reason police was at AP is because: police come to secure weed field at CM HQ> Kill the one suspect who was suspected growing due to him shooting > whole FLA comes > starts killing cops> runs to AP > and expects to be dealt with by "negotiations" just because they ran to AP.
Yeah, not why treaty was made.

You ran here to post a few pics and claim treaty was "broken" just so you could claim you didn't do anything. Not gonna work.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:51:35 am
• Any suspect above Soldier rank will have to result in law enforcement negotiating the release of the suspect by FLA or any other possible outcome.
• If entry is needed into Angel Pine for whatever reason, the highest ranking law enforcement official of any law enforcement agency should consult with the highest ranking FLA member.

Violation of any of the agreements from any party result will result in involvement and strict action by HQ.

Signed,

Development Team
Evil Teddy
        Headquarters
Leon Arallian
        Federal Bureau of Investigation
Arslan Carter
        San Andreas Police Department
Trane Kiedis
        Flint Liberation Army
Mikal O'Defaid
       
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:52:59 am

Yeah the interpretation of that wasn't "oh lets go fuck around in LS, kill cops and then run to AP so police can't do anything" and if they do we can claim "fucking broke treaty".
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Rapture on June 03, 2016, 01:53:10 am
You expect the treaty to be a 100% cop bias or what?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Luke on June 03, 2016, 01:54:59 am
You expect the treaty to be a 100% cop bias or what?

No but you don't see us heading into Angel Pine shooting everyone up for no reason.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:55:07 am
You expect the treaty to be a 100% cop bias or what?

You tell me what you expect from it. The agreement was you don't cause shit with your "group" in major areas, specially Los Santos and stay where you belong. Not "lets do whatever we want with 10 of us rolling in LS and then run to AP if police engage".
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 01:57:03 am
You can show a few pictures of us entering Angel Pine to take care of criminals who quite clearly entered LS to commit criminal acts and engaged officers in doing so but it's not really representative of the whole story now is it?

Just today, about 2-4 hours earlier, you all decided to come into LS and do this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX7NlVBU-eA

Who broke the treaty again?

Not to mention the only reason police was at AP is because: police come to secure weed field at CM HQ> Kill the one suspect who was suspected growing due to him shooting > whole FLA comes > starts killing cops> runs to AP > and expects to be dealt with by "negotiations" just because they ran to AP.
Yeah, not why treaty was made.

You ran here to post a few pics and claim treaty was "broken" just so you could claim you didn't do anything. Not gonna work.
You have both failed to say what part of the treaty we broke.

FLA were already in LS in Taseens video, suspected when they were attacked by police and defended themselves, no breach of the treaty.

Arslan, we were already in Angel Pine before we got a call for help on CB radio at Corleone Mansion, we swiftly arrived to find you harvesting one of our members fresh batch of herbs, we asked you to leave, you stayed, you gave us no choice, weed takes a long time to grow and isn't worth losing, especially when we out number you guys 8 to 3... We headed back to where we came from after completing our task.

In the end, FLA did not breach the treaty, you didn't keep your side of the deal.

No but you don't see us heading into Angel Pine shooting everyone up for no reason.
No reason? :o

The agreement was you don't cause shit with your "group" in major areas, specially Los Santos and stay where you belong.
That wasn't the agreement, check your own post on the front page.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 01:58:14 am
What makes it an act of FLA? Just the fact that some of the guys who killed you were also in the FLA /group?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 01:59:50 am
You have both failed to say what part of the treaty we broke.
I'm sure the whole basis of the treaty is a cease fire from both sides, is it not?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:00:19 am
You have both failed to say what part of the treaty we broke.

FLA were already in LS in Taseens video, suspected when they were attacked by police and defended themselves, no breach of the treaty.

Arslan, we were already in Angel Pine before we got a call for help on CB radio at Corleone Mansion, we swiftly arrived to find you harvesting one of our members fresh batch of herbs, we asking you to leave, you stayed, you gave us no choice, weed takes a long time to grow and isn't worth losing, especially when we out number you guys 8 to 3...

In the end, FLA did not breach the treaty, you didn't keep your side of the deal.
No reason? :o
That wasn't the agreement, check your own post on the front page.

The whole point of it was to reduce shootouts, reduce FLA activity in major cities, specially Los Santos and let you guys do you own shit in your own space. It isn't a constitution where you look for loop holes and gaps to see what you can and can't do in attempt to exploit them. And clearly you've misunderstood the purpose of it and are now only using it as a tool to do the exact same thing you were doing before and just running to AP and expect police not to do anything about it because you're in AP.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 02:02:43 am
The whole point of it was to reduce shootouts, reduce FLA activity in major cities, specially Los Santos and let you guys do you own shit in your own space. It isn't a constitution where you look for loop holes and gaps to see what you can and can't do in attempt to exploit them. And clearly you've misunderstood the purpose of it and are now only using it as a tool to do the exact same thing you were doing before and just running to AP and expect police not to do anything about it because your in AP.

What makes you think earlier had anything to do with FLA? Was anything said in RP about FLA? No. Was the RP started because of something related to FLA? No, it was related to weed at CMHQ. Were they wearing masks? No.

Just because they're in the FLA /group doesn't mean it was the FLA that attacked you. Not all of them were even in the /group afaik.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:02:58 am
What makes it an act of FLA? Just the fact that some of the guys who killed you were also in the FLA /group?
Uh this wan't a roleplay agreement Einstein, the whole purpose of it was to reduce TDM in the server. Everyone knows who FLA is and isn't. As I said, you completely misunderstood the purpose of this and are attempting to exploit anything which isn't written treating it as some law book. It was to give guidelines as how FLA would conduct themselves and how police should deal with their operations. Not to continue rolling around as a army, killing anyone after we tell them to "leave" 2 or three times and then run to AP.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 02:07:58 am
I'm sure the whole basis of the treaty is a cease fire from both sides, is it not?
It was a ceasefire created by certain agreements, agreements which you did not keep.

The whole point of it was to reduce shootouts, reduce FLA activity in major cities, specially Los Santos and let you guys do you own shit in your own space. It isn't a constitution where you look for loop holes and gaps to see what you can and can't do in attempt to exploit them. And clearly you've misunderstood the purpose of it and are now only using it as a tool to do the exact same thing you were doing before and just running to AP and expect police not to do anything about it because your in AP.
Why are you trying to interpret the treaty to benefit yourselves? Read what it says again, you are clearly the one looking for loop holes or gaps, we kept our side of the deal, and as Sal said:

What makes it an act of FLA? Just the fact that some of the guys who killed you were also in the FLA /group?

None of us were masked, none of us were shouting or doing anything related to FLA.

Uh this wan't a roleplay agreement Einstein, the whole purpose of it was to reduce TDM in the server. Everyone knows who FLA is and isn't. As I said, you completely misunderstood the purpose of this and are attempting to exploit anything which isn't written treating it as some law book. It was to give guidelines as how FLA would conduct themselves and how police should deal with their operations. Not to continue rolling around as a army, killing anyone after we tell them to "leave" 2 or three times and then run to AP.
Except for the fact that we met in-game, RPed a meeting, asked questions, spoke to each other, and came to agreements, all on /l...

It was RPed, as it was intended to be, Einstein.

Why didn't you just leave Verdant Bluffs and call for backup? We clearly out numbered you... Instead you say "Hey look, it's FLA" and stay for the shootout, then continue to assume it's FLA and head straight for Angel Pine with no care for the treaty that was agreed.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:11:26 am
It was a ceasefire created by certain agreements, agreements which you did not keep.
Why are you trying to interpret the treaty to benefit yourselves? Read what it says again, you are clearly the one looking for loop holes or gaps, we kept our side of the deal, and as Sal said:

None of us were masked, none of us were shouting or doing anything related to FLA.
Except for the fact that we met in-game, RPed a meeting, asked questions, spoke to each other, and came to agreements, all on /l...

It was RPed, as it was intended to be, Einstein.

Why didn't you just leave Verdant Bluffs and call for backup? We clearly out numbered you... Instead you say "Hey look, it's FLA" and stay for the shootout, then continue to assume it's FLA and head straight for Angel Pine with no care for the treaty that was agreed.
So being masked and not masked defines being FLA or not? It doesn't matter if you were RPing FLA at the time or not. You're still the same group of people killing cops. This isn't a RP discussion about if you were attacking as FLA or as Corleones. Bottom line, you're still causing shootouts, you're still creating a TDM atmosphere destroying the whole purpose of this.

Only difference I see is, you called a whole army to Corleone HQ to kill cops but you claim it wasn't RP'd as FLA so it is justified. No, purpose wasn't to stop you representing FLA in major areas, purpose was to stop TDM.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Chase on June 03, 2016, 02:13:17 am
I'm not surprised at this. #BecauseArgonath
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 02:13:33 am
It was a ceasefire created by certain agreements, agreements which you did not keep.
Who came into LS shooting at cops first again?

Except for the fact that we met in-game, RPed a meeting, asked questions, spoke to each other, and came to agreements, all on /l...
I guess the development team and managers sign role-play agreements

Not to mention...
Out of Roleplay Agreement 
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 02:13:53 am
Uh this wan't a roleplay agreement Einstein, the whole purpose of it was to reduce TDM in the server. Everyone knows who FLA is and isn't. As I said, you completely misunderstood the purpose of this and are attempting to exploit anything which isn't written treating it as some law book. It was to give guidelines as how FLA would conduct themselves and how police should deal with their operations. Not to continue rolling around as a army, killing anyone after we tell them to "leave" 2 or three times and then run to AP.

Not a roleplay agreement...? I think a peace treaty is exactly that, Sigmund Freud. I also think you don't quite get the concept of an army in general and a rebel army in particular. FLA is something that unites different groups and players to serve a shared cause. It is not a primary group for anyone except its high command.

This is not about loopholes or exploiting, it's about common sense. You can't just link any roleplay scenario with members of the FLA, to the FLA. That's pretty much the same as me saying: ''Hey look, that's Arslan and Bass in a car, they're not on duty and they're just driving around, but I'm sure they're both doing FBI stuff right now!'', while in reality you may be off duty, catching up or something.

Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:15:58 am
Not a roleplay agreement...? I think a peace treaty is exactly that, Sigmund Freud. I also think you don't quite get the concept of an army in general and a rebel army in particular. FLA is something that unites different groups and players to serve a shared cause. It is not a primary group for anyone except its high command.

This is not about loopholes or exploiting, it's about common sense. You can't just link any roleplay scenario with members of the FLA, to the FLA. That's pretty much the same as me saying: ''Hey look, that's Arslan and Bass in a car, they're not on duty and they're just driving around, but I'm sure they're both doing FBI stuff right now!'', while in reality you may be off duty, catching up or something.

I don't care what the concept of your rebel army is. Bottom line, you're still doing the same shit you were doing before under a different flag. Yeah, not the reason for this treaty. And if you wanted to play it out this way, shouldn't have come on this topic moaning treaty was broken by cops evidently because of your actions, and because you violated the agreements.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Solis on June 03, 2016, 02:17:07 am
After seeing the video, it's unfortunate to see that FLA had to find loop-holes and interpretations into the treaty to give them an advantage and continue the dick-measuring contest against law enforcement. No wonder whenever I /mdc these days, people associated with FLA are always suspected and are always at Whetstone. It's their little safe zone now.

Oh well, in Argonath you can't expect to give the server something without some people trying their best to spin it to their advantage at the expense of others.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:17:12 am
@Teddy good luck solving this one.  ;)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Hevar. on June 03, 2016, 02:18:09 am
HAAHAHAHAHAAHAH aww...this is cute i swear this relationship reminds me of the fight berween Israel and Palestine, both cant hold to ONE SIMPLE agreement contract=)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:18:50 am
After seeing the video, it's unfortunate to see that FLA had to find loop-holes and interpretations into the treaty to give them an advantage and continue the dick-measuring contest against law enforcement. No wonder whenever I /mdc these days, people associated with FLA are always suspected and are always at Whetstone. It's their little safe zone now.

Oh well, in Argonath you can't expect to give the server something without some people trying their best to spin it to their advantage at the expense of others.

In Taseen's video it was just me driving around, and random people from everywhere, INCLUDING cops started joining on top of my truck. Somehow someone was a suspect and cops started chasing after us, and a shootout occured. That video had absolutely nothing to do with FLA whatsoever.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 02:20:35 am
So being masked and not masked defines being FLA or not?
Yes, because when we do FLA shit, we are usually masked to protect ourselves from the courts... You should know since you were so desperate to sue our members a couple weeks ago.

It doesn't matter if you were RPing FLA at the time or not. You're still the same group of people killing cops. This isn't a RP discussion about if you were attacking as FLA or as Corleones. Bottom line, you're still causing shootouts, you're still creating a TDM atmosphere destroying the whole purpose of this.
You were the ones who chose to stay and start grabbing the weed after a group bigger and more well armed than yourselves told you to leave, did we cause the shootout or am I missing something?

Only difference I see is, you called a whole army to Corleone HQ to kill cops but you claim it wasn't RP'd as FLA so it is justified. No, purpose wasn't to stop you representing FLA in major areas, purpose was to stop TDM.
We are all close friends who look after eachother, does that automatically make every action we commit an FLA activity?

The purpose of the treaty was to stop shootouts, and it had been working, we were simply protecting a friends (who is coincidentally an FLA member) income and avenging his life after you killed him, the treaty was still in effect and was still working, we hadn't given you any reason to start a major shootout in the days since the treaty was created, there hadn't been one in Flint Country, there had been one in LS, with legitimate reason.

Tomorrow it would have been back to the normal treaty, no shootouts in Flint Country, no blocked roads, no major provocative actions by FLA as a group, we did today what criminals do, kidnap, grow drugs, get income, and we protected all of that as criminals, you decided to see it as a rebel action and invaded Angel Pine, breaching the treaty, why not just accept the fact and admit your wrongdoing?

As for the "not RPed treaty", here's us discussing it, in RP.

(http://i.imgur.com/5bzMndi.jpg)

In Taseen's video it was just me driving around, and random people from everywhere, INCLUDING cops started joining on top of my truck. Somehow someone was a suspect and cops started chasing after us, and a shootout occured. That video had absolutely nothing to do with FLA whatsoever.
Yup, a truck driving around with people in witches hats dancing and being plain stupid stood ontop, sounds like FLA to me...
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:21:25 am
In Taseen's video it was just me driving around, and random people from everywhere, INCLUDING cops started joining on top of my truck. Somehow someone was a suspect and cops started chasing after us, and a shootout occured. That video had absolutely nothing to do with FLA whatsoever.
Don't need to look at video anyways, it isn't the only scenario. Just go back to the event at CMHQ which you were very actively involved in chasing and shooting cops.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TruthSvensson on June 03, 2016, 02:24:40 am
Uh this wan't a roleplay agreement Einstein, the whole purpose of it was to reduce TDM in the server. Everyone knows who FLA is and isn't. As I said, you completely misunderstood the purpose of this and are attempting to exploit anything which isn't written treating it as some law book. It was to give guidelines as how FLA would conduct themselves and how police should deal with their operations. Not to continue rolling around as a army, killing anyone after we tell them to "leave" 2 or three times and then run to AP.

If it wasn't a roleplay agreement, what was it? Were you and SAPD trying to avoid RP with FLA by posting a bullshit treaty? You know it's against the rules to avoid RP. I thought this peace treaty was a great step in quality RP. But now I see that you guys are just being jerks.

ps. If you think it's TDM, why are you participating in it? Just report it to admins.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 02:25:06 am
Yup, a truck driving around with people in witches hats dancing and being plain stupid stood ontop, sounds like FLA to me...
You can tell when they're FLA when they throw bombs at you, then immediately drive back to Angel Pine under the assumption that they're under some 'immunity' from the crimes they have committed in LS.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:28:54 am
1.Yes, because when we do FLA shit, we are usually masked to protect ourselves from the courts... You should know since you were so desperate to sue our members a couple weeks ago.
2. You were the ones who chose to stay and start grabbing the weed after a group bigger and more well armed than yourselves told you to leave, did we cause the shootout or am I missing something?
We are all close friends who look after eachother, does that automatically make every action we commit an FLA activity?

3. The purpose of the treaty was to stop shootouts, and it had been working, we were simply protecting a friends (who is coincidentally an FLA member) income and avenging his life after you killed him, the treaty was still in effect and was still working, we hadn't given you any reason to start a major shootout in the days since the treaty was created, there hadn't been one in Flint Country, there had been one in LS, with legitimate reason.

Tomorrow it would have been back to the normal treaty, no shootouts in Flint Country, no blocked roads, no major provocative actions by FLA as a group, we did today what criminals do, kidnap, grow drugs, get income, and we protected all of that as criminals, you decided to see it as a rebel action and invaded Angel Pine, breaching the treaty, why not just accept the fact and admit your wrongdoing?

4. As for the "not RPed treaty", here's us discussing it, in RP.

(http://i.imgur.com/5bzMndi.jpg)
Yup, a truck driving around with people in witches hats dancing and being plain stupid stood ontop, sounds like FLA to me...
1. Getting personal because you're in the wrong still doesn't justify this.
2. Police were there 5 minutes before anyone of you even came. They responded to a weed field, dealt with the suspect and began to secure the field. Then you bring along your whole army under "aiding corleone" flag, say leave twice and shooting at cops without a word of interaction. It wasn't RP, it wasn't in compliance with this agreement, it was just a manipulation of the agreement and hunger to continue having TDM matches.
3. Yeah so basically anyone part of FLA, does a crime anywhere on the map means you warranted a response from whole FLA because "he friend" and NOT to save/evade the cops but to come, stand around, threaten them and kill them. Wasn't RP, wasn't in compliance with this treaty.
4. Yeah it was an attempt by development team and HQ to stop TDM atmosphere, in RP the federal agencies wouldn't be sitting next to terrorists discussing how you can commit treason legally.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Celso on June 03, 2016, 02:29:40 am
Were you and SAPD trying to avoid RP with FLA by posting a bullshit treaty
If by you and SAPD, You meant Server Development and HQ, you are correct!
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Chase on June 03, 2016, 02:30:14 am
@Gandalf @Devin @Teddy @eymas @Rusty

Please do something. Even if it means "losing players"... I don't like seeing the forum and main chat spammed with poo. It's gotten old, y'know?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TruthSvensson on June 03, 2016, 02:31:04 am
If by you and SAPD, You meant Server Development and HQ, you are correct!

If HQ broke their own rules, they can't expect other people to follow them.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 02:31:17 am
I don't care what the concept of your rebel army is. Bottom line, you're still doing the same shit you were doing before under a different flag. Yeah, not the reason for this treaty. And if you wanted to play it out this way, shouldn't have come on this topic moaning treaty was broken by cops evidently because of your actions.

You don't care? Goes to show who's really the one trying to spin things to their advantage. All you do is talk, you don't listen and this post painfully illustrates that.

Nothing was done under any different flag. Just because you got killed by a few guys that were coincidentally in /groupmembers FLA, doesn't mean it's an action in FLA. The purpose of the treaty was to put an end to roadblocks and keep law enforcement/FLA hostility to a minimum. It did not say ''People who are in FLA can't shoot at cops anymore''. Bottom line is this shootout had nothing to do with FLA other than some people participating in it being in /groupmembers FLA.

As for people saying FLA is the one trying to find loopholes and spin things into its profit:

If you read the treaty and then read Arslan's posts, you'll find that there is very little in common with what Arslan is saying now, and what he wrote in the actual treaty. This is ironic because indeed, he wrote and posted it, albeit after discussing it with other involved parties.

Law enforcement in this topic are trying to protect their interest now by making stuff up that wasn't in the treaty in the first place and trying to blame things on 'interpretation'. Literally nothing in the treaty resembles even closely what law enforcement, and especially Arslan is posting now after that they actually broke the treaty. It should be noted that the treaty was already hugely cop-sided and that the FLA agreed to all the terms nonetheless in hope of better cooperation and to reach more initial goals through different methods.

All I can say at this point is, learn to take a loss and think your actions through a little better next time.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 02:31:35 am
Don't need to look at video anyways, it isn't the only scenario. Just go back to the event at CMHQ which you were very actively involved in chasing and shooting cops.
Shooting the cops who refused to leave when they were out gunned, shot at us, and then ran off expecting to survive, after harvesting half of the weed we came to protect?

You can tell when they're FLA when they throw bombs at you, then immediately drive back to Angel Pine under the assumption that they're under some 'immunity' from the crimes they have committed in LS.
Oh right, I forgot that only FLA can get bombs and such...

And I was with the truck after that shootout, they didn't go back to Angel Pine, they were driving around as they had been doing for a while.
We are not abusing our 'immunity' in Angel Pine, and even if we did (which we didn't), when did you guys make any attempts to negotiate as the treaty says you would?

If by you and SAPD, You meant Server Development and HQ, you are correct!
The treaty was RPed, as a treaty should be...

@Gandalf @Devin @Teddy @eymas @Rusty

Please do something. Even if it means "losing players"... I don't like seeing the forum and main chat spammed with poo. It's gotten old, y'know?
Are you making this plea in a neutral manner or are you insinuating that FLA is the cause of these problems?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 02:35:53 am
Are you making this plea in a neutral manner or are you insinuating that FLA is the cause of these problems?
It's hard to even fathom that motion
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:37:03 am
1.Shooting the cops who refused to leave when they were out gunned, shot at us, and then ran off expecting to survive, after harvesting half of the weed we came to protect?
Oh right, I forgot that only FLA can get bombs and such...

And I was with the truck after that shootout, they didn't go back to Angel Pine, they were driving around as they had been doing for a while.
2. We are not abusing our 'immunity' in Angel Pine, and even if we did (which we didn't), when did you guys make any attempts to negotiate as the treaty says you would?
The treaty was RPed, as a treaty should be...
Are you making this plea in a neutral manner or are you insinuating that FLA is the cause of these problems?
1. Logs will show who shot at who. Your job as a suspect is aid your friends in evading the police. Not come there being big shots and claim you own the place because you have more people with you due to the DM aspect of the "RP".  And now you can't even claim you were FLA and that's why you did what you did in protest against the government and not leave or evade the cops even if you came to help since you said yourself you weren't RPing FLA.
2. Clearly you are, you do shit in LS and run to AP. If you weren't RPing FLA and were not abusing it you would've done what I said above.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TruthSvensson on June 03, 2016, 02:37:28 am
We could have negotiated, it's just that the highest rank at the time was suspected so the outcome of the situation was likely to be a 'im not coming out' type of scenario

Yes, you should take actions based on assumptions instead of the law and treaty. Good one.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Chase on June 03, 2016, 02:37:44 am
Are you making this plea in a neutral manner or are you insinuating that FLA is the cause of these problems?

Neutral. I did not watch videos nor do I intend to because I knew someone, whether it be LE or FLA, would eventually fuck up.

The reason I said "even if it means loss of players" is because HQ can't make everyone happy. Whatever side they pick, players will be lost. And really I don't care at this point as long as the mudslinging and TDM reduces at the very least.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 02:43:57 am
We could have negotiated, it's just that the highest rank at the time was suspected so the outcome of the situation was likely to be a 'im not coming out' type of scenario
So you didn't bother trying to negotiate because of a dodgy assumption and have now destroyed the peace treaty as an after effect...

1. Logs will show who shot at who. Your job as a suspect is aid your friends in evading the police. Not come there being big shots and claim you own the place because you have more people with you due to the DM aspect of the "RP".  And now you can't even claim you were FLA and that's why you did what you did in protest against the government and not leave or evade the cops even if you came to help since you said yourself you weren't RPing FLA.
2. Clearly you are, you do shit in LS and run to AP. If you weren't RPing FLA and were not abusing it you would've done what I said above.
1. Why are logs needed? We shot first after you failed to leave as we requested and started harvesting the plants we came to protect... And 'evading' would have meant leaving the weed, the very reason we came... If you had just killed John and there was no weed, we wouldn't have came.

2. We live in Angel Pine, half of FLA own a property there, it's where we spend all our time just as Ballas did when they stood idle at GS9 or City Hall all day.

Neutral. I did not watch videos nor do I intend to because I knew someone, whether it be LE or FLA, would eventually fuck up.

The reason I said "even if it means loss of players" is because HQ can't make everyone happy. Whatever side they pick, players will be lost. And really I don't care at this point as long as the mudslinging and TDM reduces at the very least.
I've been told Flint Country will never get it's independence because cops would leave the server, I even asked cops myself and some have said they would, kind of sad really, why would you leave because progress is being made which could create more RP and bring an end to all the shootouts? I was told this by a HQ member, and I'm still here, not leaving...
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:49:20 am
1.You don't care? Goes to show who's really the one trying to spin things to their advantage. All you do is talk, you don't listen and this post painfully illustrates that.

2.Nothing was done under any different flag. Just because you got killed by a few guys that were coincidentally in /groupmembers FLA, doesn't mean it's an action in FLA. The purpose of the treaty was to put an end to roadblocks and keep law enforcement/FLA hostility to a minimum. It did not say ''People who are in FLA can't shoot at cops anymore''.
3. Bottom line is this shootout had nothing to do with FLA other than some people participating in it being in /groupmembers FLA.

As for people saying FLA is the one trying to find loopholes and spin things into its profit:

4. If you read the treaty and then read Arslan's posts, you'll find that there is very little in common with what Arslan is saying now, and what he wrote in the actual treaty. This is ironic because indeed, he wrote and posted it, albeit after discussing it with other involved parties.

5. Law enforcement in this topic are trying to protect their interest now by making stuff up that wasn't in the treaty in the first place and trying to blame things on 'interpretation'. Literally nothing in the treaty resembles even closely what law enforcement, and especially Arslan is posting now after that they actually broke the treaty. It should be noted that the treaty was already hugely cop-sided and that the FLA agreed to all the terms nonetheless in hope of better cooperation and to reach more initial goals through different methods.

6. All I can say at this point is, learn to take a loss and think your actions through a little better next time.
1. You're bringing irrelevant things into the discussion which don't even matter in the actual reason for this discussion. We're not here to debate about what FLA is made for.
2. Clearly it was since you just claim you came to help your friends and you brought a whole kill squad to CM HQ solely to stand there, threaten and shoot at cops.
3. Problem is it has everything to do with FLA since it's still the same people running to kill cops being FLA or not. And this "terrorist group" is being used as justification. I'v said already what you should've done and what the rules are for being a suspect and in what way you should aid suspects. You had no reason to shoot cops at CMHQ, no one engaged you, you solely came to say "leave" 3 times and start shooting.
4. I didn't write it, I just posted it. And anything in it was agreement upon by everyone.
5. If you're saying we're trying to protect our interest by saying we're tired of this TDM, then yes, we are. Nothing is made up, everything is being laid out for HQ to make an evaluation and everything will be proven in logs.
6. We're not here to have TDM so it wasn't a loss. Also if I remember correctly, if was you who claimed in public chat TDM keeps inactivity away, yeah not here. Join DM server for that because frankly majority of people have had enough.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:54:29 am
1. Why are logs needed? We shot first after you failed to leave as we requested and started harvesting the plants we came to protect... And 'evading' would have meant leaving the weed, the very reason we came... If you had just killed John and there was no weed, we wouldn't have came.

2. We live in Angel Pine, half of FLA own a property there, it's where we spend all our time just as Ballas did when they stood idle at GS9 or City Hall all day.
I've been told Flint Country will never get it's independence because cops would leave the server, I even asked cops myself and some have said they would, kind of sad really, why would you leave because progress is being made which could create more RP and bring an end to all the shootouts? I was told this by a HQ member, and I'm still here, not leaving...
1. Yeah once the weed is discovered by the police and they've established a crime scene it would make sense to leave it and evade. As I said logs will show exactly what happen and who did what. I'm just laying out the visual aspect of how it happen. If you believe what you did is justified then fair enough.
2. Ballas didn't go around responding to man down whenever one of their men was involved in a police RP/shootout so don't even compare FLA to them.
Create more RP? All you've done is cause TDM from day one and now you claim to end this give us this and we promise we won't cause TDM when in reality it will end in the same way as this treaty did.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 06:02:31 am
>lose gunfight
>cry tdm

>win gunfight
>shitpost all-day

This has been the case since I quote, "day one". Grow the fuck up Arslan and the rest of SAPD/FBI if you can't take a loss then by all means fuck off or stop whining, both would be even much better.  Sometimes I wonder whether LEOs get promoted based on how good the can bitch and cry on forums, all the high ranks seems to be doing it. You kept bitching until HQ intervened and get you a peace treaty that was clearly biased toward you and your kindergarten, I mean SAPD, then you proceed to claim the treaty was broken because you got shot by a bunch of guys with RP names that I barely recognize that RP with FLA.
Then you proceed to try and win the 2v8 fight because robocops n shit. Then these robocops lose the fight(who would've thought) and take it upon themselves to start a 10 page arguing to satisfy their ego that was  shattered in game.

Learn when to take a loss, I used to say schools should stop teaching kids it's ok to lose goddamn but I mistaken.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Leon. on June 03, 2016, 06:23:33 am
I recommend HQ force a total administrative ceasefire under any circumstance between the groups, and ban those who violate it - as in the case of Gvardia/Soprano back in the day.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Solis on June 03, 2016, 06:44:39 am
Hurr durr

Read the thread again. This whole bickering was started by Mikal who posted misleading screenshots.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 06:53:42 am
Read the thread again. This whole bickering was started by Mikal who posted misleading screenshots.
The screens show you breaking the peace treaty. Next time keep it in mind when you decide to roll in a SWAT team, which as the biased treaty states, a request for permission has to be initiated between the highest ranking kid and the highest ranking FLA officer.

Also this.
HAAHAHAHAHAAHAH aww...this is cute i swear this relationship reminds me of the fight berween Israel and Palestine, both cant hold to ONE SIMPLE agreement contract=)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Sweeper on June 03, 2016, 08:50:00 am
I fail to see how this treaty has anything to do with FLA not being allowed to enter LS. Please tell me where to find it.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: McGarrett on June 03, 2016, 09:43:08 am
This treaty is a joke.

It gives several advantages to FLA and SAPD and ARPD gets nothing. If you think you can come into LS organized and open fire on our officers, we will respond aggressive with a counter punch. You would do the same. Besidder, FLA is a terrorist organization so dont contradict yourselves by claiming you are victims.

Argonath doesn't need FLA. Argonath needs structured roleplay which excludes DM groups and terrorist organizations. We do not need more borders, we need to be united.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 09:47:59 am
Argonath needs structured roleplay which excludes DM groups and terrorist organizations. We do not need more borders, we need to be united.
Agreed, we should also get rid of moaners but that means closing an official group that has existed for almost a decade.

Something tells me you're one of the pathetic kids who are ready to pack up and leave if FC becomes independent, I really feel sorry for you and every other special snowflake. I can feel my dick falling off for simply noticing the sight of pathetic individuals like this.

If you want RP then you should grow a fucking pair and learn to adapt with your environment.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 10:12:05 am
This has been the case since I quote, "day one". Grow the fuck up Arslan and the rest of SAPD/FBI if you can't take a loss then by all means fuck off or stop whining, both would be even much better.  Sometimes I wonder whether LEOs get promoted based on how good the can bitch and cry on forums, all the high ranks seems to be doing it. You kept bitching until HQ intervened and get you a peace treaty that was clearly biased toward you and your kindergarten, I mean SAPD, then you proceed to claim the treaty was broken because you got shot by a bunch of guys with RP names that I barely recognize that RP with FLA.
Then you proceed to try and win the 2v8 fight because robocops n shit. Then these robocops lose the fight(who would've thought) and take it upon themselves to start a 10 page arguing to satisfy their ego that was  shattered in game.
I agree with Timon for once, I imagine law enforcement are just going to moan and moan and moan until FLA is closed, and ofc it will be FLA that get's closed since it can't exactly be law enforcement.

The bitterness from law enforcement is demonstrated by how they openly admit they'd leave the server if FLA got granted the independence it wants, why the fuck are people like that high ranks in the PD in the first place? That's the kind of people they want and that's the kind of people HQ want to protect? It demonstrates the perfect must win attitude.

I recommend HQ force a total administrative ceasefire under any circumstance between the groups, and ban those who violate it - as in the case of Gvardia/Soprano back in the day.
So we can't do FLA activities, and we can't do criminal activities with our close friends because it's apparently an FLA activity, shall we all just RP old men and ride round on lawn mower mobility scooters to please the PD who must always win?

I'm done wording everything subtle now, yes I've bitched and moaned in the past, but law enforcement just don't fucking stop, they must always win which is why they say they'll quit the server if FLA gets independence, they moan when we killed them because we out number them 4 to 1 in a shootout in which no FLA activities took place, they moan when we stay at Angel Pine where we ALWAYS stand and RP, they moan when we do any FLA activity as a group which might break the law because they know they'll get smashed if they attack us, the way I see it, FLA might aswell close just to please law enforcement, and if that happens, don't expect us to disappear as close friends, we will still be here, we will still work together, we will still fight for and defend eachother, and then what group are you going to moan about? Because there won't be one.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Bruce. on June 03, 2016, 10:40:06 am
Oh here we go again. Can we not do this once again but instead go and talk with HQ. Nothing will solve the hate and grudge towards each other by posting and posting over here.
Go file a complain at HQ regarding the treaty being broken.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 11:19:35 am
So, you guys are saying you entered LS as different RP characters to be involved in a shootout with the police?

Sorry, not really following.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: OmaR_RuLeZx on June 03, 2016, 11:37:30 am


Argonath doesn't need FLA. Argonath needs structured roleplay which excludes DM groups and terrorist organizations. We do not need more borders, we need to be united.

Exactly...
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Bruce. on June 03, 2016, 11:41:17 am
The bitterness from law enforcement is demonstrated by how they openly admit they'd leave the server if FLA got granted the independence it wants, 
Oh please, that is so lovely. Go ahead and get that independence.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 11:50:31 am
shall we all just RP old men and ride round on lawn mower mobility scooters

we have some svenssons to teach us  :lol:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 11:52:46 am
-
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 11:56:33 am
Grow the fuck up Arslan and the rest of SAPD/FBI if you can't take a loss then by all means fuck off or stop whining, both would be even much better.  Sometimes I wonder whether LEOs get promoted based on how good the can bitch and cry on forums, all the high ranks seems to be doing it. You kept bitching until HQ intervened and get you a peace treaty that was clearly biased toward you and your kindergarten, I mean SAPD, then you proceed to claim the treaty was broken because you got shot by a bunch of guys with RP names that I barely recognize that RP with FLA.
Then you proceed to try and win the 2v8 fight because robocops n shit. Then these robocops lose the fight(who would've thought) and take it upon themselves to start a 10 page arguing to satisfy their ego that was  shattered in game.

Learn when to take a loss, I used to say schools should stop teaching kids it's ok to lose goddamn but I mistaken.

Start creating a mess in-game, break the treaty, ignite a fire yourself by posting random screens without the background of what happen claiming the opposition is in wrong and then getting a response has nothing to do with loss. It wasn't any LEO who started this, it was your own and hence we were in the right to clear the misrepresentation of the situation.

Should've kept your shit together and continued instead of posting bullshit screens on forum if you didn't want to cause this shit claiming to be a victim when in fact you're responsible for the very thing you are complaining about.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 11:58:21 am
-
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 11:59:10 am
So, you guys are saying you entered LS as different RP characters to be involved in a shootout with the police?

Sorry, not really following.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: CharlieKasper on June 03, 2016, 12:12:50 pm

stop shitposting without having context of what has happened.

don't assume shit, it will only add fuel to the argument here.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: psyron on June 03, 2016, 12:19:55 pm
if the cops noticed possible FLA soldiers in LS, they should have tried to contact an FLA high rank guy and question him before infiltrating FC directly. if FLA is being terrorist, the cops dont need to be terrorists as well

its just my opinion on the matter.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: AK47 on June 03, 2016, 12:21:11 pm
Argonath needs structured roleplay which excludes DM groups and terrorist organizations.

Let's close down SAPD/ARPD/SWAT/FBI then!
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: OmaR_RuLeZx on June 03, 2016, 12:22:21 pm
So, we're just gonna stay here roleplaying as cops then a suspect goes to Angel Pine and boom we lost him.
I wasn't on duty yesterday but I know it was fucked up. It doesn't makes sense to negotiate with FLA when we have murderers in Angel Pine which probably are stilling running far away, while we are standing at the Flint County toll.
This thing turned the server into a minigame for criminals.. get suspected, run into Angel Pine and you won. It destroyed part of the police roleplay.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 12:22:32 pm
if the cops noticed possible FLA soldiers in LS, they should have tried to contact an FLA high rank guy and question him before infiltrating FC directly. if FLA is being terrorist, the cops dont need to be terrorists as well

its just my opinion on the matter.

Correct but that is not possible when the leader of FLA was the one leading the assault and one of the first people to shoot.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: McGarrett on June 03, 2016, 12:22:47 pm
FLA is just like America: acting like the world police. It is time that you understood that the law enforcement agencies will always outgun and overwhelm you. This is why FLA and other terrorist groups will never fit into Argonath
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 12:28:01 pm
So, we're just gonna stay here roleplaying as cops then a suspect goes to Angel Pine and boom we lost him.
I wasn't on duty yesterday but I know it was fucked up. It doesn't makes sense to negotiate with FLA when we have murderers in Angel Pine which probably are stilling running far away, while we are standing at the Flint County toll.
This thing turned the server into a minigame for criminals.. get suspected, run into Angel Pine and you won. It destroyed part of the police roleplay.


Yes, but you have to understand that it is a different boarder, doesn't matter what crimes were committed outside of Angel Pine, once you have entered there, you've crossed the boarder and Law Enforcements no longer have jurisdiction. That's where it comes to negotiating.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 12:28:17 pm
law enforcement agencies will always outgun and overwhelm you.
I think you mean outcry and outbitch because yes LEOs will always surpass us in those, clearly you haven't been in an FLA shootout recently.
So, we're just gonna stay here roleplaying as cops then a suspect goes to Angel Pine and boom we lost him.
I wasn't on duty yesterday but I know it was fucked up. It doesn't makes sense to negotiate with FLA when we have murderers in Angel Pine which probably are stilling running far away, while we are standing at the Flint County toll.
This thing turned the server into a minigame for criminals.. get suspected, run into Angel Pine and you won. It destroyed part of the police roleplay.

Angel Pine isn't your 1718 Pirates Haven, only this who get "immunity" are FLa soldiers(there's like what? 5 active soldiers+?). SAPD "broke the treaty" by entering FLA to chase a group of suspects, one of them being an FLA soldier.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 12:31:35 pm
So, you guys are saying you entered LS as different RP characters to be involved in a shootout with the police?

Sorry, not really following.
Entered for a shootout? No we entered because our friend who is also an FLA member was calling for help on CB, when we arrive he's dead and FBI are in the middle of harvesting his weed, we out number them by 8v3 and so assume they'd leave if we told them too, but being the Terminators they are they decided to stay and continue harvesting despite our warnings, that left us with no choice but to make them leave, a few shots later and they were running for the hills, leaving us to harvest the weed, do you follow now?

Oh please, that is so lovely. Go ahead and get that independence.
I don't mind us not having independence after all it's the rebellion RP that this group was created for, but for some to say they'd leave if we got it us just plain salty.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: OmaR_RuLeZx on June 03, 2016, 12:32:14 pm
Angel Pine isn't your 1718 Pirates Haven, only this who get immunity are FLa soldiers(there's like what? 5 active soldiers+?). SAPD "broke the treaty" by entering FLA to chase a group of suspects, one of them being an FLA soldier.

Still the fact that the suspect is getting away via a route we can't use and which he/she probably stays in Angel Pine as they do most of the time.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 12:32:52 pm
-
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 12:35:39 pm
Surprised how no one bared to mention Arslans bitch move couple days back. Before the treaty we killed legit every cop in AP and Arslans wants to revenge kill by flying over AP with bombs. Learn to accept defeat.
If you had killed every cop, you wouldn't have got the treatment you did. As for this "defeat" bullshit if you want a free pass to DM, cry to HQ, not me. You want to use bombs and shit, and moan when we fight fire with fire.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 12:37:05 pm
Still the fact that the suspect is getting away via a route we can't use and which he/she probably stays in Angel Pine as they do most of the time.
Deal with it then, life isn't fair and FLA soldiers+ aren't the only criminals in San Andreas.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Celso on June 03, 2016, 12:38:28 pm
Let's close down SAPD/ARPD/SWAT/FBI then!
Keep SWAT out of it.. Since they werent present..
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: OmaR_RuLeZx on June 03, 2016, 12:39:15 pm
Deal with it then, life isn't fair and FLA soldiers+ aren't the only criminals in San Andreas.

It appears you help them without trying though.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 12:40:35 pm
-
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 12:41:52 pm
It appears you help them without trying though.
the more you reply the more I realize you didn't even read the treaty
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 12:42:40 pm
We killed all of you including you..
Clearly you don't know what you're talking about so I'd suggest stop posting. Also I thought you weren't even part of FLA? What was your purpose of being there, was a "friend" stuck and needed back up?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Bruce. on June 03, 2016, 12:49:01 pm
I don't mind us not having independence after all it's the rebellion RP that this group was created for, but for some to say they'd leave if we got it us just plain salty.
Let them leave, you just go ahead and do what you do best and let the shitstorm behind your back. Just ignore the haters and keep going. Like i said bringing in on this forum will only cause more and more shitstorm like we all can see. If you bring the problem in this case the ceasefire breach then take it to HQ without involving the forum. It just becomes a straight pain in the ass...
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 12:49:17 pm
stop shitposting without having context of what has happened.

don't assume shit, it will only add fuel to the argument here.

Right. Useful information, thanks.  :app:

Entered for a shootout? No we entered because our friend who is also an FLA member was calling for help on CB, when we arrive he's dead and FBI are in the middle of harvesting his weed, we out number them by 8v3 and so assume they'd leave if we told them too, but being the Terminators they are they decided to stay and continue harvesting despite our warnings, that left us with no choice but to make them leave, a few shots later and they were running for the hills, leaving us to harvest the weed, do you follow now?

Cheers Mikal for the actual information (no sarcasm), sounds like you do no need to keep some of your dogs on a leash though (see quote above).

Sounds like you weren't in LS in an "FLA" capacity, ie, not campaigning for your freedom and shizzle. Looks like a situation that would've likely occurred with any other criminal group in the same position in my opinion.

The treaty doesn't state that the FLA cannot commit crimes in LS, but it does state that the release of FLA suspects from Angel Pine should be negotiated with the highest ranked FLA member online. Going strictly by confines of the treaty, law enforcement should have contacted the FLA rather than entering Angel Pine.

On the flipside, outside the confines of the treaty but within the law of the constitution, it's illegal to grow weed, and it was right the individual was suspected.

The treaty states that there should be negotiation between the parties for the release of a suspect, not that the negotiation always ends with law enforcement getting them, but if as a group you've attacked/killed multiple law enforcement members, then you can't expect to run home to Angel Pine and expect nothing to happen.

Unfortunately this scenario wasn't accounted for in the treaty, but I would personally say that as soon as combat commenced in LS, the treaty was made null and void.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 12:50:33 pm
Let me clear some things out for you people. The treaty states that when it comes to suspects who are barricaded in Angel Pine, Law Enforcements MUST negotiate. Now, yes, we were at Los Santos where we have committed some crimes, and then we left. We cross the boarder to Flint County and then crossed it again to Angel Pine. Now, due to Angel Pine being in a current dictatorship state, there aren't any law enforcements there to take care of suspects. So you either let them go freely, or contact an online high ranked member to negotiate. Either we pay a fine and you leave the suspect go, or we hand him over or ask him to leave Angel Pine.

In no way WHAT WE DID gave you the right to automatically cross the boarder and take things in your hands. If you wanted us to permanently stay in Angel Pine and do not move a single muscle, should of clarified it when you were agreeing about the treaty and we would obviously decline. It was your mistake that didn't clarify what you wanted, and it was your mistake crossing the boarder because of some suspects, and we aren't talking here about just one FLA Soldier, there were plenty including Sergeants and the leadership of FLA itself.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Sweeper on June 03, 2016, 12:51:30 pm
Clearly you don't know what you're talking about so I'd suggest stop posting. Also I thought you weren't even part of FLA? What was your purpose of being there, was a "friend" stuck and needed back up?

Is Angel Pine restricted area?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 12:53:47 pm
Let me clear some things out for you people. The treaty states that when it comes to suspects who are barricaded in Angel Pine, Law Enforcements MUST negotiate. Now, yes, we were at Los Santos where we have committed some crimes, and then we left. We cross the boarder to Flint County and then crossed it again to Angel Pine. Now, due to Angel Pine being in a current dictatorship state, there aren't any law enforcements there to take care of suspects. So you either let them go freely, or contact an online high ranked member to negotiate. Either we pay a fine and you leave the suspect go, or we hand him over or ask him to leave Angel Pine.

In no way WHAT WE DID gave you the right to automatically cross the boarder and take things in your hands. If you wanted us to permanently stay in Angel Pine and do not move a single muscle, should of clarified it when you were agreeing about the treaty and we would obviously decline. It was your mistake that didn't clarify what you wanted, and it was your mistake crossing the boarder because of some suspects, and we aren't talking here about just one FLA Soldier, there were plenty including Sergeants and the leadership of FLA itself.

I see the point of view from both sides, and I know what you're saying. But a peace treaty is a cease-fire and if a group as a whole (including leadership) is involved in a shootout with law enforcement in LS, then the "cease-fire" is null and void, since the whole point of it was to prevent these events occurring?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 12:54:12 pm
-
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 12:57:24 pm
I see the point of view from both sides, and I know what you're saying. But a peace treaty is a cease-fire and if a group as a whole (including leadership) is involved in a shootout with law enforcement in LS, then the "cease-fire" is null and void, since the whole point of it was to prevent these events occurring?

Yes BUT no one from FLA was acting as FLA, at that very moment when an ally asked for back up, he asked his criminal friends to do so, and the peace treaty was done as a ceasefire and to keep both parties away from each other if possible, we defended an ally territory, and we left. They could have easily let HQ handle it, even though there was nothing to handle, but they could have left HQ to handle it and not just tell us that HQ will handle it once they've taken it in their own hands.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 12:58:32 pm
Let me clear some things out for you people. The treaty states that when it comes to suspects who are barricaded in Angel Pine, Law Enforcements MUST negotiate. Now, yes, we were at Los Santos where we have committed some crimes, and then we left. We cross the boarder to Flint County and then crossed it again to Angel Pine. Now, due to Angel Pine being in a current dictatorship state, there aren't any law enforcements there to take care of suspects. So you either let them go freely, or contact an online high ranked member to negotiate. Either we pay a fine and you leave the suspect go, or we hand him over or ask him to leave Angel Pine.

In no way WHAT WE DID gave you the right to automatically cross the boarder and take things in your hands. If you wanted us to permanently stay in Angel Pine and do not move a single muscle, should of clarified it when you were agreeing about the treaty and we would obviously decline. It was your mistake that didn't clarify what you wanted, and it was your mistake crossing the boarder because of some suspects, and we aren't talking here about just one FLA Soldier, there were plenty including Sergeants and the leadership of FLA itself.

The treaty states that for FLA suspects. You've been claiming throughout this whole topic you weren't there as FLA so evidently you're just using AP as an escape route to do what you want in LS and then run to AP assuming police can't catch us now and they need to negotiate. Not the purpose of treaty.
And it wasn't anyone's mistake. It isn't hard to understand what you did was only exploit the treaty unless every bit of word is written down for you telling you the dos and don'ts. You weren't even at the discussion, the exact thing you did at CM HQ and then moved to AP was discussed. The motion was raised that other people would use AP as a safe haven. But it turned out, the whole FLA claims to be not FLA in LS, do the same shit as before and then run into AP claiming to be FLA. Doesn't work that way.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:00:28 pm
Still don't understand why you're crying about this. It's a GAME. Stop talking out of your vagina and get your force together and develop new tactics to stop this so called 'terrorist organisation'
Uhm.. we're law enforcement our job is to stop the organisation. If you don't want interaction with law enforcement go sit in a farm or something. You want to create and be part of something and then not accept its consequences.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 01:02:30 pm
Yes BUT no one from FLA was acting as FLA, at that very moment when an ally asked for back up, he asked his criminal friends to do so, and the peace treaty was done as a ceasefire and to keep both parties away from each other if possible, we defended an ally territory, and we left. They could have easily let HQ handle it, even though there was nothing to handle, but they could have left HQ to handle it and not just tell us that HQ will handle it once they've taken it in their own hands.

So if they weren't acting as FLA, why would law enforcement not be allowed to enter Angel Pine to arrest them?
Quote
• Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area.


Nobody's fault in particular, but I think the confines of this treaty need to be defined a little better.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:04:46 pm
So if they weren't acting as FLA, why would law enforcement not be allowed to enter Angel Pine to arrest them?
This is the biggest flaw and contradiction in their argument. Now you don't even know if they were being FLA or "friends helping" since the actions carried out as either one were wrong.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:06:00 pm
And it wasn't anyone's mistake. It isn't hard to understand what you did was only exploit the treaty unless every bit of word is written down for you telling you the dos and don'ts. You weren't even at the discussion

Indeed, I wasn't at the discussion so the dos and don'ts were clearly required. Even if we did exploit it to our advantage, it was your mistake for not clarifying things beforehand.

The treaty states that for FLA suspects. You've been claiming throughout this whole topic you weren't there as FLA so evidently you're just using AP as an escape route to do what you want in LS and then run to AP assuming police can't catch us now and they need to negotiate. Not the purpose of treaty.

Committing crimes as FLA or not, if we cross the boarder, we cross it. That is why the treaty was created, to force you to roleplay and negotiate with us. That is WHY we want independence, in order for you not to automatically rush in and start putting bullets in everyone's heads.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 01:06:48 pm
-
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:08:22 pm
So if they weren't acting as FLA, why would law enforcement not be allowed to enter Angel Pine to arrest them?

Nobody's fault in particular, but I think the confines of this treaty need to be defined a little better.

As I said, doesn't matter if we were acting as FLA or NOT, we were still in a different country with different laws with different boarders, why is that so difficult to understand?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 01:10:12 pm
Correct but that is not possible when the leader of FLA was the one leading the assault and one of the first people to shoot.
Why are you making out we game into LS and straight up attacked you and why are you making out it was an FLA action? We came to save our friend but you already killed him and so the only thing left to do was save his weed, it was a criminal action, not an FLA one.

FLA is just like America: acting like the world police. It is time that you understood that the law enforcement agencies will always outgun and overwhelm you. This is why FLA and other terrorist groups will never fit into Argonath
Except for the fact that law enforcement rarely out number us these days, we are the biggest and most active group on the server, and do enlighten me as to how saving a friend and his weed are 'world police' or terrorist actions? If you think FLA is so bad start looking at the first page of our topic and work your way up, you'll see that it's law enforcement who forced us to evolve into the giant we are today, from the first brutal confrontationa at roads we blocked to the taser incident by SWAT at Flint County, it is law enforcement that made us have to grow so big, but you refuse to see that and think you're all innocent in this mess, I honestly don'the know what the solution to this is anymore, we'very tried the cease fire but you guys couldn't uphold your side of the deal.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:11:44 pm
.1 Indeed, I wasn't at the discussion so the dos and don'ts were clearly required. Even if we did exploit it to our advantage, it was your mistake for not clarifying things beforehand.

2.Committing crimes as FLA or not, if we cross the boarder, we cross it. That is why the treaty was created, to force you to roleplay and negotiate with us. That is WHY we want independence, in order for you not to automatically rush in and start putting bullets in everyone's heads.
1. Everything was clarified before hand. The reactions given in the treaty were for FLA people RPing in a FLA capacity. If you decided to RP someone else and then use the agreement to FLA while not even RPing as FLA, it isn't hard to see if it is right or wrong. We expected other people to exploit this though I must say I didn't see this coming or happening.

2. Again, you're making AP into a safe haven for suspects. No, we didn't give you the right to whatever you want in AP. The only thing which did happen is for those involved in FLA RP and are in AP relating to FLA reasons, they would be dealt with differently. And you ran from Corleone HQ to AP not for FLA reasons since you claim you weren't even there as FLA.

Talking about putting bullets in everyone's heads, what did you do at CM HQ? So when you do it, it is justified but when you get the same treatment it isn't?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: [Rstar]Peter on June 03, 2016, 01:14:21 pm
I don't understand... When its about "treaty" you are just "criminal" and you have no affliction with FLA, when its about hiding at AP you are all FLA high ranked members.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:15:53 pm
1. Why are you making out we game into LS and straight up attacked you and why are you making out it was an FLA action? We came to save our friend but you already killed him and so the only thing left to do was save his weed, it was a criminal action, not an FLA one.
2. Except for the fact that law enforcement rarely out number us these days, we are the biggest and most active group on the server, and do enlighten me as to how saving a friend and his weed are 'world police' or terrorist actions? If you think FLA is so bad start looking at the first page of our topic and work your way up, you'll see that it's law enforcement who forced us to evolve into the giant we are today, from the first brutal confrontationa at roads we blocked to the taser incident by SWAT at Flint County, it is law enforcement that made us have to grow so big, but you refuse to see that and think you're all innocent in this mess, I honestly don'the know what the solution to this is anymore, we'very tried the cease fire but you guys couldn't uphold your side of the deal.
1. So now as a result of this event, clearly you only represent yourself as FLA when you know it is within the treaty but you're still the same group of people doing the same shit. As I've said many times earlier, the point of the treaty wasn't to stop FLA but to stop the TDM crap that has been happening.

2. Yes, because you provide a free pass to every tom, dick and harry on the server to shoot at cops so who wouldn't want to be a part of that. Your screens on your topic prove that point.

The law didn't make you grow so big, it is the free DM pass that has.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Stivi on June 03, 2016, 01:18:51 pm
SAPD command/leaders and whatever have agreed they shall not enter Angel Pine. They broke the treaty, they should be the ones punished by HQ as the peace treaty suggests. I don't see the need for all this drama. Please stop bitching, I am waiting for a reply at my unban request and all I see is "peace treaty 30/05/2016".
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 01:19:26 pm
This is the biggest flaw and contradiction in their argument. Now you don't even know if they were being FLA or "friends helping" since the actions carried out as either one were wrong.
u know this funny coming from a guy who's director is also a successful businessman and a secret crime mobster

i propose creating /fladuty so cops know when to bitch and when not to /sarcasm
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:21:41 pm
u know this funny coming from a guy who's director is also a successful businessman and a secret crime mobster
Even though I'm not two of those things, I take that as a compliment.

Nevertheless, I believe enough has been discussed. Leon has said he'll look into this tonight.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 01:22:42 pm
SAPD command/leaders and whatever have agreed they shall not enter Angel Pine.
We did not break the treaty. FLA did when they came into LS guns blazing, taking out cops, then returning back to Angel Pine for their criminal immunity. The whole point of the treaty is a cease fire from both sides, which FLA clearly did not abide by.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:25:17 pm
I don't understand... When its about "treaty" you are just "criminal" and you have no affliction with FLA, when its about hiding at AP you are all FLA high ranked members.

AS I SAID OVER ONE HUNDRED GOD DAMN TIMES, PLEASE, just read before you post. It doesn't matter for which reason we were there, as FLA or NOT, it doesn't matter what our roleplay states, Angel Pine is a different boarder, if you do not respect that, then I don't know.

Talking about putting bullets in everyone's heads, what did you do at CM HQ? So when you do it, it is justified but when you get the same treatment it isn't?

The only difference is, we had a reason and we had every right to do so, we asked you to leave, you did NOT. It was you who stayed around for a shootout, not us. Our territory, our rules. If we come inside your HQ, disrespect it, the second you do is call Matthew Carter, spawn a Rhino or a Hydra and start launching misiles at every possible suspect in Los Santos and San Andreas itself.

1. Everything was clarified before hand. The reactions given in the treaty were for FLA people RPing in a FLA capacity. If you decided to RP someone else and then use the agreement to FLA while not even RPing as FLA, it isn't hard to see if it is right or wrong. We expected other people to exploit this though I must say I didn't see this coming or happening.

2. Again, you're making AP into a safe haven for suspects. No, we didn't give you the right to whatever you want in AP. The only thing which did happen is for those involved in FLA RP and are in AP relating to FLA reasons, they would be dealt with differently. And you ran from Corleone HQ to AP not for FLA reasons since you claim you weren't even there as FLA.

I'm sorry but if that's not with this is, this treaty is a bollocks as your power. I thought that the treaty was stating for the cops to back the fuck out when FLA Soldiers+ are at Angel Pine, we use it as a safe heaven or not, its up to us. Its still a different boarder to you WHICH you have no jurisdiction over. If that's not how it is, might as well remove the wannabe treaty and go somewhere else with it.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ivan_Dzeba on June 03, 2016, 01:26:09 pm
We did not break the treaty. FLA did when they came into LS guns blazing, taking out cops, then returning back to Angel Pine for their criminal immunity. The whole point of the treaty is a cease fire from both sides, which FLA clearly did not abide by.

OMG, THEY DID THAT?

Alright, I had enough of this.

If FLA is not gonna do it peacefully, then the law should do it roughly.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 01:28:07 pm
If FLA is not gonna do it peacefully, then the law should do it roughly.
roughly moaning and whining yes
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 01:28:29 pm
SAPD command/leaders and whatever have agreed they shall not enter Angel Pine. They broke the treaty, they should be the ones punished by HQ as the peace treaty suggests. I don't see the need for all this drama. Please stop bitching, I am waiting for a reply at my unban request and all I see is "peace treaty 30/05/2016".

Not strictly true, law enforcement are allowed in any area to pursue non-FLA suspects, including Angel Pine. If they were acting in a "criminal" capacity and not FLA, then it's fine to pursue them.

Imo, there are very few constructive posts in this topic, and those I've seen have been mainly from Ramo and Arslan.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: [Rstar]Peter on June 03, 2016, 01:29:37 pm
AS I SAID OVER ONE HUNDRED GOD DAMN TIMES, PLEASE, just read before you post. It doesn't matter for which reason we were there, as FLA or NOT, it doesn't matter what our roleplay states, Angel Pine is a different boarder, if you do not respect that, then I don't know.

It does.
Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:30:53 pm
It does.
Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area.

Yes, except the people that were engaged upon were
FLA Soldier+.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 01:31:42 pm
Yes, except the people that were engaged upon were

Ah, but how would law enforcement know that?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:32:49 pm
Yes, except the people that were engaged upon were
Yes except that the treaty was for FLA related RPs, not for you to do whatever you want and claim to be some different character and five minutes later become FLA Sgt. because it serves you better. The point discussed in the meeting was the fact that other people would abuse it in this way but it isn't anyone else but FLA using it in the way it was said NOT to be used.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 01:32:55 pm
Ah, but how would law enforcement know that?
oh idk perhaps use /groups like you do everytime something is happening?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 01:33:10 pm
Yes, except the people that were engaged upon were
But I thought that you weren't acting as FLA in LS so why would you go to use your immunity in Angel Pine?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:33:41 pm
Ah, but how would law enforcement know that?

With /groups, or with that logic, they can never actually enter Angel Pine because they'll never know if its Soldier+ or not. They clearly knew our /groups beforehand if they rushed to Angel Pine five minutes after we left, otherwise it would be impossible to figure out where we're heading to.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: [Rstar]Peter on June 03, 2016, 01:34:22 pm
You were RPing as FLA then.
But...

Yes BUT no one from FLA was acting as FLA, at that very moment when an ally asked for back up, he asked his criminal friends to do so, and the peace treaty was done as a ceasefire and to keep both parties away from each other if possible, we defended an ally territory, and we left.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:35:22 pm
But I thought that you weren't acting as FLA in LS so why would you go to use your immunity in Angel Pine?

Because I still remain a FLA Sergeant, acting like or not, still am. You are trying to justify your acts because you knew our /groups before we even approached. And when we left, with no trails whatsoever, you just raided Angel Pine with no possibility of knowing we were FLA.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:35:51 pm
With /groups, or with that logic, they can never actually enter Angel Pine because they'll never know if its Soldier+ or not. They clearly knew our /groups beforehand if they rushed to Angel Pine five minutes after we left, otherwise it would be impossible to figure out where we're heading to.
I don't understand why you're assuming AP to be some country for the whole server. That is only FLA belief and the agreements by law are for FLA related acts. If you weren't RPing FLA, you are still just in any like other place on the map where law enforcement can engage you. Which you weren't so shouldn't have done what you did.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:36:34 pm
I honestly give up on all of you, the stupidity in some of you is astonishing and I just can't deal with this anymore, do whatever you want, I couldn't careless. Just make a decision, clarify with everyone what it is and we'll act on what decision you come up with.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:37:26 pm
Because I still remain a FLA Sergeant, acting like or not, still am. You are trying to justify your acts because you knew our /groups before we even approached. And when we left, with no trails whatsoever, you just raided Angel Pine with no possibility of knowing we were FLA.
We're not the ones justifying anything. What we did is engage suspects. It is you who are attempting to claim police should've called you and what not instead of doing what they did. And you are attempting to justify the reasons for that approach when clearly that situation did not deserve that response.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 01:37:54 pm
So...

1. FLA Soldiers+ in /groupmembers FLA opened fire on law enforcement in LS
and then...
2. Law enforcement opened fire on FLA Soldiers+ in /groupmembers FLA

So that's it, no need to moan. Peace treaty is broken. Simply means that if we have any more complain topics like this then HQ is going to step in and take administrative action.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:38:38 pm
I don't understand why you're assuming AP to be some country for the whole server. That is only FLA belief and the agreements by law are for FLA related acts. If you weren't RPing FLA, you are still just in any like other place on the map where law enforcement can engage you. Which you weren't so shouldn't have done what you did.

That's why you should have clarified the treaty from the beginning. Not everyone was at this meeting so there's no possibility of what you actually expected from us. And I am assuming AP is with a different boarder is because HQ asked us to roleplay it that way, and that is exactly what we are doing. They did not want it officially, this is what happens.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:39:34 pm
That's why you should have clarified the treaty from the beginning. Not everyone was at this meeting so there's no possibility of what you actually expected from us. And I am assuming AP is with a different boarder is because HQ asked us to roleplay it that way, and that is exactly what we are doing. They did not want it officially, this is what happens.
1. Common sense.
2. It isn't my job to keep FLA up to date with what their leaders have agreed upon.

You can roleplay it however you want. Just don't bring the treaty into it then and claim law enforcement can't do this or that since that isn't why it was made.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 01:41:31 pm
why can't we just get along

in an alternate universe FLA is patrolling an independent FC when suddenly they receive a radio call from SAPD regarding an escaped felon who entered their boarders, FLA being a reputable ally to SA immediately chase down the felon, capture him and deliver him to justice in los santos

but noo we just have to keep bitching on forums and "threaten" to quit argo if FC becomes independent, real fucking pathetic
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:41:39 pm
1. Common sense.
2. It isn't my job to keep FLA up to date with what their leaders have agreed upon.

Why is it in the constitution, you clarify things out? Because when it was made, not everyone was there. It was whoever have created it, which I assume was you or HQ, to do it, and you failed to do so. And if its common sense to actually write it up properly and not just assume people know what you expect from us.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:42:57 pm
Why is it in the constitution, you clarify things out? Because when it was made, not everyone was there. It was whoever have created it, which I assume was you or HQ, to do it, and you failed to do so. And if its common sense to actually write it up properly and not just assume people know what you expect from us.
Your leaders should be the ones to tell you what they expect from you. If they can't manage or control the group it isn't my problem.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:45:08 pm
Your leaders should be the ones to tell you what they expect from you. If they can't manage or control the group it isn't my problem.

It is your problem because the ones who wrote the treaty fucked up, and not my leaders. It was the treaty that was suppose to let everyone know what it was actually about and not make it blurry as fuck and just wait for leaders to tell them. If that was the case, you should of wrote nothing in the beginning.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:46:33 pm
It is your problem because the ones who wrote the treaty fucked up, and not my leaders. It was the treaty that was suppose to let everyone know what it was actually about and not make it blurry as fuck and just wait for leaders to tell them. If that was the case, you should of wrote nothing in the beginning.

We didn't write the treaty. Point were discussed, everyone was told how to do what and main points were published for general public. It was the job of your representatives to keep to up to date with what you can and can't do.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:49:56 pm
We didn't write the treaty. Point were discussed, everyone was told how to do what and main points were published for general public. It was the job of your representatives to keep to up to date with what you can and can't do.

Still it wasn't written and even if we used it to our advantage, we still did not break it.

If someone breaks a so called law without knowing because the constitution is blurry, the someone is let free because its the Government's fault. Same goes for this scenario.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:51:31 pm
Still it wasn't written and even if we used it to our advantage, we still did not break it.

If someone breaks a so called law without knowing because the constitution is blurry, the someone is let free because its the Government's fault. Same goes for this scenario.
Okay, so stop using it to your advantage and changing RP characters every 5 minutes and it may solve the problem.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 01:53:37 pm
Okay, so stop using it to your advantage and changing RP characters every 5 minutes and it may solve the problem.
Maybe if Argonath has evolved past silly restrictions it wouldn't have come to this, but apparently only those allowed to have multiple rp characters are admins.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:54:23 pm
Okay, so stop using it to your advantage and changing RP characters every 5 minutes and it may solve the problem.

Let's say we were there FLA, which to be honest I do not know as we just randomly responded from around San Andreas just to go help at CMHQ, which is an ally territory. FLA members or NOT has nothing to do with it here. As I said, the treaty wasn't clarified with everyone and we just clearly used it to our advantage BUT did not break it, you did. If you'd like to go and give this treaty a try again, I'd love to help you out and do it and make shit clear to everyone.

Any meetings that are to be set by HQ or by anyone, have me involved with the FLA Leaders. I am a neutral player and always have been, FLA or LE, neutral always.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 01:56:28 pm
Let's say we were there FLA, which to be honest I do not know as we just randomly responded from around San Andreas just to go help at CMHQ, which is an ally territory. FLA members or NOT has nothing to do with it here. As I said, the treaty wasn't clarified with everyone and we just clearly used it to our advantage BUT did not break it, you did.
Ally to who? FLA right? The people who came shooting were FLA no? So How can you claim FLA has nothing to do with it?

Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 01:57:34 pm
Ally to who? FLA right? The people who came shooting were FLA no? So How can you claim FLA has nothing to do with it?

Ally of almost every criminal. Corleone runs the cities of Los Santos if I recall. + EVEN if we were there as FLA, as I said, nothing was broken from OUR side.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:03:01 pm
Ally of almost every criminal. Corleone runs the cities of Los Santos if I recall. + EVEN if we were there as FLA, as I said, nothing was broken from OUR side.
Corleone at the moment runs nothing. Nothing to do with mafia RP as of recent though that is a separate discussion. Not even if, you were FLA and you came blasting at the wrong place just to cause a shootout and now you're claiming you weren't. If anything you've proven you run around participating in every shootout you can find and not sticking to the original FLA RP you were given this treaty for. One of those agreements was FLA not operating like an army in LS and it did and apparently not as FLA some how.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:05:51 pm
Corleone at the moment runs nothing. Nothing to do with mafia RP as of recent though that is a separate discussion. Not even if, you were FLA and you came blasting at the wrong place just to cause a shootout and now you're claiming you weren't. If anything you've proven you run around participating in every shootout you can find and not sticking to the original FLA RP you were given this treaty for. One of those agreements was FLA not operating like an army in LS and it did but apparently not as FLA some how.

We were there protecting an ally territory, that itself is enough to tell you that we did have a reason to be present there. We asked you to leave, you did not. And not just that, but you also attempted to take our drugs. Did you expect us to put our hands behind our backs or just leave and whatever or what? We acted like men, you stood your ground and did the same. The problem was not there, the problem was the automatically raiding Angel Pine like its your back yard when we were continuously asked by HQ to roleplay it as an independent state. Doesn't matter if we used the treaty to our advantage or not, we still didn't break it.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:10:33 pm
We were there protecting an ally territory, that itself is enough to tell you that we did have a reason to be present there. We asked you to leave, you did not. And not just that, but you also attempted to take our drugs. Did you expect us to put our hands behind our backs or just leave and whatever or what? We acted like men, you stood your ground and did the same. The problem was not there, the problem was the automatically raiding Angel Pine like its your back yard when we were continuously asked by HQ to roleplay it as an independent state. Doesn't matter if we used the treaty to our advantage or not, we still didn't break it.
Protect an ally territory? What are you on about man? Are you attempting to liberate CMHQ as well or something? It was a crime scene at which police were investigating a marijuana production process. It wasn't rebels attempting to over through the government and claim CMHQ as their own. Firstly, you weren't even there in the first place. There was one suspect at the scene who was dealt with and you all came guns blasting.

I expected you not to come in and start shooting cops after shouting "leave" three times. You didn't act like men, you acted like DMers but use FLA to say you're rebelling so it's justified but in this case even that wasn't the case so I see no reason for what you did. One minute you claim it was independent state RP and next you say it was not FLA but aiding ally.

CMHQ isn't an FLA occupied territory which you were attempting to protect.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:14:47 pm
Protect an ally territory? What are you on about man? Are you attempting to liberate CMHQ as well or something? It was a crime scene at which police were investigating a marijuana production process. It wasn't rebels attempting to over through the government and claim CMHQ as their own. Firstly, you weren't even there in the first place. There was one suspect at the scene who was dealt with and you all came guns blasting.

I expected you not to come in and start shooting cops after shouting "leave" three times. You didn't act like men, you acted like DMers but use FLA to say you're rebelling so it's justified but in this case even that wasn't the case so I see no reason for what you did. One minute you claim it was independent state RP and next you say it was not FLA but aiding ally.

First of all, yes I was present there, I was on the front lines, thanks for noticing me!  :mad: And yes it is an ally territory because Corleone and FLA are like peanut butter and jelly, they go together. They help us, we help them. Their territory was being disturbed, we responded. We warned you to leave, you did not and you tried to continue steal our drugs. Did you expect us to watch you as you start taking what funds us away from us?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:15:55 pm
First of all, yes I was present there, I was on the front lines, thanks for noticing me!  :mad: And yes it is an ally territory because Corleone and FLA are like peanut butter and jelly, they go together. They help us, we help them. Their territory was being disturbed, we responded. We warned you to leave, you did not and you tried to continue steal our drugs. Did you expect us to watch you as you start taking what funds us away from us?
Okay so you did come as FLA therefore you breached the treaty. Problem solved.

And stop asking me what I expected from you. I've already told you. You job is to evade police not to confront them as terminators.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:20:37 pm
Okay so you did come as FLA therefore you breached the treaty. Problem solved.

And stop asking me what I expected from you. I've already told you. You job is to evade police not to confront them as terminators.

"Not confront them as terminators" is what exactly what you did when you were outnumbered. Also, in no where was it stated that we had no rights to leave Angel Pine and go roleplay elsewhere, so no, we did not breach shit.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:21:20 pm
"Not confront them as terminators" is what exactly what you did when you were outnumbered. Also, in no where was it stated that we had no rights to leave Angel Pine and go roleplay elsewhere, so no, we did not breach shit.
Admit it, you breached it. You already said it without realising.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:23:02 pm
Also, in no where was it stated that we had no rights to leave Angel Pine and go roleplay elsewhere, so no, we did not breach shit.
True, but your roleplay is to go anywhere on the map to kill cops which is what we are trying to stop and contain in AP.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TheGreasyChopper on June 03, 2016, 02:27:49 pm
 I really can't keep up with the whole topic as it's all going too fast but...From what I see it was Law Enforcement who broke the treaty. They entered Angel Pine.

 Sure FLA came to Los Santos and did a few things, but there's not a single mention of FLA not being allowed in Los Santos or not being allowed to do any crimes outside of Flint County. Yes, the treaty may have been created to stop shootouts and moaning, but you should've thought of it when you wrote it. Right now the only one who broke it from the evidence posted was PD.

Agreement terms

• Citizens of the United States of Argonath and law enforcement have access to Flint County and Whetstone but law enforcement are not permitted to enter Angel Pine. Law enforcement officials who enter Angel Pine will be reported to senior law enforcement (FBI & SAPD Sgt+) who will then ensure those officers are removed from the restricted area. Law enforcement and civilians will still be allowed to use the highways bordering Angel Pine and access Mt. Chiliad.
• Criminals who are not FLA Soldier+ and enter Angel Pine can be engaged and arrested by law enforcement without any involvement of FLA regardless of area. 
• Any suspect above Soldier rank will have to result in law enforcement negotiating the release of the suspect by FLA or any other possible outcome.
• Stop the moaning in public chat in-game and forums from both sides. No provoking comments or behavior in-game or forum.
• FLA will remove people who join for shootouts and do not participate with FLA RP.
• FLA will stop blocking main roads connecting cities such as Flint Intersection, LS-SF Tunnel etc.
• If entry is needed into Angel Pine for whatever reason, the highest ranking law enforcement official of any law enforcement agency should consult with the highest ranking FLA member.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:29:16 pm
I really can't keep up with the whole topic as it's all going too fast but...From what I see it was Law Enforcement who broke the treaty. They entered Angel Pine.

 Sure FLA came to Los Santos and did a few things, but there's not a single mention of FLA not being allowed in Los Santos or not being allowed to do any crimes outside of Flint County. Yes, the treaty may have been created to stop shootouts and moaning, but you should've thought of it when you wrote it. Right now the only one who broke it from the evidence posted was PD.
Don't post if you haven't read the topic then since we've already been over this.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:29:24 pm
Admit it, you breached it. You already said it without realising.

We exploited it, for our advantage, but you broke it. Understand that and we can move on. If you cannot understand that, move on anyway because I am done discussing this and trying to explain things to you.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:30:42 pm
We exploited it, for our advantage, but you broke it. Understand that and we can move on. If you cannot understand that, move on anyway because I am done discussing this and trying to explain things to you.
We would've broke it if you were doing some FLA shit in LS which lead to police attention and then you moved to AP but that wasn't the case since half go you say you were FLA and half of you say you weren't.
You solely came there for a shootout which is unacceptable and scraps the purpose of the treaty.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:34:19 pm
We would've broke it if you were doing some FLA shit in LS which lead to police attention and then you moved to AP but that wasn't the case since half go you say you were FLA and half of you say you weren't.
You solely came there for a shootout which is unacceptable and scraps the purpose of the treaty.

This is what I've concluded on what you expect from this so called treaty:

1. No interaction between Law Enforcements and FLA Members whatsoever.
2. FLA Members have no right to exit Angel Pine.
2.1. FLA Members have no right to protect their lands.
3. Any drugs that are found, are automatically Law Enforcements' and if a criminal goes close, automatic #1 wanted by the state.

Did I hit anything? I probably did on all of them.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 02:34:52 pm
I really can't keep up with the whole topic as it's all going too fast but...From what I see it was Law Enforcement who broke the treaty. They entered Angel Pine.

 Sure FLA came to Los Santos and did a few things, but there's not a single mention of FLA not being allowed in Los Santos or not being allowed to do any crimes outside of Flint County. Yes, the treaty may have been created to stop shootouts and moaning, but you should've thought of it when you wrote it. Right now the only one who broke it from the evidence posted was PD.

The PD are allowed to enter Angel Pine to chase non-FLA suspects.

If the suspects that the PD pursued were FLA, then the suspects were FLA when they opened fire on law enforcement in Los Santos beforehand.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:41:16 pm
This is what I've concluded on what you expect from this so called treaty:

1. No interaction between Law Enforcements and FLA Members whatsoever.
2. FLA Members have no right to exit Angel Pine.
2.1. FLA Members have no right to protect their lands.
3. Any drugs that are found, are automatically Law Enforcements' and if a criminal goes close, automatic #1 wanted by the state.

Did I hit anything? I probably did on all of them.
Interaction between FLA and law enforcement which has a roleplay purpose and not just 3 times "leave" and shootout, yes.
FLA members can do whatever they want wherever they want just not say we did this in LS as a drug lord but now that we're in AP, we're FLA.
FLA has no lands, AP is the only place we've given to allow you to RP your thing. Everything else is as it is, and civilians/law enforcement has full jurisdiction over it, including AP except for the exceptions from FLA.
Any farms which are found by the police should be considered seized and people shouldn't gather every guy they know, hand him a gun with "lets go kill cops at my field" since your job is to evade police.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:51:48 pm
civilians/law enforcement has full jurisdiction over it, including AP except for the exceptions from FLA.
Any farms which are found by the police should be considered seized and people shouldn't gather every guy they know, hand him a gun with "lets go kill cops at my field" since your job is to evade police.

If I have a shipment coming and cops are trying to fuck with it, yes, I'll give every guy I know a gun to make sure they put you down, that's exactly the same thing I would of done in reality. The only difference is that if cops notice they're outnumbered, they pack up and leave themselves and not stick around because 'they're cops and its their duty.'
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 02:54:21 pm
If I have a shipment coming and cops are trying to fuck with it, yes, I'll give every guy I know a gun to make sure they put you down, that's exactly the same thing I would of done in reality.
Damn you brave. Have you ever been arrested before?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 02:57:37 pm
Damn you brave. Have you ever been arrested before?

Lol, like I'd ever get caught. Paranoia is a great asset at times.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 03:44:56 pm
The treaty says nothing about FLA being banned from Los Santos, nor does it say anything about FLA getting into a shootout outside of Angel Pine.
Simple; cops fucked up telling officers to enter angel pine. Stop the god damn winning mentality and get off of your fucking egos for christ sake.

You can show a few pictures of us entering Angel Pine to take care of criminals who quite clearly entered LS to commit criminal acts and engaged officers in doing so but it's not really representative of the whole story now is it?

Just today, about 2-4 hours earlier, you all decided to come into LS and do this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX7NlVBU-eA

Who broke the treaty again?

Who broke the treaty? You and other officers did including SWAT and FBI members. Congratulations.
It does NOT say FLA members can't enter Los Santos nor does it say anything about FLA getting into shootouts outside of Angel Pine.
Cops made the treaty so vague and now you try to enforce nonsense that isn't even included in it. Your own fault.

You gave them a loophole, you told FLA they are allowed to be wanted in Angel Pine, you specified NOTHING about them returning to Angel Pine to hide out while wanted. Stop blaming them and admit your own fuck up.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 03:51:13 pm
The treaty says nothing about FLA being banned from Los Santos, nor does it say anything about FLA getting into a shootout outside of Angel Pine.
Simple; cops fucked up telling officers to enter angel pine. Stop the god damn winning mentality and get off of your fucking egos for christ sake.

Who broke the treaty? You and other officers did including SWAT and FBI members. Congratulations.
It does NOT say FLA members can't enter Los Santos nor does it say anything about FLA getting into shootouts outside of Angel Pine.
Cops made the treaty so vague and now you try to enforce nonsense that isn't even included in it. Your own fault.

You gave them a loophole, you told FLA they are allowed to be wanted in Angel Pine, you specified NOTHING about them returning to Angel Pine to hide out while wanted. Stop blaming them and admit your own fuck up.
I guess the whole concept of a peace treaty is not a cease fire from both sides then. I must have been horribly mistaken.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Rei on June 03, 2016, 03:52:45 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX7NlVBU-eA

I think that ped.ifp make you run faster than the default one :p
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 03:52:58 pm
You setup the terms of this treaty, did they go to los santos to randomly get wanted? No they were helping Corleone members.
You (as in the officers) agreed to set terms which never specified anything about FLA shooting anyone nor did you specify FLA must stay in Angel Pine.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 03:56:06 pm
You setup the terms of this treaty, did they go to los santos to randomly get wanted? No they were helping Corleone members.
You (as in the officers) agreed to set terms which never specified anything about FLA shooting anyone nor did you specify FLA must stay in Angel Pine.
Go speak to your fellow HQ members first. They are the ones who set this up and know what was discussed. And your claim about not making shit clear you them, I already said we discussed this point about suspects using it as a safe haven regarding what they can and can't do. It wasn't our job to write a book for them. 

The only person from HQ who has a right to make that judgement is either Teddy or Leon.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 03:56:36 pm
You setup the terms of this treaty, did they go to los santos to randomly get wanted? No they were helping Corleone members.
You (as in the officers) agreed to set terms which never specified anything about FLA shooting anyone nor did you specify FLA must stay in Angel Pine.
thx point made pls lock topic
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 03:57:41 pm
You setup the terms of this treaty, did they go to los santos to randomly get wanted? No they were helping Corleone members.
You (as in the officers) agreed to set terms which never specified anything about FLA shooting anyone nor did you specify FLA must stay in Angel Pine.
We both agreed on the terms, it wasn't one sided. You can see in the video that clearly they went into LS looking for trouble and used their FLA membership as a way out of getting caught. The definition of 'peace' is no conflict between both sides. Shooting up half of LS and killing cops counts as conflict.

I think that ped.ifp make you run faster than the default one :p
Even though it's not my vid the mod seems fine
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Stivi on June 03, 2016, 04:00:53 pm
We both agreed on the terms, it wasn't one sided. You can see in the video that clearly they went into LS looking for trouble and used their FLA membership as a way out of getting caught. The definition of 'peace' is no conflict between both sides. Shooting up half of LS and killing cops counts as conflict.
Wasn't it peace as in let's negociate to stop fighting at FC-LS border?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Gnb_22 on June 03, 2016, 04:02:35 pm
(https://i.imgflip.com/ni0dt.jpg)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:02:58 pm
Go speak to your fellow HQ members first. They are the ones who set this up and know what was discussed. And your claim about not making shit clear you them, I already said we discussed this point about suspects using it as a safe haven regarding what they can and can't do. It wasn't our job to write a book for them.

I was not even around when the treaty was created, do you see my name signed on it? No.
You agreed to the terms, not anyone's fault but yours for not wanting to specify things like FLA getting wanted and returning to FLA giving you the ability to ignore the treaty.

Why would anyone write a book for something that is clear as day? It says they will hand over non-FLA suspects to SAPD, it also says that;
"Any suspect above Soldier rank will have to result in law enforcement negotiating the release of the suspect by FLA or any other possible outcome. "

But I guess that was ignored too.

FLA did not break the treaty by entering LS to help friends, cops brought the fight to Angel Pine. It's on the police department for this cockup.

The only person from HQ who has a right to make that judgement is either Teddy or Leon.

Teddy is not a part of HQ and Leon is a manager. I have the ability to make a judgement call on this as I am the one leading the server.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Luke on June 03, 2016, 04:06:42 pm
It still cracks me up now how a extremist/terrorist group has a choice of what they do, ain't the FBI along with army forces supposed to put a cap on this? Im sorry but if a group such as FLA enter foot in the city boundries shooting up the place im 101 percent sure lethal force would be a understatment. I think this shit is pathetic and now just getting way out of hand, congratulations you found a loop-hole in the treaty maybe yes it should have been sat down and re-thought of but the main goal of the treaty was to stop this whole pew pew pew everyday and yes the PD forces went to flint but only out of the fact FLA came to LS shooting the place up, Im sorry FLA fired the first shot and well law enforcement retalitated, slam me as you will but, what is good for one is good for another something people in Argonath cease to understand. Case closed.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:09:37 pm
Before signing a treaty or any form of contract one should always look for any possible exploitable terms or missing terms. Don't blame them for doing something that is inside of the treaty limitations.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 04:11:40 pm
Before signing a treaty or any form of contract one should always look for any possible exploitable terms or missing terms. Don't blame them for doing something that is inside of the treaty limitations.

You're still failing to address this:
The definition of 'peace' is no conflict between both sides. Shooting up half of LS and killing cops counts as conflict.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 04:12:25 pm
I was not even around when the treaty was created, do you see my name signed on it? No.
You agreed to the terms, not anyone's fault but yours for not wanting to specify things like FLA getting wanted and returning to FLA giving you the ability to ignore the treaty.

Why would anyone write a book for something that is clear as day? It says they will hand over non-FLA suspects to SAPD, it also says that;
"Any suspect above Soldier rank will have to result in law enforcement negotiating the release of the suspect by FLA or any other possible outcome. "

But I guess that was ignored too.

FLA did not break the treaty by entering LS to help friends, cops brought the fight to Angel Pine. It's on the police department for this cockup.

Teddy is not a part of HQ and Leon is a manager. I have the ability to make a judgement call on this as I am the one leading the server.
I told you to speak to them because they will be able to inform you if we covered this topic or not. This post wasn't made for FLA or cops to use as a book to determine what they can and can't do hence the lack of detail. It was actually made to inform the general public of what is going on behind the scenes. Points were discussed and agreed upon by both sides and doing what they did at CMHQ was the very point which we raised about people doing this. Again point of treaty was to reduce shootouts, it was an attempt from HQ not to call it truce with FLA. It is still a terrorist organisation, it is still a group of people killing cops.

Before you had issue that cops didn't give them space and shit, now no cop barely goes to Flint County and they don't enter AP. We've given them a whole city to do their shit yet it is somehow still not enough? And you want us to let them do whatever they want and then go sit in AP so no one can touch them? I don't think it even sounds like anything which anyone would've agreed upon.

I have no problem with continuing the same as shit was before. I didn't call for this however, I did agree when someone made an initiative to reach a solution and I did my part. FLA should've taken the points that were made and implemented them. We cannot be held responsible for that.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Luke on June 03, 2016, 04:13:15 pm
Before signing a treaty or any form of contract one should always look for any possible exploitable terms or missing terms. Don't blame them for doing something that is inside of the treaty limitations.

Agreed but I think being shot at kind of well voids that contract instantly, I don't go into a agreement with someone only to be shot at by them within 3 days of the contact being presented. Pretty sure that's not how
PEACE treatys work.  :lol:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: jovanca on June 03, 2016, 04:14:26 pm
Give mayors real roleplay power so they can decide how to handle the 'terrorists'. Have elections asap. Instead of handling roleplay matter on forum, handle it in roleplay. Punish those who break the rules on both sides.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:16:50 pm
It is called a peace treaty, sure. Did it say anything about a cease fire between cops and FLA? No. You setup the terms, they stuck to what you told them to.
You all specified that cops would NOT rush in to Angel Pine, that you would negotiate handing over FLA suspects in Angel Pine.

The video provided shows the cops going up to FLA in LS, so it's still FLAs fault for being on the server?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 04:19:26 pm
It is called a peace treaty, sure. Did it say anything about a cease fire between cops and FLA? No. You setup the terms, they stuck to what you told them to.
You all specified that cops would NOT rush in to Angel Pine, that you would negotiate handing over FLA suspects in Angel Pine.

The video provided shows the cops going up to FLA in LS, so it's still FLAs fault for being on the server?

The issue was TDM which will still happen no matter where they are. FLA is still the same group of people rolling with same mentality, they are still armed and if one of them gets a slightest of problems, it turns into a TDM.

This treaty can be scrapped if you want and shit can continue as it was before.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 04:19:38 pm
It is called a peace treaty, sure. Did it say anything about a cease fire between cops and FLA? No. You setup the terms, they stuck to what you told them to.
The foundation of the treaty was a  cease fire from both sides. Ask your fellow HQ members or even Mikal. That was the fundamental principle behind it.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Conk on June 03, 2016, 04:21:55 pm
The foundation of the treaty was a  cease fire from both sides. Ask your fellow HQ members or even Mikal. That was the fundamental principle behind it.

Not what it says on the treaty, nor in the agreement terms.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 04:23:50 pm
1. You're bringing irrelevant things into the discussion which don't even matter in the actual reason for this discussion. We're not here to debate about what FLA is made for.

It is very relevant because you're assuming FLA is a primary role for everyone, thus making the very wrong assumption that every time its members are driving around in Los Santos, or in this case, helping a friend, it's an ''FLA activity''. I'm in like 15 /groups ingame and you are nobody to assume I'm either doing AV, FLA, AoD, SanitaryAndreas or Soprano stuff just because I'm around someone else that is also in FLA. Almost half the active part of the server is related to FLA in some way at this point.

2. Clearly it was since you just claim you came to help your friends and you brought a whole kill squad to CM HQ solely to stand there, threaten and shoot at cops.

And this is FLA, how?

3. Problem is it has everything to do with FLA since it's still the same people running to kill cops being FLA or not. And this "terrorist group" is being used as justification. I'v said already what you should've done and what the rules are for being a suspect and in what way you should aid suspects. You had no reason to shoot cops at CMHQ, no one engaged you, you solely came to say "leave" 3 times and start shooting.

Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't know cops didn't get shot before FLA. Guess I haven't seen anything these past 10 years in Argonath, where I was an SAPD Sergeant for years as well. As for this particular reason to shoot: You shot John dead and tried to steal his weed. You were given a fair chance to beat it while his friends took the weed back, for which John had called backup for before he died, in RP. If it was me leading it I would've killed you either way for killing my friend like that. They went easy on you but you figured you could take them on so you tried your luck anyway and failed. Who's wanting the shootouts now, huh?

4. I didn't write it, I just posted it. And anything in it was agreement upon by everyone.

Yes, I pointed this out. You worded it though and you were most vocal during the negotiations anyway. Fact is, this whole treaty was tailored to suit YOUR needs, not ours. You were very pleased with the outcome and so were all the others who are now crying that the treaty was FLA-sided. This is a shameful display of what it means to be a sore loser.

6. We're not here to have TDM so it wasn't a loss. Also if I remember correctly, if was you who claimed in public chat TDM keeps inactivity away, yeah not here. Join DM server for that because frankly majority of people have had enough.

This is extremely hypocritical. Given FBI and SAPD its attitudes in engagements with the FLA prior to the treaty, it looks to me like these parties are the ones who really are hungry for TDM. Two cases: 1.) At the bridge on the road to Angel Pine. I just stood there cause I had a bar there. I was walking slowly while suddenly a convoy of SAPD came and opened fire on a bunch of FLA soldiers. I was walking away from it, unarmed and not aiming but within 5 seconds my armor was gone. I had to jump off of the bridge to avoid getting killed just because SAPD assumed I was participating in their little skirmish. 2. The whole fiasco where Celso called backup on Teamspeak and Taseen arrived. I didn't want to shoot and I walked away from the scene before any shooting started. Taseen chased me, suspected me for ''aiding'' and opened fire instantly, again while I was not a treat. Supposedly ''brandishing a weapon'' (which wasn't even RPly, I don't pay attention to which weapon I have out, nobody does) is enough reason for him to open fire instantly after suspection, even while I was walking towards him to surrender and find out just what the hell he thought he was doing.

But yeah, I personally don't mind a little TDM. Everyone likes it, including you. In this situation it suits you to say you don't though, because you lost. Should've seen mainchat when you won a shootout, then you seemed to love it. Shooting is part of the game and I like it a lot, like everyone does but nobody seems to want to admit in times like these.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:25:42 pm
As I have said twice now, the treaty said nothing about FLA getting into a shootout with anyone.

It specifically stated that if there are any suspected FLA members above soldier, cops would organize a negotiation for them to hand over the said criminals.
Sure things got out of hand, but you still should have put your best foot forwards and done as the treaty said you would over running in to Angel Pine with command trucks.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Hevar. on June 03, 2016, 04:27:51 pm
This reminds me of a story:

An elder Native American was teaching his grandchildren about life. He said to them, "A fight is going on inside me.. it is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves. One wolf represents fear, anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.

The other stands for joy, peace, love, hope, sharing, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, friendship, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith."

"This same fight is going on inside you, and inside every other person, too", he added.

The Grandchildren thought about it for a minute and then one child asked his grandfather, "Which wolf will win?"

The old Cherokee simply replied... "The one you feed."
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 04:28:49 pm
As I have said twice now, the treaty said nothing about FLA getting into a shootout with anyone.

It specifically stated that if there are any suspected FLA members above soldier, cops would organize a negotiation for them to hand over the said criminals.
Sure things got out of hand, but you still should have put your best foot forwards and done as the treaty said you would over running in to Angel Pine with command trucks.
We find what they did not acceptable and consider what they did a breach of the treaty. So either the treaty gets renegotiated or it can be scrapped.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Luke on June 03, 2016, 04:29:49 pm
As I have said twice now, the treaty said nothing about FLA getting into a shootout with anyone.

But you still fail to understand firearms and firing them are erm well a bit out of that agreement may not be wrote on it but as soon as you take out a firearm and your fire it at the opsition of the agreement it is shown as a act of war.

Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:31:51 pm
The treaty was designed to introduce some kind of interaction other than moaning and death between the parties involved. But you seriously can't tell me the treaty means an absolute cease fire between cops and FLA. You essentially gave them immunity if they are inside of Angel Pine with this agreement.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Julio. on June 03, 2016, 04:32:34 pm
Easier to scrap the treaty... then get it rewritten and ask somebody from the court to review it.

You essentially gave them immunity if they are inside of Angel Pine with this agreement.

Yep  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 04:35:29 pm
The treaty was designed to introduce some kind of interaction other than moaning and death between the parties involved. But you seriously can't tell me the treaty means an absolute cease fire between cops and FLA.

You can't really have a peace treaty without a cease fire to be perfectly honest. The whole thing was working fine for the past few days until they decided to come and engage cops in LS.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 04:37:37 pm
The treaty was designed to introduce some kind of interaction other than moaning and death between the parties involved. But you seriously can't tell me the treaty means an absolute cease fire between cops and FLA. You essentially gave them immunity if they are inside of Angel Pine with this agreement.
Ye man it's horrific, we agreed to a treaty that gave them immunity inside Angel Pine. And Teddy and Leon ones that initiated the treaty process themselves. I don't know what the hell is on their mind for trying to make peace and end the shitstorms, but you need to get them in order as their boss. I find it very outrageous to have a developer and a manager try to maintain peace in the community between two parties at this time especially when the server turned into an unique roleplay of warfare (war simulation!), and that unique opportunity should be used and the government of Argonath should deploy special operation units and airstrikes against the militia in Flint County.

As one soldier said from a documentary about Afghanistan: "We're not here to have a fair fight, they bring an AK47 and we'll bring a jet."
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Luke on June 03, 2016, 04:39:14 pm
The treaty was designed to introduce some kind of interaction other than moaning and death between the parties involved. But you seriously can't tell me the treaty means an absolute cease fire between cops and FLA. You essentially gave them immunity if they are inside of Angel Pine with this agreement.

So if I have a flashing blue name tag above my head and I drive a black and white car with a siren that makes the same noise of a cat being slung around a few times, I instead of doing my job should let a extremist organisation enter my boundries of a patrol, tell me what to do and then fire upon my cruiser while being caught in the action of a illegal doing I am to fuck off from any means necessary and continue in my car and let that happen. The thing I just decribed was me as a police man and guess what policemen do? SERVE AND PROTECT.

Sorry but I'd rather kick back and play CSGO and find something else to do because this is the same senario we always end up in Law Enforcement are always in the wrong constantly and the other parties are correct. Sorry but I think we are getting sick of this constant bombardment the Law Enforcment Angencies incounter.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:40:14 pm
Ye man it's horrific, we agreed to a treaty that gave them immunity inside Angel Pine. And Teddy and Leon ones that initiated the treaty process themselves. I don't know what the hell is on their mind for trying to make peace and end the shitstorms, but you need to get them in order as their boss. I find it very outrageous to have a developer and a manager try to maintain peace in the community between two parties at this time especially when the server turned into an unique roleplay of warfare (war simulation!), and that unique opportunity should be used and the government of Argonath should deploy special operation units and airstrikes against the militia in Flint County.

I am going to assume you can't comprehend my post based on your response. You the police force agreed to those terms, why blame others?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 04:42:05 pm
I was never for that treaty in first place, but hey, it's Teddy and Leon who initiated with the goal of ceasing shitstorms, so why should I go and argue against it? I am also for ceasing down the shitstorms and TDM, so going against an idea that has a goal of ceasing shiststorm would be ironical.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Arslan on June 03, 2016, 04:45:09 pm
I am going to assume you can't comprehend my post based on your response. You the police force agreed to those terms, why blame others?
I'm sorry if I wasn't clear enough before but we did not agree on what you think we agreed upon. And I don't think it'd make sense for you to assume we agreed upon that either since we didn't give anyone immunity. All these points were discussed in detail and main sketch of whats going on was posted here. It was job of all the representatives to make sure everything that is discussed to be enforced.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Devin on June 03, 2016, 04:45:55 pm
I was never for that treaty in first place, but hey, it's Teddy and Leon who initiated with the goal of ceasing shitstorms, so why should I go and argue against it?

I am also for ceasing down the shitstorms and TDM, so going against an idea that has a goal of ceasing shiststorm would be ironical.

So you don't want the treaty, you didn't argue because leon and teddy tried to solve something.
But you want the treaty to stop what they're trying to resolve. Double negative.

What is "ironical" as you put it, was this post.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 04:47:06 pm
Nope, I was for another way to cease the shitstorms but that would involve having to travel to Netherlands to find Gandalf and get his attention.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 04:49:56 pm
Nope, I was for another way to cease the shitstorms but that would involve having to travel to Netherlands to find Gandalf and get his attention.

I'm pretty sure he would side with the FLA on this as well.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TrotlDebilni on June 03, 2016, 04:51:17 pm
Nope, I was for another way to cease the shitstorms but that would involve having to travel to Netherlands to find Gandalf and get his attention.
A unique roleplay opportunity?

Real life issues of poorly written legal documents being used in someone's favor?

Oh Boy! I'm sure Gandalf can't wait to shut it down!
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 04:53:10 pm
Gandalf is the president, he can make such roleplay opportunity come true using his position of a president and ordering all kinds of sanctions  :war:
No president would want some militia on his land to start rebellion and fight for independence, especially in Argonath that is more "centralized" having only one person with all authority - Gandalf.

So, as a president, it's highly unlikely he'd want his agencies like SAPD and FBI fight militia that is in possession of weapons like RPG, molotov, grenade and C4 with a desert eagle or a MP5.
Which is what is going on right now and it's unreasonable and highly unrealistic.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Celso on June 03, 2016, 04:59:45 pm
unrealistic.
I don't know what you are talking about.. Please explain how is that unrealistic!
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ramo_Hawk on June 03, 2016, 05:00:33 pm
(http://i63.tinypic.com/20qn8z7.jpg)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 05:03:10 pm
I don't know what you are talking about.. Please explain how is that unrealistic!
Easily, if there was some militia in United States of America that started rebelling using explosives and assault rifles, Obama wouldn't watch them grow and murder cops who wear glock 22 and AR-15 but would send in military and special forces to bring order. They come in with armored vehicles, advanced technology (surveillance, weaponry) and would easily overwhelm the militia in matter of days. Because real life is not fair and people driving pickup trucks with mounted machine guns on it can't stand an armored MRAP, humvee or an M1A2 tank, or a simple javelin.

(http://i63.tinypic.com/20qn8z7.jpg)
And I wouldn't also like to take credit for making the treaty since I wasn't there when it was being created and I wasn't the one that suggested making such a thing.
Besides that, I ignore every situation by FLA as of few weeks now and tell other FBI members to go and roleplay with those who roleplay like the 424 and 18th barrio.
If they want to hunt FLA they can play Arma 3 or BF4 since they'll get same gameplay with better graphics.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Gnb_22 on June 03, 2016, 05:06:05 pm
Gandalf is the president, he can make such roleplay opportunity come true using his position of a president and ordering all kinds of sanctions  :war:
No president would want some militia on his land to start rebellion and fight for independence, especially in Argonath that is more "centralized" having only one person with all authority - Gandalf.

So, as a president, it's highly unlikely he'd want his agencies like SAPD and FBI fight militia that is in possession of weapons like RPG, molotov, grenade and C4 with a desert eagle or a MP5.
Which is what is going on right now and it's unreasonable and highly unrealistic.

Yeah but lets be honest, you were not going to go to him as president. You were going to go to him as OWNER of the server and cry then suck his dick at little bit then claim Devin is not taking your side and try to convice him to take your side.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 05:06:33 pm
Easily, if there was some militia in United States of America that started rebelling using explosives and assault rifles, Obama wouldn't watch them grow and murder cops who wear glock 22 and AR-15 but would send in military and special forces to bring order. They come in with armored vehicles, advanced technology (surveillance, weaponry) and would easily overwhelm the militia in matter of days. Because real life is not fair and people driving pickup trucks with mounted machine guns on it can't stand an armored MRAP, humvee or an M1A2 tank, or a simple javelin.

Not that Argonath has anything to do with real life, but, yeah I guess you're right... :/

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/28/oregon-militia-standoff-lavoy-finicum-shooting-dead-police-malehur-national-wildlife-refuge (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/28/oregon-militia-standoff-lavoy-finicum-shooting-dead-police-malehur-national-wildlife-refuge)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 05:07:24 pm
Yeah but lets be honest, you were not going to go to him as president. You were going to go to him as OWNER of the server and cry then suck his dick at little bit then claim Devin is not taking your side and try to convice him to take your side.
No, I been wanting somebody to establish a proper realistic response to the militia, but since nobody beside Gandalf can do it I just lost hope in it and went on for closing it.


Not that Argonath has anything to do with real life, but, yeah I guess you're right... :/

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/28/oregon-militia-standoff-lavoy-finicum-shooting-dead-police-malehur-national-wildlife-refuge (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/28/oregon-militia-standoff-lavoy-finicum-shooting-dead-police-malehur-national-wildlife-refuge)
I took that situation as a prime example in some other topic about FLA and showed them the other video where FBI was negotiating with the same militia people.
There were no unrealistic demands like "GET OBAMA HERE TO SIGN ME INDEPENDNECE", but a realistic conversation with realistic expectations.
And yes, the militia also didn't wear AK47 in front of the Agents and didn't aim RPG at them for coming there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSfUJZJoUR4
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: taseen11 on June 03, 2016, 05:08:06 pm
pic
Even though it makes no sense, I seem to have gotten some sort of enjoyment from seeing Matjaha carterrr ride a bike

Yeah but lets be honest, you were not going to go to him as president. You were going to go to him as OWNER of the server and cry then suck his dick at little bit then claim Devin is not taking your side and try to convice him to take your side.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AIlz08fZos
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Celso on June 03, 2016, 05:08:41 pm
Easily, if there was some militia in United States of America that started rebelling using explosives and assault rifles, Obama wouldn't watch them grow and murder cops who wear glock 22 and AR-15 but would send in military and special forces to bring order. They come in with armored vehicles, advanced technology (surveillance, weaponry) and would easily overwhelm the militia in matter of days. Because real life is not fair and people driving pickup trucks with mounted machine guns on it can't stand an armored MRAP, humvee or an M1A2 tank, or a simple javelin.
Thank you sir for the explanation.. I now support your cause!
Please reinstate the CBF Tank to SAPD and give us Granades. ty.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: McGarrett on June 03, 2016, 05:13:00 pm
I think that ped.ifp make you run faster than the default one :p


I dont have a ped ifp. If youd stop bunnyhopping and spam the sprint button then you run faster
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TruthSvensson on June 03, 2016, 05:14:50 pm
If Argonath RPG can't handle this kind of roleplay, HQ should admit that they favor players from SAPD over players from FLA, so we can act according to that.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: FARQ3X on June 03, 2016, 05:18:09 pm
Easily, if there was some militia in United States of America that started rebelling using explosives and assault rifles, Obama wouldn't watch them grow and murder cops who wear glock 22 and AR-15 but would send in military and special forces to bring order. They come in with armored vehicles, advanced technology (surveillance, weaponry) and would easily overwhelm the militia in matter of days. Because real life is not fair and people driving pickup trucks with mounted machine guns on it can't stand an armored MRAP, humvee or an M1A2 tank, or a simple javelin.

Players tried to do so but a group like that requires ridiculous activity, resources and constant admin watch. a State organized one? Mayhem, crying, complaining as admins would be the only ones able to use it without wasting time at this.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 05:21:36 pm
No, I been wanting somebody to establish a proper realistic response to the militia, but since nobody beside Gandalf can do it I just lost hope in it and went on for closing it.

I took that situation as a prime example in some other topic about FLA and showed them the other video where FBI was negotiating with the same militia people.
There were no unrealistic demands like "GET OBAMA HERE TO SIGN ME INDEPENDNECE", but a realistic conversation with realistic expectations.
And yes, the militia also didn't wear AK47 in front of the Agents and didn't aim RPG at them for coming there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSfUJZJoUR4
You're right, I don't see any FBI member in a hunter or Hydra, real life looks good.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: .Matthew. on June 03, 2016, 05:23:32 pm
Hunter and hydra are the results of RPG, grenade and other explosive weapons that FLA easily used.
Remember how many times I tried talking with Mikal, spent 30 minutes wasting my time just so you can all at the end fire at will.

You didn't see the militia mentioned in the video go around and shoot the area up.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: FARQ3X on June 03, 2016, 05:30:17 pm
Hunter and hydra are the results of RPG, grenade and other explosive weapons that FLA easily used.
Remember how many times I tried talking with Mikal, spent 30 minutes wasting my time just so you can all at the end fire at will.

You didn't see the militia mentioned in the video go around and shoot the area up.

As far as I see from the attitude of FBINators from FbiNet RPGs are the only way to overlap all of SAPD and FBI vs a small group of men.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 03, 2016, 05:33:47 pm
I will be reviewing this case and determining which group, if not both, get penalized.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 03, 2016, 05:38:14 pm
I need someone with FLA who was present to contact me on Skype.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 03, 2016, 08:45:46 pm
After discussing with both sides we've (myself and Leon) have reached the following conclusion:

- Both parties had screwed up; with support and agreement from multiple people in attendance on both sides.

SAPD:

- The treaty does not prohibit FLA from leaving their temporary safe haven and does not prohibit them from criminal activity outside of said safe area.

FLA:

- The treaty was not intended to allow you to engage police and escape. The intent of the treaty was to stop the moaning that occurred by reducing the number of engagements with law. Now that you have your temporary safe haven; it would be most logical for you to attempt to avoid risking law enforcement encounters.

How the situation should've turned out:

- Once FLA retreated to AP; SAPD/FBI shouldn't have breached the cities territory and engage with FLA. Per agreement, negotiation channels should've been opened up.

HQ is imposing the following HQ enforced additions to the agreement:

- FLA is not to actively conducts acts of war against the State of Argonath, including but not limited to: actively seeking to confront authorities, passively committing crimes, and/or intent to cause harm against the citizens of Argonath. You have a temporary safe haven, realistically and logically you'd do what is needed to keep that maintained. This does not mean you cannot commit crimes entirely; but should be cautious about instigating police involvement.

- People who are in multiple groups must choose between FLA and their other groups. You either represent the FLA, or you don't. It's not 'optional' to switch in order to circumvent this treaty. I understand this is troubling but we cannot have people using such an excuse to misuse the agreement; as has been already witnessed. It isn't exactly a far fetched concept either so, I'm fine in supporting it.

Punishments

- At this point HQ isn't going to issue any punishments; the next transgression and our hand will be forced. Groups can be closed, people can be banned, people in SAPD/FBI can be removed, whatever HQ needs to do. The community is at stake.

None of this is negotiable or debatable. The findings, conclusions, and imposing are final by HQ
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 03, 2016, 08:50:07 pm
I will now unlock this topic and I will ask those not involved do not interfere. Those comments will be removed.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 09:36:58 pm
Alright, pretty loud and clear.

- People who are in multiple groups must choose between FLA and their other groups. You either represent the FLA, or you don't. It's not 'optional' to switch in order to circumvent this treaty. I understand this is troubling but we cannot have people using such an excuse to misuse the agreement; as has been already witnessed. It isn't exactly a far fetched concept either so, I'm fine in supporting it.

This does raise a few questionmarks, though. What exactly do you mean by having to choose?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 03, 2016, 10:28:15 pm
This does raise a few questionmarks, though. What exactly do you mean by having to choose?

A person with /groups FLA cannot be like 'Oh I wasn't acting as FLA, I was acting as x group'
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Mikal on June 03, 2016, 10:29:41 pm
TBH most of the people in FLA are from pretty dead/inactive groups (as most are these days) and spend most of their time being FLA.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Vaeldious on June 03, 2016, 10:33:33 pm
Regardless, unless you are GhostRanked, you are representing ALL those groups simultaneously in all of your actions. Would you ever see a player part of both GSF and NBA?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Teddy on June 03, 2016, 10:35:16 pm
Would you ever see a player part of both GSF and NBA?

That would be hilarious
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: TiMoN on June 03, 2016, 10:43:28 pm
Can FLA still patrol the streets of FC and pull over violators as well as hand out fines or punishments?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Conk on June 03, 2016, 10:47:47 pm
Can FLA still patrol the streets of FC and pull over violators as well as hand out fines or punishments?

Why not?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Kaze on June 03, 2016, 11:22:30 pm
A person with /groups FLA cannot be like 'Oh I wasn't acting as FLA, I was acting as x group'

Doesn't that implicate that we are now going to be forced to stick to one character i.e. First_Last and stick with that character?

Neutral here and I'm simply raising a question.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 03, 2016, 11:25:58 pm
A person with /groups FLA cannot be like 'Oh I wasn't acting as FLA, I was acting as x group'

Well, I just hope that when I do Angels of Death stuff, which is my primary group at the moment, it won't be taken as FLA stuff when for example there's a shootout with cops at our bar next to Angel Pine.

I get where the concern is coming from but it sounds like it's hard to actually keep track of when people with /groups FLA are and are not in confrontation with the law on behalf of FLA.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Vaeldious on June 03, 2016, 11:33:32 pm
Doesn't that implicate that we are now going to be forced to stick to one character i.e. First_Last and stick with that character?

Neutral here and I'm simply raising a question.

By that same logic aren't you already by becoming a member of a group and wearing their family tag? I switch characters all the time, but all the groups I am in are fully aware of this and I always represent them by being in their group, regardless of what I /changename'd to.

I may be a criminal in one group, but a civilian racer in another. During a crime, I may find an opportunity to race. During a race, I may find some crime to be done. This is ultimately why groups have rules about multi-grouping, however since a lot of groups are becoming "Legacy", players are still maintaining their rank in that group, leading to the ever increasing jokes in /p like "ohai =AV=[WS]TeaM_Teddy_Soprano".

Perhaps what REALLY needs to be done, is a better audit of /groups both ingame and on the forums. Haven't seen anything from TheCurbCrew in a while, for example. Just like there are requirements to attain /groups status, there should also be a set of rules to loose /groups status and actually be enforced.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on June 03, 2016, 11:36:26 pm
A good idea to avoid conflict is for people to choose one single group and stick with it, instead of being in six groups at once and switching between them each week. I know that goes against our general vision (OUR vision, not THE vision  :rolleyes: ) but it would ease the whole game of Guess Who.

Maybe not that constructive or achieveable though. It's something =P
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 04, 2016, 01:41:07 am
A good idea to avoid conflict is for people to choose one single group and stick with it, instead of being in six groups at once and switching between them each week. I know that goes against our general vision (OUR vision, not THE vision  :rolleyes: ) but it would ease the whole game of Guess Who.

Maybe not that constructive or achieveable though. It's something =P

I love being in a bunch of groups because then there's always something to do. It's always been like that for me, but especially with activity levels as they are nowadays, it's wise to be in at least 5 active groups if you always want to have something to. That's how I experience it, anyway.

I think a better solution is just to not make assumptions on what someone is roleplaying at that given time. It's usually pretty obvious what someone is doing (i.e. medic RP) but the confusion emerged here because pretty much ALL groups engage in armed encounters with cops.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: JDC on June 04, 2016, 05:16:35 am
At some point I was in several groups as well, three of them being FBI, Kolta, and the Church of Argonath. But it made more sense to me to separate my Agent and Archbishop roles.  But even if Kolta can mix with both an LE and Church role, the LE and Church themselves cannot do the same easily, so I had to choose a role to identify with. You did not see Archbishop Kolta giving out Satanic Holy Mass at the LS Cathedral while wearing an FBI badge.

^ A situation like this (groups "mixing") can possibly complicate things with multigroup players. But in this case, HQ has tried to make things as clear-cut and defined as possible with a yes-or-no question. When you enter something, you either represent FLA or don't represent FLA.

Doesn't that implicate that we are now going to be forced to stick to one character i.e. First_Last and stick with that character?

Neutral here as well. If I read the new additions correctly, then I think what it means is that when players with several groups engage in a scenario, they cannot switch between those for their convenience with the intent of circumventing the treaty. They have to decide what to be when they start doing something, if they will enter into scenarios representing FLA or not. Not permanently having to choose between their groups / characters.

- People who are in multiple groups must choose between FLA and their other groups. You either represent the FLA, or you don't. It's not 'optional' to switch in order to circumvent this treaty.
A person with /groups FLA cannot be like 'Oh I wasn't acting as FLA, I was acting as x group'

For Example: player [DoA]Malnosella is a member of both the Disciples of Atropos (DoA) and FLA under /groups. Malnosella decides to grow weed at the farm between Montgomery and Palomino Creek, east of the LS-LV highway. Malnosella enters into the scenario as a [DoA] member, contributing to the group's criminal business. Officer Ghase_Creggor, who happens to be patrolling nearby, catches Malnosella doing the criminal act. Manosella decides not to surrender and flees to Angel Pine, the FLA safe zone. Ghase follows in pursuit.

Under the rules of engagement, Malnosella is not allowed to invoke FLA rights under the Treaty because he entered into the scenario acting under a group other than FLA. Therefore, Ghase is allowed to arrest or kill Malnosella in Angel Pine. It would, however, be a different story if Malnosella went into his scenario as an FLA member and not as [DoA]. Either way, HQ will not have to intervene.

A violation of HQ rules would be if Malnosella started crying "hey hey wait, I'm FLA!" upon entering Angel Pine after starting the scenario as [DoA], because he "switched" groups. Malnosella would then be liable for admin punishments.

TL;DR: You have to choose what group you represent when you start a scenario.
(Did I get it rite? :D)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 04, 2016, 02:28:14 pm
The thing is, they're not different characters for me. That character is essentially a biker living in Flint Country who happens to serve in the FLA. Like I said earlier, the FLA isn't really a primary kind of group for most of its members. The FLA is there to fight for a cause shared by many other people and groups, uniting them under the 'FLA' banner.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ben. on June 04, 2016, 03:01:21 pm
The thing is, they're not different characters for me. That character is essentially a biker living in Flint Country who happens to serve in the FLA. Like I said earlier, the FLA isn't really a primary kind of group for most of its members. The FLA is there to fight for a cause shared by many other people and groups, uniting them under the 'FLA' banner.
In which case you need to stick to the treaty.  :cop:
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ben. on June 04, 2016, 03:03:29 pm
The point is to stop some fucktard from shooting up cops in LS, claiming to not be associated with FLA as that character, then scuttling to Angel Pine amd crying to HQ because they are FLA and "cops have ab00zed".
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: JDC on June 04, 2016, 03:27:59 pm
The thing is, they're not different characters for me. That character is essentially a biker living in Flint Country who happens to serve in the FLA. Like I said earlier, the FLA isn't really a primary kind of group for most of its members. The FLA is there to fight for a cause shared by many other people and groups, uniting them under the 'FLA' banner.

In this specific case, and as Ben said above, the issue here would be switching between their roles / groups to circumvent the treaty. You can say this is a downside of Argo giving us the freedom to have whatever RP characters you like. If you represent FLA (in your character's case, you always do) and a hostile engagement happens, then the rules of engagement apply. Simple. Someone with as much experience like you should know what to do. But we're at this point in the first place because some idiots (on both sides) still love to screw around.

Someone switching their roles to save their ass in a situation where they have caused shit for others isn't even about LE-FLA rivalry anymore. It's just being a dick. About e-penis, winning, and rubbing it in someone else's face instead of making sure all of you have fun.

TBH, one of the things that tired me out before I left 1.5 years ago was years and years of near-complete lack of competitive sportsmanship. It pleased me to see cops and criminals or rival gangs telling each other "hey thanks man, that was fun" "great game / chase / RP today" but those incidents were few and far in between. And now that SA:MP has taken a step forward by giving scenarios like this a chance, people are STILL trying to circumvent the Treaty instead of trying to keep moving forward.

Law Enforcement and FLA are headed by veteran players, so unless you want to get all petulant and sword-fight with your e-penises again, it shouldn't be too hard to lead the junior members in uniting for a better RP environment and community. Is it?
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Huntsman on June 04, 2016, 03:39:17 pm
I see you still like to type walls of text :D.

May I propose a suggestion though - add a point where that if a FLA member comitts a crime outside of Los Santos, he should not go to Angel Pine until caught or evaded. IT is really annoying how some people abuse the treaty to piss off cops in Los Santos and then race to Angel Pine and there is nothing we can do about it or we could be HQ punished...
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Salmonella on June 04, 2016, 03:42:52 pm
I see you still like to type walls of text :D.

May I propose a suggestion though - add a point where that if a FLA member comitts a crime outside of Los Santos, he should not go to Angel Pine until caught or evaded. IT is really annoying how some people abuse the treaty to piss off cops in Los Santos and then race to Angel Pine and there is nothing we can do about it or we could be HQ punished...

You can negotiate.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Hubbestubbe on June 05, 2016, 03:10:28 pm
Hi, I've been inactive last week and just found this topic. Nice reading for my bus trip. Can anyone shortly update me, is this peace treaty still active, or broken into pieces?

I guess one way to solve this "was it FLA or not?" would be to get an FLA-duty spot in the FLA HQ which gives you a green nametag. Anyone doing FLA things without being on duty would be punished either by administration or by FLA. If we ever would get this "buy M4 without notoriety" thing, also that should only be possible when on FLA duty, and the weapons would only be spawned when the member goes on duty.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on June 05, 2016, 03:17:01 pm
Hi, I've been inactive last week and just found this topic. Nice reading for my bus trip. Can anyone shortly update me, is this peace treaty still active, or broken into pieces?

I guess one way to solve this "was it FLA or not?" would be to get an FLA-duty spot in the FLA HQ which gives you a green nametag. Anyone doing FLA things without being on duty would be punished either by administration or by FLA. If we ever would get this "buy M4 without notoriety" thing, also that should only be possible when on FLA duty, and the weapons would only be spawned when the member goes on duty.
It's still alive, we amended it with a few extra points.
As for a separate duty for the group, to me it seems like a little too much if it just needs people to remain clear on which side they are. ^^
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Ivan_Dzeba on June 05, 2016, 05:00:32 pm
Let's all organize a battle in LS between FLA and it's allies vs every LEA group+USAA. If Law wins, FLA gets no independence, if FLA wins, FLA gets independence.

Example:

(http://i.makeagif.com/media/6-05-2016/78hsTW.gif) (http://makeagif.com/78hsTW)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on June 05, 2016, 05:13:10 pm
Let's all organize a battle in LS between FLA and it's allies vs every LEA group+USAA. If Law wins, FLA gets no independence, if FLA wins, FLA gets independence.
As if that battle isn't still ongoing, now with a recess period with the vultures watching over the field.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Pizza4_Games on June 05, 2016, 05:14:51 pm
Let's all organize a battle in LS between FLA and it's allies vs every LEA group+USAA. If Law wins, FLA gets no independence, if FLA wins, FLA gets independence.

Example:

(http://i.makeagif.com/media/6-05-2016/78hsTW.gif) (http://makeagif.com/78hsTW)
Just fucking say World War, lol. This is cringe worthy guy, stop.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: Civello on June 05, 2016, 05:29:39 pm
Let's all organize a battle in LS between FLA and it's allies vs every LEA group+USAA. If Law wins, FLA gets no independence, if FLA wins, FLA gets independence.

Example:

(http://i.makeagif.com/media/6-05-2016/78hsTW.gif) (http://makeagif.com/78hsTW)
:lol: :lol: cant stop laughing of that war :)
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: JDC on June 06, 2016, 06:42:19 pm
Let's all organize a battle in LS between FLA and it's allies vs every LEA group+USAA. If Law wins, FLA gets no independence, if FLA wins, FLA gets independence.

I believe many players are smart enough to organize solutions other than "trial by combat." They have brains. The problem is that many of them choose not to use them and act like children instead.
Title: Re: Peace Treaty 30/05/2016
Post by: eymas on June 18, 2016, 11:51:13 am
FYI, If there was something that happened, and you go screaming around "THE TREATY IS BROKEN!! THE TREATY IS BROKEN!!" like the red barons arrive... please don't.

If something has happened on where you think the treaty has been broken, inform us with the right evidence because words mean nothing to all of us. This is to prevent further trouble spawning out of confusion.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal